The Mental Militia Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: A New Beginning  (Read 9928 times)

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #15 on: July 05, 2004, 07:59:32 pm »

COURSE 6 - BEING A DIPLOMAT



   PURPOSE: To find the communication network and link into it
   
·   Learn how to communicate effectively to all levels of people
·   Learn how to present yourself and your message effectively and professionally
·   Learn how to interact with police, judges, clerks, federal agents and other public and private people under any circumstance with success
   
   FINAL PRODUCT: The ability to communicate effectively and present yourself in a professional manner to anyone under any condition

Diploma. [Greek diploma – a paper folded double, from diploo – to fold, double] A letter or writing usually under seal and signed by competent authority conferring some power, privilege, or honor.
Diplomacy. The science of art of conducting negotiations, arranging treaties, etc. between nations, artful management or maneuvering with the view of securing advantages.

   Since you have finished COURSE 4 - REDEMPTION, you should have your treaty in effect. So now you can be a “diplomat” and artfully conduct negotiations with the view of securing advantages.

   When you decide you are going to jump into the realm of discharging public debt, it is vital that you know and understand the rules of the game. One very important thing to remember when doing this often dangerous excursion is that the bankers want you to know that “only they can use your credit – not you!” Of course this is ridiculous and absurd when you understand that you are the creditor and every product that you see exists solely on the fact that you furnished the credit to make it from the very beginning.

   To start with, you should already be knowledgeable and effective in completing the administrative processes whenever you receive a dishonor from anyone of your debtors. These processes are detailed in COURSE 5 – CONTRACTS. The key processes include your own private affidavit and the essential follow-up default procedure, as well as the notarial protest and the eventual involuntary bankruptcy proceeding to liquidate YOUR equity formerly in possession of the debtor. Notice I said YOUR equity. Everything the municipalities and corporations have purchased was produced by the use of YOUR credit as production capital.

   We will be defining terms of all the actions and procedures relating to this subject. A complete study of the etymology of each word is vital for understanding and if done correctly the definitions speak for themselves in finding the answer. The following definitions are taken from Black’s 6th edition which are typed in italics. The derivations are taken from the Consolidated Webster Encyclopedic Dictionary 1939 edition. The Hebrew and Greek definitions are taken from the Strong’s Exhaustive Concordance to the King James Bible.

   We will start with one of the most powerful terms on this subject that is the key to understanding redemption.

Power of acceptance. Capacity of offeree (you), upon acceptance of terms of offer, to create binding contract.

Dishonor. To refuse to accept

   When you understand the “power of acceptance,” then you will see the world in a different light. You will realize, possibly for the first time, that you no longer have to “fight,” “deny,” or “argue” as these are all dishonor. And, that you have the power to create a binding contract on YOUR terms. You will realize that YOU HAVE POWER!

YOUR AGENTS

   Occasionally, while finishing up your processes, one may encounter the Secret Service. To a “citizen” or a “debtor,” this may sound frightening. But as for a creditor, you will look forward to getting your commercial matter resolved by your “agents.”

Secret Service. The investigative responsibilities are to detect and arrest persons committing any offense against the laws of the United States relating to coins obligations and securities or the United States and of foreign governments; and to detect and arrest persons violating certain laws relating to the FDIC, Federal land banks, electronic fund transfer frauds, credit and debit card frauds, false identification documents.

   Did you know that the duty of the Secret Service is to “detect and arrest persons” that violate the laws pertaining to “securities of foreign governments?” You should know by now that you are a government “foreign” to the US government and all municipalities, and that the credit they enjoy is back by YOUR securities. So, if one of your debtors dishonors your check on a private account where they were supposed to do an “electronic funds transfer,” would this constitute a “fraud” on their part? Does this mean that they could be arrested for this? Yes it does! And to aid the Secret Service so that they can investigate the facts and do their duty  to you, they must be provided with “information.”

Information. An accusation in the nature of an indictment, from which it differs only in being presented by a competent public officer on his oath of office, instead of a grand jury on their oath.

Notary Public. A public officer whose function it is to administer oaths; to attest and certify, by his hand and official seal, certain classes of documents, in order to give them credit and authenticity in foreign jurisdictions; to perform certain official acts, chiefly in commercial matters, such as the protesting of notes and bills, the noting of foreign drafts, and marine protests in cases of loss or damage.

   If the debtor has dishonored your acceptance after you have returned it to them and they “argue” the charge still exists, then THEY can now be CHARGED with an information or an indictment. To complete this process one must be able to locate a notary public knowledgeable on this subject and willing to do a notarial protest.  When the notarial protest process is completed it is as effective as a criminal indictment from a grand jury or a prosecutor. On the civil side it is as effective as a Default Judgment in a State’s Superior Court! You should then send an “affidavit of information” along with the completed administrative process to the Secret Service as well as the US Attorney, US Attorney General, US Secretary of Treasury, US Secretary of State, Director of IRS, and your own state’s relating officers. This is covered in detail in COURSE 5 – CONTRACTS.

   There is another part of the definition of the Secret Service that is important here;

Secret Service. The protective responsibilities include protection of … a visiting head of a foreign state or foreign government…unless such protection is decline.

Visiting. In international law, the right of visit or visitation is the right of a cruiser or war-ship to stop a vessel sailing under another flag on the high seas, and send an officer to such vessel to ascertain whether her nationality is what it purports to be.

Visitor. A person appointed to visit, inspect, inquire into, and correct irregularities of corporations.

   Is there any reason why we would “decline” the offer of someone to protect us and our securities? All the Secret Service is there for is to “ascertain” whether your foreign nationality is what you purport it to be. If you are not sure you are a foreign nation – THEN YOU AREN’T ONE! How then, can one BE a foreign nation? You must think, act and speak like a foreign head.

   Usually, the Secret Service will contact you to do an interview with them. When they offer, you should NOT decline as they are there to help you in handling the corporation that dishonored your acceptance. You will be acting as a visitor to “inspect, inquire into and correct irregularities of corporations.”  To be prepared for this meeting separately package copies of all the administrative process and perfected claims that you have done on each dishonor, then attaching the “affidavit of information” as the cover letter. Now you have everything they need to continue in the “investigation” of the corporation that dishonored you through “electronic transfer fund fraud.” Because – that is their job! Now you are acting like a creditor, a principal, a head of a foreign government. A DIPLOMAT!

   Be very happy to see them and thank them for looking into this matter for you. Ask them for their card so that you can give them any further information regarding this matter. It would also be impressive to have a card to give to them – this would be very professional and respectful. Encourage them to keep you updated on the progress of the investigation, but let them know that time is of the essence in completing the liquidation of the corporation’s equity and that if it was absolutely necessary, you could allow them more time to handle the matter.

   If they ask you where does the money come from to pay for the items, you should correct them and say “there is no money, because the UNITED STATES and all municipalities are in bankruptcy and the only currency that exists is the people’s credit.” You could also tell them “the US Trust Fund is where all of the people’s property has been collateralized to create the credit of the nation.” If they appear confused, show them a copy of the 73rd Congress, March 9, 1933 where it says;

“(the new money) will be backed by the credit of the nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and property of all the people in the nation.”

   IN THEIR OWN WRITING THEY AGREE WE ARE THE CREDITORS!

   Wow! They would be so impressed and shocked that they had actually witnessed a creditor who knows his business, that they in turn would probably conduct themselves more respectful and  business like towards you.

DRILL: Practice talking to an “agent” using the above information until you are comfortable with the flow of the conversation. Have your classmate, as the agent, start with a low gradient and work up to a stressful situation. Then reverse the flow to your classmate.

THE APPEARANCE BOND

In the course of your business, one may eventually get a court order from one of your debtors to “argue” about the matter. There is no need to dishonor their offer to go to court, so just accept it or conditionally accept it to shift the burden of proof asking THEM to prove you are NOT the creditor. It is possible that the court may issue an “arrest warrant” to force you into agreeing with their point of view even though they have already dishonored. However, not to worry, there is a brilliant method of discharging this “charge.” KNOWING the fact that, “you are the Creditor,” firmly implanted in your mind, we will begin to define several key terms from this powerful viewpoint.

   While defining the following terms, keep in mind how each definition relates to “accounting principles.” The “court” is merely a commercial enterprise existing primarily to sell you “governmental services” such as “whisking you off to secluded get-a-ways” where you get “free room and board” and the “state of the art security is the finest money (your credit) can by.” First we will start with some terms of how the USA looks at your relationship with your strawman corporation.

Implied Partnership. One which is not a real partnership but which is recognized by the court as such because of the conduct of the parties; in effect, the parties are estopped from denying the existence of a partnership.

Charging order. A statutorily created means for a creditor (USA) of a judgment debtor (strawman, JOHN) who is a partner of others (John) to reach the debtor’s beneficial interest in the partnership (your credit), without risking dissolution of the partnership. Uniform Partnership Act, ss 28.

   It is the intention of the USA, as plaintiff, to “charge” JOHN so John can go in and “conduct himself as a partner” and argue about it. You cannot “deny” or you will, of course, dishonor yourself and they win. The whole trick is to get your credit without you knowing that they are charging the  “partner,” and to keep the “partnership” going without risk of dissolution. Are these guys good or what?

Charge: An encumbrance, lien, or claim; a burden or load; an obligation or duty; a liability; an accusation. A person or thing committed to the care of another. The price of, or rate for, something.

Charge account. System of purchasing goods and services on credit, under which customer (you) agrees to settle or make payments on his balance.

   No matter what they do to “compel” you into court – DON’T GO. Why would a soveran go to a place and let his servants sort out his affairs for him. Let’s say you are handed an arrest warrant by a “peace officer” after you “fail to appear.” Look it over and make sure it is correct then say;

   “I am accepting this charge and am now returning it to you.”

   Give the warrant back to him as you say it. It does not matter at that point what he does with it as it is a balanced the account, a done deal, finito! Don’t take it back, because it has already been discharged. It is a COMPLETED CYCLE OF ACTION.

The bailee (officer) then may “escort” you to the “warehouse.” The first thing you must do when you get there is ask for your phone call that you are guaranteed to get so that you can call the magistrate that will be able to give you an “appearance bond.” You are guaranteed this call even if you have called someone else first. This is the right to go before a magistrate within 24 hours of your “detainment.” When talking to the magistrate make a “statement” as follows;

“I want closure on this matter and I do not intend to dispute the facts.”

Statement. In a general sense, an allegation; a declaration of matters of fact. A summary of a financial account showing the balance due.

Statement of affairs. A balance sheet showing immediate liquidation amounts, usually prepared when bankruptcy is imminent.

When you make a “statement” are you actually asking for the financial account, the balance sheet, so that you can see what the value of the “charge” is? They are in bankruptcy and you are the creditor requesting to see the account of your debtor.

Close/closure. To suspend or stop operations of, to transfer to the main account. [L claudo – to shut, conclude.]

Closed account. An account to which no further additions can be made on either side, but which remains still open for adjustment and set-off, which distinguishes it from and account stated.

Set-off. The equitable right to cancel or offset mutual debts or cross demands, commonly used by a bank (you) in reducing a customer’s (USA) checking or deposit account in satisfaction of a debt the customer (USA) owes the bank (you).

   You see, YOU are the bank! You and your property are the only substance that exists in this fictional system of commerce and you are the only one who can USE it for any purpose. Your substance is the only reason the corporations exist and function at all. The only way to settle the account is to “cancel mutual debt,” because being in bankruptcy - THERE IS NO MONEY!

Dispute. A conflict or controversy; an assertion of a right, claim, or demand on one side, met by contrary claims or allegations on the other. The subject of litigation; the matter for which a suit is brought and upon which issue is joined, and in relation to which jurors are called and witnesses examined.

   Sounds like DISHONOR to me. So when you say “I do not intend to dispute the facts,” what are you saying? I ACCEPT the charges and now I OWN them!

Fact [L facio to do or make] A true statement. A fact is either a state of things, that is in existence, or a motion, that is, an event. Evidence. A truth, as distinguished from fiction or error. “Fact” means reality of events or things, the actual occurrence or existence of which is to be determined by evidence.

Admissions. More accurately regarded, they are statements by a party (JOHN), or some one identified with him (John as a partner) in legal interest, of the existence of a fact which is relevant to the cause.

   As creditor, you are asking to see the statement of account as distinguished from “fiction” which is assumption and presumption. You want to see the basis of the charge – the FACTS.

“I request an appearance bond in order to plead. I request to be released on my own recogniscence until the hearing.”

So the question you may be asking yourself is “why would I ask for an appearance bond?”
To answer this question one must understand the exact definition of this term.

Appear/Appearance. To be in evidence; to be proved. Coming into court by a party to a suit, whether plaintiff or defendant. A special appearance is for the purpose of testing or objecting to the sufficiency of service or the jurisdiction of the court over defendant without submitting to such jurisdiction;

Bond. In every case a bond represents debt – its holder is a creditor of the corporation (you) and not a part owner as is the shareholder. The word “bond” is sometimes used more broadly to refer also to unsecured debt instruments.

   Does this appearance bond request you to come to court or something else? What name is on the charging instrument entitled COMPLAINT? Your name or the strawman’s name? If you say “the strawman,” how is he going to make an “appearance?”

   Just what is the strawman anyway? Can you see a “strawman?” No, but you can show evidence of it. It is an “account” of all the debits the UNITED STATES and municipalities enter to show debt, hence DEBTOR. It is the opposite (public) side of the account which shows the credits (private). And who does the credits belong to? You the “creditor.” This being the case, one could see “evidence” of the strawman or the “account which shows the debt.”

Does the strawman represent you? No, absolutely not! What then does the strawman represent – who/what created the strawman and is using the credit of the creditor? UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, the plaintiff, who also represents the DEBTOR. Do I hear conflict of interest? So how can this be a judicial proceeding? It is an impossibility.  It is a “business transaction in commerce,” and the only reason they need you present at the negotiations is so that you, as the principal, can sign for the debtor in order to balance the account. And you say “this is justice?” Maybe it is.

Account. [Old English accompt, from ac – to add + compt – a calculation; from Latin computo – to compute, reckon]

Justice. [L justus – just, from jus – to be right, to bind, rights of man]

Right.  Hebrew yaman - to be right; to be right handed; the right hand or right side; the stronger;  the South. Latin regere - to rule. Greek oregein - to stretch out]
 
Left.    Hebrew semol - wrapping up; properly dark; as enveloped; the North, the left side, the
idea of cover, assuming the shape of the object beneath. [Anglo Saxon left – worthless, from lef – weak, infirm.

   Do you find it interesting to notice that the debits (debt) of an account are entered on the “left” side meaning “worthless”  and “assuming the shape” as in the court assuming you will buy into the game that the name of the strawman has the same shape as your own? But when you enter (the court) from the “right” side, it means “the stronger” and “to rule.” It means “substance,” “reality.” It means “to make right.” Do you think that this is a co-incidence? I think not.

Hearing. The parties proceeded against or otherwise involved have right to be heard, in much the same manner as a trial and such proceedings may terminate a final order.

Audit. Systematic inspection of accounting records involving analyses, tests, and confirmations. The hearing and investigation had before and auditor. A formal or official examination and authentication of accounts, with witnesses, vouchers, etc. [L audit – he hears, a hearing, from audio – to hear]

Auditor. An officer of the court, assigned to state the items of debit and credit between the parties in a suit where accounts are in question, and exhibit the balance. Under Rules of Civil Procedure in many states, the term “master” is used to describe those persons formerly known as auditors;

Magistrate. [L magister – a master, from magia – sorcery, from Greek mageia – the theology of Magicians]

Master of chancery. An officer of a court of chancery who acts as an assistant to the judge or chancellor. His duties are to inquire into such matters as may be referred to him by the court, examine causes, take testimony, take accounts, compute damages, etc., reporting his findings to the court in such shape that a decree may be made;

RULES OF CIVIL PROCEDURE.  53. Masters
(a) Appointment and Compensation.
“master” includes a referee, and auditor, an examiner, and an assessor. The master shall not retain the master’s report as security for the master’s compensation; but when the party ordered to pay the compensation allowed by the court does not pay it after notice and with the time prescribed by the court, the master is entitled to a writ of execution against the delinquent party.

   Wow! What officer of the court must state the items of debit and credit and exhibit the balance? You got it, the magistrate holding out “the balance scales of justice.” What happens when you are offered the “order to pay” and you do not pay (accept) it? You dishonor, and you will get a writ of execution against you.

© Powers.
The master may require the production before the master of evidence upon all matters embraced in the reference, including the production of all books, papers, vouchers, documents, and writings applicable thereto.

(d) (2) Witnesses.
If without adequate excuse a witness fails to appear or give evidence, the witness may be punished as for a contempt and be subjected to the consequences, penalties, and remedies provided in Rules 37 and 45.

(d) (3) Witnesses.
When matters of accounting are in issue before the master, the master may prescribe the form in which the accounts shall be submitted and in any proper case may require or receive in evidence a statement by a certified public accountant who is called as a witness.

(e) Report.
In an action to be tried without a jury, unless otherwise directed by the order of reference, the master shall file with the report a transcript of the proceedings and of the evidence and the original exhibits.

   Who is the witness referred to here? It is the accountant or accounting that must provide the court with evidence of the account of the Defendant/ Debtor/Strawman. If they do not provide the court with this evidence, then they are in big trouble!

Account. A detailed statement of the mutual demands in the nature of debit and credit between parties, arising out of contracts or some fiduciary relation.

Accountable. Subject to pay; responsible; liable.

Accounting/accrual method. A method of keeping accounts which shows expenses incurred and income earned for a given period, although such expenses and income may not have been actually paid or received.

   Whatever is debited to the strawman/debtor, we, as a creditor, will show as income. Since there is no money, we can never be paid.  So we must take the equity from the corporation or the “service” of the municipality instead as interest payment for using our credit.

   In summary, when you ask for the “appearance bond” you are asking to bring evidence into court of the account which shows the debt in order to test the claim without submitting to such jurisdiction so that you can accept the charge and balance the account.

THE GUILTY PLEA

   Some of you could be saying “but I don’t want to plead GUILTY”! Maybe you don’t know what you are saying. Just what does “guilty” mean?

Guilty. [Anglo Saxon gildan – to pay, payment] justly chargeable with a crime(commercial liability);         Webster’s Consolidated Encyclopedic Dictionary 1939 edition

   What are you saying when you say “guilty?” Isn’t this a “bad” thing? As you well know, all crimes are commercial liabilities. Instead of saying “I am guilty,” you are REALLY saying “I am payment.” You are saying “the debtor is chargeable and I, as the creditor am going to pay with my signature as payment, just like all the other credit that I have created with my signature, which the municipalities and corporations have been capitalizing on  up to this point. You are saying, “I don’t have to get permission from the Federal Reserve System to use MY OWN CREDIT. The Fed intentionally did NOT print enough Federal Reserve Notes to cover the interest payments known as “income taxes” (which creates the national debt), so I am bypassing them and their faulty accounting system and will handle this matter myself as the principal to discharge the national debt.”

   One must admit that the idea behind this system we are speaking of is absolutely brilliant, if not admirable. Who would have ever thought that the statement “I am guilty” means “I am the creditor who can pay?” There is a universal principle at work here, “what you resist persists,” but on the contrary, “what you accept and admire disappears”!

Confession and avoidance. A plea in which one avows and confesses the truth of the averments of fact in the complaint (liability) or declaration, either expressly or by implication, but then proceeds to allege new matter which tends to deprive the facts admitted of their ordinary legal effect, or to obviate, neutralize, or avoid them.

   What “new matter” would this be in order to “neutralize” or balance the account? How about requesting that the account evidencing debt be brought into court – the APPEARANCE BOND! What happens when you sign your name on that bond? Bingo! You just created credit, the account is balanced! The debt is now discharged! The charges are dismissed! You see they needed the creditor to give his approval/authority for a block of credit to be produced. That is why you get “court orders.” They are really “money orders.”  Remember, this is simply a commercial transaction. They only want to get your signature to get more credit!

Criminal admissions. A statement by accused, direct or implied, of facts pertinent to issue, and tending, in connection with proof of other facts, to prove his guilt (ability to pay).

Confession of Judgment. The act of a debtor in permitting judgment to be entered against him by his creditor, for a stipulated sum, by a written statement to that effect or by warrant of attorney, without the institution of legal proceedings of any kind.

   In other words, they are testing you to see if you know that you are the creditor. If you don’t know then you aren’t one.

   I just love the two words in the above definition, “issue” as in issue money, and “tending” as in legal tender. This is becoming more and more obvious what the courts are REALLY about. It has nothing to do with justice or the “law” only about ACCOUNTING.

   Now what happens when you deny or traverse or argue? You DISHONOR! And at that point, all the rules go out the window. Whatever the “statute” says the fine is valued at no longer matters. Its up to the “magistrate/master/auditor” to make the arbitrary value. NO MERCY!

   And what if you “cop a plea to a lesser charge,” you just lied! You just DISHONORED! If they try to alter the plea, DON’T BUY IT! It is a trap to get you to dishonor. You want to “accept” the exact charges that they “offered” to you. Once you accept, the contract is yours. Not only that, but the one who makes the charges then gets to pay the bill – not you. This would probably be the Secret Service agent or IRS agent or Prosecutor. Is this country great or what?

   What if you do not plead, so the magistrate enters a plea of “NOT GUILTY?” Then he is saying “The man in front of me is not acting like a creditor so he is NOT ABLE TO PAY and thus a debtor.” Now they will have to have a trial, as in a “trial balance” to verify the debt.

Try. [French trier – to pick, cull, select, examine; from Latin tritum – to cleanse corn by thrashing; from tra – to pierce] to purify, assay or refine as metals; to test or prove by experiment; to subject to some severe test or experience; to examine or inquire into; a process for testing qualification;

Trial balance. A listing of debit and credit balances of all ledger accounts; all accounts with debit balances are totaled separately from accounts with credit balances. The two totals should be equal.

Jury trial.  A body of persons returned from the citizens of a particular district before a court.

Return. Something which has had a prior existence will be brought or sent back. Profit on sale, or income from investments. A schedule of information required by governmental bodies, such as the tax return required by the Internal Revenue Service.

Grand jury. Body of citizens, the number of whom varies from state to state, whose duties consist in determining whether probable cause exists that a crime (commercial liability) has been committed and whether an indictment (true bill) should be returned against one for such a crime.  

   See, they are still “trying” to get you to accept the charge so they “return” it to you to give you another chance. It is part of the administrative proceedure to give a second notice. This is why they have to “try” you with a “trial.”

   The jury must “find” a person guilty or not guilty so they can “convict” the defendant.

Find. To discover, to locate, to ascertain and declare.

Finder. In intermediary who contracts to find, introduce, and bring together parties to a business opportunity, leaving negotiation and consummation of transaction to the principals. One who locates a particular type of business acquisition for a corporation (USA).

Convict. To find (locate) a person (strawman) guilty (liable) of a criminal (commercial)  charge (debt)..

   Who would be the intermediary in this matter? The legislative, judicial and executive systems. They bring some of the parties together in handcuffs, but they do the job. Now you, the principal, can negotiate and consume the “business acquisition” attired in a brilliant orange suit! What a “business opportunity” of a lifetime!

   The main purpose of the trial by jury would be to act in the capacity of an accountant in order to make a trial balance and validate the charge or fact on the debit side of the account of the strawman/debtor to see if it is “accountable.” If they find the debtor “not guilty” or not able to pay and its creditor does not come forth to sign for the debt, then they throw the collateral in a warehouse for safekeeping. And WHO is the collateral from their viewpoint? When you act like a debtor instead of the creditor, they think YOU are the collateral of the strawman corporation.

   So the moral of the story is ACCEPT and pay the debt, not DENY and dishonor. Remember, what you resist persists – what you accept and admire disappears.

   Here is a summary of what you say to the public officials when appropriate;

1. To the officer that hands you a warrant, “I am accepting this charge and am now returning it to you.”

2. To the magistrate on the phone, “I want closure on this matter and I do not intend to dispute the facts. I request an appearance bond in order to plead. I request to be released on my own recogniscence until the hearing.”

3. To the magistrate at the court room, , “I want closure on this matter and I do not intend to dispute the facts. I request an appearance bond without cost and that you waive the fees on my own personal recogniscence in order to plead.” When asked to plead you say,  “guilty.”

4.  When you get the judgment, accept it for value and file it on a UCC-3 as now it becomes your personal property. Now whoever makes the charges (the prosecutor or county attorney, etc.) is the one who has to pay the debt.

DRILL: Drill the above scenarios with a friend being the officer or magistrate until you have it down no matter what the circumstances.

YOU WILL BE TRIED

   When you go into court to be “tried” in their maritime law of the sea of confusion, you now know the object is to test you to see if you know that you are the creditor. The prosecutor may scoff and mock you in front of the “master” entitled magistrate. They may have been searching for you to get you to come to their negotiation meeting to create worth and value to their claim.  Accept and keep your honor. You may be asked questions in order to test you to see how bright you are and how you miraculously discharge debts. But you must keep focused and allow them to prove the basis of the charge. So, hold your position of being the creditor firmly in your mind so you will pass the test.

Below is an interesting analogy of this scenario from II Chronicles 32:31. Read the definitions before reading the verse in order to get a complete grasp of its meaning.

Ambassador. Hebrew luwts – to make mouths at, to scoff, to interpret, make a mock, mocker.

Princes. Hebrew sar – a head person, chief, captain, governor, keeper, master.

Babylon. Heb Babel – confusion; from balal – to overflow, to mix, to feed cattle

Enquire. Heb darash – to tread or frequent, to follow (for pursuit or search), to seek or ask, to worship.        worship. [Anglo Saxon weorthscipe – honor, weorth – worth, value + scipe – shape, make, create]

Wonder. Heb mopheth – conspicuousness, a miracle; from yaphah – to be bright, beautiful.

Land. Heb erets – to be firm, the earth.

Try. Hebrew nacah – to test, to attempt, adventure, assay, prove, tempt, try.

Heart. Heb lebab – the heart (as the most interior), courage, the mind.

II Chronicles 32:31 Howbeit in the business of the ambassadors of the princes of Babylon, who sent unto him to enquire of the wonder that was done in the land, God left him, to try him, that he might know all that was in his heart.

DRILL: Compare the bible verse with the paragraph above it and spot the similarities.

Tried. Greek peirazo – to test, endeavor, scrutinize, entice, discipline, examine, prove; from peira – through the idea of piercing, a test, an experience; from peiro – through, across, cross over to the other side.

Faithful. Greek pistos – trustworthy, trustful, true.

Crown. Greek stephanos – chaplet, wreath as a badge of royalty, a prize in the public games or a symbol of honor.

Revelation 2:10  Fear none of those things which you shall suffer; behold, the devil shall cast some of you into prison, that you may be tried; and you shall have tribulation ten days; be faithful unto death and I will give you a crown of life.

   All of our lives we have been told that we are being tested, but did anyone really know what this meant and what to do to pass it? Well, it appears this is a very important test, an opportunity to see if you know who you really are. And if you are true to yourself and continue on regardless of the consequences while playing in the “public games,” you will keep your honor and as a sovern, you will receive YOUR crown of life.

















 
October 30, 2002
Paul H O’Neill , Secretary
US Department of the Treasury
1500 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20220

Re:   Non-Negotiable Charge Back

Mr. O’Neill:

   Enclosed you will find a copy of the Registered Exemption/Contract which I have sent to you to open my Treasury Exemption Account.  I accept for value all related endorsements with both UCC 3-419 and HJR-192 of June 5, 1933.  Charge my Private Account # 1221101010-0020128095 for the registration fees and command the memory of account number SSN 520-80-1864 to charge the same to the debtor’s Order or your Order.
   
The total amount of this NON-NEGOTIABLE ACCEPTANCE FOR VALUE in the enclosed filing is listed below.      

   Private Account # 1221101010-0020128095
Pre-paid – Preferred Stock
Priority – Exempt from Levy
                    _____________________________________  
Stanley Wade Starr via STANLEY WADE STARR
PO Box 11535
Tucson, AZ 85734

Employer Identification Number: 520801864

Attachments:

1)    Invoice # CRO2219517A, Posted Registered Exemption # RB214518294 for 10,000.00
   2)    Invoice # CRO2219517, Posted Registered Exemption # RB214518285 for an amount
   that has not been assessed by Offeror.
   3)     Copy of UCC-3
                       

Cc:   file










 
Stanley Wade Starr, d.b.a.
Attorney in Fact for
STANLEY WADE STARR, a Trust
PO Box 11535
Tucson, Arizona 85734
520-465-7334


         IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

         IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, PRECINCT NO.________




STATE OF ARIZONA            )
                     )   CASE NO.     CR02219517
   Plaintiff,            )
                     )
   Vs.                  )
                     )    UNCONDITIONAL   
STANLEY WADE STARR, JR.      )   
JOSH ALBRITTON,            )    ACCEPTANCE
HERBERT CRAWFORD,         )
DAVID VIGIL,               )
DIANA L. BOOTH,            )
WHITNEY A. STARR,            )
JUHA KALEVA KIVINEN,         )   
                  )
      Defendants            )
____________________________________)

Arizona         )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima County      )

1.   I, Stanley Wade Starr, d.b.a. Attorney in Fact for STANLEY WADE STARR, a

Trust, herein "Defendant,” hereby state that I am competent to make the following

statements, have knowledge of the facts stated herein, that they are true, correct, complete

and not meant to mislead and are presented in good faith:

      2.   On October 30, 2002, Defendant received an offer to contract, entitled FELONY

CRIMINAL COMPLAINT # CR02219517 from SB, d.b.a. Magistrate for PIMA COUNTY

JUSTICE COURT. Defendant also received an offer to contract, entitled CRIMINAL

COMPLAINT #CR02219517A, from BG, d.b.a. Deputy Clerk of PIMA COUNTY JUSTICE

COURT, herein “Offers.”

