The Mental Militia Forums

General Interest => General Discussion => Topic started by: mouse on July 25, 2019, 09:19:13 pm

Title: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on July 25, 2019, 09:19:13 pm
As soon as I read that Jeffrey Epstein's case was to be reinvestigated and he had been apprehended and it was theorised (correctly I assume) that he was running a world-wide blackmail operation and could potentially "name names", I saw that this would happen.

Do you think it was a genuine suicide attempt on his part? Or that it was a botched attempt at killing him before he could talk?  Or that it was botched on purpose?  Perhaps as a warning, or some other motive?

Remember when Hillary Clinton famously said "we will all hang from nooses if I lose" (the election) in 2016, well I guess the possibility of people like Jeffrey Epstein ratting on his clientele, is what she was talking about.

https://summit.news/2019/07/25/ann-coulter-get-epstein-to-a-super-max-prison-before-he-is-suicided/

Ann Coulter is asking that the Bureau of Prisons move Jeffrey Epstein to a Super Max facility so that “the people who want him dead” won’t be able to hide their complicity in his sex trafficking crimes.
Epstein was found nearly unconscious in a fetal position inside his NYC jail cell yesterday, with the cause of his injuries unknown.
The incident became public at the same time as a report confirming that Epstein had visited the Clinton White House multiple times, contrary to Bill Clinton’s claims of limited contact with the billionaire.
Now Ann Coulter is calling for Epstein to be protected so that the powerful people complicit in his crimes do not go free.
“Dear Bureau of Prisons: Please get Jeffrey Epstein to a super Max prison pronto, or the people who want him dead will make sure we never know the truth. ACT NOW!” tweeted Coulter.

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on July 27, 2019, 01:08:42 pm
Jeffrey Epstein could be effectively protected if the law power was in power in America, but it is not, and that same question works for everyone, everywhere, all the time.

Could ___fill-in-the-blank___ being "suicided," be prevented?

Put the name John Kennedy, Martin Luther King Jr., Robert Kennedy, and any name of anyone, anywhere, anytime in the crosshairs of those who wish to "suicide" someone, and what are the obvious answers for every one of them?

People are not protected in so-called "custody." The criminals run the law power. The people themselves run the law power when the law power is genuine. Solid proof of the fact that the criminals run the law power is abundant since so many people confess by their actions, and their words, that they are ignorant of this very fact: the people themselves run the law power: not the government.

If someone innocent (or guilty) is brought before the criminal versions of JUSTus, they are routinely consumed for profit, because that is how criminal versions of JUSTus work in actual reality. Criminal versions of JUSTus are working monopolies that cause the flow of power to begin flowing from a victim group - each victim in turn from birth to death - to a criminal group, and that flow of power is meticulously documented - unarguably - as a matter of fact.

Putting on a fantasy hat that wrongfully presumes that the powers-that-be (criminal), are in any way just, and in any way capable of following the law of the land: What would happen to secure the blessings of liberty for this Jeffrey Epstein (or any) alleged criminal?

The (or any) accusation of wrongdoing is passed from the accuser to someone who can then assemble an independent grand jury. If the grand jury is, in fact, independent, then the grand jurors command all jurisdiction civil and criminal in this case. They can, therefore, subpoena witnesses, including the original accuser.  The grand jurors, or someone more familiar with the actual law power, can inform these accusers that they voluntarily place their liberty, life, property, and reputation on the line as an official - not kidding, and no fingers crossed - witness to a criminal act perpetrated by a named perpetrator. Lying is fraud, fraud while serving as a witness is perjury. Accusers are subject to obvious and demonstrable counterclaims of False Accusation; what is good for the goose is good for the gander.

If the grand jurors find no cause (no probable cause to begin exerting the law power) they can place the accusation in the round file, and inform the witness that they have no cause to prosecute the case, but those grand jurors could inform the witnesses in the case of possible methods that the witnesses could employ in the future to ensure that probable cause is, in fact, established. The grand jurors can thereby excuse those nebulous witnesses and the grand jurors could, on their own authority, pursue the case as they see fit, if they see probable cause other than the nebulous witness testimony.

Here is where the laugh test ought to be employed. If witness after witness brings at least 10 tortured bodies to the “Grand Jury,” along with videotaped evidence recorded by the “accused” showing how those tortured bodies were tortured by the “accused,” and one of the “Grand Jurors” is the accused, then that would not be - laughably not be - an independent Grand Jury to some. To other people, I suppose, anything goes.

Since the case in question involves sufficient evidence to have already caused a Kangaroo court trial involving alleged multiple victims, and the alleged perpetrator has already placed on record a plea deal (which could have been extorted), it is likely that this case would breeze through the independent grand jury phase of a real trial according to the real law, and the presentment from a real grand jury would officially place on record the reasons why the cause moves into action mode: a jury trial by the country, according to the law of the land, which is the common law: not Equity, not Maritime, not Admiralty, not Family, not Military, or any other Summary Justice System of Plunder other than the law of the land, which is the common law.

Note: The actual common law has been counterfeited in England, and that is well documented. The actual common law involves a trial by the people, not a trial by the so-called legal fiction sovereign fake being, or fake government with a black-robed devil worshiper swinging absolute JUSTus and a little hammer.

So, there are the particulars concerning how the accused, who is free to protect himself as best he can, leading up to an offer by the people, who are represented in this case by the grand jurors, for the accused to clear his name, liberty, property, and reputation in open, public, trial by the country, with the help of the government if the government is actually a government. If the government is just another despotic criminal organization operating under a very thin color of law, then anything goes, just ask them, obey them, and don’t question their dictates or else.

If the accused refuses to appear in a trial by the country, then by the actions of the accused - confession by action - the accused willfully chooses to become an outlaw in fact. If the accused is in danger, likely to be assaulted for merely appearing in front of armed bandits (with or without badges), then clearly that alone can excuse someone from attending a dangerous situation which threatens their life, liberty, property, security, health, well-being, independence, freedom, etc.

If you go around doing onto other people that which you would fight tooth and nail to prevent having the same done to you, then it is unreasonable to expect peace in your lifetime. The real law is natural law, you get what you pay for, even if it was falsely advertised.   



 

 

 

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on July 31, 2019, 02:56:53 am
They are saying the same thing on several sites, even mainstream, is it that obvious?  If so, it's really insulting if the mainstream media (after an Epstein "suicide") turn round and claim that it was a genuine suicide and then "move on folks, nothing to see here ….."