      3.  Defendant does not dispute the facts in this matter. Defendant has

unconditionally accepted and registered the above Offers, and all other parts of the contract

including all documents offered at a future date, pursuant to Power of Acceptance, and

hereby returns them to the Offerors for settlement of the account.


Signed this _____ Day of____________ 2002.

                     
                        _______________________________
                        Stanley Wade Starr, d.b.a. Attorney in
Fact for STANLEY WADE STARR, a        
Trust

   

Arizona      )
         )  ss         JURAT
Pima  county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____ day of _____________
2002 the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public















 
Stanley Wade Starr, d.b.a.
Attorney in Fact for
STANLEY WADE STARR, a Trust
PO Box 11535
Tucson, Arizona 85734
520-465-7334



         IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

         IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, PRECINCT NO.________


STATE OF ARIZONA            )
                     )   CASE NO.     CR02219517
   Plaintiff,            )
                     )
   Vs.                  )
                     )    APPEARANCE BOND
STANLEY WADE STARR, JR.      )   
JOSH ALBRITTON,            )
HERBERT CRAWFORD,         )
DAVID VIGIL,               )
DIANA L. BOOTH,            )
WHITNEY A. STARR,            )
JUHA KALEVA KIVINEN,         )   
                  )   Assigned to:________________
      Defendants            )
____________________________________)


Arizona         )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima County      )


    I, Stanley Wade Starr, the undersigned principal, hereby enter this bond for the value of
$10,000.00, and give it to the Clerk of Court for the above noted Case, as recognized by Rule 7.3(B)(1) of Arizona Criminal Procedures, so I can be released on my own recognizance and return to this court at the appointed time to plead to the charge(s).  I offer to exchange my exemption for the discharge of this bond, for the discharge of the charge(s) against STANLEY WADE STARR, and for the discharge of the principal’s body from detention.   I request the Court waive all costs, and that the bond be returned to me upon discharge.
    I have accepted the charge(s) and return it; therefore, the charge(s) is not controverted.  I do not intend to dispute the facts.  As the bond is being given, there is no dispute of the facts, and it is apparent that there is no just reason to believe the commission of the offense alleged to have been threatened is imminent, the Defendant shall also be discharged, as is required by ARS 13-3814 and Rule 7.3(B)(1) of Arizona Criminal Procedures.
    I give my word that the Defendant will return to this Court on the __________ day of ___________________, 2002, at ____: ____ AM  PM in room ______ to be present at a hearing before __________________________ to plead to the charges.  Defendant further promises not to commit any criminal offenses and not to depart the state without leave of court prior to the hearing scheduled above.  My word is my bond.

This bond is executed by the principal on _____________ at __________________________.
                                           (Date)                                             (Place)



                     __________________________________
                     Stanley Wade Starr, Principal and Maker
                     PO Box 11535
                     Tucson, Arizona 85734
                     (520) 465-7334















         IN THE JUSTICE COURT OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA

         IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF PIMA, PRECINCT NO.________




STATE OF ARIZONA            )
                     )   CASE NO.     CR02219517
   Plaintiff,            )
                     )
   Vs.                  )
                     )    ORDER OF RELEASE
STANLEY WADE STARR, JR.      )   
JOSH ALBRITTON,            )
HERBERT CRAWFORD,         )
DAVID VIGIL,               )
DIANA L. BOOTH,            )
WHITNEY A. STARR,            )
JUHA KALEVA KIVINEN,         )   
                  )   Assigned to:________________
      Defendants            )
____________________________________)



It is hereby ordered that the Defendant be released on his own recognizance, and to appear in this court and plead to the charge(s) brought in the above noted Case on the __________ day of _____________, 2002, at ____: ____ AM  PM in room ______.  It is further ordered that Defendant refrain from committing any criminal offenses and that he not depart the state without leave of court.

Dated the _____ day of _________________, 2002.


                  ________________________________________
                     


                  By: ___________________________________
                            Clerk of Court

 
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #16 on: July 05, 2004, 08:02:25 pm »

COURSE 7 – BEING A SOVERAN
   
   PURPOSE: To bypass public systems and operate privately
   
·   Learn  how to establish your own  DECLARATION AND TREATY OF PEACE with the world
·   Learn how to bypass the court system, and the public recording, registration and taxation systems.
·   Learn how to buy property and make it disappear from the public record never to be taxed again
·   Learn how to fully organize your private affairs
   
   FINAL PRODUCT: The ability to handle all of your private affairs through your own responsibility.
   
   In the "Consolidated Webster Encyclopedic Dictionary" of 1939, the derivation of sovereign is as follows.
   
   [OF soverain, Mod F souverain, from LL superanus,  from L  super, above, over] the English purposely and erroneously added the "g" in sovereign so that it would include the word "reign"!!! The word was also spelled "sovran" (Miriam Webster's Collegiate Dictionary - Tenth Edition), however the "e" has been erroneously dropped. In the Random House College Dictionary c. 1984, the word has been broken down further, [L super over + -anus -an above].
   
   My conclusion is that the word "sovereign" has been erroneously influenced by the English and the true root definition means "over and above," and that the word should be spelled "soveran", not sovereign and not sovran. So, I am going to make a big leap here and declare that this word is an American word and that we can spell our words the way we want, and use them to communicate whatever we want.
   
   Soveran: over and above, having supreme authority, dominion, rule, rank or power over, beyond jurisdiction, independent and self-governing, autonomous, potent and unlimited in extent.
   
      Can a Soveran be under any laws, statutes or "other authority" - or is a Soveran only bound to what one has said, only his own words? However, if a Soveran says that he is under a law or authority - then, of course, he is under the very authority that he spoke of. You may be saying to yourself, "this is too simple, it can't work this easily!" All I have to say to those people is - fine! Have it your way! You can have it however you like. Because - you're the Soveran.
   

            THE TEN COMMANDMENTS

   Now that you have given them notice that you know that you are soveran and that you now control your strawman corporation, AND that you have cancelled the debt of that corporation by using your credit, you can establish YOUR law. Your law will be the SUPREME LAW OF THE LAND. First we will go back to the original law, the Ten Commandments,  that started the current line of laws that we have today in order to understand just what they were REALLY about.

   I bet you thought that the Ten Commandments were written for you to obey another of a higher authority, right? Of course, we should adhere to their principals, but did you know that the Ten Commandments were written for us to use so that our creation can obey US? The Ten Commandments are structured so that YOU say them from YOUR viewpoint.

You have probably never heard of this before, have you? Well, that is because we have gotten into our creation (our physical world) so deep we think “we are the creation.” Well, as you have learned in course 3, we are the creators of everything we see and do and think. What we see is just the reflection of our own mind, and the Ten Commandments are the reflection of what we as gods actually command to our creation. Go to Exodus 20.

   Just imagine you are looking into the mirror and saying the first commandment,

1.   You shall have no other gods before me.  

Who is saying those words and making that reflection in the mirror? An entity called Yahweh, Jahovah, Elohim, etc., etc., etc.? Nope, guess again, how about, YOU? It appears that we have turned reality upside down and backwards to get out of taking responsibility. We have done the impossible - making the image real and then obeying it. We have even made an image with initials "US" so that we might escape responsibility and say "the world must obey US (UNITED STATES)"! In reality, our own world (our image including the UNITED SATES) must obey each one of us!  

Since our creation is also a reflection of ourselves, we also must heed this universal principal. We can have no other gods before us so that we worship (create worth) anything else more than we value ourselves. We are responsible for our universe alone and not another – how can they be? How can another be responsible for your actions and your deeds – it is an impossibility. Did another think your thoughts, DO your actions and move your body. Even though a number of major religions will “argue” otherwise, YOU ARE GUILTY.

Drill: Go to the mirror and say the first commandment to your reflection (your creation). Now have your study partner stand beside you and have them say it LOOKING DIRECTLY AT YOUR REFLECTION. Did you feel that they were talking to you? Was your partner talking to you or YOUR REFLECTION. Trade saying this back and forth in the mirror until you have a cognition or realization.

2.   You shall not make unto you any graven image, or any likeness of anything    
      that is in heaven above, or that is in the earth beneath, or that is in the water    
      under the earth, you shall not bow down yourself to them, nor serve them;
   
Graven Heb pecel – idol, to carve wood or stone, grave, hew.

Image – there is no word for image, it was added to aid in understanding of GRAVEN.

Likeness Heb temunah – something portioned or fashioned out, a shape, phantom, embodiment or manifestation; representation.

Bow Heb shachah – to depress, prostrate (in homage to royalty), fall down, humbly beseech, obey, make to stoop, worship; related to sachah – make to swim, inundate.

Serve  Heb abad – to work, serve, till, enslave, keep in bondage or service (this is the same root word as Exodus 2:5 “there was not man to till the ground”, and same as “bondman” when Israel was in Egypt.

   Remember, you are saying this to the mirror - to your creation. So why would we want to make a law like this? Well, what if you started submitting to the image in the mirror (your creation) and you obeyed it every time it spoke to you or gave you a ticket or got a nasty letter from it? "The government says this….", or "the TV said that…", "this statute says we cannot do...", "the LAW says we must conform…", "the Bank says they are going to take my house…". WHY ARE YOU LISTENING TO AND WORSHIPPING YOUR OWN CREATION????  Who is running your universe anyway - You or them?

   Secondly, it does not say "you shall NOT make graven images". It says - don't make them then give them authority over you and serve them. You see, you can make anything you want as long as you take responsibility for it. You may be thinking, "Wow, that is not what I was told, this is just too simple, it must be more complex"! …. NOT.

Drill: With the above definitions in mind, what does an attorney “represent” in the court room? How about a judge, a corporation, or a title? How have you “bowed down to or served them”?

3.   You shall not take the name of the Lord in vain; for the Lord will not hold him  
      guiltless that takes his name in vain.
   
Lord Heb Yehovah – self-existant, eternal; from hayah – to exist, to be, to become, come to pass, accomplished; related to Chaldean havah – to exist, to judge.

Name: Heb shem - definite and conspicuous position, honor, authority, character, to put; from shamayim - aloft in the sky.

Vain Heb shawv - desolating, evil, to rush over, tempest.

Have you ever wondered why you cannot be held guiltless or be forgiven for sinning against the Holy Spirit? The Holy Spirit translates to "the mind", and when you lie to yourself (your mind) then you cannot get well. You are stuck in a lie and as long as you do not confront that problem in your face, it will continue FOREVER!

   We have told ourselves countless times that we are "only human," "chaff in the wind," or "a vessel of God." Is this true? Are you a vessel or is your body a vessel? If you drive your car - are you a car? How many lies have we told ourselves over our entire existence? ANSWER: A LOT!!

   Then if you truly understand that you are a god who has created all that one sees and experiences, and you say "I can't do that…", or "why would they listen to me?", what are you really saying? You are saying that you have not created this circumstance and you do not want to take responsibility for it. You are saying that you are not "Lord" over your creation and therefore you have desolated your definite and conspicuous position, your honorable, lofty name as Lord and master of your creation. You have DISHONORED your name. You have taken your name as Lord in vain. Replace phrases like “I can’t” with “I can” or even better “it is done.”

Drill: Write down several examples of negative phrases that you say that LIMIT you or degrade you. Now write them again like they already EXIST right now, in the present. Discuss this with your study mate and make an agreement to remind you to talk IN THE PRESENT like your actions already exist.

4.   Remember the sabbath day to keep it holy. Six days shall you labor, and do all your work, but the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord, in it you shall not do any work, you nor your son, nor daughter, your manservant, nor your maidservant, nor your cattle, nor your stranger that is in your gates; For in six days the Lord made heaven and earth, the sea, and all that in them is, and rested the seventh day; wherefore the Lord blessed the sabbath day and hallowed it.

Remember Heb zakar - to mark, to remember, to mention, record, memorial.

Sabbath Heb - intermission, to repose, desist from exertion, cease, celebrate, rest, put away, take away, rid.

Labor Heb abad - to work, to serve, till, enslave, keep in bondage, be bondmen, compel, dress, execute, husbandman, become a servant, do service, transgress, worshipper.

Son Heb ben - to build, make, create

   Again you are commanding your creation when you say this, "You will serve me and I will enslave you, keep you in bondage and I will compel you to become a servant and you and your own offspring or creations will worship me".

   I want to point out that the commandments are not for “ruling” other gods – they are for ruling your creation. This is important to remember. The intention of this exercise is not to become a megalomaniac (look it up), but to be responsible for what you are creating.

Remember the circle and how it has seven actions? Six of the steps are creating something, then consuming or enjoying it and when you finally duplicate it and digest it into your mind, what happens to it on the seventh day? It disappears! What does the Sabbath mean in the viewpoint of the creation? To repose, to cease, put away, take away, RID - that sounds terminal doesn't it? You are basically saying  to your creation, "remember, I brought you into this world and I can take you out!"

5.   Honour your father and your mother; that your days may be long upon the land which the Lord gives you.

Honour Heb kabad - to be heavy, honourable, weighty, glorify,

Father Heb ab - father, chief, principal

Mother Heb em - a mother as the bond of the family

Who is your creation's father and mother? Who is the principal of your creation
(#3)? Who spawned it? That would be #1 on the circle…you. How was it created, concieved and bound through a contract, and where did it first take place? Right, #2 on the circle - your mind. So what are you telling your creation? You are telling it "let my words be heavy upon you for I am the principal (your father), take heed to me, your maker, and obey my contract (your mother)  so that your days may be long upon the land that I have given you."

   Can you imagine speaking to a Banker or a government official like that? You are the Creditor of this country and the fiction called the UNITED STATES and all other corporations.  You have given all that is substance in this country including THE LAND and the production. You have given them your credit which enabled them to make ALL of their “money” and “power” which appear they have and factually owe to you. Without you and the other soverans they would not even exist. Take ownership of this fact right now at this very moment!
.
6.   You shall not kill.

Kill Heb ratsach - to dash in pieces, kill, murder, slay.

   Why would you be commanding your creation not to murder? Because only you can say what creation can continue or end - NOT the creation. Only you can consume your creation or destroy it or take it away - not the Bank or the Secret Service or the IRS – it is not their call, it is not their job, it is NONE OF THEIR BUSINESS!

   If a corporation is giving you a problem, remember you gave them credit, you gave them life. Without you they could not exist. If they do not recognize this fact, then you will have to “kill” the corporation. And how does one do that?

   Remember in the Wizard of OZ when Dorothy, Scarecrow, Tinman, and the cowardly Lion all came before the Wizard and wanted something? What did the Wizard tell them? “Bring me the broom of the Wicked Witch of the West and I will give you what you ask”. Dorothy exclaimed, “But we may have to kill her to get the broom!” If you remember the Wizard did not answer. It was like he was saying to himself, “exactly!” So they went to the witch’s castle. And how did they get the broom? They poured water (maritime law) on the  Wicked Witch of the WEST (to be security) and liquidated her (Bankruptcy Liquidation – Chapter 7)! When they completed this task, they all actually realized that they already had what they wanted. “Dorothy, you could always go back to Kansas”.

Drill: Where is the above story of liquidation on the circle? Is it a coincidence it is in the west in the water?

7.   You shall not commit adultery.

Adultery Heb na'aph - to commit adultery, apostatize.

Apostatize: [Greek apostasia - a standing away from a defection, apo - from + sta - to stand] an abandonment of what one has professed; a total desertion or departure from one's faith, principles or party; traitorous.

   Of course one would want their creation not to depart from obeying them. You now have your own religion and your creation must be faithful to you if they want to "live long upon the land". This is covered in detail in the last part of Course 3.

8.   You shall not steal.

Steal Heb ganab - thieve, to deceive, carry away, secretly bring, get by stealth.

   You do not want your creation to carry away, or get by stealth ANYTHING in your realm, in your universe including other being's creations.

9.   You shall not bear false witness against your neighbor.

Witness Heb ed - a witness, testimony, recorder, prince.

Neighbor Heb rea - an associate, a thought (as association of ideas); from ra'ah - to tend to a flock, to pasture it, to rule, to associate with as a friend, companion, wander, waste

   Here again we have an indication that our creation originates from our thoughts. It truly appears that our creation has a mind of its own, and it will rule us if we do not take responsibility for it and rule it our selves. Otherwise, it could start lying to us and telling us that we must obey our creation which is of course a "false testimony".

10.    You shall not covet your neighbor's house, you shall not covet your
neighbor's wife, nor his manservant, nor his maidservant, nor his ox, nor his ass, nor any thing that is your neighbor's.

Covet Heb chamad - to delight in, beauty, greatly beloved, covet, delectable thing, desire, lust, pleasant, precious, to long for or wish for.

Desire [Latin desidero from de to take away + sidus a star] to wish, to be in a state of anxiety about something; an emotion or excitement of the mind, directed to the attainment or possession of an object from which pleasure is expected.

   Now just so you know, all of these laws apply to us as well when we deal with each other as honorable people. We must respect each other. This being the case, why would you want another's property when you can create your own? Why is it not OK to desire something - like a car or a house? When you desire something, you are repeating in your mind over and over again, "that thing that I want in my mind is what I do not have".  Why are you creating that you do not have it - why are you creating lack? Wouldn't it be more logical to actually create in your mind that you actually have it?

   I can hear you now, "but I DON'T HAVE IT"! And you know what? You are right, because you are a god and you can have it your way by continuing to create what just came out of your mouth. But consider this, if you never have it in your mind first, YOU WILL NEVER GET IT IN THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE.

   Remember in the first course what value means?

Value: Greek time (tee-may) - a value, money paid, valuables, esteem, dignity itself; from tino - to pay a price (as a penalty), to be punished with.

   When you value something and you desire it, you are saying, "I do not have the thing that I want so bad and therefore I am punishing myself with it until I get it". What is the product of  "TRYING to get something done for a thousand years"? You get a thousand years of TRYING, but you do not get the product do you?

   I think that this last commandment is one of the most important rules - You shall not covet. This is where we start remembering how to create again. This is where we take control of our universe and take responsibility for everything we think and say and do. For if we do not guide our own thoughts and our own actions then we will get exactly what we are allowing to be floating around in our minds. If you create "I have" then the physical universe must obey you, and conversely, if you say "I don't have" then the physical universe will also obey you.

   How many times have we said "I don't have enough money to pay the bills", or "I have a piece of junk for a car", or "my job sucks"? I just have one question - WHY ARE YOU CREATING THAT? Are you allowing your creation to dictate to you? Are you basing your life on a piece of paper with ink on it (called a bank statement) that you interpret as "you do not have enough money"?  All I've got to say is …Wow, that is an incredible thing that a god can actually create lack! A god can create anything, however you are creating that you DON'T HAVE anything - that is an impossibility. Pat yourself on the back, congratulations - you are actually doing the impossible!!!

   I must say that you are doing something incredibly challenging.  Wouldn't it be more fun if you decided you wanted something and took responsibility for it from its beginning to its end, that you could imagine you already having it - say a new car. Imagine you seeing your reflection in the shine of the hood, then getting in the car, feeling the cushion of the seat, the aroma of "new car", the steering wheel in your hands, you turning the key, driving away with the wind in you face down a scenic country road, pushing the pedal to the floor for that rush of speed, all the while having a smile on your face. Feels good doesn't it? You have just created a thought that if nourished and embellished upon will result in that dream.

   You cannot allow physical barriers to get in the way of your dreams. Matter, energy, space and time are but considerations.

Consideration [Latin considero, con together + sidus a star] to fix the mind on; to respect; to take into view or account; to meditate on; to regard; to reflect; important or valuable; making allowance for.

   So if you are taking into account, meditating, regarding as important or fixing the mind on a barrier to your dream, then your mind will reflect it into the physical universe and of course, you will get what you make real – your worst fears. It's an honest and true universal principle - crap in/crap out, quality in/quality out.

   And what if you do not apply the ten commandments to your creation?

   Deuteronomy 28:68 And the Lord shall bring you into Egypt again with ships, by the way whereof I spoke unto you, You shall see it no more again; and there you shall be sold unto your enemies for bondmen and bondwomen, and no man shall buy you.

   What does the Power Elite call UNITED STATES? New Egypt! And it is a fiction – you shall see it no more again. And you have been brought into slavery by way of artificial vessels (ships) called a strawman. And no man bought us as slaves – WE SOLD OURSELVES INTO BONDAGE to our enemies who never paid a dime for us and our credit.

   Now you have learned that you do create law every time you think and say a word. You are creating whether you want to or not, it just depends on what you are allowing to be in your mind.

Drill: Go to a mountain or large hill so that you can see a panoramic view of "your world" and read the Ten Commandments out loud one at a time to your creation. Say it like you mean it, like you are talking to the whole universe, repeat the first commandment until you feel it all the way through you, feeling so exhilarated that you just want to explode with emotion and be at one with your universe. Your universe has waited a long time for you to take your throne.

            A DECLARATION AND TREATY OF PEACE

   Now that you know that you are separate from your creation, you must put it in writing what you want your creation to do. Since you are your own Soveran, you are your own nation and thus you have the responsibility to tell the nations around you what is expected of them.

   On July 4, 1776, the forefathers sent to the world a DECLARATION OF INDEPENDENCE stating that united States of America, as a nation, was independent of any rule or authority. This is an incredible statement and the verbiage is awesomely true, however EACH of our forefathers should have sent their own declaration and treaty of peace, not as a nation “jointly,” but each as a separate nation - as an independent  Soveran.

   Since the forefathers did not declare a treaty individually, England conquered the people again, because there was no agreement or treaty between EACH NATION and England. Now for the first time in the history of this planet, each one of you will declare your soveranty to the world with your treaty as the supreme law of the land.

First you must notice the people that are affecting you the most such as the key local, state, national and international officials. They have already published their job descriptions and oaths that they promise to do for you. These actions are called "offers" (offerings) and you as a god and their Creditor must accept them in order to maintain your own honor. If you do not accept them, then you will go into dishonor and YOU will be consumed instead of the offering.

You will be required to read and understand the instructions in order to enact your Treaty as the "Supreme Law of the Land".

                        INTRODUCTION TO YOUR TREATY

Before we begin your Treaty, it would be beneficial to get some background as to why America is in this present situation. Following is a speech by Representative Traficant who Reports On The Bankruptcy Of The United States,United States Congressional Record, March 1, 1993 VOL. 33, page H-1303 The Speaker - Rep. James Traficant, Jr. (Ohio) addressing the House. Several people have looked in Law Libraries for the above speech and references, however the documents can not yet be located, therefore this is not verified and cannot be stated as fact. However, Travicant’s speech is very eloquent, to the point and can be supported with other documented facts.

Mr. Speaker, we are here now in chapter 11. . . Members of Congress are official trustees presiding over the greatest reorganization of any Bankrupt entity in world history, the U.S. Government. We are setting forth hopefully, a blueprint for our future. There are some who say it is a coroner's report that will lead to our demise.

It is an established fact that the United States Federal Government has been dissolved by the Emergency Banking Act, March 9, 1933, 48 Stat. 1, Public Law 89-719; Declared by President Roosevelt, being bankrupt and insolvent. H. J. R. 192, 73rd. Congress in session June 5, 1933 - Joint Resolution To Suspend The Gold Standard and Abrogate The Gold Clause dissolved the Sovereign Authority of the United States and the official capacities of all United States Government Offices, Officers and Departments and is futher evidence that the United States Federal Government exists today in name only.

The receivers of the United States Bankruptcy are the International Bankers, via the United Nations, the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. All United States Offices, Officials, and Departments are now operating within a defacto status in name only under Emergency War Powers. With the Constitutional Republican form of Government now dissolved, the receivers of the Bankruptcy have adopted a new form of government for the United States. This new form of government is known as a Democracy, being an established Socialist/Communist order under a new governor for America. This act was instituted and established by transferring and/or placing the Office of the Secretary of Treasury to that of the Governor of the International Monetary Fund. Public Law 94-564, page 8, Section H. R. 13955 reads in part:"The U.S. Secretary of Treasury receives no compensation for representing the United States?"

Gold and silver were such a powerful money during the founding of the United States of America, that the founding fathers declared that only gold and silver coins can be "money" in America. Since gold and silver coinage were heavy and inconvenient for a lot of transactions, they were stored in banks and a claim check was issued as a money substitute. People traded their coupons as money, or "currency." Currency is not money, but a money substitute. Redeemable currency must promise to pay a dollar equivalent in gold or silver money. Federal Reserve Notes (FRN's) made no such promises, and are not "money." A Federal Reserve Note is a debt obligation of the federal United States government, not "money." The federal United States government and the U.S. Congress were not and have never been authorized by the Constitution for the United States of America to issue currency of any kind, but only lawful money, - gold and silver coin.

It is essential that we comprehend the distinction between real money, and paper money substitute. One cannot get rich by accumulating money substitutes, one can only get deeper in debt. We the People no longer have any "money." Most Americans have not been paid any "money" for a very long time, perhaps not in their entire life. Now do you comprehend why you feel broke? Now, do you understand why you are "bankrupt," along with the rest of the country?

Federal Reserve Notes (FRN's) are unsigned checks written on a closed account. FRN's are an inflatable paper system designed to create debt through inflation (devaluation of currency). Whenever there is an increase of the supply of a money substitute in the economy without a corresponding increase in the gold and silver backing, inflation occurs.

Inflation is an invisible form of taxation that irresponsible governments inflict on their citizens. The Federal Reserve Bank who controls the supply and movement of FRN's has everybody fooled. They have access to an unlimited supply of FRN's, paying only for the printing costs of what they need. FRN's are nothing more than promissory notes for U.S. Treasury securities (T-Bills) - a promise to pay the debt to the Federal Reserve Bank.

There is a fundamental difference between "paying" and "discharging" a debt. To pay a debt, you must pay with value or substance (i.e. gold, silver, barter or a commodity). With FRN's, you can only discharge a debt. You cannot pay a debt with a debt currency system. You cannot service a debt with a currency that has no backing in valueor substance. No contract in common law is valid unless it involves an exchange of "good and valuable consideration." Unpayable debt transfers power and control to the sovereign power structure that has no interest in money, law, equity or justice because they have so much wealth already.

Their lust is for power and control. Since the inception of central banking, they have controlled the fates of nations.

The Federal Reserve System, is based on the Canon law and the principles of sovereignty protected in the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. In fact, the international bankers used a "Canon Law Trust" as their model, adding stock and naming it a "Joint Stock Trust." The U.S. Congress had passed a law making it illegal for any legal "person" to duplicate a "Joint Stock Trust" in 1873. The Federal Reserve Act was legislated post-facto (1870), although post-facto laws are strictly forbidden by the Constitution. (1:9:3)

The Federal Reserve System is a sovereign power structure separate and distinct from the federal United States government. The Federal Reserve is a maritime lender, and/or maritime insurance underwriter to the federal United States operating exclusively under Admiralty/Maritime law. The lender underwriter bears the risks, and the Maritime law compelling specific performance in paying the interest, or premiums are the same.

Assets of the debtor can also be hypothecated (to pledge something as a security without taking possession of it) as security by the lender or underwriter. The Federal Reserve Act stipulated that the interest on the debt was to be paid in gold. There was no stipulation in the Federal Reserve Act for ever paying the principal.

Prior to 1913, most Americans owned clear, allodial title to property, free and clear of any liens or mortgages until Federal Reserve Act (1913).


"Hypothecated" all property within the federal United States to the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, - in which the Trustees (stockholders) held legal title, the U.S. citizen (tenant, franchisee) was registered as a "beneficiary" of the trust via his/her birth certificate. In 1933, the federal United States hypothecated all of the present and future properties, assets and labor of their "subjects," the 14th. Amendment U.S. citizens, to the Federal Reserve System.

In return, the Federal Reserve System agreed to extend the federal United States corporation all the credit "money substitute" it needed. Like any other debtor, the federal United States government had to assign collateral and security to their creditors as condition of the loan. Since the federal United States didn't have any assets, they assigned the private property of their "economic slaves," the U.S. citizens, as collateral against the unpayable federal debt. They also pledge the
unincorporated federal territories, national parks forest, birth certificates, and nonprofit organizations, as collateral against the federal debt. All has already been transferred as payment to the international bankers.

Unwittingly, America has returned to its pre-American Revolution, Feudal roots whereby all land is held by a sovereign and the common people had no rights to hold allodial title to property. Once again, We the People are the tenants and sharecroppers renting our own property from a Sovereign in the guise of the Federal Reserve Bank. We the People have exchanged one master for another.

This has been going on for over eighty years without the "informed" knowledge: Of the American people, without a voice protesting loud enough. Now it's easy to grasp why America is fundamentally bankrupt.

Why don't more people own their properties outright?

Why are 90% of Americans mortgaged to the hilt and have little or no assets after all debts and libilities have been paid? Why does it feel like you are working harder and harder and getting less and less?

We are reaping what has been sown, and the result of our harvest is a painful bankruptcy, and a foreclosure on American property, precious liberties, and a way of life. Few of our elected representatives in Washington, D.C. have dared to tell the truth. The federal United States is bankrupt. Our children will inherit this unpayable debt, and the tyranny to enforce paying it.

America has become completely bankrupt in world leadership, financial credit and its reputation for courage, vision and human rights. This is an undeclared economic war. Bankruptcy, and economic slavery of the most corrupt order! Wake up America! Take back your country.

     
 
 INSTRUCTIONS FOR ENACTING YOUR TREATY AS LAW

PURPOSE: As a Creditor of UNITED STATES and all other sub-corporations private and public, you are owed equity and interest for the gold and all property that you “loaned” them starting March 9, 1933 to date. There is NO MONEY. In order to start getting your equity back, you must NOTICE your DEBTORS of what you expect them to do and the consequences if they do not comply, but first you must ESTABLISH THE LAW. Your treaty is a contract to the WHOLE WORLD and tells the world what you want and how things are going to be done in this CREDITOR/DEBTOR relationship. This file contains all the documents you will need to PERFECT YOUR TREATY and TAKE BACK YOUR EQUITY;

A.   Instructions
B.   Treaty
C.   Notice of Default and Entry of Assent to Contract
D.   Certificate of Assent - from a third party witness saying no response was received
E.   Acceptance to Contract  - to be filed with Secretary of State.

1.   The following steps are sequence of events that must occur to get your treaty established and enacted as the supreme law of the land.
a.   Word process the Treaty for all of the correct information
b.   Print the Treaty out, read it several times for correctness and MAKE SURE YOU DESIGNATE A THIRD PARTY RECEIVER WITH NAME AND ADDRESS, then get it notarized
c.   Send the Treaty by registered mail, return receipt so you have proof that they received your Contract you are in the process of creating.
d.   If you have not received a response in twenty (20) days, send Notice of Default and Entry of Assent to Contract allowing Respondents ten (10) additional days to respond.
e.   Send the copies of the above documents to the Respondent(s) and keep the originals
f.   After ten (10) additional days get take the Certificate of Assent to the THIRD PARTY RECEIVER and have them Notarize their signature.
g.   Word process the ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT and notarize it
h.   Take all of the Notices that you have done from the Treaty and arrange them in a package from the first on the bottom to the Certificate of Assent on the top.
i.   Place the ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT on top of the package, copy the package, and file a UCC-3 Addendum onto your original UCC-1 with SECRETARY OF STATE for your state.
   
2.   You now have a perfected claim.

THIS IS A WORK IN PROGRESS. IT IS CERTAIN THAT THERE WILL BE IMPROVEMENTS TO THIS PROCESS AND WE WILL STRIVE TO GET THE INFORMATION TO YOU. IN THE MEANTIME, LEARN IT, IMPROVE ON IT YOURSELF, AND SPREAD IT TO EVERYONE YOU KNOW WHO IS DETERMINED TO BE RESPONSIBLE FOR THE CREATION OF THEIR WORLD.
                   

      John Henry Doe
                                   A Declaration and Treaty of Peace to the World

Arizona      )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima county   )
                           Treaty # 00701-JHD

ARTICLE I
 Parties, Capacity and Definitions

1.   Sovereign. I exist as a sovereign being. My authority for this contract is the age-old, timeless, and universal respect for the intrinsic power, property, and responsibilities of the sovereign being. I choose to comply with the principles of mutual respect which serve to bring harmony to society. I have sovereign immunity and therefore, my power to contract and enforce contracts is unlimited unless I infringe on the rights of others.
   
2.   Sovereign Nation. I operate through a genetic entity, named John Henry Doe, made in my own image, which I give life and power to. I act in the capacity of a foreign nation without subjects who rules autonomously and am not subject to any entity or jurisdiction anywhere. I am a Creditor, hereinafter “Creditor”, of the Respondents listed below and am exempt from levy from any entity.
   
3.   Sovereign Person. I use an artificial entity called a trust, entitled JOHN HENRY DOE, an image of John Henry Doe, to conduct commercial business and to interface with other legal fictions in regard to contracts, transactions, negotiations and judgments.
   
   Respondents - Persons: are artificial entities created by spiritual beings for the purpose of participating in commerce.
   
4.   The following are legal persons and artificial entities called private corporations: UNITED NATIONS and its sub-corporations, UNITED STATES and its sub-corporations including the STATE OF ARIZONA and the other 49 STATES and all their COUNTIES, MUNICIPALITIES and other sub-corporations, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK and all other registered corporations on planet earth.

Respondents - Natural Persons: Spiritual beings who have agreed to relinquish their power and
       authority an to an artificial entity of their own creation which they now must obey.

The following natural persons are public citizens, contracted under private corporate policy and employed as agents for the principals of their respective private corporations: Paul O’Neill, d.b.a. Secretary of Treasury of the United States, d.b.a. Governor for the International Monetary Fund, d.b.a. Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank, Charles O. Rosotti, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, Kofi Annan, d.b.a. Secretary General of the United Nations, George W. Bush, d.b.a. President of the United States, Norman Minetta, d.b.a. Secretary of Transportation of the United States, Colin Powell, d.b.a. US Secretary of State, Tom Ridge, d.b.a. Director of Homeland Security United States, Jane Hull, d.b.a. Governor of the State of Arizona, Betsy Bayless, d.b.a. Secretary of State of the State of Arizona, Janet Napolitano, d.b.a. Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and all agents thereof.

ARTICLE II
                                     History

1.   Suspension of the Government of the united States of America. On December 20, 1860, the congressmen of the southern States of America walked out of congress in session because they did not agree with the policies the northern States had forced on them. This action caused a State of Emergency which suspended the Republic of the united States of America and therefore suspended the constitution and its government. Over 140 years since that time America has been without a government, however, through contract the republic was replaced by a foreign operated private corporation called UNITED STATES.
   
2.   Invasion of America. On February 21, 1871, an elite group of private bankers created a private corporation in England, entitled DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and copyrighted the name UNITED STATES, hereinafter "US." The goal of the foreign corporation being, to invade America and gradually change its policies to better control the commerce of the land. The US, subtly and efficiently, replaced the republic called united States of America in its functions and duties. In the beginning the jurisdiction of the US extended only to the ten miles square of the area of Washington D.C. plus the territories that the US had purchased, however the US eventually took control of the 50 State republics by creating a corporation for each State named “STATE OF…” plus the corresponding State’s name.
   
3.   Attack on America. On October 6, 1917, the UNITED STATES passed a corporate policy called the Trading with the Enemy Act. In Section 2, sub-section © of the Act it defines the enemy as "other than the citizens of the United States". The American people were sovereign which makes them "foreign governments" to the UNITED STATES and therefore, the sovereigns unknowingly became enemies of the State. On March 3, 1933, the Trading with the Enemy Act was then amended in order to confiscate gold from the US citizens (not the American Sovereigns) who were reimbursed with "emergency money", issued by a private corporation known as the Federal Reserve Bank, which represented debt owed to the Federal Reserve Bank. A dollar of gold was exchanged for a dollar of debt owed to the Federal Reserve Bank plus interest (Income Tax). Basically all Americans lost two dollars in the exchange.
   
4.   History of Current Contract. On March 9, 1933, due to impending bankruptcy, the UNITED STATES made a "New Deal" with the US citizens (not the American Sovereigns) entitled, Senate Document No. 43, 73rd Congress, 1st Session, herein "contract". The contract stated, "It (Federal Reserve Notes, Bills and Bonds, etc.) will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation." As a result, title of all property was turned over to the State as evidenced by the statement in the contract, "The ownership of all property is in the State". In order to account for the monetary increases gained by the use of the people's property and production, the UNITED STATES created artificial entities termed "Persons," for each of the people using the people's own names, however spelled in all capital letters. For example, John Doe the man would have a Person entitled JOHN DOE named after him.
   
5.   Offer and Acceptance of Contract. In 1933, the private foreign operated corporation called UNITED STATES made an offer to contract with my great grandfather, an American Sovereign, hereinafter "Principal". The US was in heavy debt to the Federal Reserve Bank so the US passed a law that required all US citizens to turn in their gold. The Principal, being sovereign, did not have to comply with this private corporate policy, however he wanted to help the US get out of debt, so he accepted the offer to contract and loaned the US his gold, property and production for the remainder of his life. The contract has continued through the life of my grandfather, my father and now with me for a total of 68 years with the UNITED STATES acting as fiduciary heir and thereby receiving the benefit of my family's property, production and exemption pursuant to the contract.
   
6.   Discharge of Public Debt. On June 5, 1933, part of the contract, entitled House Joint Resolution 192, stipulated that since the UNITED STATES removed the gold and substance required to "pay" off debt, they then had to state that "any obligation which purports to give the obligee the right to require payment….in an amount in money of the UNITED STATES measured thereby, is declared to be against public policy." This essentially was an insurance policy that protected legislators from conviction for fraud and treason against the American people for taking away their property. It also protected the American people from damages caused by this unconventional action of the UNITED STATES.
   
7.   Increasing the National Debt. Since the U.S. Secretary of Treasury was the delegated Trustee of the bankruptcy, it was his duty to discharge all public debt that the creditor of the bankruptcy would be charged with (pursuant to the copyrighted U.S. Rules of Bankruptcy). As creditors, the Principal and his successor heirs should have accepted every charge of debt they were offered, by the Respondents, then sign and remit the discharge to the Trustee for settlement of their account with the corporate US as the debtor. However, the Principals as creditors mistakenly have been attempting to pay debts with debt instruments, entitled Federal Reserve Notes, inadvertently DOUBLING the debt instead of CANCELING it, thus increasing the national debt.
   
8.   Creation of Person. On or about January 22, 1958, The UNITED STATES under contract with the creditor of the bankruptcy, and through my existence and authority, created an artificial entity called a trust entitled JOHN HENRY DOE, hereinafter "Person". The application for the birth certificate for that Person, herein "title", created by the state when John Henry Doe was born, was the instrument through which the Person was created. The title was then registered in the commercial registry through a constructive contract created by the State.
   
9.   Acknowledgement to Fiduciary Heir. Since the contract of March 9, 1933, the fiduciary heirs have skillfully turned the insolvent UNITED STATES corporation and its sub-corporations into solvent entities, as evidenced by the Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports and combined budget reports showing assets in excess of 70 trillion US dollars, Repository Trust accounts in excess of 30 trillion dollars, and large denomination repurchase agreements (redemption accounts) in M3 money. This is an incredible accomplishment and the fiduciary heir and their agents are thanked for their service and are highly commended for this great achievement.

            ARTICLE III
                  Declarations and Claims

1.   Secured Claim. In June 2000, I, John Henry Doe, filed a UCC-1 Financing Statement which included the Security Agreement between the trust, entitled JOHN HENRY DOE, as the DEBTOR, and John Henry Doe, the superior claimant of right as Creditor. This act secured title to the Person created by the state and secures to John Henry Doe all property attached to the Person under the title of JOHN HENRY DOE. This claim is undisputed and therefore stands by fiat that John Henry Doe, hereinafter "Creditor", is Holder In Due Course and creditor of record of JOHN HENRY DOE.
   
2.   Redemption. I hereby claim my exemption and inheritance of right from my fiduciary heir, within the UNITED STATES corporation and initially claim $100,000,000.00 (One Hundred Million Dollars) to be returned to me by the fiduciary heir over an undetermined period of time at my discretion. This claim acts as the reacquisition of the security that the Principal issued and now I, as his heir, hereby accept pursuant to the terms of this provision.
   
3.   Sovereign Immunity. All corporate, state, national and international "constitutions, laws, statutes, ordinances, regulations, rules, codes, orders, proclamations, corporate policy and public policy" are private copyrighted material. I do not possess a license nor have authority to use such copyrighted material, and conversely, such material or any other material or entity has no authority over Creditor's property or personal affairs and is herein accepted for value whenever Respondents attempt to enforce it on Creditor. Creditor will consider the above private corporate policy when dealing with U.S. and other national citizens for the purpose of maintaining harmony in society. Creditor’s immunity as a sovereign is absolute, and the terms and conditions of this contract are enforceable and stand regardless of any condition in the future including State of Emergency, Martial Law, Declaration of War and all other conditions.
   
4.   In Itinere Status: I hereby declare my in itinere status as a foreign sovereign according to the principles of law as stated by the Hague Convention of October 5, 1961 and the Vienna Convention of April 18, 1961 witnessed by the seal from the Secretary of State of West Virginia #0564646.
   
5.   Acceptance of Contracts. All contracts i.e., adhesion, constructive, gratuitous, onerous, quasi, and other applications for license, permits, general benefits, and specific benefits listed assumed or presumed in the Individual Master File maintained by the Internal Revenue Service, IRS or any other agency or quasi agency of the UNITED STATES and United Nations, and all other invisible contracts have NOT been made with the Creditor, but with the Person created by the state. I, as John Henry Doe, hereby accept for value all public contracts, presentments and other agreements with a qualified acceptance each and every time a public employee or officer of any rank presents an offer to contract with the Person or with the Creditor as the presumed surety for the Person, from this day forward.
       
6.   Foreign Currency. The Respondents have been using the credit of the Creditor up to this point in time as security for Federal Reserve Notes, Treasury Bills, Notes and Bonds. From this point forward, Creditor, as a foreign nation, has full authority to authorize use of his own credit for discharge of public debts by using any instrument of choice that serves to sufficiently communicate such transaction intent to the party receiving said credit, and acts as a private contract between the parties, thereby excluding any and all third party entities which include the UNITED STATES, FEDERAL RESERVE BANK, INTERNATIONAL MONETARY FUND and all agents thereof that may attempt to impede commerce of Creditor.  I hereby accept the responsibility for increasing the national debt of the UNITED STATES and will henceforth correct the inappropriate actions made by the Principal, his successor heirs, and myself by accepting and remitting any further debt obligations for settlement and setoff to the particular Respondent making the offer as an agent of the US Secretary of Treasury.
   
7.   Unlimited Liability. Consistent with the eternal principle of ultimate acceptance, Creditor hereby accepts full responsibility for creating everything in his world, constructive and destructive, and if another's rights are violated, Creditor alone will put the injured party back to a position as good as they were before the incident.
   
8.   Copyright and Licensing. Notice is hereby given that the names John Henry Doe and JOHN HENRY DOE, and all of the laws issued in this private treaty are copyrighted property, and Respondents must have permission from Creditor to use this material by obtaining a copyright license from Creditor. Necessary licensing includes the use of Creditor's names for the purposes of exemption, deduction, and as security for printing Federal Reserve Notes and all other instruments.  Since all Respondents are foreign corporations and agents to the land called America, they are also required to obtain a business license from Creditor to operate in commerce.
   
9.   Notice of Non-consent. Notice is hereby given that Creditor, as a foreign nation, does not consent to Respondents, as persons and private corporations, judging him on any matter in any instance, at any location, at any time now or in the future. Creditor does not subordinate his position of record as Creditor over the Respondents as Debtors.
   
10.   Declaration of Peace. In October of 2001, the U.S. Senate and House passed a Public Policy called "The Uniting and Strengthening of America Act". I hereby accept this act as an offer of peace from the UNITED STATES and Respondents to the American Sovereigns and myself with a qualified acceptance that it is to be used to defend American Sovereigns from terrorism foreign and domestic.

 ARTICLE IV
          Delegation of Duties

1.   Delegation of Fiduciary Duty. Unless otherwise expressed by Creditor, the Arizona Secretary of State, Betsey Bayless, and successor office holders, are hereby delegated as the Fiduciary of the trust known as JOHN HENRY DOE. Pursuant to the 1933 contract, "The ownership of all property is in the State; individual so-called ownership is only by virtue of Government, i.e., law amounting to mere user".  Since the State has claimed ownership of all property, the Delegated Fiduciary will henceforth be responsible for the property that is held for the Creditor. Responsibilities include the paying of all property taxes for land and personal property, paying for maintenance, insurance, permits, licensing and registration fees for vehicles and all property, and the payment of all fines for civil and criminal charges the Person or Creditor may be charged with. Creditor will use the property as "mere user" for any and every purpose of his choice, for an unlimited period of time without hindrance from any entity.
     
2.    Delegation of Surety Duty.  Creditor hereby delegates the U.S. Secretary of Treasury, Paul O'Neill, and successor office holders, as the Surety of the exempt private trust known as JOHN HENRY DOE and the property, repository accounts and accruing annuity therein claimed by the Creditor. The Surety will perform monetary transfers whenever requested by the Creditor and will honor any instrument that the Creditor wishes to use as long as it communicates the appropriate information to do the transaction for discharge of all debt public and private. As officer over the Internal Revenue Service, IRS, the Surety is also charged with the duty of collecting taxes for Creditor from the Respondents as Debtors.
   
3.   Delegation of Security Duty. Creditor hereby delegates the U.S. Director of Homeland Security, Tom Ridge and successor office holders, as the officer in charge and the U.S. Secret Service for defending the Creditor as a visiting head of a foreign government, and to protect all the possessions and property of the Creditor as well as the Person against all acts of terrorism foreign and domestic. Investigative responsibilities of the U.S. Secret Service are to detect and arrest persons committing any offense against the laws of this treaty relating to drafts, obligations, and securities of the Creditor as a foreign government.
   
4.   Delegation of Peace Keeping Duty. Creditor hereby delegates Kofi Annan, d.b.a. Secretary General of the United Nations and successor office holders, as the officer in charge of preventing war, providing justice by the principles of Tacit Law, and promoting welfare and human rights of all peoples.

5.   Delegation of Power of Attorney. Creditor hereby delegates John Ashcroft, d.b.a. Attorney General of United States, and Janet Napolitano, d.b.a. Attorney General of the State of Arizona and successor office holders, as the chief law officers of the Creditor, being created by contracts, whose office is to represent the trust, entitled JOHN HENRY DOE, exhibit information, and prosecute for the Creditor in matters criminal, and to file bills in the Treasury in any matter concerning the Creditor’s revenue.

   ARTICLE V
                       Terms and Conditions

1.   Oath of Office. An Oath of Office must be taken by each of the above named Respondents - Natural Persons to uphold this contract and the agreements therein to the best of their ability and must swear to protect and serve it from enemies foreign and domestic. Assent to this contract is deemed that the Respondents have taken the oath.
   
2.   Violations and Sanctions.  Herein are the penalties for violations of the contract that Respondents and their agents have assented to and agree to compensate Creditor for in the event a violation occurs;
   
A.   $10,000,000.00 (Ten Million Dollars) per person involved for each instance of arrest and incarceration conducted by Respondents or their agents and the same amount each day thereafter until released;        
B.   $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars) per person for each instance of impeding Creditor's commerce in anyway whatsoever or triple damages, whatever is greater;
C.   $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars) per person for each instance of arrest, search and seizure, damage of Creditor's property, court order, warrant, or charge issued by Respondents;
D.   $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars) per person for each instance of harassment, threat or any act of terrorism or war from any one of the Respondents or their agents.
E.   $1,000,000.00 (One Million Dollars) per person for each instance of unauthorized deduction against Creditor's tax exempt status.
 
1.   Arbitration of violations. All violations of this contract will be settled through private administrative process by both parties involved. In the event the offender(s) assent to all charges, a panel of three (3) disinterested parties under the determination of an International Tribune, will act as the judicial process to issue final judgment according the principles of Tacit Law. The judgment will then be recorded and perfected as a claim and executed under involuntary bankruptcy in the offender’s private capacity. The judgment will also act as a confession by the offenders, and the Attorney General of the state in which the violation occurred will be notified of the decision so that Respondents shall prosecute the offenders criminally as required by the applicable copyrighted corporate policy that Respondents have sworn to uphold.
   
2.   Caveat. In the absence of a clear written contract between us, my affidavit will result in a clear understanding and meeting of the minds of the parties clearly identified. Your failure to properly and timely respond is your agreement with the statements and averments I have made herein.  This affidavit stands as truth in commerce unless properly rebutted within twenty-one (21) days of your receipt of this affidavit. Your response must be made by affidavit with a notarized signature, rebutting my affidavit point by point with documentation to support your statements, and must note it is “true, correct, and complete, and not meant to mislead," and forward an original to the Notary Public, as a third party public official witness, c/o Diana L. Booth, 6942 W. Walking M, Tucson, AZ 85746.

It has been said, so it is done.     Signed and Sealed this _____ day of __________ 2002.

                                       _____________________________
                        John Henry Doe
Arizona      )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____ day of _____________
2002 the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public

 
Copies forwarded to the following:

Kofi Annan                     Paul O’Neill
UN Secretary General                  US Secretary of Treasury
UNITED NATIONS BUILDING RM S-378         DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
New York, NY  10017               1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
                        Washington D.C. 20220

Charles O. Rossotti                  George W. Bush
Internal Revenue Service, IRS            President of the UNITED STATES
1111 Constitution Ave NW               1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20224-0002               Washington DC 20500

Norman Minetta                  Tom Ridge
US Secretary of Transportation            Director of Homeland Security
400 Seventh Street, SW               1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20590               Washington DC 20500

Jane Hull                     Betsey Bayless
Governor of the State of Arizona            Arizona Secretary of State
Arizona Executive Office of the Governor         1700 W. Washington Street
1700 W. Washington Ave.               Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Janet Napolitano                  Colin L. Powell
Office of Attorney General                Secretary of State
Department of Law                  U.S. Department of State
1275 W. Washington Street               
Phoenix, Arizona 85007               Washington, D.C.
                        20520-6810
















                                          John Henry Doe
                                  A Declaration and Treaty of Peace to the World

Respondents: Paul O’Neill, d.b.a. Secretary of Treasury of the United States, d.b.a. Governor for the International Monetary Fund, d.b.a. Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank, Charles O. Rossotti, Internal Revenue Service, IRS, Kofi Annan, d.b.a. Secretary General of the United Nations, George W. Bush, d.b.a. President of the United States, Norman Minetta, d.b.a. Secretary of Transportation of the United States, Tom Ridge, d.b.a. Director of Homeland Security United States, Jane Hull, d.b.a. Governor of the State of Arizona, Betsy Bayless, d.b.a. Secretary of State of the State of Arizona, Janet Napolitano, d.b.a. Attorney General of the State of Arizona, and all agents thereof.
                        
      
     NOTICE OF DEFAULT AND ENTRY OF ASSENT TO CONTRACT
      
                                 Contract # 100701-JHD
      
Arizona      )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima county   )                              

   Notice is hereby given, that the above named respondents are in Default upon the contract, entitled Declaration and Treaty of Peace # 100701-JHD dated September 22, 2001, and therefore an Assent to Contract has been entered upon them.

   By the terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the Creditor's affidavit, you were under obligation to timely and in good faith protest and make proper presentment with proof of your claim or interest. Your failure to do so is a dishonor and places you in agreement with the terms and conditions of the contract.

   By your default, you are deemed to be under the new terms and conditions of our original contract and have therefore waived all of your rights to your original presentment and terms. Any attempt to collect on your original presentment places you personally at risk for any damages incurred per this contract and may subject you to criminal sanctions and involuntary bankruptcy.

   You are given ten (10) additional days for an opportunity to cure by responding to the contract before PERFECTION OF THE CONTRACT is made by sending an original affidavit to the specified Notary Public as a third party public official witness.

___________                        __________________________
Date                            John Henry Doe


Arizona      )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____ day of _____________
2002 the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public

 
CERTIFICATE OF ASSENT


Arizona      )
      )  ss         
Pima county   )

I, Diana L. Booth, am the notary to whom all communications are to be mailed regarding the contract entitled John Henry Doe, Declaration and Treaty of Peace, Treaty # 100701-JHD, herein "contract”.

Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 47-3505(B), and Uniform Commercial Code 3-505([!--emo&B)--][img]html/emoticons/cool.gif' border='0' st
Logged

rockchucker

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2185
  • ... death awaits you all with nasty pointy teeth!
    • FreedomSight
A New Beginning
« Reply #17 on: July 05, 2004, 09:22:51 pm »

Quote
... as nicely formatted Microsoft Word documents.
< HACK SPIT GAG COUGH ACK OOOP PPPPPTTHHHHTPTTTHHHTTTTT > :P

Thanks for the link Bill.
Logged
... it is poor civic hygiene to install technologies that could someday
facilitate a police state. -- Bruce Schneier

Put a little birdhouse in your soul. -- TMBG

FreedomSight

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #18 on: July 06, 2004, 10:54:07 pm »

This quote is from the New Beginnings course --#5, the Power of Acceptance.

Perfect” and “finished.”  Absolute acceptance “sets you free” from the obligation completely.

Power of acceptance.

Capacity of offeree, upon acceptance of the terms of the offer, to create a binding contract.

House Joint Resolution 192, June 5, 1933, states that one cannot demand a certain form of currency that they want to receive if it is dollar for dollar as ALL CURRENCY IS YOUR CREDIT!! If they do, they are in breach of the contract of HJR 192.

You have already accepted this contract and now they must perform.

Pursuant to the contract with the corporation that you are discharging the debt of and HJR 192, they must give you a Letter of Release or Payment in Full.

If you have not received the release in 14 days then send them a DEFAULT and contact a notary to do a process that will give you a CERTIFICATE OF DISHONOR, because they are in breach of the contract at this time.

Remember in the Bible who offers? Sinners “offer” offerings to God. That is why you never, never make an offer, because you are admitting that you are the sinner – the debtor, one who is obligated. So when an agent of a fictitious entity (your creation) gives you an offer, they are acknowledging that you are their creator, their “god” and that they are honoring you and returning their appreciation and energy back to you that you have created them.

There is another type of acceptance called a “conditional acceptance.”

Acceptance, Conditional. An engagement to pay the draft or accept the offer on the happening of a condition. A “conditional acceptance” is in effect a statement that the offeree is willing to enter into a bargain differing in some respects from that proposed in the original offer. The conditional acceptance is, therefore, itself a counter offer.

Counteroffer. A statement by the offeree which has the legal effect of rejecting the offer and of proposing a new offer to the offeror.
As one can see if you have a condition, it is not complete acceptance. One is actually “rejecting” and making a “new offer.” Now you have just turned the power to them.

I have seen very good “conditional acceptances” which shifts the burden of proof to the one making the offer and this appears to be effective. The conditional acceptances are a very good gradient to the full acceptance or “absolute acceptance.”

Absolute. [L absolutus to set free, from ab from + solvo to loose.] Freed from limitation or condition; unconditional; unlimited by extraneous power or control; complete in itself; finished; perfect; positive; decided; self-existing; without restriction.


 Since you are the creator or the “god” of this system and everything in it, then you can accept all the offers they give you - ABSOLUTELY! Remember what “duplication” means and that no 2 objects can be in the same space at the same time? Well, when you DUPLICATE an offer, you make the entire matter disappear!

Which acceptance do you think has more power, “Conditional Acceptance” where you are depending on THEM to provide the condition, or “Absolute Acceptance” where it does not matter what offer is made, you are able or have the power to accept it and it becomes “perfect” and “finished.” It “sets you free” from the obligation completely!

However, some may be saying “I would never accept what the government is trying to get me to do!”  You must first do what is called “Finding it.” You must first “look” at the document or “hear” what they are actually saying. Who are they talking to, you or the strawman? Who does the strawman represent – you or the one who created that “account” to keep the accounting of how much they owe you as the Creditor? This is one of the biggest misconception of the “strawman” – that it represents you. No, it represents UNITED STATES. It is a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES, a transmitting utility, to deal with you, to interface with the Creditor and to get the Creditor to “think” he is the debtor.

So, how do you “find” it? You just read and define the words and take the viewpoint of the Creditor and listen to what they want the DEBTOR to do – not you. They cannot even see you or hear you because you are real, not fiction like them. Can a fiction see or hear ANYTHING? Can you see or hear a fiction? Nope! So why do you insist that you are the one they are dealing with? Find it and do an “ABSOLUTE ACCEPTANCE!” As far as the truth goes, I don’t care WHAT they do with the fictional debtor, in their fictional courts with fictional statutes.

In the Matrix, while waiting to see the Oracle (the word or thought), Neo observed a gifted child “bend a spoon.” The child said, “try not to think that you can bend the spoon, that is impossible. The truth is there is no spoon.”