This is the "Sun" - hardly known as a "right wing" rag (but definitely a "rag") and yet more "alternative" sites (many of them) say that an Epstein "suicide" is a sure thing.

what do you think?

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/9605078/jeffrey-epsteins-life-in-jeopardy-pals-dont-want-secrets-out/

JEFFREY Epstein's life may be in danger as his powerful pals do not want him to reveal their secrets, his victims' lawyer has claimed.
Spencer Kuvin, who represents three of the billionaire perv's sex trafficking accusers, threw doubt on claims the financier attempted suicide.

Epstein was found "sprawled on the floor" and "blue in the face" in a New York jail, last Tuesday according to reports.
Investigators are still probing whether it was a suicide attempt or if the shamed 66-year-old was attacked.

Now Kuvin believes Epstein knows so much dirt about his rich and famous friends that there may be some individuals willing to organise a "hit" on him to prevent that information ever getting out.
"I question whether or not it was a true suicide attempt that Mr Epstein was involved in in jail or whether or not there may be some powerful people who just don’t want him to talk," Kuvin told Sun Online.

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on July 31, 2019, 02:12:45 pm
Perhaps the following is worth considering concerning this matter and broader matters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6-gUqNPi4I
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Bill St. Clair on July 31, 2019, 04:33:03 pm
Perhaps the following is worth considering concerning this matter and broader matters:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6-gUqNPi4I

For those who would rather not click on video links without some idea of what's in them, it's a video posted by Steve Pieczenik of a guy who claims that the Epstein pedophilia ring is a Mossad operation that goes back decades. I only watched a minute of it. Don't want that stuff in my head any more.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on July 31, 2019, 08:51:35 pm
"I only watched a minute of it. Don't want that stuff in my head any more."

I can posit, of course at risk of obvious consequences.

My posited notion concerning the quote above is what I will call the Ostridge syndrome. Unwanted information inspires the Ostridge to not only stick the sensory mechanism into darkness, said Ostridge leaves a warning sign to any similarly constituted Ostridges: stick head in the sand now.

I've been on forums for over 30 years now, and it isn't so much that the general population cannot be all satisfied with the information offered by so many varied perspectives, rather the routine is such that the so-called moderators claim to fill the demand for those fact-based, or potentially fact-based perspectives, while those same so-called moderators are the first to stick their heads in the sand, and insist upon the righteousness of doing so.

The hideousness of worldwide consumption of posterity is hardly more evident in what has now become "human trafficking." Children, extracted from mothers prior to birth, in pieces, well I didn't want that in my head anymore. Children (posterity) brainwashed as slaves from birth to death, nope, don't want that in my head anymore. Children kidnapped and sold for body parts, again not something I want in my head anymore. Children forced into poverty, by obvious, less obvious, and very well hidden mechanisms, and sold into what? Is it righteously called Satanism?  I don't want that anywhere near my head anymore. One of the moments that this fake “legalized” consuming of posterity became current events in my head was an obscure (censored) documentary titled The Conspiracy of Silence; an apt title.

I don’t want that in my head anymore. 

I'll save the Ostridge gang the trouble of allowing such unwanted information to pierce their sterilized, secure, environment, and for those constituted with some vague duty to know the truth, and provide for it, those exceptions to the rule (non-ostridges) can find the title of the documentary if they so choose.

I suppose that this is again off-topic, daring to move the topic from Jeffery Epstein, and moving the topic to someone named Steve, as Steve offers some names of people who are known associates of Jeffery Epstein, such as:

“Court papers put daughter of Robert Maxwell at centre of ‘sex slave’ claims”  That is a title of a “News” Article, with a reference to a Kangaroo Court Case in the Plantation known as Florida.

Of course, that may be as poor a choice for information as is listening to a fictional character named Jack Ryan, but there are so-called (kangaroo) Court documents, for whatever that may be worth to any current or future ostridge.

Everyone is lying or sticking their heads in the sand?

You tell me, please.

In law (a verb) a suspected perpetrator is offered a trial by jury, which is a trial by the country, and 12 randomly selected people who represent the whole country to determine fact, law, guilt or innocence, remedy, restitution, or punishment, attempt to get all the facts in the case, it is their duty in fact.   

In a world run by criminals, the plebes know when to stick their heads in the sand.

"Qui non prohibet cum potest, jubet: That man abets an evil, who prevents it not, when it is in his power. Nec caret scrupulo sosietatis occultae qui evidenter facinori definit obviare: nor can he escape the suspicion of being a secret accomplice, who evidently declines the prevention of an atrocious crime."
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Tahn L. on August 01, 2019, 11:05:28 am
Joe Kelly,

 To imply that Bill St. Clair is refusing to acknowledge reality, (ostrich syndrome) by not chasing down every iota of evil is to be unaware of how much Bill has helped and promoted freedom for the last several decades, both here and elsewhere. Not wanting to smell the flatulence of every crooked or evil politician, is NOT the same as being "unaware". I believe you have done him a great disservice by your erroneous implication, not that he probably cares about your uppity superiority, nor would most of the thousands of people who have read and followed his postings and quest to promote freedom over the years. 

Bill, THANK YOU for sharing your few minutes of watching that crap, so I did not have to. I join you in not wanting that stuff in my head.

Tahn

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on August 01, 2019, 02:58:55 pm
"To imply that Bill St. Clair is refusing to acknowledge reality,..."

Did I imply (strongly suggest something), or did someone other than me infer something? Why not just ask? Dictatorial people tend to put words in other people's mouths as if the dictator has a sock puppet. The concept of dictation is one-way communication. The shoe does not fit me. My point had to do more with the process known as gatekeeping.

"...not chasing down every iota of evil is..."

That is called hyperbole, added to a false claim of implication concerning an inference. Why is attack mode the default mode? Why not simply ask? That shoe does not fit me either.

"... smell the flatulence of every crooked or evil politician..."

That is potentially libelous, but certainly not in that form. Someone is waving an indiscriminate finger at an unspecified evil. Who is an evil politician according to the one making that claim? Who fits that shoe? 

"Not wanting to smell the flatulence of every crooked or evil politician, is NOT the same as being "unaware"."

Who said that the one thing claimed is not the other thing claimed? I did not. This is the Man-of-Straw process. It is routine. The creator of the Man-of Straw puts a fallacious process of thought out into the data stream. Who fits that shoe? I do not. I don't know anyone who fits that shoe. Perhaps the one who created that shoe has in mind someone to fit that shoe on; Cinderella?