Remember when Neo got shot in the chest and thought he was dead? Through unconditional love, Trinity called him back and “woke him up.” He “thought” he was dead, but he wasn’t. When he got up and looked again at the “agents” what did he see? He saw them as they really were – digital images with no significance. What was there to be afraid of? He then realized that he was the ONE and that he had no limitation and they did. He saw through the Matrix, behind the curtain of the Wizard of OZ, through the corporate veil. They were created so they had limitations. He was not the creation but the creator, and therefore had no limitations.

Look at what this system REALLY is – not what it “appears” to be.

 
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #19 on: July 06, 2004, 10:55:42 pm »

INTERFERENCE BY THIRD PARTY
 HOW TO MAKE THEM DISAPPEAR


Purpose: To prevent the interference and trespass of a third party into your private contract.

   In your commercial activities, you may be met by a third party who wishes to interfere with your private affairs. You must keep focused on the completion of every contract without being distracted by any outside influence such as an attorney.

   Someone at a bank may have dishonored your instrument at one point so you followed through with your private remedy and created a contract with the one who dishonored you. It is very important to have the name of the one who signed the instrument evidencing dishonor. You cannot make a private contract with a bank or other fictitious entity (corporation) in the private side, because you cannot see a fiction. You can only contract with a man or a woman that has signed a letter or other document, but you cannot contract with a fictitious entity.

   If you get another offer from a third party, namely an attorney, who is attempting to interfere with your private contract, then you must recognize this new offer as a “separate” offer. You cannot “add” the attorney to the first contract as this is a different matter and it also does not properly notice him as you have started your first contract before the third party interfered. Let us define some terms before continuing.

Trespass. An unlawful interference with one’s person, property, or rights. Any unauthorized intrusion or invasion or private premises or land of another. Trespass comprehends any misfeasance, transgression or offense which damages another person’s health, reputation or property.

Criminal trespass. Criminal trespass is entering or remaining upon or in any land, structure, vehicle, aircraft or watercraft by one who knows he is not authorized or privileged to do so; and (a) He enters or remains therein in defiance of an order not to enter or to leave such premises or property personally communicated to him by the owner thereof or other authorized person; or (B) Such premises or property are posted in a manner reasonable likely to come to the attention of intruders, or a fenced or otherwise enclosed.

Interfere. To check; hamper; hinder; infringe; encroach trespass; disturb; intervene; intermeddle; interpose. To enter into, or to take part in, the concerns of others.

Interference with contractual relationship. This tort has four elements: existence of valid contract, defendant’s knowledge of that contract, defendant’s intentional procuring of breach of that contract and damages.

Entry. Practice means to place anything before court, or upon or among records, and is nearly equivalent to setting down formally in writing, either in full or abridged form but it may be used as meaning supply to file or duly deposit.  In criminal law, entry is the unlawful making one’s way into a dwelling or other house, for the purpose of committing a crime therein. In cases of burglary, the least entry with the whole or any part of the body, hand, or foot, or with any instrument or weapon, introduced for the purpose of committing a felony, is sufficient to complete the offense.

Dwell. [ME dwellen to lead astray, stun, abide, dwellan go astray, hinder] to live or stay as a permanent resident, reside; to linger over, emphasize, or ponder in thought, speech, or writing; to be motionless for a certain interval during operation.

Instrument. A formal legal document in writing, such as a contract, deed, will, bond, or lease. A writing that satisfies the requisites of negotiability prescribed by UCC Article 3. A negotiable instrument or any other writing which evidences a right to the payment of money and is not itself a security agreement…

   If you happen to get an “instrument” in the mail from a third party which has “entered the dwelling” of the strawman that “evidences a right to payment of money” (such as a letter from an attorney) then it is time to accept his offer and create a contract with the intruder.

Maintenance. Lawsuits. An officious intermeddling in a lawsurit by a non-party by maintaining, supporting or assisting either party, with money or otherwise, to prosecute or defend the litigation.

Barratry. The offense of frequently exiting and stirring up quarrels and suits, either at law or otherwise. In maritime law, an act committed by master (magistrate) or mariners (attorneys) of a vessel (your strawman) for some fraudulent or unlawful purpose contrary to their duty (as a trustee) to owner (you) and resulting in injury to owner.


1. CREATING THE CONTRACT

1.   Notice of Acceptance to Contract
2.   Notice of Default
3.   Notice of Dishonor – from Notary Public
4.   Certificate of Dishonor - from Notary Public
5.   Default

   The following steps are sequence of events that must occur to get your Contract established and enacted as the supreme law of the land.

1.   NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT
   
   Word process the Notice of Acceptance to Contract for all of the correct information
   Print the Notice of Acceptance to Contract out, read it several times for correctness. Stamp the OFFER with your Acceptance for Value stamp and sign it. Then get the Notice notarized. Send the Notice of Acceptance to Contract by registered mail, return receipt so you have proof that they received your Contract you are in the process of creating. Send the copies of the above documents to the Respondent(s) and keep the originals
   
2.   NOTICE OF DEFAULT
   
   After the 10 days send them a Notice of Fault. This notice completes your court procedure as a sovereign in your nation that is foreign to the public venue. Now you will need to pursue this matter in the “public venue” in their legal proceedings, however it will not go into the courts you are familiar with. You must take this matter up with the SECRETARY OF STATE of the state you are in.
   
   Secretary of State. In American law. Title of the chief of the executive bureau of the United States called the “Department of State.” He is a member of the cabinet, and is charged with the general administration of the international and diplomatic affairs of the government. In many of the state governments there is an executive officer bearing the same title and exercising important functions. In English law. The secretaries of state are cabinet ministers attending the sovereign for the receipt and dispatch of letters, grants, petitions, and many of the most important affairs of the kingdom, both foreign and domestic. Black’s 4th edition
   
   You are a foreign nation in their eyes, so you must go through the proper channels so that you can utilize the functions and duties of the Secretary of State –  “general administration of the international affairs” and “attending the sovereign.” There are many “designees” of the Secretary of the state in the area you live, normally called Notary Publics. Find a private Notary Public that you can work with; OR create one by getting a friend to become a Notary who understands this procedure.
   
3.   NOTICE OF DISHONOR – Notary Public
   
   Now we will go through the process called a Notarial Protest, a very powerful process that will create a witness against the debtor  through a Public Official. Following is the definition of a Notary Public according to Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th edition.  It is important to know why you need to use a Notary Public.
   
   Notary Public:  A public officer whose function it is to administer oaths;  to attest and certify, by her or his hand and official seal, certain classes of documents, in order to give them credit and authenticity in foreign jurisdictions;  to take acknowledgements of deeds and other conveyances, and certify the same;  and to perform certain official acts, chiefly in commercial matters such as the protesting of notes and bills, the noting of foreign drafts, and marine protests in cases of loss or damage.  One who is authorized by the State or Federal Government to administer oaths, and to attest to the authenticity of signatures. Black’s 6th edition
   
   Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes (ARS) Title 41-332;
   
   Secretary of the State; deputy county clerk; county clerk functions
   “…each clerk of the superior court shall deputize the secretary of state and the secretary’s designees as deputy county clerks of the superior court solely for the performance of the superior court clerk’s functions…”
   
   In summary of the above definitions, a Notary Public is a commissioner designated by the secretary of the state and deputized to be a deputy superior court clerk to hear certain issues presented to them by foreign agents by taking depositions of the parties termed “notes.” In order for the “notes” (contracts) to be binding they are registered in the public record.
   
   
4.   CERTIFICATE OF DISHONOR – Notary Public
   
   If in 10 days the Notary Public does not receive a response point for point by affidavit with documented evidence, the debtor has defaulted and therefore dishonored your acceptance.  Then the Notary prepares a Notarial Protest which the Notary keeps for her/his own records, and issues you a Certificate of Dishonor. The Certificate of Dishonor is similar to a Default Judgment in a Superior Court.  
   
5.   DEFAULT
   
   Now that you have a Default in your private venue and a Default in the public venue and the Respondent has assented to the terms and conditions by his silence, the Respondent has become your Debtor. You can now liquidate the Debtor’s property.
      
   You will write the DEFAULT in affidavit form summarizing the actions of what you have done to this point. The purpose for this document is to enter this matter into the public record so that one may begin to “foreclose or otherwise enforce the claim” which at this point will be liquidation.
   
   UCC 9-601.  Rights After Default;
         (a) [Rights or secured party after default.] After default, a secured party has the rights provided in this part and except as otherwise provided in Section 9-602, those provided by agreement of the parties. A secured party:
1.   may reduce a claim to judgment, foreclose, or otherwise enforce the claim, security interest, or agricultural lien by any available judicial procedure; and

UCC 9-607. Collection and Enforcement by Secured Party.
   (B) [Nonjudicial enforcement of mortgage.] If necessary to enable a secured party to
exercise under subsection (a)(3) the right of a debtor to enforce a mortgage nonjudicially, the secured party may record in the office in which a record of the mortgage is recorded:
1.   a copy of the security agreement that creates or provides for a security interest in the          
         obligation secured by the mortgage; and
2.   the secured party’s sworn affidavit in recordable form stating that:
a.   a default has occurred; and
b.   the secured party is entitled to enforce the mortgage nonjudicially.

Your contract is the “security agreement.” The affidavit, entitled NOTICE OF DEFAULT, is the “sworn affidavit in recordable form stating that a default has occurred.”

UCC 9-609. Secured Party’s Right to Take Possession After Default.
   (a)  [Possession; rendering equipment unusable; disposition on debtor’s premises.] After default, a secured party:
1.   may take possession of the collateral;
(B)  [Judicial and nonjudicial process.] A secured party may proceed under subsection (a):
   (2)  without judicial process, if it proceeds without breach of the peace.

   Now that you have completed your “nonjudicial process,” you can collect the collateral and take possession of it





 
John Henry Doe
                c/o P.O. Box 5472  
                Tucson, AZ 85734   

               Contract No 92501-JHD      
   
               Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684
Respondent         

     NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT
         
Arizona      )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss      NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima county        )

   I, John Henry Doe, hereinafter “Secured Party”, am competent to state the matters included in this contract which are true, correct and complete, and not meant to mislead.      
               STATEMENT OF FACTS

1)   On September 15, 2002, Secured Party sent a documentary draft to Shyster Bank for adjustment and setoff. As professional banking agents, they knew or should have known that a collecting bank must follow documentary instructions or they are liable for the face value of the draft plus any damages that may have occurred.
   
2)   On September 25, 2002, Secured Party received the documentary draft back to him by mail evidencing dishonor. The bank personnel did not follow instructions sent by Secured Party to process the transaction.
   
3)   On October 11, 2002, Secured Party sent a NOTICE OF ERROR and REQUEST FOR INVESTIGATION to Debra N. Benda, d.b.a. VP of the Shyster Bank branch on 6257 E. Broadway. The notice requested Benda to follow banking laws specified in 15 USCA 1693(h) to initiate an investigation into this matter. Benda has not responded to the above request, which puts them in Default, and has now agreed to compensate Secured Party for $600,000.00 (Six hundred thousand Dollars).
   
4)   On October 19, 2002, Secured Party received an offer from a third party to interfere and trespass on the private contract between Secured Party and Benda. The person who signed the offer to contract is Robert W. Burns, d.b.a. Attorney for Shyster Bank, hereinafter “Respondent”.
   
5)   Secured Party hereby timely accepts the offer to contract from Respondent and herein state the terms and conditions.
   
   
               TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF CONTRACT
   
6)   If Respondent chooses to trespass on or interfere, in any manner whatsoever, with the private contract between Baird and Secured Party, 03001-SWS-DNW, then he agrees to compensate Secured Party for $100,000.00 within ten (10) days.
   
7)   In the event respondent does not deliver $100,000.00 to Secured Party within ten (10) days as agreed to in this contract, Respondent agrees to compensate Secured Party for triple damages or $300,000.00 thereafter and may be subject to involuntary bankruptcy in his private capacity to settle the account.
   
8)   In the event Respondent withdraws his offer to contract within 10 days, then this contract will become void and Secured Party will not proceed with the enforcement of the above terms and conditions.
 
   It has been said, so it is done.

   Signed and sealed this ____ day of _____________, 2003.

   .                        __________________________
                           John Henry Doe

Arizona                 )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____day of ____________
2003 the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________            _____________________   
Notary Public                     My commission expires













                  
 
  John Henry Doe
                c/o P.O. Box 5472  
                Tucson, AZ 85734   

               Contract No 92501-JHD      
   
                     Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684
Respondent         

           NOTICE OF DEFAULT
         
Arizona      )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss      NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima county        )


   Notice is hereby given, that the above named respondents are in Default upon the contract, entitled NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF CONTRACT dated October 19, 2002, and therefore a Default has been entered upon them.

   By the terms and conditions of the agreement contained in the Secured Party's affidavit, you were under obligation to timely and in good faith protest and make proper presentment with proof of your claim or interest. Your failure to do so is a dishonor and places you at Default.

   By your default, you are deemed to be under the new terms and conditions of our original contract and have therefore waived all of your rights to your original presentment and terms. Any attempt to collect on your original presentment places you personally at risk for any damages incurred per this contract and may subject you to criminal sanctions and involuntary bankruptcy.

You are given ten (10) days to respond final judgment is made by sending an original affidavit to the specified Notary Public as a third party public official witness.

___________                        __________________________
Date                            John Henry Doe

 
NOTICE OF ASSENT
      
Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684

Dear Mr. Burns,

I received a request to be a third party witness pursuant to Arizona Revised Statues at Sections 47-3505(a), from John Henry Doe, who informed me you have not responded to his acceptance to your offer to contract. The contents of the contract that he stated that he sent you consists of the NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT, dated October 19, 2002, and NOTICE OF DEFAULT dated November 3, 2002. The notices were sent to you at 105 E Speedway, Phoenix, Arizona 85684, as evidenced by U.S. Postal Service CERTIFICATE OF MAILING verifying the contents of the Mail package.
In the event your acquiescence was unintentional or due to reasonable neglect or impossibility, I am attaching a copy of the same presentment to this Notice.
You may respond to me, and I will forward your response to John Henry Doe. Your response is expected no later than ten (10) days from the postmark of this Notice of Assent.

Thank you for your prompt attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

______________________________________
Notary Public (name)
Address:
______________________________________
______________________________________
______________________________________


   (Stamp)
 

          CERTIFICATE OF ASSENT

I, Diana L. Baker, am the notary to whom all communications are to be mailed regarding the contracts entitled NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT, # 92501-JHD, herein "contract.”

Pursuant to Arizona Revised Statutes 47-3505(B), and Uniform Commercial Code 3-505(B), Notice of Protest is hereby given with Certificate of Dishonor regarding the following:

On November 23, 2002, I mailed a Notice of Dishonor to Robert W. Burns, d.b.a. Attorney with Shakedown Law Firm, giving Respondent 10 days to answer.

As of this date, no response had been delivered to me, the designated receiver. I interviewed John Henry Doe, whose affidavit is attached to this Notarial Protest. John Henry Doe has stated to me by affidavit that Petitioner has received no response to said Contract at any other mailing location. Based on the foregoing information, Respondent has dishonored John Henry Doe's contract by non-acceptance and/or non-performance and have therefore assented to the terms and conditions in said Contract.
                                                                                     _____________________________
                     Diana L. Baker, Third Party Witness

                          Date_________________








 
 
 John Henry Doe
                c/o P.O. Box 5472  
                Tucson, AZ 85734   

               Contract No 92501-JHD      
   
                     Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684
                  Respondent

                     DEFAULT
         
Arizona      )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss      NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima county        )

The parties to the contract entitled, Notice of Acceptance to Contract, hereinafter "Contract", are in full agreement regarding the following:

1.   I, John Henry Doe, herein "Affiant", am competent to state to the matters included in this declaration, have knowledge of the facts, and declared that to the best of my knowledge, the statements made in this affidavit are true, correct, and not meant to mislead;
   
2.   Robert W. Burns is herein addressed in his private capacity, but in his public capacity is a citizen and resident of the State of Arizona and is participating in a commercial enterprise with his co-business partners, including but not limited to SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM, hereinafter collectively referred to as “Respondent”;
   
3.   The governing law of this private contract is the agreement of the parties supported by the Law Merchant and applicable maxims of law;
   
4.   Affiant at no time has willing, knowingly, intentionally, or voluntarily agreed to subordinate their position as creditor, through signature, words, actions, or inaction’s;
   
5.   Affiant is not a party to a valid contract with Respondent that requires Affiant to perform in any manner, including but not limited to the payment of money to Respondent;
   
6.   On October 19, 2002, Secured Party received an offer from a third party to interfere and trespass on a private contract. The person who signed the offer to contract is Robert W. Burns, d.b.a. Attorney for Shyster Bank Loan Department, hereinafter “Respondent”.
   
7.   On November 23, 2002, Diana L. Baker, a Public Notary, mailed a Notice of Dishonor to Robert W. Burns, d.b.a. Attorney with Shakedown Law Firm, giving Respondent 10 days to answer.
   
8.   On December 10, 2002, I received a Certificate of Assent from Diana L. Baker, the designated receiver for Respondent, stating that she had received no response from Respondent.
   
9.   Affiant sent Notices of Fault and Default allowing Respondent additional time to respond, however no response has been received so Respondent has fully agreed to all of the terms and conditions of the contract. Including the compensation to Affiant for a total of $300,000.00 (THREE HUNDRED THOUSAND DOLLARS).

It has been said, so shall it be done.

Dated this     day of          , 2003.

                                    
                     John Henry Doe
Arizona      )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____ day of _____________
2003 the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public

 
         2.  ENACTING THE CONTRACT

PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to file and PERFECT the claim that you have against a debtor if they have dishonored you or your acceptance of their offer AND ENACT IT AS LAW. Before starting this process, one must have accepted all offers given to them, completed the administrative procedure, including the Notarial Protest, and now have a secured claim against the debtor. This procedure starts once you have a CERTIFICATE OF DISHONOR from the notary which is as valid as a Default Judgment in a Superior Court.

Bankrupt [L bank a bench + ruptus broken, literally one whose bench has been broken, the bench or table which a merchant or banker formerly used in the exchange having been broken on his bankruptcy.]
The Consolidated WEBSTER’S Encyclopedic Dictionary 1939 edition.

Bankrupt. Originally and strictly, a trader who secretes himself or does certain other acts tending to defraud his creditors. In a looser sense, an insolvent person. In English law there were two characteristics which distinguished bankrupts from insolvents; the former must have been a trader and the object of the proceedings against, not by him. As used in American law, the distinction between a bankrupt and an insolvent is not generally regarded.

   Do you find it interesting that a “bankrupt” is one who acts to “defraud his creditors?” Who fits the description of a trader and who is the creditor?

Trader. One who makes it his business to buy merchandise, goods, or chattels to sell the same at a profit. One who sells goods substantially in the form in which they are bought; one who has not converted them into another form of property by his skill and labor.

   The above definitions for “bankrupt” or “trader” could not be found in the Black’s 6th edition and here is probably why. What institution do you know of “sells chattels substantially in the form in which they are bought?” Here is a hint – what does the bank do when they deposit your promissory note as an asset instead of a liability, then writes a check off of the deposit to give to the seller of the property? First of all, the bankers do not “buy” your credit with “money.”  After you GIVE your credit to them, they sell your credit to the seller of the property without “converting it into another form.” It goes in and comes out the same – your credit! Or as they would say “money.” Could this be considered of the bank to be an “act to defraud his creditor?”

Bankrupt Law. The leading distinction between a bankrupt law and an insolvent law, in the proper technical sense, consists in the character of the persons upon whom it is designed to operate, - the former contemplating as its objects bankrupts only, that is traders of a certain description; the latter insolvents in general, or persons unable to pay their debts. This has led to a marked separation between the two systems, in principle and in practice, which in England has always been carefully maintained, although the United States it has of late been disregarded. The only substantial difference between a strictly bankrupt law and an insolvent law lies in the circumstance that the former affords relief upon the application of the creditor, and the latter upon the application of the debtor.

   Why do you think that United States has failed to maintain the difference between bankrupt and insolvency? I have a theory.  Since they call you “bankrupt,” they are “assuming” that you are acting to defraud your creditors and therefore you are in dishonor before walking into the court room, and that you are considered a “criminal” by the mere fact the you filed your bankruptcy petition.

   Following is a step-by-step set of instructions that will assist you in your taking the equity from your debtors. Note, this is only an example that has been used to take property – one will still have to continue processes to KEEP IT! This procedure will, of course, be improved from time to time, but it is a good place to start.

Steps in Sequence

1.   Notice of Substitution of Trustee
2.   Collateral Found
3.   Substitution of Trustee
4.   UCC-1 assigned
5.   Notice of Disposition
6.   Disposition – Real Property
7.   Disposition — Personal Property
8.   Disposition — Vehicle
9.   Confirmation of Receipt of Recordings and Filings


1.   Notice of Substitution of Trustee
   
   Information.  An accusation exhibited against a person for some criminal offense, without an indictment. An accusation in the nature of  an indictment, from which it differs only in being presented by a competent public officer on his oath of office, instead of a grand jury on their oath. Function of an “information” is to inform defendant of the nature of the charge made against him and the act constituting such charge so that he can prepare for trial and to prevent him from being tried again for the same offense. Black’s Law Dictionary 6th edition
   
   Notary Public. A public officer whose function it is to administer oaths; to attest and certify, by his hand and official seal, certain classes of documents, in order to give them credit and authenticity in foreign jurisdictions; the noting of foreign drafts.
   
      Operating outside a bankruptcy proceeding is considered to be a crime according to 11 USCA. Any public official who is aware of an activity evidencing “unlawful operations” must report such activity to the “proper authorities” such as a US Attorney or the US Bankruptcy Trustee (Paul H. O’Neill). An information is an accusation exhibited by a “public official.” Since a notary is a “public official” and has first hand knowledge of the crime by doing a Notarial Protest on that person, the notary must report such activities by “information.” The information will be in the form of a “Certificate of Dishonor” issued by the notary that will include all previous notices and evidence of  noticing that you have done since the beginning of the matter.
   
      The information will be written by you and will contain all details and specifics on such activities and must be in affidavit form in order for a criminal complaint to be initiated and the matter investigated by the US Attorney or any other agency with a duty to handle the matter.
   
      ACCEPTANCE SUPRA PROTEST (Acceptance for Honor). The acceptance or payment of a bill of exchange, after it has been dishonoured, by a person wishing to save the honour of the drawer or an endorser of the bill.
   Dictionary of Business, Oxford University Press, © Market House Books Ltd 1996      
   
   Supra Protest. In mercantile law. A term applied to an acceptance of a bill by a third person, after protest for nonacceptance by the drawee. Black’s 4th edition
   
   The second purpose for sending this document is to allow all of the notified parties an opportunity to “accept for honor” this matter. This package is to be sent to the Trustee of the UNITED STATES Bankruptcy, Paul H. O’Neill, so they can investigate why the debtor is unlawfully using your exemption and operating outside the US Bankruptcy. If this third party (who represents you, the Creditor) does not wish to save the honor of the debtor (a sub-corporation or the U.S.), you will put the debtor into Involuntary Bankruptcy.
   
   You will give a ten (10) day notice to the “proper authorities” in order to accept for honor or handle the situation. If they fail to respond, their silence is their consent for you to administrate and conclude the involuntary bankruptcy in a foreign proceeding – your court, as a foreign nation. This is pursuant to 11 USCA 303(B)(4). At this point, the state, United States or all of their agents can not come back to you and bring up the fact that you “did not have the authority” to liquidate the debtor’s property.
   
   The third purpose of this document is to give Paul H. O’Neill, the chapter 11 – Re-organization Bankruptcy Trustee, a notice of substitution. Being a chapter 11 trustee, he “fails to qualify” to commence with any chapter 7 – Liquidation proceedings so he must be “substituted” by another who is qualified to do so.
   
         11 USCA 703 Successor trustee
   (a) If a trustee dies or resigns during a case, fails to qualify under section 322 of this title or is removed under section 324 of this title, creditors may elect, in the manner specified in section 702 of this title, a person to fill the vacancy in the office of trustee.
   
   Since the proceeding is foreign, you would not need a “person to fill the vacancy in the office of trustee,” you would elect or assign a “private” trustee yourself.
   
   Substitution. Putting in one person in the place of another; particularly, the act of a testator in naming a second devisee who is to take the bequest either on failure of the original devisee after him. Black’s 4th edition
   
         Testator. One who makes a will.
   
   Devisee. A person to whom lands or other real property are devised or given by will. In the case of a devise to an existing trust or trustee, or to a trustee on trust described by will, the trust or trustee is the devisee and the beneficiaries are not devisees.
   Devise. A testamentary disposition of land or realty by the last will and testament of the donor; to dispose of real or personal property by will.
   
      You may be asking “what does a will have to do with bankruptcy or trusts?” or “who died leaving you in charge anyway?”
   
      One must remember that the debtor is a “trust” created by the state in order to keep an accounting of all the credit they are using in the creditor’s name. It is just an account with the debtor showing how much the state or United States is liable to the creditor – the real man or woman.
   
   The debtor is actually an unincorporated corporation (pursuant to 15 USCA 44) that has been operating in the public venue as a sub-corporation of UNITED STATES in a chapter 11 – Reorganization Bankruptcy. You as its creditor have allowed UNITED STATES and all its sub-corporations to operate in the bankruptcy on the condition that they must honor your method of payment per HJR 192. As creditor, your method of payment is a “set-off,” or a cancellation of mutual debt. Their debt being interest due for the use of your credit that is backed by your property and your production. However, once the debtor dishonors your method of payment, then you may choose to “liquidate” the debtor by disposing all the property in the debtor’s name. In other words “game over.”
   
   When the debtor is liquidated, that corporation “dies.” Now the trust becomes a will and you have the superior claim to the property - unless the state wanted to bring their claim against the debtor! I would love to see them do that – they would have to admit to creating the strawman and consequently blow the lid off this whole scam.
   
   After ten days with no response received regarding this matter, you will file a petition with the US Bankruptcy Court.
   
2.    Collateral Found and Listed
   
   There are a number of ways to find collateral.  The fastest and easiest way is to call an online private detective, the website is www.americafind.com.  The phone number is 713-271-9518.  For $99 the detective searches 22 databases to find the address, social security number, real property and other information of the Offeror.  One can also go down to the Department of Motor Vehicles and tell them that you are going to place a lien on the Offeror’s vehicle and that you need the Vehicle Identification Number (V.I.N. number) for the lien.  There are other detective services that are being tested and you can find your own methods by trial and error (one is Windsor Judicial Services).  However, the main object of finding collateral is to find their social security number, address, real property and vehicle.  List all the collateral as a separate attachment.  An example of the specific descriptions is provided with theses instructions.  The goal is to attach this list of collateral to a UCC-3 with the Offeror as the Debtor and claim it as your own property by filing it with the Secretary of State.
   
   
3.   Substitution of Trustee
   
   This document substitutes Paul H. O’Neill, the chapter 11 –  Re-organization Trustee, with the Chapter 7 – Liquidation Trustee.  The substitution trustee will be named and an address given where to contact the trustee. This is a straight forward simple summary which will be attached to your UCC-1 when you file it along with the list of collateral.  
   
   
4.   UCC-1 assigned
   
   When you get the list of collateral done you are now ready to fill out a UCC-1.  Fill-in the Debtors information and your information as the Secured Party in the appropriate boxes.  The assignee, in section 5, who will receive the “Assignment for the benefit of Creditors” (you as the creditor), will be someone you know and trust.  You will assign the collateral to the assignee, with the intent to dispose of it.  The assignee is actually listed as an unincorporated foreign corporation, which is the strawman corporation of the flesh and blood being.  This is a method of separating and using the strawman as an interface to the public venue, while remaining in the private side.  This assignment is described more fully in Black’s Dictionary, 6th Edition.
   
   Assignment for benefit of creditors:  A general assignment for benefit of creditors is transfer of all or substantially all of debtors property to another person in trust to collect any money owing to debtor, to sell property, to distribute the proceeds to his creditors and to return the surplus, if any, to debtor.   Under Bankruptcy Act of 1898, such assignment was an “act of  bankruptcy” if made within four months of bankruptcy.  
   
   Now that the UCC-1 has been filled out, attach the NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE, SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE, LIST OF COLLATERAL, CERTIFICATE OF DISHONOR and your NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE TO CONTRACT with the DEFAULT.  File these documents in the office of the secretary of the state, and then when you get your copy back from them, send a copy to the Debtor
   
   
5.   Notice of Disposition
   
   You must give the debtor at least a 10-day notification before you dispose of the property.  Less is not considered a reasonable period of time.  “Authenticated” in the definition below means notarized by a Notary Public and recorded at the County Recorders Office of the county the property is in.
   
   UCC-9-611(B)   [Notification of disposition required.]  Except as otherwise provided in subsection (d),  a secure party that disposes of collateral under  Section 9-610 shall send to the persons specified in sub-section © a reasonable authenticated notice of disposition.  
   
   UCC-9-612(B)   [10-day period sufficient in non-consumer transaction.]  In a transaction other than a consumer transaction, a notification of disposition sent after default and 10 days or more before the earliest time of disposition set forth in the notification is sent within a reasonable time before the disposition.
   
   Make a copy of the Notice of Disposition before you record it and send it to the Debtor giving him at least 10 days (21 to 30 days is better) notice to allow him a last chance remedy.  Send this Notice by Certified Mail or any other proof of service.
   
   
6.   Disposition – Real Property
   
   The assignee you assigned in your UCC-1 has the duty to dispose of all the collateral that you find under the debtors name or is associated with the debtor.
   
   Bill of Sale.  In contracts, a written agreement, formerly limited to one under seal, by which one person assigns or transfers his right or interest in goods and personal chattels to another.  Legal document which conveys title from seller to buyer
   
   When one transfers title using a bill of sale it is actually the only real title that exists on the private side.  This means that once you pay your property taxes with a closed checking account (substance) it takes the property out of the public side and a bill of sale is the only way it can be transferred privately.  Any and every other form of title, i.e. deed of trust, warranty deed, etc. is a fiction and will transfer the private property back to the public side.  The description of the real property should be in metes and bounds and township, section, and range if at all possible.  Include the address and former property identification (tax I.D.) with a note that this is a fictional description.  
   
   However, if one is going to keep the property in the public, it is OK to file a Warranty Deed. Especially if you are going to transfer the property into a trust that you control.
   
   
7.   Disposition — Personal Property
   
   All other personal property will be transferred with a bill of sale or a UCC-3.   Personal property may include BAR Licenses, business licenses, trade names, trademarks, copyrighted materials, bank accounts, computers and any other equipment.
   
   
8.   Disposition — Vehicle
   
   Vehicles will be transferred with a bill of sale and a transfer statement.  Transfer statements are normally provided by the Department of Motor Vehicles.  Request a transfer statement when you go to your DMV to register the vehicle and fill it out with the appropriate information.  Present the transfer statement with the bill of sale at the DMV window and you will receive your new registration and plates.
   
9.   Confirmation of Receipt of Recordings and Filings

This final step is to verify that all collateral is properly disposed of and titles transferred to their new owners.  

 
John Henry Doe
                c/o P.O. Box 5472  
                Tucson, AZ 85734   

               Contract No 92501-JHD      
   
               Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684
             Debtor

             NOTICE OF SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE

Arizona         )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima County      )

   I, John Henry Doe, herein "Creditor,” hereby state that I am competent to make the following statements, have knowledge of the facts stated herein, that they are true, correct, complete and not meant to mislead and are presented in good faith:

1.   The corporations, entitled UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES, STATE OF ARIZONA, and above named, herein "Debtors," are Bankrupt and must operate pursuant to House Joint Resolution 192, June 5, 1933. The above corporations have been using the credit of Creditor since his birth, January 22, 1958, without remuneration to Creditor;
   
2.   Creditor has accepted all offers and returned them to the above named Debtors thereby discharging all controversy and all charges. Debtors then claimed the charge still exists and therefore they are liable for the debt.
   
3.   Creditor has accepted all offers and claims issued by Debtors and returned them to Debtors for proper processing. Debtors have failed to provide a remedy and is operating outside the UNITED STATES Bankruptcy – a criminal offense;
   
4.   Debtors are holding the discharging instrument, but has failed to provide Creditor with a copy of the 1099 Original Issue Discount, therefore Debtors are TAX DELINQUENT since the claim is considered to be Creditor’s exemption;
   
5.   Creditor has timely noticed Debtors and has properly commenced and concluded a perfected security interest against Debtors. The perfected security interest, Contract No. 92501-JHD herein “Contract,” includes all notices including a Certificate of Dishonor, herein “Information,” issued by a Public Official.
   
   TERMS AND CONDITIONS
   
6.   John Snow, the chapter 11 bankruptcy trustee for the UNITED STATES, is hereby given a final opportunity to execute an Acceptance for Honor if he wishes to save the honor of the Debtors by giving Creditor a remedy. In the event John Snow does not wish to save the honor of Debtors, it will constitute John Snow’s consent for substitution of trustee, whereas Creditor will designate an assignee of his choice to liquidate all of Debtor’s property in a foreign proceeding pursuant to Contract #92501-JHD;
   
7.   Debtor has ten (10) days from the date of postmark on this mailing to provide remedy regarding this matter.  In the event Debtor fails to provide a remedy, Creditor will accept evidence of Debtors’ dishonor as a refusal to volunteer into the bankruptcy remedy, whereby Debtors will be stripped of all immunity that UNITED STATES public policy may have otherwise afforded him. Upon dishonor, Debtors agrees in the alternative to Involuntary Bankruptcy that will be initiated on Debtors in a private capacity;
   
8.   In the event Debtors dishonors, Debtors agrees to provide a list of all the property held in Debtors’ names.  Creditor will take the equity and place it for sale and proceed to liquidate the personal property for settlement of this account. Debtors additionally agrees to be placed on a UCC-1 Financing Statement as DEBTOR attaching it to a Declaration of Involuntary Bankruptcy and a list of Debtors’ collateral. Upon filing the UCC-1 form with the Secretary of State of Arizona, the liquidation and disposition of property will be executed immediately.

Dated this ____ of ____________, 2003.                                                  _______________________________
                John Henry Doe
Arizona       )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____day of_____________
______ the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public
 
Copies forwarded to the following:

John Ashcroft                     John Snow
US Attorney General                  US Secretary of Treasury
950 Pennsylvania Avenue NW             DEPARTMENT OF TREASURY
Washington, D.C. 20530-0001            1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
                        Washington D.C. 20220

Charles O. Rossotti                  George W. Bush
Internal Revenue Service, IRS            President of the UNITED STATES
1111 Constitution Ave NW               1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20224-0002               Washington DC 20500

Norman Minetta                  Tom Ridge
US Secretary of Transportation            Director of Homeland Security
400 Seventh Street, SW               1600 Pennsylvania Avenue
Washington, DC 20590               Washington DC 20500

Colin L. Powell                  Brian L. Stafford
US Secretary of State                  Director of Secret Service
US Department of State               US Government Service Agency
Washington, DC 20520-6810               950 H Street, NW Ste 912
                        Washington, DC 20223

Jane Hull                     Betsey Bayless
Governor of the State of Arizona            Arizona Secretary of State
Arizona Executive Office of the Governor         1700 W. Washington Street
1700 W. Washington Ave.               Phoenix, Arizona 85007
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Janet Napolitano                  Arizona Judicial Commission
Office of Attorney General                1501 W. Washington
Department of Law                  Phoenix, AZ 85077
1275 W. Washington Street
Phoenix, Arizona 85007

Barbara LaWall          
Pima County Attorney                   
32 N. Stone Avenue, Ste 2100
Tucson, AZ 85701




 
                                        Creditor:
John Henry Doe
                        c/o P.O. Box 5472  
                                  Tucson, AZ 85734   

                   
Debtor:
Robert W. Burns, d.b.a.
Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm                
105 E Speedway
Phoenix, Arizona 85684

SUBSTITUTION OF TRUSTEE

Contract No 92501-JHD

Arizona         )       NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss         NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima County      )

I, John Henry Doe, herein "Creditor", hereby state that I am competent to make the following statements, have knowledge of the facts stated herein, that they are true, correct, complete and not meant to mislead and are presented in good faith:

The undersigned beneficiary hereby appoints WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation, successor chapter 7 trustee under the contract #92501-JHD executed by ROBERT W. BURNS as Debtor, in which John Henry Doe is named as Creditor, and under the contract/treaty 100701-SWS whereby John Snow is named as the chapter 11 trustee of the UNITED STATES Bankruptcy.

   WHEREAS, the undersigned is the present Creditor under said contracts and,
   WHEREAS, the undersigned desires to substitute a new Trustee under said
Contract in the place and stead of said original Trustee there under.

NOW, THEREFORE, the undersigned hereby substitutes WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation, PMB 278, 1830 East Broadway Ste 124, Tucson, AZ 85734

Dated this ____ of ____________, 2003.         _________________________________
              John Henry Doe, Creditor

For the purpose of verification of signature -- and seal -- and for public notice, I the undersigned Notary Public, being commissioned in the county noted above, do declare on the _____  day of ______________  2003, the one  known to me to be, or who proved to me to be  John Henry Doe did execute this document before me.

_____________________________                  _____________________
Notary Public                           My Commission expires


 
When recorded mail to:  William Hanson Harrison
                 PMB 278, 1830 East Broadway Ste 124
           Tucson, AZ 85734

 
        NOTICE OF DISPOSITION
            
Arizona      )          NOTICE TO AGENT IS NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL
)  ss          NOTICE TO PRINCIPAL IS NOTICE TO AGENT
Pima County      )

I, William Hanson Harrison, agent for WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation, hereinafter “Grantor”, am competent to state the matters included in this contract which are true, correct and complete, and not meant to mislead.   

Grantor has been designated to execute the ASSIGNMENT FOR THE BENEFIT OF CREDITOR pursuant to the Involuntary Bankruptcy as stated in Contract No 92501-JHD in the UCC-1 Financing Statement filed June 3, 2002 with the Secretary of State of Arizona for

Secured Party:     John Henry Doe
      PO Box 34567,   Tucson, AZ 85734      Phone: (520) 465-7334

Grantor:      WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
      PMB 278, 1830 East Broadway Ste 124,     Tucson, AZ 85734

DEBTOR:    ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm
      105 E Speedway, Phoenix, AZ 85684

Interested Party:   John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
   1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
      Washington D.C. 20220

the following described Real Property Located in PIMA, Arizona

CASAS BONITAS LOT 6, BLOCK B, BOOK 8 OF MAPS PLATS AT PAGE 28
Recorded  03/10/89 at Docket  8491,  Page  381,  
At the Address of : 105 E Speedway, Phoenix, AZ 85684
PARCEL NUMBER 125-09-1760

We will sell the described property privately in 11 days, sometime after August 12, 2002. You are entitled to an accounting of the unpaid indebtedness secured by the property that we intend to sell. You may request an accounting by calling us at (520) 230-4919.
            __________________________
WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
                        BY: William Hanson Harrison, Creditor
Arizona       )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____day of______________
______ the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public

When recorded mail to:    JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746



Contract No 92501-JHD

               WARRANTY DEED

For the consideration of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS, and other valuable considerations, I or we,

WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
PMB 278, 1830 East Broadway Ste 124,     Tucson, AZ 85734
                           GRANTOR

do hereby convey to

JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746                     GRANTEE

the following described Real Property Located in PIMA, Arizona

CASAS BONITAS LOT 6, BLOCK B, BOOK 8 OF MAPS PLATS AT PAGE 28
Recorded  03/10/89 at Docket  8491,  Page  381,  
At the Address of : 105 E Speedway, Phoenix, AZ 85684
FORMER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 125-09-1760

SUBJECT TO:    Existing taxes, assessments, liens, encumbrances, covenants conditions, restrictions,
      Rights of way and easements, and obligations and  liabilities of record.

And the GRANTOR does warrant the title against all persons whomsoever, subject to the matters above set forth.

Transferred this ______Day of ____________, 2003.                        
                                           
              _________________________________
WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
                        BY: William Hanson Harrison, Creditor


For the purpose of verification of signature -- and seal -- and for public notice, I the undersigned Notary Public, being commissioned in the county noted above, do declare on the _____  day of ______________  2003, the one  known to me to be, or who proved to me to be  William Hanson Harrison  did execute this document before me.

_____________________________                  _____________________
Notary Public                           My Commission expires

 
When recorded mail to:    JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746


           BILL OF SALE AND CONTRACT FOR DEED

For the consideration of TEN AND NO/100 DOLLARS, and other valuable considerations, I or we,

WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
PMB 278
1830 East Broadway Ste 124              
Tucson, AZ 85734                     GRANTOR

do hereby convey to

JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746                     GRANTEE

without covenant or warranty, express or implied, all right, title and interest of Grantor in Real Property in allodium. Pursuant to the Declaration of Involuntary Bankruptcy, Real Property was sold by Grantor at Bankruptcy Liquidation on June 19, 2002, at a private sale to Grantee who was the transferee for Real Property, for $94,000.00, which will be paid with $10,000.00 Down and monthly principal payments of $1,000.00 per month for eighty-four (84) months (7 years) with 0% interest.

the following formerly described Real Property Located in PIMA, Arizona

CASAS BONITAS LOT 6, BLOCK B, BOOK 8 OF MAPS PLATS AT PAGE 28
Recorded  03/10/89 at Docket  8491,  Page  381,  
At the Address of : 105 E Speedway, Phoenix, AZ 85684
FORMER TAX IDENTIFICATION NUMBER 125-09-1760

Grantee is now the owner of the land and property described above which is now private property exempt from levy and not under the jurisdiction of anyone or any artificial entity.

Transferred this ______Day of ____________, 2003.                           
                                                                                                  _____________________________________
WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
                        BY: William Hanson Harrison, Creditor
Arizona       )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____day of______________
______ the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public

 
WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON
an unincorporated foreign corporation
             PMB 2781830 East Broadway Ste 124
Tucson, AZ 85734




           BILL OF SALE



To Whom It May Concern:

For receipt of the sum of $5,000.00, WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON does hereby sell and transfer at a Bankruptcy Liquidation Sale the motor vehicle described as;


Make:      Buick
Model:      Electra
Year:       1999
VIN:       3994837237292200


To:      JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746


Transferred this _________ day of _____________________ 2002.

                        ________________________________
WILLIAM HANSON HARRISON, an unincorporated foreign corporation
                        BY: William Hanson Harrison, Creditor
Arizona       )
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this _____day of______________
______ the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public


 

     3.  EXECUTING YOUR CONTRACT


PURPOSE: The purpose of this procedure is to execute the claim that you have against a debtor in order to get you equity back. Before starting this process, one must have properly filed with your agent the Secretary of State and consequently now have a perfected secured claim against the debtor. This procedure starts after you have recorded a NOTICE OF DISPOSITION and sent the Debtor a copy of it giving them ten (10) days before the Liquidation Sale and then transferred the property.

Execute. To complete; to make; to sign; to perform; to do; to follow out; to carry out according to its terms; to fulfill the command or purpose of.

   This “eviction” process is the same one that the bank uses to remove people who do not know they are Creditors from their homes. We have taken the same documents they have sent us and are using them to evict the bankers from their own buildings! Is this a great country or what?

   The following documents will be used in this process:

1.   NOTICE REQUIRING DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF PREMISES
2.   SERVICE OF PROCESS BY PRIVATE PERSON
3.   LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
4.   SUMMONS FOR FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER
5.   COMPLAINT IN FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER
6.   AFFIDAVIT FOR APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
7.   ENTRY FOR DEFAULT
8.   DEFAULT JUDGMENT

1.     NOTICE REQUIRING DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF PREMISES

   After you have transferred title to another person, they will have to evict the tenants from the property.

Eviction.  Dispossession by process of law; the act of depriving a person of the possession of land or rental property which he has held or leased. Act of turning a tenantout of possession, either by re-entry or legal proceedings, such as an action of ejectment.

Re-entry.  The act of resuming the possession of lands or tenements in pursuance of a right which party exercising it reserved to himself when he quit his former possession. The right reserved by a grantor to enter the premises on breach of a condition of the conveyance.

Quit. To leave; remove from; surrender possession of; as when a tenant “quits” the premises or receives a “notice to quit.”

   Remember the quote from the 73rd Congress, March 9, 1933:

“It (the new money) will be worth 100 cents on the dollar, because it is backed by the credit of the Nation. It will represent a mortgage on all the homes and other property of all the people in the Nation.”

   You see, we as Creditors have given our homes, property and substance up to UNITED STATES to be mortgaged so that they can operate in the bankruptcy. When any agent in UNITED STATES breaches the “mortgage” then we can claim RE-ENTRY and enter the premises that we “quit” when we “surrendered the possession” of the property to the state originally in 1933. It does not matter if it is the same property, it matters that whenever an agent for UNITED STATES (our Debtor) breaches the contract we can claim “possession” of the property back.

2.   SERVICE OF PROCESS BY PRIVATE PERSON

   Service of Process can be done by a private person in the state of Arizona. You will have to check to see if this is legal in your state. The reason why this is so important in this case is that you will be going to court and this will be a requirement to have legal service of process. The process server can be anyone you know, but not a relative. They only need to serve the address if no one is present to answer the door.

   This process has nothing to do with serving the person – only the address. I know this for a fact as I had a house that I rented out and I never got the document that was served on the “tenants.” You see it is not the person occupying the property that matters, only the address that is served.

3.   LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

   After 7 days go back to the house and if they have vacated send John Snow the Trustee to the US Bankruptcy a LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT acknowledging the delivery of the possession of the premises to the owner. Why John Snow, you might be asking? Because he is an agent of the US who manages the bankruptcy for you and you let him know that this property is no longer in the possession of UNITED STATES.

1.   SUMMONS FOR FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER
   
   If however, the “tenants” are detaining you from possession your property, you
   will start an eviction process to remove them. The summons will notify them of when they will have to answer or they will be in Default.
   
2.   COMPLAINT IN FORCIBLE ENTRY AND DETAINER
   
   Forcible entry and detainer.  A summary proceeding for restoring to possession of land by one who is wrongfully kept out or has been wrongfully deprived of the possession. An action to obtain possession or repossession of real property which had been transferred from one to another pursuant to contract; such proceeding is not an action to determine ownership of title to property.
   
      How many times have we went to court thinking “we will just bring up all the paperwork we have sent them about ownership and title of the house?” So what did we learn when that did not work? Did we ever look up the meaning of this action? Noooooooooo! We just complained and blamed the system.  
   
   You see, this action has nothing to do with “ownership of title to property.” In fact, you cannot even bring it up as some of you have tried and gotten “denied.” This action is about TENANCY and only that. So when you walk into court, how do you think the judge and the bank attorney look at you? You got it – a tenant!
   
   There is only one thing that can be brought up in that court room – do you have a lease agreement or not. No one that I know has ever had a lease with the bank because they “assigned” the lease to the bank when they signed the Deed of Trust (no kidding)! So when the “tenant” cannot provide a lease, he is given an arbitrary time to remove himself from the premises. He is also told how much rent he is being charged with per day – now he really is a tenant.
   
   Since this works so well on us, it will work on them. When you evict the bank, it will not matter how many attorneys they bring into the courtroom – THEY CAN NEVER BRING UP OWNERSHIP OF THE TITLE TO THE PROPERTY!!!!! Use their own instruments against them. Is that justice or what?
   
3.   AFFIDAVIT FOR APPLICATION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
   
   After 20 days (30 days for out of state) and you do not get an answer from the
   tenants, they have defaulted and you can file for a Default Judgment. This must be in affidavit form summarizing what has been done to this point. You will also file the ENTRY FO
« Last Edit: July 06, 2004, 11:01:34 pm by unstructuredreality »
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #20 on: July 06, 2004, 11:02:46 pm »

Continued

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that within seven ( 7 ) days after the service of this NOTICE upon you, you are required to deliver up possession of the above described premises to the undersigned, or legal proceedings will be commenced against you to recover possession of said premises.

This NOTICE is given to you pursuant to Section 12-1171 through 12-1174 of the Arizona Revised Statutes. For further information, please contact Wade at (520) 883-3556.

DATED THIS: _________________, 2002




                     OWNER: __________________________.
                              John Smith












 
JOHN SMITH
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720


         PIMA COUNTY, STATE OF ARIZONA

John Smith                  )
                     )
         vs            )
                     )
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for       )
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM            )
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR      )
SUBTENANTS                )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:   )   SERVICE OF PROCESS
105 E Speedway               )   BY PRIVATE PERSON
Phoenix, AZ 85684               )
__________________________________________)


I declare that I am a citizen of the United States, over the age of eighteen, and not a party to this action. And that within the boundaries of the state where service was affected, I was authorized to perform said service.

On August 14, 2002, I received a document entitled, NOTICE REQUIRING DELIVERY OF POSSESSION OF PREMISES.

Copies of which I personally served as follows:
UPON OCCUPANT, BY SERVING ONE TRUE COPY UPON JOHN DOE RESIDING THEREIN, AT THE ADDRESS OF 9322 South Patricia Drive, Tucson, PIMA COUNTY, Arizona 85746, AT THE HOUR OF 11:15 AM.

TOTAL COST OF SERVICE:  $25.00

                        ________________________
                        William Smith

Arizona                    )                     
      )  ss         ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

As a Notary Public for said County and State, I do hereby certify that on this ____ day of _____________
_______ the above mentioned appeared before me and executed the foregoing. Witness my hand and seal:

_____________________________   
Notary Public


John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720



LETTER OF ACKNOWLEDGEMENT


TO:    John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
   Washington D.C. 20220



ACKNOWLEDGEMENT IS HEREBY GIVEN that ROBERT W. BURNS and ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR SUBTENANTS, herein “Tenants”, have vacated and have delivered up possession of the above-described premises to the undersigned owner of the property, John Smith.

NOTICE IS FURTHER GIVEN that, at anytime in the future, Tenants or any agent thereof wishing to enter the property, a request in writing to John Smith will be required 10 days in advance. Permission will be granted upon the discretion of the owner. If forcible entry is made by Tenants from this point forward legal proceedings will be commenced against them to recover possession of said premises.

Tenants are thanked for their cooperation in this matter.


DATED THIS: _________________, 2002




OWNER:_________________________
                                  John Smith








 
John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720

            ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

               PIMA COUNTY

JOHN SMITH               )
                  )   CASE NO._____________
   Plaintiff,         )   
                  )   SUMMONS
   Vs.               )
                  )    FORCIBLE ENTRY
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for    )   AND DETAINER
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM.   )
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR   )
SUBTENANTS             )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:)   
105 E Speedway            )   
Phoenix, AZ 85684            )
& DOES I - X inclusive,         )
                  )
      Defendants         )
____________________________________)

THE STATE OF ARIZONA TO:
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for Shakedown Law Firm
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR SUBTENANTS & DOES I - X inclusive

YOUR ARE HEREBY SUMMONED and required to appear and defend or answer in this action in this Court as follows: ARS ss12-1175

   BEFORE:  ________________________
DATE AND TIME: _________________
PLACE: Division No. ______of this Court located at: _____________________

You are further advised that Plaintiffs seek to recover possession of the following property:   
105 E SPEEDWAY, PHOENIX, AZ 85684

YOU ARE HEREBY NOTIFIED that in case of your failure to appear and defend within the time applicable, judgment by default may be rendered against you for the relief demanded in the Complaint.

REQUESTS FOR REASONABLE ACCOMODATION FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES MUST BE MADE TO THE COURT BY PARTIES AT LEAST 3 WORKING DAYS IN ADVANCE OF A SCHEDULED COURT PROCEEDING.

SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED____________________________,  2002.

                     
                     CLERK OF THE COURT

                     BY:__________________________
                           Deputy Clerk

ORIGINAL FILED:

COPY of the foregoing sent
_____ day of May, 2002 to:

ROBERT W. BURNS
105 E Speedway               
Phoenix, AZ 85684

John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20220
 
John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720

            ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

               PIMA COUNTY

JOHN SMITH               )
                  )   CASE NO._____________
   Plaintiff,         )   
                  )   
   Vs.               )   COMPLAINT IN
                  )    FORCIBLE ENTRY
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for    )   AND DETAINER
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM         )
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR   )
SUBTENANTS             )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:)   
105 E Speedway            )   
Phoenix, AZ 85684            )
& DOES I - X inclusive,         )
                  )
      Defendants         )
____________________________________)

Plaintiff alleges:

            PARTIES AND JURISDICTION

1.   Plaintiff is a Creditor registered to do business in Arizona and is entitled to

the possession of, and is the recorded owner of a parcel of property and the dwelling

thereon located at: 105 E Speedway, Phoenix, AZ 85684, property is more particularly

described as follows:

CASAS BONITAS LOT 6, BLOCK B, BOOK 8 OF MAPS PLATS AT PAGE 28, RECORDS OF PIMA COUNTY, ARIZONA

as located within the above-captioned Judicial District and County.

   2.   The true names or capacities, whether individual, corporate, associate or

otherwise of the Defendants named herein as DOES I through X in occupancy are

unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues said Defendants by such fictitious names.

Plaintiff will amend this complaint to show their true names and capacities when they

have been ascertained.

3.   That Defendants, and each of them, are currently in possession of and

occupying the above-described real property.

      CAUSE OF ACTION FOR FORCIBLE DETAINER

4.   The Plaintiff purchased the above-described real property at a Liquidation

Sale held on July 21, 2002, in accordance with Arizona Revised Statutes Section 47-9612

and 47-9613 et seq. and its title has been duly perfected.

   5.   That Plaintiff has a duly executed Bill of Sale and Contract for Deed, a

copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “A” and by this reference incorporated herein

as if set forth in full.

   6.   That on July 27, 2002, by written notice, and in compliance with Arizona

Revised Statutes Section 12-1173.01, Plaintiff made demand on said Defendants for and

required the delivery of possession of said real property within seven (7) days from

service of said notice, a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit “B” and by this

reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in full.

   7.   Said written Notice and demand served upon the Defendants has been

neglected and refused for seven (7) days following its service upon them, and remains

neglected and refused now. A true copy of the Affidavit of  Service of the Notice is

attached hereto as Exhibit “C” and by this reference, incorporated herein as if set forth in

full.

   8.   Said Defendants unlawfully are continuing in possession of said premises

after said demand and without permission of the Plaintiff and under no claim of right.

   9.   The reasonable value for the use and occupancy of the subject premises is

$30.00 per day. Plaintiff seeks such damages from July 21, 2002, the date of the

Liquidation sale, and for each day thereafter, until the date Defendants are removed from

the premises.

   10.   Plaintiff has performed all the necessary conditions and given all the

required notices to bring this Forcible Detainer action.

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests for Judgment as follows:

1.   Defendants be ordered to leave and vacate subject premises and Plaintiff

be placed in possession thereof;

2.   For an order to the Clerk of the Court to issue a Writ of Restitution, in this

action to the Sheriff of Pima County, Arizona, commanding him to immediately restore

possession of the property to Plaintiff from Defendants and all persons holding

possession under Defendants or otherwise;

   3.   Defendants be ordered to pay a fair rental on the premises from July 21,

2002, through the date of judgment at the rate of $30.00 per day;

   4.   For such other relief as this Court may deem just and proper.

DATED____________________________,  2002.
                     
                     BY:__________________________
                           John Smith
ORIGINAL FILED:

COPY of the foregoing sent
_____ day of May, 2002 to:

ROBERT W. BURNS
105 E Speedway               
Phoenix, AZ 85684

John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20220
 
 John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720



            ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

               PIMA COUNTY




JOHN SMITH               )
                  )   CASE NO._____________
   Plaintiff,         )
                  )    AFFIDAVIT IN SUPPORT OF
   Vs.               )
                  )    APPLICATION FOR      
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for    )   
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM         )    ENTRY OF DEFAULT
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR   )
SUBTENANTS             )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:)   
105 E Speedway            )   
Phoenix, AZ 85684            )
& DOES I - X inclusive,         )                                    )
      Defendants         )
____________________________________)


Arizona         )       
)  ss         
Pima County      )

   I, John Smith, herein "Plaintiff", hereby state that I am competent to make the following statements, have knowledge of the facts stated herein, that they are true, correct, complete and not meant to mislead and are presented in good faith:

On __________ Plaintiff filed with the Superior Court a cause entitled Forcible Entry and

Detainer against Defendants ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for  SHAKEDOWN

LAW FIRM AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR

SUBTENANTS and DOES I - X inclusive, herein "Defendants."  Plaintiff is

now filing for Application for Entry of Default on the Forcible Entry and Detainer and

Affidavit in Support of Application for Entry of Default that Defendants have been

regularly served with process, that Defendants have failed to plead or otherwise defend as

to the complaint on file in this action, and the time allowed has expired, the default of

Defendants is hereby applied for to the Clerk of the Superior Court. This default shall not

be effective if Defendants plead or otherwise defend prior to the expiration of ten (10)

days from the date hereof.


DATED____________________________,  2002.

                     
                     __________________________
                      John Smith
Arizona      )
      )      ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
Pima county   )

For the purpose of verification of signature -- and seal -- and for public notice, I the undersigned Notary Public, being commissioned in the county noted above, do declare on the _____  day of ______________  2002, the one  known to me to be, or who proved to me to be  John Smith  did execute this document before me.