A sign was placed in the path of information as such: "I only watched a minute of it. Don't want that stuff in my head any more."

Does the gatekeeper shoe fit on the author of those two sentences, in the context of this topic?

It looked to me like someone was warning other people about information that they have judged to be unworthy of credit. I can be mistaken. Some people will read that warning sign, read it as a warning, such as keep out, and those people may take that advice. The information does not flow to those people, because they obey the warning sign, that gate is thereby closed by that gatekeeper. Other people may read that sign and be inspired with greater curiosity. The obvious intent (at least as far as my ability to infer such a thing as motive) is discredit aimed at someone or anyone who might credit the information that exists on the other side of that closed gate.

"I believe you have done him a great disservice by your erroneous implication..."

You have inferred something about what you read. I can tell you as many times, in as many words, as possible, to let you know that your inference as to my intended implication is incorrect, at least as far as I am able to find the intended meanings of your words. In your mind, as far as I can tell, you have determined, on your own authority, what my intention “is”, and you have formed a belief concerning your ability to find the intended meaning of my words. Is your trust in your belief accurate or something else? Do you understand the difference between an inference (in your control) and an implication (something I am in control of while I write)?

"...not that he probably cares about your uppity superiority..."

That is called an ad-hominem attack.

1.
(of an argument or reaction) directed against a person rather than the position they are maintaining.
"vicious ad hominem attacks"

You do not know me, you have no idea (very likely false ideas based upon your resort to ad-hominem attacks) what is, or is not, my character flaws, of which there are many, and all that is beside the point: off-topic.

"...nor would most of the thousands of people who have read and followed his postings and quest to promote freedom over the years."

If it acts like a gatekeeper, then perhaps it is a gatekeeper. How would one know without asking?

Is it an example of gatekeeping?

Was there already a Court Case in Florida involving the daughter of Robert Maxwell? Is that on-topic? Who might be targetting Jeffrey Epstein? Who might have a clue as to what might be possible if the idea was to prevent a false suicide, which would be an assassination, of Jeffrey Epstein? If someone, or a lot of people, ignore the information from sources like Steve Pieczenik, why - what is the motive - in doing so?

What is the stated motive?

"Bill, THANK YOU for sharing your few minutes of watching that crap, so I did not have to. I join you in not wanting that stuff in my head."

If there is an actual trial, a trial by the people themselves, not a trial by the fake government, then is it possible that the flow of innocent lives flowing into a figurative meat grinder will abate? If the bird is dead, it don't sing; that gate is closed too.
 




 

 

 
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Tahn L. on August 01, 2019, 06:59:35 pm
"I only watched a minute of it. Don't want that stuff in my head any more."

I can posit, of course at risk of obvious consequences.

My posited notion concerning the quote above is what I will call the Ostridge syndrome. Unwanted information inspires the Ostridge to not only stick the sensory mechanism into darkness, said Ostridge leaves a warning sign to any similarly constituted Ostridges: stick head in the sand now.



Joe Kelley,

 You are the one who quoted Bill and "posited" that he was guilty of "the ostrich syndrome". If I, in my ignorance of language, misinterpreted your statement, then I apologize.

Tahn   
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on August 02, 2019, 05:57:01 pm
Posit:
"assume as a fact; put forward as a basis of argument."

Assuming something, or presuming something, is akin to a hypothesis, which is an idea, which is not a belief, not a conclusion, not a determination, not a judgment, rather it is a "basis" from which to discuss a specific topic from a specified (assumed) point of view. See also rhetoric; as in a rhetorical question.

rhetorical question:
"a question asked in order to create a dramatic effect or to make a point rather than to get an answer."

I prefer not to use the word argument, and I prefer to employ the process known as discussion. To me, a discussion is a voluntary effort in which many participants offer their limited viewpoints in the effort to construct an improved viewpoint that is made up of many diverse viewpoints, on a specified topic. The concept of "argument" tends to illicit a winner take all battle of viewpoints, and typically anything goes, as the saying suggests: All is fair in love and war (war with words).

"If I, in my ignorance of language, misinterpreted your statement, then I apologize." 

I also apologize for my many character flaws that are painfully obvious to almost everyone save for myself. I can't seem to say anything without either being too wordy, too brief, insulting, boasting, meek, combative, confusing, boring, nonsensical, you name it, I'm guilty.

The topic is if anything a topic about gatekeeping. If the bird can be disappeared, it won't sing anymore. If, on the other hand, the song being sung can be employed factually, so as to account for specific actions done to innocent people by specific guilty people, then those on deck to do the same evil things may think twice out of concern for suffering the same focus of attention in their evil ways.

Nicomachean Ethics
By Aristotle
Written 350 B.C.E
"Our discussion will be adequate if it has as much clearness as the subject-matter admits of, for precision is not to be sought for alike in all discussions, any more than in all the products of the crafts. Now fine and just actions, which political science investigates, admit of much variety and fluctuation of opinion, so that they may be thought to exist only by convention, and not by nature. And goods also give rise to a similar fluctuation because they bring harm to many people; for before now men have been undone by reason of their wealth, and others by reason of their courage. We must be content, then, in speaking of such subjects and with such premisses to indicate the truth roughly and in outline, and in speaking about things which are only for the most part true and with premisses of the same kind to reach conclusions that are no better. In the same spirit, therefore, should each type of statement be received; for it is the mark of an educated man to look for precision in each class of things just so far as the nature of the subject admits; it is evidently equally foolish to accept probable reasoning from a mathematician and to demand from a rhetorician scientific proofs.

"Now each man judges well the things he knows, and of these he is a good judge. And so the man who has been educated in a subject is a good judge of that subject, and the man who has received an all-round education is a good judge in general. Hence a young man is not a proper hearer of lectures on political science; for he is inexperienced in the actions that occur in life, but its discussions start from these and are about these; and, further, since he tends to follow his passions, his study will be vain and unprofitable, because the end aimed at is not knowledge but action. And it makes no difference whether he is young in years or youthful in character; the defect does not depend on time, but on his living, and pursuing each successive object, as passion directs. For to such persons, as to the incontinent, knowledge brings no profit; but to those who desire and act in accordance with a rational principle knowledge about such matters will be of great benefit."