_____________________________                  _____________________
Notary Public                           My Commission expires




ORIGINAL FILED:

COPY of the foregoing sent
_____ day of May, 2002 to:

ROBERT W. BURNS
105 E Speedway               
Phoenix, AZ 85684

John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20220
   



John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720



            ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

               PIMA COUNTY




JOHN SMITH               )
                  )   CASE NO._____________
   Plaintiff,         )
                  )   ENTRY OF DEFAULT
   Vs.               )
                  )
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for    )   
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM.   )
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR   )
SUBTENANTS             )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:)   
105 E Speedway            )   
Phoenix, AZ 85684            )
& DOES I - X inclusive,         )
                  )
      Defendants         )
____________________________________)



   It appearing to the Clerk of this Court from the Plaintiff's Application for Entry of

Default on the Forcible Entry and Detainer and Affidavit in Support of Application for

Entry of Default that Defendants ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for

SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM AND ALL OCCUMPANTS, TENTANTS , its

successors and/ or assigns and DOES I - X inclusive, herein "Defendants", have been

regularly served with process, that Defendants have failed to plead or otherwise defend as

to the complaint on file in this action, and the time allowed has expired, the default of

Defendants is hereby entered. This default shall not be effective if Defendants pleads or

otherwise defend prior to the expiration of ten (10) days from the date hereof.

   SIGNED, SEALED AND DATED____________________________,  2002.

                     
CLERK OF THE COURT

                     BY:__________________________
                           Deputy Clerk


ORIGINAL FILED:

COPY of the foregoing sent
_____ day of May, 2002 to:

ROBERT W. BURNS
105 E Speedway               
Phoenix, AZ 85684

John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20220














 
John Smith
342 E Broadway
Tucson, Arizona 85746
520-320-0720



            ARIZONA SUPERIOR COURT

               PIMA COUNTY




JOHN SMITH               )
                  )   CASE NO._____________
   Plaintiff,         )
                  )
   Vs.               )
                  )    DEFAULT    JUDGMENT
ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for    )   
SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM.   )
AND ALL OCCUPANTS, TENANTS OR   )
SUBTENANTS             )
POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:)   
105 E Speedway            )   
Phoenix, AZ 85684            )
& DOES I - X inclusive,         )
                  )
      Defendants         )
____________________________________)


   This cause came regularly to the Superior Court on _______________ .  

Defendants, being properly served, failed to appear or otherwise respond to the

Complaint.

The Court having considered the evidence before it and finding that the

Defendants herein named were regularly entered; that the allegations contained in

Plaintiff's Complaint are true and correct; and there is no just reason for a delay in

entering a final judgment against the persons named below, and good cause appearing

therefore:
   
   IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff is

granted Judgment against the Defendant, ROBERT W. BURNS, d.b.a. Attorney for

SHAKEDOWN LAW FIRM AND ALL OCCUPANTS,

TENANTS OR SUBTENANTS POSSESSION OF PREMISES LOCATED AT:&

DOES I - X inclusive, and each of them as follows:

1.   For possessions of the premises located at 105 E Speedway,
   
   Phoenix, AZ 85684, and;
   
2.   Rental damages and costs are waived.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that should Defendants fail or refuse to vacate

according to this Order, Plaintiff shall be entitled to the Issuance of a Writ of Restitution

of the aforementioned premises no sooner than _______________________, 2002.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this judgment be entered at this time as a

final Judgment.

DATED____________________________,  2002.
                     
                     ______________________________
                      Superior Court Judge/Commissioner

ORIGINAL FILED:

COPY of the foregoing sent
_____ day of May, 2002 to:

ROBERT W. BURNS
105 E Speedway               
Phoenix, AZ 85684

John Snow, d.b.a. Trustee for U.S. Bankruptcy
1500 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington D.C. 20220
   

 
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #21 on: July 06, 2004, 11:05:15 pm »

Page 1 of 95 October 17, 2000
Freely Received Freely Given:
There’s The Freedom
We’ve Been Looking For.
Interpretive Writings Of
My Understandings
Of Redemption.
Subject To Many Constant And Unpredictable
Changes As My Understanding Grows
After October 17, 2000.
Page 2 of 95 October 17, 2000
Table of Contents
The Changing Process . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
Word Assimilation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
Money Is The Biggest Drug . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .7
Substance Over Form . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
New Testament & Old Testament . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 11
Jubilee & Redemption . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
Triple Cross & Word Association . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .14
Operation & Execution . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .16
Understanding Operation & Execution Of Law . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18
Private & Public . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .20
The Money Order (Bill) For Gold . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .22
Executive Order Of April 5, 1933 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .23
The Supersedeas Bond To Pay Our Debts . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .26
Public Policy HJR-192 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .28
Pre-Payment Of The Promise Is The Pass Over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .30
Diagram Of The Pass Over . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .34
Grace/Public Policy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 36
Execution Of Law Against Your Brother . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 37
Re-Paying Creates A Futures Contract . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .38
Very Basic Accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .40
Charges Of Sin=Coming At You With The Shadow & The Strawman . . . . . . . . . . . . . .42
Charges Of Sign=Coming At You With The Object & You The Owner . . . . . . . . . . . . .44
Page 3 of 95 October 17, 2000
Internal Revenue Service/ IRS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46
Pass Thru & The Internal Revenue Service To Ground The Charge . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 48
Taxes, Interest & Principal . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 49
Interest & In Trust & The Trust Account . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 51
Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 52
Registration & Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .54
Exemption & Deduction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .56
1099OID . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 58
1099INT . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .59
1040ES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 60
W-9 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 61
Calendar Year & Fiscal Year . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .62
Understanding The Energy . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64
Employer & Employee . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .67
Adjustment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .68
Criminal Charges Are Delinquent Taxes . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .70
Priority Exchange & Transfer . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .72
A Graphic Of A Transfer & Exchange . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 73
Strawman . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .74
Owner & License Holder . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 75
Preferred Stock & Common Stock . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .78
Supervisor . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 79
Claim & Dispute Of Title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 80
Page 4 of 95 October 17, 2000
You & Dispute Of Title . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .82
Firm Offers & Possession & Payment . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .83
Replevin Bond . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .84
The Acceptance Stamp . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .85
Offender & Defendant . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 88
International Jurisdiction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89
Ecclesiastical Court Of Conscience . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .90
Court Language-Forensic Accounting . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .91
Closing . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .95
Page 5 of 95 October 17, 2000
The Changing Process
My intent of this paper is share with you the principles behind my acceptance, it
is not to show you how to do the specifics, so if you are looking for a Ten-
Commandment version of the exact steps, you will need to look somewhere else. This
is the understanding I base my acceptances on and it will change tomorrow as I gain a
better understanding. This is a fluid process, just like the sea, and remember the Lord
walks on maritime jurisdiction. When doing an acceptance remember that the principles
are the only things that you can carry on. The actual form of doing the paperwork
changes constantly and there is no exact way to handle every scenario, take some
Grace and do your own procedure. What I have learned is that the more you
understand what you are doing, and not how to do it, the more sense it makes, which
makes you laugh. Remember to be light hearted with yourself because if your not
having fun your not doing it right.
To see what you have to do in a specific case, you have to identify where you
want to go with it and what are you looking for in your end result. You have to identify
the source of the energy they are after. First identify your purpose, and you will be able
to follow your own steps to obtain your remedy. Don’t expect the process to be in a ten
fold step, which is the mosaic thinking of the law that is so ever present in our brains,
operate your existence by deciding where you want to go with what you are doing and
then shoot there. After this date, it is really hard to tell you what is out of date and what
isn’t because my understanding changes daily and because you aren’t with me 24-7,
you don’t see me change and that is why I suggest you understand the principles
behind what you are doing because they don’t change. Just learn the principles of
operation and you will see your own procedure pop right out of this process and that will
be what you are most able to use. You have to custom tailor the process for yourself
because you are the only one that can provide your remedy, not the public nor anybody
else. Nobody’s process will be identical, it just won’t happen so tailor your letters to fit
your remedy. Also remember that you are in Grace and that you can take some
liberties in what you are doing. And most of all, when reading this, don’t rush your self,
read only 10 or 15 minutes a day. It is what you understand, not what you have read
that matters. 1Thessalonians 5:21. One more thing, if you truly want your freedom, you
better start to learn how to free you debtors from the same bondage you find yourself in.
My Motto: How much can you care the least about the Mill Stone?
Page 6 of 95 October 17, 2000
Word Assimilation
The most fun I have is word association. Think of this, we live in the “STATE OF
SO AND SO,” well; “STATE” is a STATistic with an “E” for energy, on the end. And
think of this in regard to charges “Hey everybody, lets go “RE-VOLT.” What ever you
do, don’t “Test if I” am guilty, or “testify.” Testimony is “Test of Money.” I “wave” my
constitutional rights on the sea of commerce. As the owner of the account, I have
constitutional rights and lefts as the owner of preferred stock. We are looking for justice
in our political system, so we need to “add justice” or “adjust” the account. A Jew is an
executor of law, having executed the redeemer, while a gentile is a gentleman, which is
why we make requests not demands (a gentile order). How many counts were you
charged with, well “a count,” or “account.” My God is an unchanging God; He is “EX”
“CHANGING.” The Industrial Society attempts to remove our operation of law and
execute against us when they “add vice” to the account, or give us “advise.”
Incorporated is usually “Inc,” well it is actually “Ink.” Penitentiaries are usually called a
“Pen,” and now think of it with “State minus the E” in front, and you get “Stat Pen,” and
they are usually all incorporated making them “Ink Stat Pens.” “Firm offer” is the Law
Firm and is mentioned in the scriptures as the firmament, or “firm money”. An
instrument is just “in straw money.” The Lords Infinite Atonement was “At One Money,”
see what The Redeemer did was the Ultimate payment; there is no need to redo what
was done perfectly. Phonetically in the scriptures “Dead” sounds just like “Debt.” What
ever you do, don’t re-COG-nize them, or you will be put into the (mill stone) WHEELS of
justice. What is the difference between “prophet” and “profit” and the “law of the profits”
as a good business plan? If we follow the prophet (profit), we have a good business
plan. “Return” is a “tax return.” “Interest” is separated from the principal, from whom it
accrued, making it “in trust.” While “principal” is “Prince of Paul.” “Christ” represents a
crucible because a crucible is used to hold a substance under heat, which makes the
impurities burn off leaving the perfected product. Christ is the perfected product. “Sin”
is just “SinE” or “Debt with energy,” or “Sign.” Usually the Jew is the executor and is the
billor drawing against the dead/debt, well in jubilee, the entries are reversed and the
Jew is now the billee, making it “Jubilee” but in New Testament we call it Redemption.
The expanse as accounted for in Genesis is actually the “expense account.” The public
can never rely on a “verbal contract,” why you ask? Well if it’s all-verbal, in that it is all
“verbs” in operation of movement and since we are the operator, the public cannot
execute as we are keeping the body alive (they can’t kill a moving object). Well these
are just a few, but I see that the more phonetically I listen to what I am saying the more
clearer the words are. Just use your conscience to orally and phonetically twist the
words and they will make so much sense.
Page 7 of 95 October 17, 2000
Money Is The Biggest Drug
The love/lust of money is the root of all evil and we need to be capacitors of self
control. Lets reflect on the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 and HJR-192 (Public
Policy). The executive order removed all of the money, being substance, from society.
Money was tangible and it cast a shadow being gold or silver. Now that it has been
removed from society and Public Policy is now in effect with HJR-192, we cannot be
obligated to pay because it would take money to pay and because we have no money,
we are precluded from achieving that act. What you really have to do is a lot of
pondering about is this: Since we have no money in society, what is the purpose of my
life, because for all these years, all my time has been exchanged for paper, you need to
realize that the value of our economic system is not gold nor silver nor paper, but the
nuclear energy in our cells that allows us to produce. Kick the moneychangers out of
the temples of your lobes. Understand this: our money is paper; there is no substance
other than our willingness to help each other out. If you love money, just go open a
paper factory. This process is not about money but about being able to live without the
social constraints of a limited amount of negotiable paper i.e. Federal Reserve Notes. If
you work for paper, you really show how worthless you existence is, find a purpose for
your life, work because you like what you do, be productive to help you brother.
Operate your existence; don’t execute it by following the orders of a bookkeeper. This
process is not about money, it is about being able to get some semblance of control
over our lives so we can act on our own accord (providing we use our conscience).
The reason bills always write, “do not send cash, pay by check or money order,”
is because all of the money is drug money and that is why you have to have your
fiduciaries hold it. Many would say we should go back to a gold standard. Gold is a
substance that is in limited quantities just like cotton is a commodity. Federal Reserve
Notes are a commodity made of cotton. When dealing in a limited substance as money,
there will never be enough. The reason Federal Reserve Notes have buying power is
because there is a limited amount that people wage war for (the war of wages at the
auction block). The moment there is not enough money; someone must look to borrow
the money, only to go into dead/debt to pay the owed debt. Being a limited substance,
there will never be enough to pay back or to obtain the redemption. Look to the account
of Cain and Able to understand what happens with a limited substance. Cain took the
blessings that Able sponsored as the credit and when he had to return the blessings
from where they came from, as an executor he had to kill Able to surrender the
blessings. An executor must provide substance to pay for a debt, and with substance
there is always a limited quantity because it must be manufactured in commerce and
with the manufacturing, it takes someone to incur a debt to manufacture it. Because
substance is limited in quantity, it takes a redeemer to operate on intangible value
(paper, or even more specific= intangible energy at the atomic level) to redeem the
account to keep the executors from dying. The redeemer operates on an intangible
level because there is always more intangible than tangible, than needed creating a
surplus to prevent an execution from making up the deficiency. I pray that you look at
this process not for the paper that it can provide you because paper can’t pay anyways,
it can only provide a method to discharge and because we have no money in the
Page 8 of 95 October 17, 2000
system, don’t look at this process to be able to get any money (because there is no
money), it just allows you to operate in a paper economy. All the public money is soft
money because what you are doing is bribing the one to whom you are paying because
a debt cant be paid with a debt instrument, you just create more debt. So when you pay
are you just bribing them to keep you creditors off of your back, and are you really
redeeming the debt or just taking them to the Pub-lick where they can all get drunk off of
the debt instruments? Remembering that there is no money, what is the cost to what
we are doing, well here it is: You have to spend and invest your time because it just
takes time. It is a put and take, our time is all we have, and it is a limited resource (that
creates the risk liability that an insurance policy would be used for like Public Policy).
The reason money exists is to exercise as a “medium of exchange.” When the
medium is created it is a propellant for the less self-industrial to force them to enter the
workforce because of the use of money, they now have bills to pay. They work only to
pay bills. On the other side of the account is the person that is self-industrious. This
person sees money as a hindrance because the lack of it is a detriment to his
productivity. Look at Nikola Tesla, he was an incredible inventor and because he didn’t
have enough money to fund his inventions, we are still paying for electricity when he
found out how to take the energy out of the earth. To me, money is a deterrent because
I can’t find enough of it to do productive things with. I find that the lack of money really
hinders my performance. I don’t work to pay bills; those are side issues. I work
because I like what I do. When you work because you like what you do, money then
becomes secondary. Money for the busybodies is the same reason there exists
“withholding.” Withholding is not for people who are productive on their own but for the
busybodies. The reason withholding exists is so that when you spend 100% of your
effort into the industrial society, you only get back 91%, and needing an additional 9%,
you now work overtime thus having put into the account 109% to get back to 100% of
your effort to sustain yourself, see withholding is used to prime the economy with
“overtime” labor. What I am trying to show is that money as a “medium of exchange”
primes the account for those that are busybodies, and is a deterrent to those that are
productive. The purpose of money is because we would be over-producing every other
nation without it, so they limit it, which slows the economy down.
The same amount of energy you put into building a product is the same amount
of energy that the recipient will get out of it when they are asked “Did the product pay for
itself?” The moment the product was used, it paid for itself because the same amount of
energy used to build the object is the same amount of energy that is received from it in
it’s usefulness and resourcefulness, then there is no liability making the product debt
free (or Redeemed). The moment a regulator (money or other weight or measure other
than it’s own resourcefulness) is used against an object to value it; a debt is incurred
because now it has to live up to this artificial standard.
Look at yourself for the above example. You are priceless. The moment you say
I am worth $12.50 an hour, you just discounted yourself so much that the person paying
your wage (waging war) is so indebted to you, that they will never get out of debt or
obtain the redemption, which would be required from them a “just return” (a tax return)
Page 9 of 95 October 17, 2000
not of money (an artificial standard) but a remedy of the energy you need for your
sustenance. Remember this part, these last two paragraphs wrote about what is called
“The Note,” or “The Promise,” I will explain it latter. Remember this next part and you
will never go wrong; this is the context that I am writing to you, “Work to live, don’t live to
work.”
Examine this account I am going to give you and picture it in your head: You are
looking at a paper that has the Gross National Product of every nation in the world
comprising all of the industrial society. It has on it some massive number represented
by the statistics of each nation. Now picture this. You move the paper out of the way of
your feet and you look at your feet, now looking at the floor, look at the wall in front of
you. Seeing the wall, imagine you have X-Ray vision and you can see what is on the
other side of the wall. Your front yard, where you drive way is, is what might pop up in
your head. Now look to the street and then to the end of the street. Now look to the
end of the street where you enter a new county, continue to the end of the state, now
heading east, you come to the Atlantic Ocean, look at all of that blue, it is huge, now
you are traveling over a thousand miles an hour over the ocean. You come to Spain
and continue across Europe past all of the hills and lakes and enter into Asia, seeing
snow on the rolling hills, you come to the Japan, the end of Asia, and you see more
water. It is the Pacific Ocean; continue across the ocean over Hawaii and back to the
United States. Now back into your state and into your county onto your road and back
into your house but you can see the back of your head as you look around the earth.
After crossing the entire earth with all of the people and creations, can paper ever give a
close estimate of the intrinsic value of the earth? No. Paper will always fall short of the
intrinsic value. We have the reality we just circled, and we allow the paper to tell us
what it’s worth. Don’t bind/bond yourself to someone’s functional currency. Identify that
the real value of the world is not the “$” in life but the fulfillment of your purpose in life.
Once you see that, you will see the tool/earth that is before you. Things need to be
broken down to where the real value shows and that is at the atomic level.
Page 10 of 95 October 17, 2000
Substance Over Form
Understand that the paperwork steps you do is the form side of the account and
that is exactly what the law is. The law is form without substance, just look at an
Internal Revenue Service Paperwork Reduction Act Notice, and go down to where it
says the time schedule and you will see the quote “Learning about the law or the form,”
and they are right, the law is the form, not the substance. The substance is our
discernment of conscience. Substance is this work in progress we are in. The
substance is your creativity. The substance is your intelligence. The substance is your
productivity. The substance is the credit you sponsor. We have to be vigorously
involved in the good fight of faith and that is the substance. Get your thinking straight
and form will come easy, there is no quick fix, you just have to order up some remedy
from the store you are dealing with. What matters is not what I have written because
this is how I see it, what matters is do you see it? If you do, good, if not, you just have
to find out how to make it work for you. It’s really simple, your internal questions are
“What are you charging me with?” and “How do you expect me to pay?” Learning the
form will always fall short because if you don’t have any substance to cast the shadow,
the shadow will disappear if there is no object (ive). Ask yourself “What is my position in
the following demands made against me?” “What type of remedy am I looking for?”
You are the only one that can provide your remedy, not the public; so keep ordering up
some remedy until you get what you need. Get your mind out of the “What are the 5 or
6 steps I need to take to get my remedy?” Base your life off of facts, not off of
hypothecations made into the future, you must be an apprentice, not a public school
memorizor. Study the principles of the redemption process and “the how to do it” will
come very easy. Remember this most importantly, “If your not having fun, your not
doing it right!” The principles are what matter because with the principles come a
greater understanding; if you put yourself into a bind they help you to become more selfreliant.
You need to work off of your principles, a firm foundation. In the redemption
process, you can be your brothers keeper, but the mirror image of that is, your brother
already has a redeemer and two might be one too many. You need to be able to
represent yourself because you’re the only one that can represent yourself if you get led
into court. Prepare yourself individually by operating this private jurisdiction that exists
internally inside yourself to come to a better understanding of what you’re looking for in
life. Know what you’re doing, but act on faith, and by that I mean educate yourself but
practice what you preach (faith without works is dead). Remember that if you act in a
public mentality of gluttony you are not a true redeemer because you are stealing
another mans profits. Work with your brother to obtain your remedy, not against him.
Remember the golden rule most importantly. Substance does matter. Form only exists
on paper. Operate your existence don’t execute your existence. If you expedite your
process, it will be difficult to backtrack to find out where you made your errors. The
public sees this process as a loophole because of what it provides, treat it as your
remedy and you won’t go wrong. If you compete against your brother, you’re acting just
like the gladiators of old. Just remember that there are no U-Haul Trucks that make
deliveries to the graveyard so you’re not taking any of your stuff with you.
Page 11 of 95 October 17, 2000
New Testament & Old Testament
The Bible is broken down into two parts, Old Testament and New Testament.
Moses brought down the Lesser Law from Mount Sinai and it was codified into 10 Laws
that were restrictive in nature because the people were not exercising their consciences
and were living so irresponsible that they had to be told what to do. The Mosaic Law
was based on “Don’t do this, and don’t do that,” in a very similar fashion as the seatbelt
laws and stop signs of today are. These laws of today seem to restrict the freedom of
conscience that everybody has, only because we should not be cutting people off as we
drive down the road, but we should show courtesy, and the like. If you use your
conscience, you don’t need to be told the law, you know we are supposed to be
courteous. In the Mosaic Law, sins were paid for with burnt offerings of first-born lambs,
crops, and the like, something of tangible substance. The Mosaic Law is the common
law because it is the law of the commoners and if you operate in execution of law
(Mosaic/Common law) there is no Grace because it requires an execution to provide a
remedy (see the story of Cain and Able). The common law is death because if you
operate under it, it will soon execute you because you yourself aren’t perfect enough to
stave off its justice forever. In Mosaic Law there is no room for mercy, just as the same
in common law. This depicts two very important principles. First, an offering had to be
made. Second, the lamb or the crops was an item of tangible substance, which was in
limited quantities. To pay for sins, tangible substance had to be offered. Burnt Offering
is the mirror image of acceptance of the Redeemer. One more thing is that Moses
could not wear commercial shoes when he was with the burning bush, nor could he
walk on water, he was a sovereign on the land and when he divided the Red Sea, he
couldn’t walk on maritime jurisdiction, he had to be on the land, whereas the Lord
walked on water.
Christ’s life is depicted in the New Testament. Christ came to fulfill the law, not
to destroy it. During Christ’s life, he preformed many miracles such as raising people
from the dead (debt) and giving them sight. During the Sermon on the Mount, Christ
shared the Higher law which was not described with a negative overtone but a positive
“Blessed is he that”…persuasion. The Mosaic Law was fulfilled when Christ died on the
cross. The Law was fulfilled by a tender offer of a living sacrifice for all those that
accept him; he paid the ultimate price in a hostage exchange. What now exists is called
Grace; if you live it there is no law. The mirror image of Law is Grace. Now that is not
to say that Grace means chaos, what I am saying is the dictates of the law are not
necessary because by your operation of Grace the law gets fulfilled, not destroyed.
When the law was fulfilled, all those that accepted Christ had their sins redeemed from
them. Christ’s Sacrifice made it unnecessary to make burnt offerings of tangible
substance. What is now done is acceptance of him as the redeemer through intangible
intent of prayer to pay for sins. To identify whom laws apply to, read First Timothy
Chapter 1. Once in Grace, you don’t commit those offenses, not by the execution of the
law do you refrain from committing those activities but by your operation do you fulfill
the law. “I did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it.”
To sum it up, The Mosaic Law- Execution of Law, required two very important things:
Page 12 of 95 October 17, 2000
Scriptural Commercial
1) Burnt offers or Tender offerings
2) Tangible Substance or Gold and Silver (commodity of limited quantity)
The New Testament or Grace- Operation of Law, required two very important things
Scriptural Commercial
1) Accept Christ or Acceptance for Value of charge
2) Intangible substance or Paper money (commercial energy, infinite)
If the industrial society can keep you from operating in Grace then you are
denying that Christ died on the Cross for your sins which creates your pre-payment on
the condition we accept him. The industrial societies biggest challenge when they don’t
adjust the account is to create the stress that we will buckle you to cause you to deny
Grace in an attempt to maintain the idea in your head that they are justifiably there for
you.
Page 13 of 95 October 17, 2000
Jubilee & Redemption
In Mosaic Law, Jubilee occurs every certain amount of years in the Old
Testament depending upon the contract; see Deuteronomy 15 and Leviticus 25.
Jubilee has two parts to it: 1) The property is returned (tax returned) to the original
owner, and 2) The debt is discharge (written off/charge off/adjusted). In New Testament
operations, Redemption is the same function as jubilee but it happens continually at
every acceptance of the charge, in a twinkling of an eye (the closing and reopening of
the account, 1 Corinthians 15:52), there is no bondage to the law in Grace. When Debt
is redeemed, the goods return to the original owner, and the debt is swiped clean
(charged off/adjusted). Jubilee occurs only once every certain amount of years while
redemption occurs constantly at the acceptance. What happens is you become a
temporal redeemer of monetary debt and substance in emulation of the true redeemer,
by your acceptance of the charge. Public Policy is Grace. The laws can no longer force
payment because it has been fulfilled through HJR-192, which makes it against Public
Policy to require the payment in substance. In Redemption, the debt-laden accounts
are closed at the acceptance of the charge. Read Leviticus 25 and count the times you
see the word “return,” well that is a return of the interest to the principal for the
adjustment of the account to discharge the tax. It is also associated with a “tax return.”
The process we are doing is called redemption, that is why it is so important that we
consider ourselves the original owner, or we will be doing what the public does as
“Escheat,” (look that one up). We are redeeming our property, the industrial society
attempt to escheat it from us.
Page 14 of 95 October 17, 2000
Triple Cross
& Word Association
Murderer Redeemer Thief
Offer (promise to deliver) Accept (promise to deliver) Offer
Calendar-365 Adjustment Fiscal-360
Tangible Intangible
Object Shadow
State Federal
Fiduciary Creditor/ Debtor Taxpayer Fiduciary Debtor/ Creditor
Holder-in-due-course Owner Holder-in-due-course
Strawman Owner Strawman
Coveter Owner Coveter
Old Testament New Testament Old Testament
Mosaic Law Grace Mosaic Law
Public Law Public Policy Public Law
Credit Pass Thru (zero liability) Debit
Levy able Exempt from Levy Levy able
Execution of Law Operation of Law Execution of Law
Common Stock Preferred Stock Common Stock
Common Law Public Policy Common Law
Supervisor Supervisor
Bear Witness Registered Account Bear Witness
Agent Principal Agent
Capital Principal Capital
Public Private Public
Pay (Promise to Pay) Pre-Paid Pay (Promise to Pay)
Deduction Exemption Deduction
Fiscal- 360 Calendar- 365 Fiscal- 360
Order for Money Money Order Order for Money
Offer Accept Offer
Public Private Public
Corporate Registry UCC Corporate Registry
Title of Nobility Dispute of Title Title of Nobility
Interest- In Trust Principal In Trust -Interest
Transfer Exchange Transfer
Employee Employer Employee
Taxable Charge Claim Taxable Charge
Executor Operator Executor
Non-Negotiable Negotiable
Replevin Treble Damages Replevin
M1 Money M3 Money M2 Money
Sponsor For Credit
Foreign Domestic Foreign
Domestic Foreign Domestic
Page 15 of 95 October 17, 2000
Accommodated Party Accommodation Party Accommodated Party
Venue Re-venue
Charge Discharge
Write off Ground Charge off
Bill Note Bond
Bond Note Bill
Debt No Debt Debt
Calvary Hill And Double Entry Bookkeeping
C D
C D C D
Murderer Redeemer Thief
Page 16 of 95 October 17, 2000
Operation & Execution
Operation of law & Execution of law. Many would say that without law, people
would run around like monkeys killing each other, this is negative thinking that comes
from the public debt. People have all along decided what they are going to do, whether
the law permits it or not, realize that fact for what it is. The key is to take upon yourself
the responsibility to operate your existence not pursuant to The Law but according to
your conscience. Not to destroy/execute the law but to fulfill/operate it. The Public
Jurisdiction operates on “Execution of Law” and it is commonly said as “The daily
drudge” of waking up at seven, showering, eating, driving to a horrible job, taking an
hour lunch to go to a fast food restaurant, only to be five minuets late and having your
superiors yelling at you, leaving for home only after you complete all of your hours,
driving home in traffic, thinking about bills you don’t have enough money to pay, all to
get home to a house that is just as fried as you are at the end of your day. I really hope
nobody’s day is that bad, I am just trying to show a great example of “EXECUTING
YOUR EXISTANCE” in the mindset of the Ten Commandments. We need to have fun
and enjoyment in our lives, not to live in gluttony but to have happiness. To “OPERATE
YOUR EXISTANCE” is just that. Living according to an exact dictate, day in and day
out is executing your existence. You need to lighten up. You weren’t put here to be a
slave, you were put here to be tested, two different things. Don’t live your existence
because the law says you are suppose to do certain things, realize that if you let your
conscience be your guide, the law will get fulfilled. Not by your execution of the law but
by your operation “I did not come to destroy the law but to fulfill it.” To operate your
existence, you have to use the discernment of your conscience and that is one thing the
public does not have. They are all fiction and do not have that ability to operate in
Public Policy/Grace. Using the conscience you were given is private intellect and the
burden on your back will be lifted because the stress won’t be killing/executing you.
The Jews executed their existence by executing the Christ. Now Romans 2:28-29
writes that the Jew is not outwardly displayed like most people would think, being the
religion of the Jews that we are most common with but the Jew is the one with vice in
his heart, creating a veil over his heart which creates the execution mentality like most
judges, attorneys, police officers, and unjust stewards/renters possess by denying the
redeemers attempt to redeem his property. The Jew is not the one that reflects the
religion of the Jew but the one with inward vice. The opposite of the Jew is the gentile.
The gentile is the gentleman. The gentlemen attempts to swoon his bride and the bride
is the queen with all her ladies in waiting (government with all the agencies.) This is
why we must be gentlemen, because if we are not, then inwardly we are executers of
The Son. Here is the simplest way to sum up execution of law, if you follow the dictates
of a bookkeeper; you operate on execution of law because it was the executors of law
that nailed The Lord to the cross (posted to the ledger of a T-chart). The real Jews are
the ones that want to hold everybody accountable for their debts and want to forget that
the Redeemer took them on for us as a final tender offer of a living sacrifice.
See when there is an execution we have to go into the State of Emergency room
that is a sterile private environment being an operating room and we have to redeem
the body. Colossians 2:12
Page 17 of 95 October 17, 2000
Oh yeah, YOU HAVE TO THINK IN GERUNDS TO UNDERSTAND
EVERTHING I AM WRITING, (VERBAL NOWNS); it is by operation of the words, not by
execution of the definitions of the text, i.e. “The letter of the law killeth but the spirit
giveth life.” Here is a good example: Give me an account of how you got this book? It
is not an account that physically exists, but by its operation does it exist. That is the
exact same thing with regards to the bill of exchange for the Birth Certificate; the
account is a verb, not a noun.
Page 18 of 95 October 17, 2000
Understanding Operation & Execution Of Law
This is how a florescent bulb works:
When electrons go into an atom it builds a charge by having the surplus
electrons bounce out to an outer orbital, as the energy grows, it creates an unstable ion
with built up charges.
Charge The Account
e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e- +
To discharge the atom, the electrons much now leave the atom and continue to
the positive end of the bulb. When the atom releases the electrons on it’s path, the
atom then discharges the charge by releasing the atom and the release of the stored
energy emanates light from the release of stored energy due to the electron bouncing
back to a smaller orbital and expelling an electron to flow to the positive end of the bulb.
Discharge The Account
e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-e-+
Christ is the charge. The last thing Christ said on the cross is “It is finished” as
the electrons left his body and he gave up the ghost. See the industrial society
operates so that the public gives up the ghost (release of the charge) to discharge the
account through execution of law because that is the only way for the stored up charges
to discharge is to ground the body six feet under to pay the tax back to mother earth by
charging back the charge.
Page 19 of 95 October 17, 2000
In execution of law, the account does not pass over the body for the benefit of
the principal but to his detriment. Now the body has the charges in which it must be
grounded/charged-back into the earth (tax return by death). When the account is
accepted and passes over the owner in operation of law for the benefit of the principal, it
is the accuser whose strawman is now fused into the account when the fuse blew.
Whoever offers rather than accepts, places their strawman into the fuse box when the
account was re-fused and counter offered. When the account is “re-fused” and
accepted, and the offeror has not made satisfaction to me, his dishonor (self
execution/suicide) has now discharged my liability of the account after the acceptance
of the offer (after the order of Melchizedek), due to his strawman now being held as the
collateral for the dishonor (acceptance of re-fusal of the offeror), see even Christ was
rejected, so I accept the rejection because that ejects me from liability and I receive the
discharge value for my self indemnification (accuser becomes the bond/ and
indemnifies my future liability). Now that the account has been re-fused with an
acceptable fuse (the accusers strawman) being the holder of delinquent taxes, the
charge must now be discharged to comply with the Constitution “discharge of duty/tax,”
and the accuser has now lost their personal exemption (due to their dishonor/ the refuse
boxing) until they settle with me and make satisfaction to the owner. Since they
lose their personal exemption until they make good to the owner, they have the option
to operate in execution of law or operation of law, for the owner to obtain the remedy.
Operation of law allows it to pass over the acceptor for the benefit of the principal
because the acceptor returns the charge/charges-it-back to whom offered it to
discharge himself and “re-charge” the executor/accuser now with the duty under the
Constitution to discharge their duty seeing that they are holding the charge/delinquent
taxes.
Page 20 of 95 October 17, 2000
Private & Public
There are only two types of jurisdictions in this entire universe, that which is
“Private Jurisdiction” and that, which is “Public Jurisdiction.” Every thing inside your
body is private because only you exist there and it is a very sanitary environment;
everything outside of you is the Public Jurisdiction and is full of filth. It is like when the
scriptures say “Sweat and Blood,” well, that is both jurisdictions. Sweat is public
because it shows how much work has been executed to your cells and Blood is internal
and is a fluid operation that gives life. All rights come from the right to privacy. What
makes this private is everybody keeps to his or her own business. In the public, as for
most people involved in “the good fight of faith” have come to a great understanding of
public court: “Don’t ask the devil to cast out the demons.” For those of you that haven’t
realized that public court is a waste of your time keep going, and I pray that you will
realize the feudal effort of raising your constitutional rights and lefts, j/k. The public has
no final remedy because you are relying on other people to fix your problems under
execution of law, and to provide the remedy, something must die. You are the biggest
problem to yourself. You have to get your thinking straight in your head before you will
ever find a remedy that will last. Only you can provide your remedy, don’t ask the public
to save you from them self. Remedy can only be found in a private jurisdiction and that
means in a sanitary environment, being your scull. The public jurisdiction is full of
instant gratification and lascivious filth. It is the saying “You can’t fix others, until you fix
yourself.” Well you are the solution to all of your problems. Your private existence is
where you internally get to make a judgment call. It is by your internal operation that
makes it private, not by the virtue of the paper.
There is no dividing line between public and private, it is all on how you mentally
perceive things, and by their operation as to what side they fall on. Just because you
say it is private, doesn’t make it that way, it is how you do it or operate it that makes it
that way and vise versa.
When things enter the public, they seem to get spun way out of control, probably
with the downward spiral of the public debt. To say it is private doesn’t necessarily
mean the information is restricted for negative purposes, probably only that to release
the information into the “public” would corrupt it because the people can’t responsibly
cope with the newness of liberties that comes with private understanding, there is a veil
over their hearts. That is why the Lord spoke in parables. It is because only those that
are supposed to understand at that time will.
Moses from Mt. Sinai first brought down the higher law/private side and when he
saw the people living such terrible lives, worshiping the golden “CAFR” (calf), he knew it
would have been a liability on his head if he were to disseminate the higher law to the
public masses so he went back up the Mount, and returned with the Mosaic Law/public
side because that was all the people could handle. Too many un-self constrained
liberties can wreak havoc on a people. The private side in its concept is that with the
newness of information, which increases liberties, that wise decision-making is done as
to not take away the liberties of others. The golden Rule is “Do unto others as you
Page 21 of 95 October 17, 2000
would have them do unto you,” is really what sums up the private thought. The private
side requires by its operation the discernment of consciences.
If you owe anybody money, you are public. The private owes no money to
anybody, as they are the source of the money. This means that when you act in
commerce and you accidentally make an offer, you have to provide a check or money
order (order for money) to get the other party a remedy. The accepting party must be
able to Pass Thru your name for the energy of their remedy to be made. Look at Pass
Thru this way: a check is a three party instrument, you are telling “A” to pay “B”, this is a
Pass Thru account because they have to use your name as the drawer of the funds to
provide the money to be moved from “A” to “B” and this cannot happen unless you are
in the middle. That is why when a person dishonors and won’t come forth with the offer
after your acceptance for adjustment, and provide a remedy, they loose their exemption
with you because you can’t Pass Thru their account to get their exemption and when
they don’t let you Pass Thru their account to get paid, they lose their exemption (due to
their dishonor/ the re-fuse boxing) until they settle with you. This means when you get a
letter, either demanding something from you (a public form of acceptance which
provides no remedy) or an acceptance letter of you action (a request or an acceptance
for value) both of which are trying to use your name to get their remedy you need to
accept it. When it is accepted, the claim made against you was returned to pay for
itself. Because we live in Public Policy, you cannot be obligated to pay, the most that
we can do is accept the paper as though it had value and turn it back on itself because
that is the extent of the obligation that Public Policy allows. When you accept an offer,
the Offeror must also allow it to Pass Thru his account by his acceptance of your
acceptance, when he has done this, he has technically accepted a bill drawn against
him and returned it to you for negotiation. Now that both parties have accepted what
has happened, neither party owes each other anything because the original acceptor
returned the claim for full settlement and the offer accepted the return. The debt has
been effectively redeemed. When a person continues to dishonor, he is not allowing his
exemption to pay for the request and because of that, he loses his exemption to be
private and now becomes public. When they don’t settle with you, they become public.
It is all based around Public Policy, bottom line is = We cannot be obligated to pay a
debt, the most we can be obligated to do is right up to payment, which means
acceptance and return. You have to do all you can (i.e. acceptance and return) and
then after that, mercy comes in being Grace because it is your exemption that makes
the payment. It is you inability to pay that pays for it, same as Grace.
The only way to sum up everything that is outside you body is to call it the
industrial society, it is all public works, the system, government, commerce, both fiscal
and calendar years, proprietors, corporations, trusts, banks, car dealers, license
holders, Titles of Nobility, manufactures, the courts, mutual funds, your friends,
nightclubs, and the like. It is all the industrial society.
Page 22 of 95 October 17, 2000
The Money Order (Bill) For Gold
The Democracy on April 5, 1933 issued an Executive Order removing the gold
from circulation as a currency. This Executive Order served the same function as a
money order to the United States People for the purchase of all the gold in society.
What the President did was billed the bonds of the people by accommodation. In that
what he did was he took the gold away from the peoples holdings without their
endorsement on the money order that removed all of the gold from the banks and
corporations. Gold is substance and was used in the “payment of debt.” When the
President wrote the money order for all of the gold to be taken out of the system and
placed with the government, the government then removed the people’s ability to “pay a
debt” because they didn’t have any money to pay with thus freeing us from the bondage
of owing a debt. The golden rule is usually summed up in “He who has the gold makes
the rules,” well it sounds mosaic to me. Here is another part of the golden rule they
don’t tell you about “He who has the gold pays the bills.” They got the money; they
make the payments. The government then became indebted to the people to pay all of
the debts because the government was holding all of the money. You ever heard the
phrase “All money is loaned into existence”, well that is right because they are
borrowing it from me. This money order debited the people by removing the gold from
their possession, which in turn credited the United States Government with all of the
newly held gold in their possession. This exchange is halfway completed because the
gold was taken from the people and nothing had yet been returned. The people now
need something in this exchange to balance out the ledger and re-credit their original
holdings. To complete the exchange, the United States Government debited them
selves with a bond (Public Policy), which in return re-credited the people with Public
Policy. This was the executing order from the President killing the legal capacity of the
Government to control the people. The government was then dead/debt (phonetically it
sounds similar). Here is another interesting part: The debtor always has the money
because he is the one borrowing it, so when the President wrote the money order which
took the gold, they became the borrower/debtor, and that is why there is a Public Debt,
it is because they are borrowing the money from us, the Owner. What must happen
now is the debt must be redeemed back to the original owner. The next page is the
Executive Order (money order) that killed the government and made them the ones
liable for every debt they associate to. When you see “Executive” think, “execute” and
when you see “order,” think “money order.”
Because all the money was taken away in an executive order (money order), the
President is holding all the money that can pay the bills. Here is an example. A
national emergency occurs and an executive order is issued and money can now be
sent to the victims. Another example is when Mexico got money from the U.S. The
Congress said no but then the President by executive order then sent the money.
Another example is when the prisons are running out of money, an executive order can
be issued and now the prisons get all the funding the need.
Page 23 of 95 October 17, 2000
Executive Order Of April 5, 1933
UNDER EXECUTIVE ORDER OF
THE PRESIDENT
Issued April 5, 1933
All persons are required to deliver
ON OR BEFORE MAY 1, 1933 all GOLD COIN, GOLD BULLION, AND GOLD
CERTIFICATES now owned by them to a Federal Reserve Bank, branch or agency, or
to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System.
EXECUTIVE ORDER
FORBIDDING THE HOARDING OF GOLD COIN, GOLD BULLION, AND GOLD
CERTIFICATES
By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5(B) of the Act of October 6,
1917 as amended by Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, entitled “An Act to Provide
Relief in the Existing Emergency in Banking, and for other purposes” in which
Amendatory Act Congress declared that a serious emergency crises, I, Franklin D.
Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do declare that said national
emergency still continues to exist, and pursuant to said Section do hereby prohibit the
hoarding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United
States by individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations, and hereby prescribe
the following regulations for carrying out the purposes of this Order.
Section 1. For the purposes of this regulation the term “hoarding” means the
withdrawal and withholding of gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates from the
recognized and customary channels of trade. The term “person” means any individual,
partnership, association or corporation.
Section 2. All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933,
to a Federal Reserve Bank or branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the
Federal Reserve System all gold coins, gold bullion or gold certificates now owned by
them or coming into their ownership on or before April 23, 1933, except the following:
(a) Such amount of gold as may be required for legitimate and customary
use in industry, professions, or art within a reasonable time, excluding gold prior
to refining and stocks of gold in reasonable amounts for the usual true
requirements of owners mining and refining such gold.
(B) Gold coins and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the
aggregate $100 belonging to any one person; and gold coin having a recognized
special value to collectors or rare and unusual coins.
© Gold coin and bullion earmarked or held in trust for a recognized
foreign government (or foreign central bank or the Bank for International
Settlements).
Page 24 of 95 October 17, 2000
(d) Gold coin and bullion licensed for other proper transactions (not
involving hoarding) including gold coin and bullion imported for re-export or held
pending action on application for export licenses.
Section 3. Until otherwise ordered by any other person becoming the owner of
any gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates after April 23, 1933, shall within three
days after receipt thereof, deliver the same in the manner prescribed in Section 2:
unless such gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates are held for any of the purposes
specified in paragraphs (a), (B), or © of Section 2: or unless such gold coin, or gold
bullion is held for purposes specified in paragraph (d) of Section 2 and the person
holding it is, with respect to such gold coin or bullion, a licensee or applicant for license
pending action thereon.
Section 4. Upon receipt of gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates delivered to
it in accordance with Section 2 or 3, the Federal reserve bank or member bank will pay
therefore an equivalent amount of any form of coin or currency coined or issued under
the laws of the United States.
Section 5. Member banks shall deliver all gold coin, gold bullion and gold
certificates owned or received by them (other than as exempted under the provisions of
Section 2) to the Federal reserve banks of their respective districts and receive credit or
payment therefore.
Section 6. The Secretary of the Treasury, out of the sum make available to the
President by Section 301 of the Act of March 9, 1933, will in all proper cases pay the
reasonable costs of transportation of gold coin, gold bullion or gold certificates delivered
to a member bank or Federal reserve bank in accordance with Section 2, 3,or 5 hereof,
including the cost of insurance, protection, and such other incidental costs as may be
necessary, upon production of satisfactory evidence of such costs. Voucher forms for
this purpose may be procured from Federal Reserve Banks.
Section 7. In cases where the delivery of gold coin, gold bullion or gold
certificates by the owners thereof within the time set for the above will involve
extraordinary hardship or difficulty, the Secretary of the Treasury may, in his discretion,
extended the time within which such delivery must be made. Applications for such
extensions must be make in writing under oath, addressed to the Secretary of the
Treasury and filed with a Federal reserve bank. Each application must state the date to
which the extension is desired, the amount and location of the gold coin, gold bullion
and gold certificates in respect of which such application is made and the facts showing
extension to be necessary to avoid extraordinary hardship or difficulty.
Section 8. The Secretary of the Treasury is hereby authorized and empowered
to issue such further regulations as he may deem necessary to carry out the purpose of
this order and to issue licenses there under, through each offices or agencies as he
may designate, including licenses permitting the Federal reserve banks and member
banks of the Federal Reserve System, in return for an equivalent amount of other coin,
currency or credit, to deliver, earmark or hold in trust gold coin and bullion to or for
persons showing he need for the same for any of the purposes specified in Paragraphs
(a), © and (d) of Section 2 of these regulations.
Section 9. Whoever willfully violates any provision of this Executive Order or of
these regulations or of any rule, regulation or license issued there under may be fined
not more than $10,000, or if a natural person, may be imprisoned for not more than ten
Page 25 of 95 October 17, 2000
years, or both and any officer, director or agency of any corporation who knowingly
participates in any such violation may be punished by a like fine, imprisoned, or both.
This order and these regulations may be modified or revoked at any time.
FRANKLIN D. ROOSEVELT
THE WHITE HOUSE
April 5, 1933
Further Information Consult Your Local Bank

Continued with gold tommorrow from where this leaves off.  You can call it a cliff hanger if you are still interested to this point.  Peace to all of you.
« Last Edit: July 06, 2004, 11:18:02 pm by unstructuredreality »
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #22 on: July 08, 2004, 06:02:10 pm »

Page 25 of 95 October 17, 2000
GOLD CERTIFICATES may be identified by the words “GOLD CERTIFICATE”
APPEARING THEREON. The serial number and the Treasury seal on the face of a
GOLD CERTIFICATE are printed in YELLOW. Be careful not to confuse GOLD
CERTIFIACTES with other issues which are redeemable in gold but which are not
GOLD CERTIFICATES. Federal Reserve Notes and United States Notes are
“redeemable in gold” but are not “GOLD CERTIFICATES” and are not required to be
surrendered.
Special attention is directed to the exceptions allowed under
Section 2 of the Executive Order
CRIMINAL PENALTIES FOR VIOLATIONS OF EXECUTIVE ORDER
Page 26 of 95 October 17, 2000
The Supersedeas Bond To Pay Our Debts
(To Stave Off The Execution)
HJR-192 of June 5, 1933 is the bond the government issued to balance the
exchange to re-credit the people and is our insurance policy to stave off execution of
law, which allows it to pass over us for our benefit. The bond is on the debit side of the
United States Governments ledger, which was a debited from their credit, created by
the Executive Order of April 5, 1933 when they took the gold out of circulation. Public
Policy is rooted in HJR-192 and is Grace that creates our exemption. This is your
temporal saving Grace. Under Grace, the law falls away to create a more perfect
contract. Public Policy removed the people’s liability to make all payments by making a
contract null if it required the payment to be in substance or debt, because the people
didn’t have any money to pay with. All that must be done now is to discharge the
liability. Pay and discharge are similar words but the principles are as different as Old
and New Testaments. The word “pay” is equated with gold and silver, or something of
substance like a first-born lamb, which requires tangible work to be invested in it to
remove the liability because an execution must occur. The word “Discharge” is equated
with paper, or even more basic, simple credits and debits, that exist on paper only, like
the slate held by the agents/angels of heaven that get swiped clean when you pray.
You cannot pay a bill with a bill and you cannot pay a debt with a debt and you can’t pay
a debt with notes. You need a bond to pay a bill and that’s what Public Policy does.
The best we can do is if a debt exists is to write it off, but that can only happen if we
give the property back to the original owner. See corporations pay with debt
instruments and we pay with asset instruments. Look at this example. Bail notices
write “Pay by check or money order, do not send cash.” HJR-192 made it against
Public Policy to pay with debt therefore if you didn’t get a check with their demand; their
order for money needs to be returned as they failed to give you the appropriated cost for
production. What HJR-192 did was, remove the liability of an obligor (someone
obligated to pay a debt) by making it against Public Policy to pay debts with debt. All
that needs to be done now is discharge the debt with an appropriate credit “dollar for
dollar,” or exchange the “bill for the bond” or the “past liability for the future liability,” thus
passing over the present liability of the “Note.” The “Note” is the promise to deliver the
offer. The one problem the industrial society has is there is no money to even credit the
account with and because of that we (the creators of the industrial products) are the
credit that the industrial society needs to adjust the ledger. They need our
acknowledgement of having received the charge from them to be able to discharge their
duty, just like electrical currency otherwise, they have an aging accounts receivable that
they cannot close without our endorsement as to the benefits that were provided. As
the operator, they need to charge us so we can ground/charge-back the account thus
paying the tax. Debt must be “discharged dollar for dollar” in the same sense, as sin
must be repented of as soon as it is incurred, an acknowledgment must be given. The
moment a debt exists, it must be written off. We have to take on the charge to allow
them to discharge the account, and when we give them acknowledgement by our
acceptance, they can now zero the account by grounding the charge-back to where it
came from (See Calendar Year & Fiscal Year) and clean up their delinquently held open
books/accounts. The catch is, we can’t write off/charge off the debt because we are not
Page 27 of 95 October 17, 2000
in possession of the account in deficit; our fiduciary agent is in possession of the
account so we must provide him with the tax return (by the return of the original offer) so
the fiduciary can discharge the liability through their internal revenue service (the
bookkeeper). We don’t need to make payments that are “acceptable by our fiduciaries,”
which would entail that we made the offer; you make the acceptance and return their
offer as payment. They offer, we don’t, we return. See it is the paper that is the
collateral itself, not the property described under Public Policy. The tangible property
merely goes along with the owner of the paper because (substance/execution of a
commodity) cannot be used as a method of payment in Grace/Public Policy.
Most feel that when the money was taken out of society, the people became the
slaves, this is not true, the people were freed from every obligation that society could
create thus freeing the people from any obligation which they may incur simply because
we cannot pay a debt. Ask yourself the question, What are you charging me with? And
how do you expect me to pay? Simply said, there is no money, plain and simple for me
to make the payment with and on top of that, if I were to pay, who is paying me to pay
that guy and who’s paying that guy and so on... Public Policy is the supersedeas bond
because it limits our liability to pay. It is the more perfect contract because it operates
on Grace to pay our debts after we have done all that we can. We go as far as we can
to fulfill the obligation (acceptance and tax return) and after we have done all we can,
mercy and Grace kick in being our exemption to make the payment. Grace/Public
Policy creates our exemption in the industrial society so long as we accept the charge
(Christ). Hebrew 7:22.
Page 28 of 95 October 17, 2000
Public Policy HJR-192
JOINT RESOLUTION TO SUSPEND THE GOLD
STANDARD AND ABROGATE THE GOLD
CLAUSE, JUNE 5, 1933
H.J. Res. 192, 73rd Cong., 1st Session
Joint resolution to assure uniform value to the coins and currencies of the United
States.
Whereas the holding of or dealing in gold affect the public interest, and therefore
subject to proper regulation and restriction; and
Whereas the existing emergency has disclosed that provisions of obligations
which purport to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a particular kind of
coin or currency of the United States, or in an amount of money of the United States
measured thereby, obstruct the power of the Congress to regulate the value of money
of the United States, and are inconsistent with the declared policy of the Congress to
maintain at all times the equal power of every dollar, coined or issued by the United
States, in the markets and in the payment of debts. Now, therefore, be it
Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America
in Congress assembled, That (a) every provision contained in or made with respect to
any obligation which purports to give the obligee a right to require payment in gold or a
particular kind of coin or currency, or in an amount in money of the United States
measured thereby, is declared to be against Public Policy; and no such provision shall
be contained in or made with respect to any obligation hereafter incurred. Every
obligation, heretofore or hereafter incurred, whether or not any such provisions is
contained therein or made with respect thereto, shall be discharged upon payment,
dollar for dollar, in any such coin or currency which at the time of payment is legal
tender for public and private debts. Any such provision contained in any law authorizing
obligations to be issued by or under authority of the United States, is hereby repealed,
but the repeal of any such provision shall not invalidate any other provision or authority
contained in such law.
(B) As used in this resolution, the term "obligation" means an obligation (including
every obligation of and to the United States, excepting currency) payable in money of
the United States; and the term "coin or currency" means coin or currency of the United
States, including Federal Reserve notes and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks
and national banking associations.
SEC. 2. The last sentence of paragraph (1) of subsection (B) of section 43 of the
Act entitled " An Act to relieve the existing national economic emergency by increasing
agricultural purchasing power, to raise revenue for extraordinary expenses incurred by
reason of such emergency, to provide emergency relief with respect to agricultural
Page 29 of 95 October 17, 2000
indebtedness, to provide for the orderly liquidation of joint-stock land banks, and for
other purposes", approved May 12, 1933, is amended to read as follows:
"All coins and currencies of the United States (including Federal Reserve notes
and circulating notes of Federal Reserve banks and national banking associations)
heretofore or hereafter coined or issued, shall be legal tender for all debts, for public
and private, public charges, taxes, duties, and dues, except that gold coins, when below
the standard weight and limit of tolerance provided by law for the single piece, shall be
legal tender only at valuation in proportion to their actual weight."
Approved June 5, 1933, 4:30 p.m.
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #23 on: July 08, 2004, 06:04:20 pm »

cont.