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: slidemansailor on August 02, 2019, 07:38:02 pm
Appropos of nothing much, I just remembered the "IGNORE" switch. 
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: casca-503 on August 03, 2019, 08:39:55 am
slideman,  agree....enough   time   wasted   on   this   feces..../   those   rich ...crooked...pedaphyles ... politicians...or...not...deserve ....lamp   post   decoration   justice....some  here   being   far  too   verbose,   me   thinks....
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Bill St. Clair on August 07, 2019, 09:55:56 am
I often enjoy Joe Kelly's posts, though he tends to be overly wordy, sort of like Elias. 😈

I've caused myself much anger over similar things in the past. I have not noticed that my expressions of that anger have done ANYTHING to change the world. I've decided that treating with kindness the people the universe places physically close to me is more important to me than hunting down every one of the thousands of travesties that happen every day far away. If that's ostrich syndrome, then I own it, proudly.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on August 07, 2019, 02:21:01 pm
"If that's ostrich syndrome, then I own it, proudly."

The shoe was not meant to fit anyone that does not fit into the shoe, and I hope that these are not too many words, or too few.

Discussion is the real law power, as for example investigatory jurors deliberate in the effort to share viewpoints as to the right or wrong of ignoring false or trivial accusations, and the right or wrong of presenting legitimate accused individuals with a trial date, so as to offer the accused their equal footing of real law power. Similarly trial jurors deliberately deliberate in the effort to constitute a true representation of the whole country of people in the location where an accuser has accused an accused individual of something worthy of unleashing the whole country into action in the effort to remedy a conflict.

Someone creating a pond, on their own authority, on their own land, to then provide water in case of fire that endangers life in the area, is not a terrorist in my view. I am one of those who constitute the whole country of people in the location where I locate. Someone kidnapping babies, or children, or young adults, or adults, or middle-aged people, or old people, and using those enslaved people for amusement or profit is a serial perpetrator of treasonous, heinous, capital, felonies. I would most certainly put my 2 cents into a presentment that moves a Jeffery Epstein from freeholder at liberty to accused, presumed to be innocent, defendant stating his case before the whole country represented in a trial jury in a trial by the country, if I were afforded the opportunity to do so by my fellow Americans. I would do that in the location where I locate because the accused is accused by someone in my location for having perpetrated the accused crimes in my location, according to what remains of the common law in my location.

If we the people have been corralled, cajoled, enticed, or otherwise controlled into becoming a single Nation State, then we are one country now, not many independent localities formed into independent individuals, families, towns, cities, counties, Nation States (example: Rhode Island), and all those independent, sovereign, entities, voluntarily formed into a Federation for our mutual defense of our lives, liberties, property, and our common law.

If, on the other hand, we the people afford each other as much law power as we voluntarily take upon our own authority, then we ought to learn from history and mind our own business in our own jurisdictions that extend roughly as far as we can afford to relocate when duty or necessity requires.

An assembly of the most discrete and honest among us in that area we all can afford to police on our own authority constitutes a grand jury in fact, not in fiction. Imagine a counter virus that works like a cure for the cancer of malfeasance in office and in each sovereign (independent) individual law power, those counter virus empowered people work effectively to discover, find, locate, become aware of, and inspire those who are most discrete and honest, and all of these counter viruses actually form those historic, ancient, cures for the cancer of malfeasance in office, those grand juries in those localities in every area where the common law has always been, and will always be, in power, if we decide to access it.

What would a presentment look like concerning anyone in any office anywhere in each town, city, county, State, or Federation of States? Which one would be good enough? Which presentment would constitute the cause to act in defense of all those slaves yet to be born, all those slaves just born, all those slaves yet to learn how to speak, and all those slaves yet to be shown either lawful behavior or the opposite?

If the shoe doesn’t fit then you don’t wear the shoe.

"Responsibility must be individual, or there is no responsibility at all."
Equitable Commerce by Josiah Warren, 1852

If you decided to volunteer to be a grand juror, and you were faced with a go or no go decision to place Jeffery Epstein (or anyone similar in your location) before a trial by the country (trial by jury) to state his case, would you help document a legible presentment, and if so what message would you place into a court of record in that, or a similar, case?

 

 

 

 

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 10, 2019, 03:12:54 pm
As soon as I read that Jeffrey Epstein's case was to be reinvestigated and he had been apprehended and it was theorised (correctly I assume) that he was running a world-wide blackmail operation and could potentially "name names", I saw that this would happen.

Do you think it was a genuine suicide attempt on his part? Or that it was a botched attempt at killing him before he could talk?  Or that it was botched on purpose?  Perhaps as a warning, or some other motive?

Remember when Hillary Clinton famously said "we will all hang from nooses if I lose" (the election) in 2016, well I guess the possibility of people like Jeffrey Epstein ratting on his clientele, is what she was talking about.

https://summit.news/2019/07/25/ann-coulter-get-epstein-to-a-super-max-prison-before-he-is-suicided/

Ann Coulter is asking that the Bureau of Prisons move Jeffrey Epstein to a Super Max facility so that “the people who want him dead” won’t be able to hide their complicity in his sex trafficking crimes.
Epstein was found nearly unconscious in a fetal position inside his NYC jail cell yesterday, with the cause of his injuries unknown.
The incident became public at the same time as a report confirming that Epstein had visited the Clinton White House multiple times, contrary to Bill Clinton’s claims of limited contact with the billionaire.
Now Ann Coulter is calling for Epstein to be protected so that the powerful people complicit in his crimes do not go free.
“Dear Bureau of Prisons: Please get Jeffrey Epstein to a super Max prison pronto, or the people who want him dead will make sure we never know the truth. ACT NOW!” tweeted Coulter.

snip

Yo, mouse --
Am sure you've heard by now, but let's add this story which broke on Saturday, August 10, 2019.

https://www.yahoo.com/gma/jeffrey-epstein-accused-sex-trafficker-dies-suicide-officials-125649444--abc-news-topstories.html

Hanging himself in a suicide-prevention cell would call for some fairly competent help, yes/no?

So this shows us at least some degree of depth in the Deep State.

Jeez!

Salute!
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 10, 2019, 07:35:27 pm
Gee, they don't even try to hide it any more, do they?

I just hope it is not all dropped.  I hope that no one thinks Jeffrey Epstein's death means this entire thing goes away.  There are a LOT of people involved and killing Jeffrey Epstein does not change that fact.

It has to all come out eventually, it is inevitable.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 10, 2019, 07:51:58 pm
Gee, they don't even try to hide it any more, do they?

I just hope it is not all dropped.  I hope that no one thinks Jeffrey Epstein's death means this entire thing goes away.  There are a LOT of people involved and killing Jeffrey Epstein does not change that fact.

It has to all come out eventually, it is inevitable.
Agreed.
And killing Epstein will help it come out more quickly. This was a murder, and it was done to protect a large number of deep state operatives. The heirarchy goes up to the top of the new world order.
This is staggering news. You're right -- they don't even try to hide it any more. They will stop at nothing.
Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 10, 2019, 09:12:51 pm
Well, well, well …..  Who would have thought???  Never in a million years would this be suspicious in any way at all.

Wow!  "CAMERA MALFUNCTION"  I'm sure the prison "authorities" did all they could but. well,.... these things just keep on happening .... nobody's fault .... these things are sent to try us ..... I mean WHO could have predicted this?

https://bigleaguepolitics.com/report-camera-malfunction-in-epsteins-prison-cell-prevented-recording-of-his-alleged-suicide/

The reported suicide of Democrat-affiliated sex predator Jeffrey Epstein earlier this morning has journalists and other concerned citizens demanding answers.
But they shouldn’t expect any to arise soon, if ever, as a report from New Right founder Michael Coudrey indicates that a mysterious camera malfunction has prevented any footage of Epstein’s alleged suicide from being captured.

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on August 10, 2019, 10:36:13 pm
Good find mouse, thanks.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mi6a2lm on August 11, 2019, 03:49:56 am
(http://l.wigflip.com/a/nzT2XNZW/roflbot.jpg)
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mi6a2lm on August 11, 2019, 04:47:51 am

(http://i64.tinypic.com/o8c6rq.jpg)
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: slidemansailor on August 13, 2019, 08:29:47 pm
It appears that taking down the pedophile network is a Trump Team / Q Team priority.  Thus far they have not appeared to do anything particularly stupid. For example, assuming normal prison solitary would protect a potent witness from incredibly evil, powerful people would have been stupid.

Very unlikely for them to do that.

Finding [creating] a substitute cadaver to facilitate moving Epstein to serious protective custody ... say, for example, a completely rebuilt Guantanamo would be much more credible than the official story of suicide in a make-suicide-impossible cell.

I do recommend ya'all relax on this story. It definitely is not over.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 13, 2019, 09:18:03 pm
There seems to be a lot of articles on this matter, and everybody has something to say.  However, the absolute best is this SATIRE site, it sums everything up perfectly.  I'm no longer amazed at any of these coverups (over recent years coverups and 'official stories' have reached a point where they're so obviously what they are and nobody even pretends that the 'official story' is even credible, possible, likely or true) because I've realised that there's nothing anyone can do to convince somebody who is hellbent on believing the 'official story", of the truth.  People will always believe what they want to believe.

Here's the SATIRE article (did I stress that it is SATIRE, and in no way to be taken seriously?)  Though it is kinda funny, so worth reading.

https://genesiustimes.com/breaking-epstein-to-be-accidentally-cremated-before-full-autopsy/

New York Coroner Deepak Statey will accidentally cremate the body of Jeffrey Epstein who was suicided last week, according to authorities.
Epstein, 66, pleaded not guilty to sex trafficking and conspiracy charges last month and was being held without bail. But others had a different opinion as they suicided him in his cell.

Last month Epstein was found semi-conscious in his cell after an apparent suicide attempt. And prison guards thought that “suicide watch” meant that they were going to watch him commit suicide.
The planned accidental cremation will include all evidence of the supposed hanging.
New York Mayor Bill de Blasio said it “way too convenient” that Epstein could no longer incriminate others.
Epstein was accused of paying girls under the age of 18 to perform sex acts at his Manhattan and Florida mansions between 2002 and 2005.

snip

This one is good as well, in case you missed it:

https://genesiustimes.com/breaking-epsteins-prison-guard-was-tragically-killed-in-auto-accident-tomorrow/

n a shocking coincidence, the prison guard who was watching Jeffrey Epstein during his suicide, Malcolm Smith, was tragically killed in an auto accident tomorrow.
“I can’t believe it,” Oswald Harvey Lee a Smith coworker said. “It’s hard to believe that he’s gone.”
Smith had overseen the transfer of Epstein’s cellmate and the switching off of the security cameras that monitored Epstein during his 24-hour surveillance on suicide watch.
“It’s just a shame. Nothing like this has ever happened in American politics,” Lee added. “I just can’t believe he died tomorrow.”

snip

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 14, 2019, 07:50:16 am
This is one of those "yeah, right!"  Moments.

https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2019-08-14/guards-were-sleeping-during-epsteins-alleged-suicide-then-falsified-records-cover

Guards were sleeping during Epstein's alleged suicide, then falsified records to cover it up.

snip

Ladies and gentlemen, have we found our patsies?

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 14, 2019, 03:08:18 pm
This is probably the most comprehensive and realistic source I've seen yet.
From the Corbett Report, a well-organized and researched presentation.

https://youtu.be/cFwQp5DLQqM

Salute!
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Joe Kelley on August 14, 2019, 04:25:55 pm
Thanks, Elias Alias, another good find.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: kirgi07 on August 15, 2019, 02:33:23 am
He got whacked,someone got paid. Ought 7.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 16, 2019, 06:50:44 am

Finding [creating] a substitute cadaver to facilitate moving Epstein to serious protective custody ... say, for example, a completely rebuilt Guantanamo would be much more credible than the official story of suicide in a make-suicide-impossible cell.

I do recommend ya'all relax on this story. It definitely is not over.

Lots of "smoke and mirrors" abound, for sure. The switching with a cadaver is but one thing, and it's doing would require an autopsy report which fortified in the public mind the needed "fact" that Epstein had indeed died (either suicide or murdered). Reports now show that the dude who oversaw this Epstein autopsy is indeed the same dude who oversaw the autopsy of JFK, Martin Luther King, and other drama-laden public figures.
Two possibilities arise quickly -- 1. the White House could get a falsified autopsy report, and 2. so could the deep state.
Therefore, I agree with you totally, that remaining in a relaxed condition of detachment as we watch events unfold is the desirable preference of the wise.
Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 16, 2019, 07:23:13 am
Thanks, Elias Alias, another good find.

Glad you liked, Joe Kelley. There is much coming to light as this topic explodes in a display of bursting fireballs of new discoveries, twists in the story, unlikely possibilities, and inconceivable conceptions -- it's like watching a Fourth of July fireworks display in our own field of cognizance. I hope the gush of new revelations continues, in hopes that some good awakening might sweep across the public awareness of impending power-plays which beset the feet of we the people now.
Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 16, 2019, 07:44:14 am
Absolutely, positively, remarkably, this picture of a painting has been tied to Epstein's NYC plush pad. Thanks to Paul Craig Roberts for fetching this one.
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-7353967/Did-Jeffrey-Epstein-portrait-Bill-Clinton-blue-dress-red-heels-NYC-mansion.html

(https://thenypost.files.wordpress.com/2019/08/painting-1.jpg?quality=90&strip=all&w=618&h=410&crop=1)

For fun and games, enter in your favorite search engine this collection of benign words --
"Bill Clinton Blue Dress Monica Lewinsky Epstein"

Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: casca-503 on August 16, 2019, 08:05:57 am
pay  no   attention   to   the   man   behind   the   curtain    or   the   man   on   the   hill   with  the   umbrella....
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 16, 2019, 08:07:26 am
Gives a whole new meaning to "devil in a blue dress", doesn't it?

Wow, went to a search engine and typed in those random words, and 10 pages of articles depicting that image.  I first thought "how would Bill Clinton ever live it down" but then I thought "he doesn't really care".  If the picture had been of Hillary, that would have been far more telling.

Maybe I'm being a bit naďve but I'm wondering why the things that must have been found in the houses belonging to Jeffrey Epstein haven't been made more public.  I mean there was a lot of speculation (on discussion boards on the internet and news articles) as to the house on "paedophile island" being set up as with video cameras everywhere and everything kept and filed so as to enable this "world wide blackmail operation" to function (speculation that this was the source of Epstein's wealth).  "Paedophile Island" and his NYC residence must have been a "gold mine" of information.  Where do you think it all is now?

Also, who do you think the "associate" is?

https://nypost.com/2019/08/16/jeffrey-epsteins-body-claimed-by-mystery-associate/

Jeffrey Epstein's body has been claimed from the medical examiner's office in New York - by a mystery "associate" according to a new report.

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: FDD on August 16, 2019, 11:04:28 am
MY EYES< OHHHH MY EYESSS   WHERE IS THE BLEACH?  :thrshocker: :panic:
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on August 16, 2019, 10:55:37 pm
MY EYES< OHHHH MY EYESSS   WHERE IS THE BLEACH?  :thrshocker: :panic:

Imagine if it had been Hillary in the picture.  At least Bill shaved his legs.

He did pose for the painting, right?  Or do you think the artist did it from memory?
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on August 23, 2019, 09:44:55 am
MY EYES< OHHHH MY EYESSS   WHERE IS THE BLEACH?  :thrshocker: :panic:

Imagine if it had been Hillary in the picture.  At least Bill shaved his legs.

He did pose for the painting, right?  Or do you think the artist did it from memory?

That's a good question, mouse. I truly would like to know if the idiot actually posed for that painting, but it's quite likely that he did not -- yet it is possible that he did. We do know that the idiot has brain damage (and sinus damage too) from overly-abusing cocaine, which he got from the CIA when he was Governor of Arkansas. If any sleuths reading here chance upon the history of how that painting came to be, I'd like to hear the details.

Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on October 31, 2019, 01:21:01 am
Are we expected to "put this behind us and move on"?  "Hanging does not cause these three broken bones, homicide does".  This is potentially far more important to just let go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=583&v=LxYstvg3SaE

#FoxNews
Famed medical examiner makes explosive claim regarding Epstein's death

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on October 31, 2019, 02:36:39 am
Are we expected to "put this behind us and move on"?  "Hanging does not cause these three broken bones, homicide does".  This is potentially far more important to just let go.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=583&v=LxYstvg3SaE

#FoxNews
Famed medical examiner makes explosive claim regarding Epstein's death

snip

Hi mouse!
Let me offer you this much please.
First, this broadcast came from Fox News, which is now known to be yet another servant to the deep state. Any news service which comes across a television set is a controlled narrative dispenser.  That's one thing.
But another thing is that the media and the government itself wants everyone to think that Epstein is actually dead. I truly do not believe he is dead. We have to udnerstand that public perception is choreographed ahead of time, constantly and perpetually, by very nefarious power-players, such as the idiots who have now got Trump interested in Pre-Crime Arrests and psychological surveillance which all goverments are now anticipating with the roll-out of 5G. (DARPA is developing high-tech brain-wave collection for all individuals everywhere using the 5G matrix). But my point is that we're constantly being lied to, being deceived, being hypnotized and mesmerized by flicker-rates on TV screens and by electro-magnetic pollution coming from smart meters, cell phones, Wi-Fi, television sets, radios, government-beamed ELF waves, HAARP-generated "waves", and other electric systems, etc.
I know that sounds preposterous, mouse, so let me give you a very timely example of where I'm coming from. Here is a video by the Corbett Report which is absolutely air-tight when it comes to styles and patterns of government deception coming at us through the media. (Hate to do this to the "Trump Believers", but here ya go --

https://youtu.be/3Kn9cSbzzyA

I will guarantee you that Epstein was totally too important to too many people inside our own damn government, and that there is literally no way the Trump regime would have allowed that prison to permit a suicide, much less a murder, inside a top security cell. When this doctor witnessed the (quote-unquote) "autopsy", he was (if he even did witness an autopsy) certainly looking at a substitute corpse, not at a dead Epstein.  Epstein could have been easily exchanged previously, such as when he went to the sick-bay after his first "attempt" to commit suicide. That is where they would have replaced him with a stand-in look-alike, and that stand-in look-alike can't talk about it now because he was murdered by strangulation, right? ;)

mouse, the lying sons of bitches infesting the U.S. general goverment these days are so full of tricks and deceptions that it's totally impossible to believe anything they say, especially when they stage a tv episode like this flakey Fox News show. For all the strong questions the crew asked the good medical examiner, not a one of them, nor he himself, bothered to mention the fact that high-security prison protocol requires paper sheets, not linen sheets, for exactly the reason which is central to this story -- paper sheets cannot be used to hang oneself. Also what they did not bother to mention is the fact that the damned designer of that top-security cell most assuredly did not place an open rafter or a rod or bar or anything else on the ceiling which would have been necessary for hanging the sheet on something higher than floor-height.

They're lying to us, same as they're lying about 9/11, OK City Fed building, Waco, Ruby Ridge, weapons of mass destruction, the Bay of Pigs, Watergate, BCCI, Iran in 1952, Panama, Guatemala, Haiti, Afghanistan, Al Qaeda, ISIS, and the man in the goddam moon. And speaking of ISIS, in that vid I just linked for you, whoever wrote Trump's script embellished a bit too much when he had Trump say that Baghdadi created ISIS. Sheesh! The whole world knows that Baghdadi  had nothing to do with creating ISIS, yet the speech writer had Trump say that anyway. And Trump, obeying his own masters from higher up the pyramid of power, repeated that insanity, that blatant mistake, that outright lie, even though he knew it was a lie.
That is the sorry state of affairs into which our America has devolved.
I'd like to know your opinion of that Corbett Report video if you have time.
And you're welcome to rebut my curt assault on that Fox News theatric show. ;)
Thanks mouse!
Salute!
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on November 01, 2019, 08:21:13 am
Thanks Elias for your interest in this.  Personally I believe that Epstein is dead, no real evidence, just think that.  There seems to be no purpose to be served by going to the trouble of letting him live, escape to some far away place and live under an assumed name for the rest of his natural life.  Who would pay for that?  Who would benefit from that?  Surely it's far easier to just kill him?  Remember no one could ever have access to his wealth or any property left behind.  That plan seems to take far too many risks of getting found out.  And sacrificing a stand-in?  Just seems - to me anyway - to be a lof of trouble to go to, maybe too much.

I read some time ago that "paedophile island" was set up with cameras and sound equipment and there were extensive files found with names and all sorts of details - an obvious blackmail operation.

I haven't read anything since about what became of that information.  I'm guessing that it was destroyed because too many well known people were on the "blackmail list" (we know of Bill Clinton and prince Andrew - who else and how many other "big names"?

I'm assuming that Jeffrey Epstein was strangled to prevent a trial taking place (in which he might have "named names" in order to get a light sentence).  I'm surprised that he didn't simply make a few 'phone calls after being arrested and become a free man within hours (you know the old very cliched "if you let me go down for this, I'm taking you down with me").

I started to watch the Corbet report video, and I saw about 8 minutes of it but it is late here and I can hardly keep my eyes open any more, so I'll watch the rest tomorrow and get back to you.
Actually it's very good so far, I just got up to "killed, arrested, killed 2003, killed again 2006" and I just thought "the deep state relies on the fact that people generally don't pay attention to anything, they might read (something like) "major coup, Goldstein killed in battle with heroic troops" and not even remember that they've read something very similar about the arch-villain Goldstein a short time ago".

So, until tomorrow.

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on November 02, 2019, 07:54:26 am
Finally saw the whole Corbett report video, and it's depressing in a way.  After hearing that you suddenly realise that you just can't believe ANYTHING AT ALL that you hear or read on any news media at all.

I took a renewed interest in Orwell's "1984", in 1998 when we went through "the great 'digi-driving licence' fiasco" and got it from the library and read it for about the fourth time since I was at high school, but since then the book has become more and more relevant - to the entire world - governments everywhere seem to see it as a "car manual", an "instruction book", on how they ought to run things.  I used to think that one of the few things "predicted" that had not become a reality was the archetype villain "Goldstein", now I realise that there have been several "Goldsteins" and will continue to be.

I'm sure the average person just does not realise what a "goldmine of information" has been lost with the death of Jeffrey Epstein and how many high powered people round the world are breathing a huge sigh of relief.

Whether or not the world will be better off "not knowing" is debatable.  No doubt those who "made this happen" probably justify it to themselves by telling themselves "people really shouldn't know what their betters have done behind closed  doors, we're being kind by keeping them in the dark".

It's even more insulting though when it is made so obvious that we're being taken for idiots and being duped all the time.  It's like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez saying to the public "if you support the green new deal, I'll give you a lifetime free pass on the train that my party is building to run on the floating tracks across the ocean to Hawaii to replace the aeroplanes".  How many people would believe that and expect that there will actually be such a train?
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on November 02, 2019, 10:56:52 am
Finally saw the whole Corbett report video, and it's depressing in a way.  After hearing that you suddenly realise that you just can't believe ANYTHING AT ALL that you hear or read on any news media at all.

I took a renewed interest in Orwell's "1984", in 1998 when we went through "the great 'digi-driving licence' fiasco" and got it from the library and read it for about the fourth time since I was at high school, but since then the book has become more and more relevant - to the entire world - governments everywhere seem to see it as a "car manual", an "instruction book", on how they ought to run things.  I used to think that one of the few things "predicted" that had not become a reality was the archetype villain "Goldstein", now I realise that there have been several "Goldsteins" and will continue to be.

I'm sure the average person just does not realise what a "goldmine of information" has been lost with the death of Jeffrey Epstein and how many high powered people round the world are breathing a huge sigh of relief.

Whether or not the world will be better off "not knowing" is debatable.  No doubt those who "made this happen" probably justify it to themselves by telling themselves "people really shouldn't know what their betters have done behind closed  doors, we're being kind by keeping them in the dark".

It's even more insulting though when it is made so obvious that we're being taken for idiots and being duped all the time.  It's like Alexandria Ocasio Cortez saying to the public "if you support the green new deal, I'll give you a lifetime free pass on the train that my party is building to run on the floating tracks across the ocean to Hawaii to replace the aeroplanes".  How many people would believe that and expect that there will actually be such a train?

Well, Ms mouse, thank you sincerely for viewing that video. Also, I thank you personally for re-reading Orwell's "1984".  I agree with you that the book itself was extremely prophetic, and it does appear that governments in general, all over the world, use "the memory hole" extensively to control the perception of their populations. That is one reason why this forum is titled, "The Mental Militia".

But mouse, I'm having an emergency here today and must be too brief right now. I will continue this with you after I get on top of current happenings here at my workshop. Thank you for being patient. I will close for now with this brief note for you.

I would like to say that I honestly have no proof that Epstein is still alive, just as the world at large has no real proof that he is dead. In my opinion, we may never know. What we can know is exactly what you just expressed -- everything we're told is part of a controlled narrative, a "psy-op". The portrait of reality presented by all major media is engineered by state-sponsored think tanks inside and outside government. Such think tanks are in multiple Intelligence community offices and are also in various private sector corporate offices.

Let me ask you to do something which is probably more than you want to do, so I will understand if you don't want to do so much reading. I wrote some time back, about four years ago, a four-part series on Jade Helm 15. I completed my series when I saw DJ, of Level 9 News, on the John B. Wells show, Caravan To Midnight. When I saw her on that show, I knew that the chapter was closed, and that Jade Helm 15 was a MindWar psy-op. She is in The Mental Militia, and  has been since then, and remains a dear friend. I would like to offer you a chance to read all four installments of my series, which I feel will show yet more completely why we cannot believe anything we are told by the government and/or its lapdog mass media. Each part of the series is linked at the bottom of each page therein.

https://thementalmilitia.net/2015/08/17/jade-helm-2015-questions-and-reflections/

Sorry to be so brief, but life keeps going faster than I can keep up with. Thank you for all you do here.
Salute!
Elias

Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: FDD on November 04, 2019, 03:08:43 pm
it use to be required reading, Orwell's 1984, in school, but I guess not anymore, to bad.
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on November 04, 2019, 04:10:48 pm
In that series of articles I linked for mouse in a previous post on page two of this thread, Part Four has a section on the Washington Post's amazing website titled "Top Secret America". In that section, which is way down the page on part four, I walked through a few clicks at the Top Secret America site to get to Unconventional Warfare, Psychological Operations, and the number of private sector corporations doing Psy-Op work for government departments and offices including the CIA, NRO, DIA, etc etc.
The Top Secret America site listed almost two thousand private businesses doing "top secret" work for fedgov. The site was built on two years of work by Dana Priest and Bill Arkin, along with their staff. It was a massive project and it laid out a banquet of secret info. It was posted online in 2010, nine years ago.
Last week I chanced to need to go to that site and dig up something, and I've discovered that the site is now missing. I googled it and every link which came up was re-directed to the Washington Post's national front page, with no link on that page to Top Secret America.
So I wrote to Steven Aftergood of FAS.ORG (Federated Scientists of America). He found an archived link to the site, sent me that link, and when I went there and clicked on it, nothing happened. All links on front page of that now disappeared site are null and impotent. All that remains is the front page, with static, malfunctioning links.
Mr. Aftergood did find Bill Arkin's email address, and suggested I write him but also noted for me that Mr. Arkin probably would not respond to my email. I wrote Mr. Arkin two days ago and have not heard back from him yet.
So here is the deal -- somebody way high up in the pyramid of power has managed to force Washington Post to "disappear" a site they spent tons of money building over a two year period.  Our dearly beloved government does not want we little people to know how intensely it is now censoring "free speech" and "leaked information".
I am thinking about doing a short video about this and posting that on my YouTube channel, on PocketNet.App, and possibly on Brighteon as well. This is really big news, important news, and I'm apparently the first one to notice it.
Here is the link to Part Four on my series on Jade Helm 15. Part Four is a very long read, but as DJ of Level 9 News told me yesterday, that article is packed with tons of good information. Only problem is that the section I wrote on Top Secret America is now neutered. Dang!

https://thementalmilitia.net/2015/09/06/jade-helm-2015-mindwar-and-psyop-part-four/

Anyone who has not yet read that series I wrote back in 2015 should seriously considering taking time to read it all the way through.  As mouse noted the need to re-read 1984, this series reveals Big Brother's shady side to be an ominous ploy to totally enslave all Americans. What Jade Helm 15, the military exercise, was really doing was field-testing a strategy of "mapping the human terain" so that government can control "the human domain". It's all about a psy-war effort to launch MindWar, which we've covered at our national website. Now, four years after I wrote that series, they're rolling out 5G, which will complete their conquest of the American people for the United Nations' Agenda 21 one-world government.
Everything is coming to a head, swiftly now.
Will keep you posted, but here's link to the four part series starting on Part One. Links to each other installment are at bottom of each page.
https://thementalmilitia.net/2015/08/17/jade-helm-2015-questions-and-reflections/
Note -- speaking of censorship, in that four-part series are now several videos which have been pulled from the Internet. I've left them there just to show examples of state-sponsored censorship.
Salute!
Elias Alias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on December 19, 2019, 01:54:17 am
Well surprise, surprise

Prison surveillance footage from Jeffrey Epstein's first suicide attempt has gone missing

https://www.businessinsider.com/video-footage-from-jeffrey-epsteins-first-suicide-attempt-missing-report-2019-12/?r=AU&IR=T

Surveillance footage outside Jeffrey Epstein's cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center during his first attempted suicide has gone missing, assistant US Attorney Jason Swergold told Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth Karas on Wednesday.

snip
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: Elias Alias on December 19, 2019, 02:06:33 am
Well surprise, surprise

Prison surveillance footage from Jeffrey Epstein's first suicide attempt has gone missing

https://www.businessinsider.com/video-footage-from-jeffrey-epsteins-first-suicide-attempt-missing-report-2019-12/?r=AU&IR=T

Surveillance footage outside Jeffrey Epstein's cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center during his first attempted suicide has gone missing, assistant US Attorney Jason Swergold told Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth Karas on Wednesday.

snip

Hi mouse,
Thank you for posting that. I've just clicked the link but because I have an ad blocker on my browser they won't let me read it. Can you copy-paste a bit more of that article for me here please?
Nothing these days surprises me. The entire house of cards called western civilization seems to be crashing down all around us. The corruption in WDC is so indescribable that it's unbearable to even try to keep up with it. (But I do try, lol!)

And mouse -- Merry Christmas to ye and thine!
Blessings, with
Salute!
Elias
Title: Re: Could Jeffrey Epstein being "suicided", be prevented?
Post by: mouse on December 22, 2019, 06:52:55 am
Sure Elias, here goes:

This is the Business Insider:
Surveillance footage outside Jeffrey Epstein's cell at the Metropolitan Correctional Center during his first attempted suicide has gone missing, assistant US Attorney Jason Swergold told Southern District of New York Judge Kenneth Karas on Wednesday.
Epstein, who was facing sex trafficking and conspiracy charges, first attempted to take his own life at the end of July in a cell he shared with Nick Tartaglione, a former police officer who is charged with the murder of four men.
Epstein died by suicide on August 10.
Attorneys for Tartaglione requested to retain the footage, following a report that the ex-cop tried to save Epstein's life after he attempted to hang himself in the cell.
The footage could potentially evidence Tartaglione "good character" for trying to save Epstein's life, as he could face the death penalty if found guilty, according to the New York Daily News report.

(That's not the entirety, but all that is interesting.)

This is a link to a better site that has the more of the story and a video:  https://www.cnbc.com/2019/12/18/jeffrey-epsteins-first-suicide-attempt-video-is-missing.html