Page 29 of 95 October 17, 2000
Page 30 of 95 October 17, 2000
Pre-Payment of The Promise
Is The Pass Over
The Pass Over of exchanging the Past Liability for the Future Liability creates an
effect that you have the option to accept the charge (Christ) and allow it to pass-thru
(pass over) through the return, which is of the freewoman in accordance with Public
Policy/Grace, or you have the option to not accept the charge and counter-offer and to
be of the bonds maid. These two jurisdictions exist right on top of each other in the
industrial society.
At the Treasury, the order is T-Bills, T-Notes, and T-Bonds. They are all at
different levels of indebtedness. T-Bills are for one year or less and are for the Past
Liability, T-Notes are for 10 years or less and are the Present Liability, and T-Bonds are
10 years or more and are the Future Liability. Notes insure bills. Bonds insure both
notes and bills. See how the note insures the bill until you move further to the right in
which the bond insures both the note and the bill. A greater debt insures the lesser is
what I am trying to display.
See, Diagram Of The Pass-Over. It goes Bills, Notes, and Bonds. Now if you
look back in the earlier topics, you will see “The Money Order (Bill) For Gold” and “The
Supersedeas Bond To Pay Our Debts,” you will notice that it skipped over the “Note.” In
my writings, I wrote the Bill then went directly to the Bond. Where is the Note? The
Note is the Promises of Abraham and is the promise by the offeror to deliver first, which
is what we are all looking for in life; they are the blessings in the storehouse of the
United States Corporation that we need as sustenance.
What needs to be done is we need to determine who is entitled to the Promissory
Note of Abraham (delivery of the offer) to determine who will get the blessings so we
turn to Galatians 4:22-31. In our society, we have two jurisdictions, one right on top of
the other, one is of the bonds maid and one is of the freewoman, you choose which one
you are in our society just by your operation (Public and Private) through your use or
non-use of Public Policy. If you read into the scriptures, you will see that the bonds
maid is of mount Sinai (Mosaic Law/Public Jurisdiction), and the children of the
freewoman are heirs to the promise (of Christ/Private Jurisdiction). The difference
between the two is the acceptance of the Christ. Here is an important part; Christ is the
charge off of the account. When you accept Christ, you are now of the freewoman and
not in bondage of the bonds maid. The promise (The Note) is entitled to the acceptor of
the offeror’s promise to deliver the property whether intangible or tangible. The
acceptor is entitled to the delivery of the offer. Now it is identified to whom the promise
(The Note) is entitled.
The Promise is the Promissory Note in the middle and is the Present Liability.
The Note is also the promise by the offeror to deliver the offer. John the Baptist sums
up the attitude of the Offeror when he said in Mathew 3:9 (KJV) “And think not to say
within yourselves, We have Abraham to our father…” Our fiduciaries act as though they
are entitled to the Promise when in fact it takes the acceptance of the charge
Page 31 of 95 October 17, 2000
(Acceptance of Christ off of the account) for that to happen. The Promise is all of the
blessings in the storehouse; it is all of the property required as our sustenance.
When the Offeror didn’t pay for his demand and provide a check to show value
for his claim (an appropriation for production) i.e. ignored HJR-192, and billed me, he is
treating me as though I am of the bonds maid and I am his bond in whom he is drawing
on. He is trying to make withdrawals from me without making any deposits; he over
drafted the full value of the demand. The moment the Offeror billed (past Liability) me
and didn’t provide the Promissory Note (the check/ Present Liability) and drew on me as
though I was the bond (future Liability), he skipped over the Note by keeping it as my
fiduciary (See Replevin Bond) and pre-paid the Note by calling on the bond (me) to
liquidate my strawman thus paying for the bill and the note at the liquidation of the bond.
What Public Policy does is it reverses entries so the offeror who acts in disregard of
Public Policy becomes the child of the Bonds maid. By not forgiving me of my debt, his
debts won’t be forgiven. Accepting in accordance with Public Policy allowed it to
continue to pass over me and back to the Offeror in whom now becomes the child of the
bonds maid by not freeing me of my bondage and because he didn’t free me of his
bondage, he is not to be freed from the bondage he just put himself in. The Offeror
claiming me as a debtor, indebted himself for the full value of my debt to him, see
Mathew 6:12, Ephesians 4:32. The reason he indebted himself to me was because
Public Policy as my bond makes it against Public Policy to make a payment in debt and
in turn then draws the same amount of value that was made against me (the acceptor)
drawn against the offer, for his taxable claim of skipping over the Note (failing to provide
me with a check for the value of his claim, i.e. the appropriation for production).
When the bill passed over the note (passed over the present time and went into
the future) for settlement by going directly to the bond (a bond is an evidence of an
indebtedness/ a debtor), it called the bond. My accuser is calling on me as though I am
an heir to the bonds maid and is treating me as though I am a debtor. What my accuser
did was passed over the Promissory Note for payment and began to execute me. The
Promissory Note is the blessings that are in the storehouse. It is the material substance
that we need for survival is what the Note is. When my accuser looked to me for the
payment (treated me as the bond holder) rather than look to the note (the property) for
the payment of the bill, he called the bond and paid the note and the bill. In that, what
happens is a creditor has to only show you as a debtor to be able to make the check
good to pay the vendor. See, once you are labeled as a debtor it makes the credit to
the venders account good. You don’t even have to have money in the account because
when a holder-in-due-course is the holder of an instrument (like a check), he could force
the draw on the account when there is no money in the account (even without overdraft
protection). But you see, labeling you as a debtor means that the accuser has put you
to death/debt or is trying to execute you. Public Policy then became our supersedeas
bond that stopped the execution and made the payment for us by putting the liability
back on the person that demanded money and did not provide a check (an
appropriation for expenditure). When the Promise is skipped over the offeror offers
himself as the bonds maid child.
Page 32 of 95 October 17, 2000
See, it is the corporation or the offeror that has “the promise to pay” the
note/blessings over to the owner/acceptor, being as the corporation is the maker of the
Offer (the maker of the Note). The corporation has this liability to deliver the offer
because that is the purpose it serves. Corporations exist to make offers. When the
offer is withheld, and not delivered, the corporation has now become a delinquent
holder of the blessings when notice was given that the account has been accepted and
is entitled to the release. When the release is refused, the corporation is now a tax
fugitive being as they hold the offer (on book liability) and the order for adjustment (my
acceptance) as an off book asset and is not applying the acceptance to the account for
the zero out/grounding of the energy. The corporation is holding off-book energy, which
creates a tax delinquency on the offeror’s part due to their mismanagement of their
books. See, Firm Offer & Possession & Payment and See, Replevin Bond.
Seeing that to use the bond/debt/death to pay is execution of law, operation of
law is to use the Note to pay. Remember the Note is the blessings in the storehouse.
The Note is the tangible substance that carries it’s own intrinsic value. The Note is the
Promise of Abraham that you will have not enough to receive. Using the Note to make
the payment requires the discernment of conscience (See Money Is The Biggest Drug)
in operation of law. The intrinsic value is the real value that Public Policy provides as
the payment. The questions that are asked of the Note are this “Did the product pay for
itself? Did it serve its purpose? Did it accomplish what was intended from it when it
was created? Is the product resourceful? Was the product worth using? Would you
use the product again? Is the product useful?” See these are all questions that only the
person in possession of the property can answer as these types of questions cannot get
a dollar amount of value, but an intrinsic answer. The moment the person in possession
says “Yes, it paid for itself in it’s resourcefulness” and doesn’t make a tax return of the
product. The creditor got paid because the Note paid for itself. See the present Liability
will pay for itself because the world is pretty much no more or less mass than when it
started and all that has changed was the atoms have been organized into more
resourceful products. Other than what has gone into space and things like that, the
mass of the world is identical to that in which it started, if you want to break it down this
far, the quarks have just changed locations but the mass is still identical. No liability is
incurred in the reorganization of atoms other than to reorganize them expends energy,
which is then absorbed by neighbor atoms and then expelled and absorbed and so on
forever, but the mass never changes. The earth’s liability never increases when things
are broken down into the atomic structure. When the mass stays the same, which is the
present. And that is why we have to live in the now.
Now examine this, this part is operation of law because it requires the
discernment of your conscience. Ask a homeless man how much a roof is worth and he
will say priceless. Not because roofs are monetarily priceless but because a roof has
so much more intrinsic value than any amount can come close to. See it is just like the
law. The letter of the law killeth but the spirit giveth life. See the law/money will always
fall short as a method of value because everybody has his or her own opinion. The
Federal Reserve has their opinion; the gas station has their opinion, get a look at this.
The government says that hundred dollar bills are worth a hundred dollars but my
Page 33 of 95 October 17, 2000
grocer won’t take bills larger than a fifty. See to the grocer, the money over fifty dollars
is worthless. Everybody has his or her own opinion. Just accept that and realize that
that is their business, not yours, see 1 Thessalonians 4:11. When people get involved
in your business, then use Public Policy on the account.
The predicament is that debt cannot be used as a method of payment under
Public Policy so to whomever testifies of a value other than the intrinsic value of remedy
for their brother is in disregard of Public Policy/Grace “This means creditors love thy
debtors as thyself,” and now the testifier must deliver the value for the demand/claim to
allow the other party to operate in accord with Public Policy. See everybody’s policy
has to be in accord with the Public Policy when you accept in accordance with Public
Policy, because it is the policy for the public, they have to follow it.
When the promise is passed over, it appears as though the offeror is billing me
as though I am the bond. Here is an example, when you write a check (bill) and don’t
make any deposits (pass over note) against your bank (bond), you will overdraft the
account 100% of the time. That is what is happening when the offeror bills and
overdrafts us for the value of their claim, will the overdraft is the pass over and if you
look at the arc on the diagram, it looks just like a bouncing check (overdraft).
So when they skip over the promise by call me as their bonds maid child, they
are actually indebting themselves and pre-payed the promise for the acceptor of the
charge because when they overdraft against me and I accept, it now becomes a “loan”
to the offeror in which I am sponsoring the credit. See over drafting is identified as an
extension of credit and is treated as a “loan,” not as a negative deposit balance.
The pre-payment of the product in accordance with Public Policy occurs when
the product is created in fact. The last words Christ spoke prior to dieing on the cross
were “It is finished,” well that is the fulfillment of the law or the fulfillment of the payment
and that was the industrial society saying, “it is finished” as the bell rings as one more
car comes out of the manufacturing plant. See the manufacturing of the product is the
payment for it in fact. The same amount of energy put into the product for it’s creation
by a mutual employer like myself is the same amount of energy received from it when it
works in accordance with the owners desires of unobstructed possession and use (See,
Understanding The Energy). The Corporation of the United States of America is a team
effort. We still need to live so people will still have to create. Nothing stops; it just
adjusts the value structure from that of money to that of remedy of sustenance for
survival.
Diagram Of The Pass Over
(7) Pre-Paid Note
-Order/property is the arrow
-Release the order
(2) The Property apart from owner
(3) Delivery (1) Manufacturing Plant
Public Land
Own/Private Land
Bill Note Bond
Past Liability Present Liability Future Liability
Draw of debt on BOW/BOE
Primes account for Acceptor of BOE
(4) debt (6) Sponsor Credit
-Adjustment -Add justice
-Fulfill law -Point of diminishing return
(5) Payment by acceptance of charge (Christ)
The Wise Men of the bonds maid were called and liquidated, they came from the
east (debt/the red) and delivered Christ’s pre paid account. When they left through their
own land (foreign) it drew on the BOW/BOE/Bill of Exchange which indebted the Christ
and made the payment (on the cross) and tensioned the bow for the release of the
order (arrow/ follow the straight and narrow/ the straightened arrow) and sponsored the
credit by his death for the acceptor of the charge.
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #24 on: July 08, 2004, 06:05:45 pm »

Page 34 of 95 October 17, 2000
Due to the bill (Past Liability) calling directly on the child (execution of law) as
though the child was the bonds (Future Liability) maid child rather than stopping at the
Note (Present Liability) for the payment (operation of law) as though the child is an heir
to the promise, it turned the bill into a bond drawn on the offeror for having attempted to
execute the child, having exchanged the past liability for the future liability, it pre-paid
the present liability. Therefore the offeror indebted himself for the value of his claim by
opting to act in disregard of Public Policy/Grace, thus liquidating the bond from the
offeror’s end (the offeror is now of the bonds maid) and pre-paying the Note for the
acceptor of the Charge (acceptor of Christ).
Page 35 of 95 October 17, 2000
A bill is a demand for performance whether it is a monetary issue or a
performance issue.
The Note is the Promissory note of Abraham, which is the offer being a promise
to deliver, it is all the blessings and the sustenance that we are creating in society for
our life, and the heir to the promise gets the Note.
The Bond is Public Policy as the supersedeas bond; all contracts have to be in
accordance with Public Policy. When it is instilled into the contract it removes the
obligation to make payment in money. Public Policy/Grace makes our payment for us
when we accept the charge (Christ). When the bill exchanged for the bond, they
became the same thing against the drawer when it was done in derelict of Public Policy.
Page 36 of 95 October 17, 2000
Grace/Public Policy
Owner of both sides of the account/ blessings on both sides of the account
Own Business Own Business
Note Land Lord Note Land Lord Note
See how if we stick with the Promises of Abraham: The Note, there is no debt or
Bond. We need to look to the Promises of Abraham for the value of what we are doing
in life, not to a Bonds maid child /a debtor to whom owes us.
Straight is the path narrow is the Way (The Straightened Arrow): Keep to your
own business (Your individual private process).
Examine, Diagram Of The Pass Over, the Note is the Present Liability and that
always remains at zero= NO DEBT.
Page 37 of 95 October 17, 2000
Execution Of Law Against Your Brother
The Fight For The Note
Land Lord Note Land Lord
When you execute against your brother and fight for the note (Promises of
Abraham) and forget that you have promises on both sides of you as the owner of both
sides of the account, and call him to pay for the debt, you have called him to be the
bonds maid child
The Fight For The Note
BONDS MAID Land Lord Note Land Lord BONDS MAID
Newton’s Third Law of Motion: Whenever one object exerts a force on a second
object, the second object exerts an equal magnitude, but an opposite direction force on
the first object.
See when you call someone a debtor (call on their bond), you have unwittingly
coined yourself a BONDS MAID child. Public Policy provides for the accused a remedy
under Grace/Public Policy to supersede the execution by the accuser and forces the
accuser to pay the debt and release the Note to the accused.
Page 38 of 95 October 17, 2000
Re-Paying Creates
A Futures Contract
Re-paying is very simple. The entire economy is already pre-paid because it is
the manufacturing that pays for it (look to the Note (Present Liability of the Earth) rather
than the Bond (Future Liability) for the payment). Look at it this way: We have a car
sitting on a dealer’s lot. You walk up to buy the car. Does the dealer ever tell you “I am
glad you are going to buy this car because we have to find out how we are going to pay
for this car to be built?” No is the answer you would get, but that is exactly what they
are doing when you go to the bank to get a loan to pay for the Treasury Bill, that built
the car. See with Public Policy the Treasury Bill is both a bill and a bond, so when I give
them my bond (a payment), that creates two bonds making the payment on one
product, this shows that my payment is being invested into a futures contract (this is
called a false prophet/profit). The manufacturing company already paid for the car to get
it built. Proof that the car was paid for is that it is sitting there on the lot. When do they
ever build something and then talk about how they are going to finance it to be built.
The product was paid for when the contract was put in place to collect the industrial
recourses through the Army Corp of Engineers, EPA, DOT, and OSHA in Flint,
Michigan to build it. Even more precisely, the item was paid for when the census did a
per-capita poll to identify how much money those agencies should put into the economy
based on our productivity, (unfortunately take a quick look at Marxism and Keynesian
Economics to make a connection with your worth and your previous status). Now
everybody with a head (per capita) raise your hand. Good, the municipality loaned
against you as a liability to the city and at the corporate level, human resources says,
“Our employees are our most important asset.” This is the “Principal Account” that
finances every operation. Making the Note pre-paid for the acceptor by sponsoring
(underwriting) the credit.
This is one of the most important parts to understand the value of what we are as
children of God. Work to live, don’t live to work. Your daily works and good deeds
cannot be done in every facet to sustain life (I can’t build a car, my house, and my food
all at the same time) and because of that, your help in what you prefer to spend your
time doing, in the industrial society (Corporation of The United States Of America) takes
care of any obligation that may be incurred to sustain your existence. The principal
reason you are Pre-Paid is because Christ’s acceptance of the sins in the Garden of
Gethsemane and His death on the cross, created the Pre-Payment of all your liabilities
both temporal and spiritual because they are inseparable, since I wasn’t here two
thousand years ago but my sins were pre-paid (the Note was pre-paid) on the condition
that I accept the Redeemer (The Charge). We are just spiritual beings having temporal
experiences. You are the source of economic production being the principal and your
interest accruing from you i.e. a per-capita census statistics was pledged as the
collateral to be the sponsor of the monetary systems’ credit. That is why when interest
that accrues from the principal gets returned (tax returned) to the principal, there is a
decrease in tax liability (a deduction). The vendor is paying his taxes to you. That is
why it is a tax matter. Tax is just a return of the interest to the principal.
Page 39 of 95 October 17, 2000
Having labeled me as a debtor, it made the check good to the vendor to pay for
the product but you see the product is paid for once the object has been used, so when
I make my monetary payment on the debt, I am re-paying the bond that was already
used to pay for the debt so the money I am sending my accuser is being invested into a
futures contract. See it operates as a huge discharge machine where one person pays
for another person’s liabilities before the debt is even incurred so it can be invested into
a futures contract to pay future liability. We are all paying for each other’s sins in this
fashion, each redoing what Christ has already done for us. What happened was the
bond was swapped for the bill (The Past was exchanged for the Future) and that is what
creates the ability for the bill to pay for itself because the person who is making the
demand already got their money. Everybody is pre-paying each other’s liability by
investing the payments that are currently being made into a futures contract to pay for a
new product. We are being each other’s Christ in a huge discharge machine because
of our lack of faith, not realizing He already fulfilled the law.
Page 40 of 95 October 17, 2000
Very Basic Accounting
(I Am Not An Accountant So It Is A Little
Hard To Explain, Please Bear With Me)
Credits and Debits are all it amounts too. They are the mirror image of each
other but it becomes difficult to understand because they are usually referenced to the
one speaking them. When I say “my credit,” it is actually “your debit” and when you say
“my debit,” it is actually “your credit,” credits and debits to easily understand them
referenced them in first person for your situation, and the mirror image to another party.
My interest is your expense and my expense is your interest. Credits and Debits are
placed on a T-Chart for every person involved in the equation. Everybody involved in a
transaction has a T-Chart that must be adjusted to Zero and grounded/charged-back to
remove any liability avoiding a levy to the account. Credits and debits must operate
fluidly like water, there must be no restriction of the flow or the accounts will be
unbalanced. Every debit must have an offsetting credit and every credit must have an
offsetting debit.
It is a fundamental operation of our current economic system that as we talk
about money as currency, both of which are synonymous in our society. It is necessary
to relate the understanding of basic electronics to that of accounting. Electronics all
start at the atomic level with a charge of an ion. A balanced atom carries no charge
because the protons are at an even balance with the electrons making a neutral charge.
Electricity is a negative charge because it is the influx of electrons to the atom that
ionize it with a charge. Electronics is the exchange of negative charges that start at one
edge of a battery and once the battery is put into the circuit (court), the battery
discharges as the negative electrons flow to the positive protons as they Pass Thru the
system. The electrons search out the protons to balance the charge to a neutral
substance and that is what happens when a new battery full of electricity is attached to
a circuit (court), the charges flow from the negative side to the positive side, thus
neutralizing the battery and it said the battery is dead. When talking about a battery,
everybody thinks of a warehouse for electricity and then if you get more specific in the
batteries operation, the battery “holds an electrical charge.” Remembering that a
charge is a negative energy particle (a debt). The flow of the battery is not from the
positive side to the negative side like most people think but from the negative side to the
positive side. The charge carries the energy. Now it is possible to see that the word
“charge” is negative energy. Now relating our economic currency system to that of
electric currency, our economic structure is based on “Federal Reserve Notes.” A note
or “a promise to pay,” is a negative energy because it is a liability to the issuer, being
the United States Government, it is a debt instrument, and debt is equated with “being
in the red,” or a negative “-.“ Debt instruments are negative charges. A draft or “a order
to pay” is a positive energy because it is an asset to the issuer, it is a credit instrument,
a credit is equated with “black ink,” or positive “+.” Credit instruments are positive,
because the liability claimed against the debtor (a person holding a debit account) can
discharge the liability by issuing a draft (to credit the creditors account) for a discharge
of the charge by passing through the endorsers name to reach the other side of the
ledger.
Words the Public use
Debits Charge Promissory Note Promise -
Credits Discharge Drafts Order +
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #25 on: July 08, 2004, 06:07:29 pm »

Page 41 of 95 October 17, 2000
The catch is Charges and Discharges, see the public can only discharge the
account when they truly charge you with an object. By coming after you with the object,
and when you take the object into the calendar year (whether it is a paper or a product)
they can now discharge their books because they can no longer claim it on their books
as it has left a fiscal year and is now on your books as an asset. But if we are talking
about the shadow of the charge, you can’t hold the charge, you have to redirect it back
to itself, but if it is an object, you can have possession if a witness says you can,
through registration.
In a very practical economic scenario, lets say you go to the store and you have
money in your pocket and you go to buy a sandwich. You walk into the store and the
sandwich is five dollars. You have credit in your pocket, which is your money because it
is a debt on the government, being a note of United States issue, their liability, and your
asset, your credit. The sandwich shop charges five dollars for the sandwich and you
take the credit out of your pocket and count it out 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 dollars. When you hand it
to the cashier, you debited the credit you had in your hand and charged the store with
the physical possession of the money at the same time as the sandwich shop charged
you with possession of the sandwich. Because the store charged you five dollars, you
discharged your liability to pay for the sandwich by giving them the credit from your
pocket. Immediately after the debit of your money into the cashier’s possession, the
cashier is now holding both items, your money and your sandwich. To avoid a crime or
a “criminal charge,” the cashier must instantaneously debit or release the sandwich from
the cashier’s possession into your control, re-crediting you with sustainable life. The
release of the sandwich was a tax return of one of the items, being either a tax return of
the money or a tax return of the property back into your possession. When this event
occurs instantaneously, it is called an “exchange,” something for something and there is
no income, because the expense was equal the income. Charging for money is called
sin. Charging with the property is called sinE, or sign, the “E” is representative by
physics in shorthand being energy.
Lets follow the exchange that just occurred: First you started with a credit of
money. Second you placed an Order for food and debited your pocket. Third, the
cashier is credited with your money and Fourth, the debit of the sandwich from the store
which immediately credits you with life. This is a very basic exchange, in that it only
involves two people, you and the cashier. It all happened instantaneously making it an
exchange of your intangible money to a tangible item of food, the income was balanced
with an equal expense on both sides, making it an exchange and a non-taxable event.
Page 42 of 95 October 17, 2000
Charges Of Sin=Coming At You With The Shadow
& The Strawman
When you commit an offense of the law, the system charges you. Lets take a
ticket scenario because they are very simple to display. You are driving down the road,
not hurting anybody and your taillight is out. An officer of the law pulls you over and is
trying to defer some of the municipalities’ debt onto you by giving you a ticket (the
accounts receivables market). The ticket charges you with sin because of your
transgression and in essence, the ticket is placed on the books as the municipalities’
asset, which credits them and debits you in the process, the court being the collection
agency for the liability of your ticket. The taking of your money without providing any
product to you means that the ticket was representative of the shadow, there was no
object given to you to offset your expense. The Officer charged you with the shadow
hoping that you would supply the object, being the check payable to the clerk to cast the
shadow. My city’s Comprehensive Annual Financial Report has this quote in it “Our
goal is to operate in a business like manner, while realizing our product is a service and
our arena is non-competitive.” See they come with the shadow of the service, when we
need products to survive and the one product I don’t need is “vice” to operate, I am
already a good person. The officers offer to come at you with the shadow was the
equivalent of sin because scriptural, “sin” is “debt” and that is what the system uses to
charge with, a debt instrument, putting debt on you which is the equivalent of sin. The
charge was sin because it did not come with a product, to offset you debit and credit
you making an exchange. They taxed you as if the ticket was the interest that accrued
from the principal being the city, thus stealing your exemption. This is what the
strawman takes upon itself, because only fiction can hold sin (represented by debt.) In
an operation of sin, the system charges you with the shadow hoping that you will supply
the object (a check in the traffic situation, or in a court scenario, the recognition of their
authority in a show of fear). These are call “charges without charges,” or “empty
charges.” The reason it is “empty charges” is because there is no charge in the
account. Look at it this way; they want you to write a check when they didn’t give you
one. Ask yourself this question, “Can I write checks off of my checking account if I don’t
make deposits, and can I be mad at the bank when the check bounces because of
insufficient funds?” Well that is what they do with us, and when we don’t write a check
to them, they are as mad as all get out. This helps you identify why there is money. Let
me build through the example. The only way I can get money put into my checking
account is if I do work and get a paycheck or some side job, or if I sold something that I
worked for to buy. When they give us empty charges all they want you to do is to work
overtime so we can make a deposit into your checking account to be able to write them
a check. See how the only reason we have money is to make people work. Here
comes the private side of things and where Grace steps into the account. If I am
satisfying my obligations to abstain from be a busybody and to work with my hands from
what I read in the scriptures, do I need someone to compel me to work? NO. The
reason money exists is not so everybody can have some (Douche Mark), but to be able
to get some, you have to work. See how money is for people who wouldn’t work on
their own accord. If you can work on your own accord, money is a deterrent (look at
what Nikola Tesla could have brought forward for everybody if money wasn’t a
Page 43 of 95 October 17, 2000
deterrent). Money actually inhibits production for those that follow their consciences.
Without money it requires the discernment of your conscience and that is why it is still in
use today (not very many people use their consciences so they need the complement of
bills to pay).
When the system charges you for a sandwich or a crime, don’t think that for a
second they are going to take the charge off of their books and give it to you. They
charge you but they lie, what they do is charge you and hold onto the charge. See the
only way they can discharge their duty is to take the “charge off” of their books and give
it to you and charge you. See the “charge off” is to take the charge off the books and
close the account. But they won’t want to do that because they are so used to putting
debt on their ledger that they don’t want to take it off. Acceptance allows you to redirect
the charge back onto themselves to force the “charge off” of their books because of the
delinquent taxes they are holding. It is simple charges and discharges. If I give you a
paper, you are in charge of it, and I am discharged. If you return it to me, you are
discharged and I am charged. It is simple hot potato. But they keep the potato and tell
you that you are charged with it when in fact they keep it. The proof that they keep it is
because it is still on their books so they can’t possible have taken the charge off and
given it to you. Because to take the charge off would mean to write it off to close the
account (redemption) and when you see them holding it on their books, it is proof
positive that they are still holding onto the charge when they charged you.
When the system comes at you with the shadow, the only saving Grace is
Acceptance for Value because now that you took the offer for value and now owned it in
the calendar year, you can now return it to the fiscal year and the ticket pay for the sin
with itself. The public side cannot teach you how to hold the charge because it is
internal pondering that creates the possibilities. Redirecting the charge requires a lot of
apprenticeship because what you have to do is learn how to be in charge because then
you are holding the charge and are in charge of it. Now you can redirect the charge to
accomplish what your needs are. Now is an important part: you have to use the
discernment of your conscience and say the word “sin” and think about it as you hear
what you say phonetically.
Page 44 of 95 October 17, 2000
Charges Of Sign=Coming At You With The Object
& You The Owner
Remember previously the phonetic sound that “sin” makes; now we are going to
talk about charges of Sign, or charges of the Object. Take the short hand of physics
into play now to understand what “Sign” is. In physics, “E” is short for energy. And
when you look at “sin”, it is simply this; “Sin” with an “E” at the end, said phonetically it is
“sign.” See you have to put your energy into the debt instrument with your “sign” and
now the offer can be negotiated because you allowed the offer to Pass Thru your
account (unrestricted by the signature of your name and returned). When you sine the
ticket, the ticket becomes a negotiable contract that can now be exchanged into
products and services that the industrial society can function on.
To be charged with the object is this: Instead of debiting you with an “empty
charge,” like what the system does, here is how charges actually work for the private.
Take a quick read of Acts 8:27, see charge is an “in-charge” kind of thing if you know
how to accept it, not a bad thing. So when you are charged with an offense, you are incharge
of the offense and the only way they can discharge their duty (tax) is to charge
you with it. Now you are holding the tax.
When you go to the grocery store, and you are at the cashier ringing up the
groceries, the grocery clerk has to charge you with the groceries, not the bill for the
groceries. The grocery clerk has to physically put the groceries into the bag and that is
what you are charged with, not the shadow but the object. The shadow comes with the
object, not vise versa. These are real charges in fact. The real charges in fact are what
create the Sovereign. We are not the Sovereign until we are charged. Take a look at it
this way in the light of the scriptures. When the prophets of old were charged with the
priesthood, they were charged with the actual priesthood, not the sin if they use the
priesthood wrong. Now look at it this way in regards to your family. You are twelve
years old and you can now baby-sit for the first time, how excited you were. Ask
yourself this Question “Would I be in-charge if I wasn’t given any added responsibilities
from my parents?” No is the answer, because you would have to have more
responsibilities given to you in fact before you could be in-charge of the delegation to be
able to give the orders to your siblings. Now look at the last sentence, first you have to
be charged with a property (responsibility) before you could be in-charge (holding the
property of responsibility) before you could give the orders (money orders). True orders
come from being charged in fact, with an object, not the shadow. Now take it in light of
the constitution. We put the elect into office and charge them with possession of their
office in fact, and with that comes the duties and obligations to discharge their charge
by operating in accord with the constitution to guarantee a republican form of
government (a private side of government has to be guaranteed because we charged
them with the office to be the guarantors, also republic is to re-public the money like revenue)
and that is why there is a public debt. It exists because the public has signed a
promissory note as the guarantors of a republican form of government, which has
caused them to become indebted, to the owners of the guarantee. The reason there is
a public debt is not because they are holding the shadow of the debt (being paper
Page 45 of 95 October 17, 2000
claiming a liability) but because they are holding the object of all the publicly held
property being land, cars, and every type of publicly held property apart from the owner.
Every dollar is loaned into the economy and now the question is, who is the sponsor for
the loan? I am. Therefore what ever the intangible loan is exchanged for into a tangible
product must be returned to me before the debt can be discharged because I am the
sponsor for the credit in the first place. They have to charge me with the property and
then they can discharge their books.
To be able to hold the charge of the object, you have to have a witness to tell the
world that you are allowed to have it. This is one of the purposes of registration. Now
that you have registered your ownership with the state, they are your witness that you
are entitled to have it. See everything came from mother earth to start with and to be
able to keep it from her possession from a long time, you need a witness to testify on
your behalf as a fiduciary that you are entitled to possession.
Now that you can see how the system charges i.e. coming with the shadow and
how real charges work i.e. coming with the object. You can now understand why you
want to be charged. They give you sin and you turn it into sign by accepting it for value.
This Pass Thru of the account lets them use your name to fund the product. Charge me
because when you charge me you will either have to give me my property that I am
sponsoring or you will have to release the order of the court so I can exchange that
money order for my property.
Page 46 of 95 October 17, 2000
Internal Revenue Service/ IRS
The Internal Revenue Service and the IRS are two different things. You own the
Internal Revenue Service because it is your internal re-venue we are always talking
about; you are the owner of all the re-venue. Every accountant in the world works in the
Internal Revenue Service. It is as a communal effort of every corporation by being in
possession of this collective debt that makes up the Internal Revenue Service. Every
account that exists on the entire world is attached through the Internal Revenue Service
and is all inter connected through registration (picture a huge phonebook, a phone
number registry). That means person “A” through person “Z,” is attached through the
internal revenue service (kind of like a communal effort of the new world money order).
Agencies go into private with us because they are all the “Internal” revenue service, see
they are internal.
The debt is already collected, in that; it is all-existent in the public waiting for the
redemption of the collective debt. This is why we stay away from the word collection, it
is because the corporation already collected the debt and they are holding the debt over
my head. The collection already occurred and has taken place once somebody was
called a debtor. We use the word “presentment,” when we are dealing with the written
account of our acceptance. It is plain and simple; the internal revenue service is the
bookkeeper because 99.9% of tax forms get completed outside of the Hubs (district
offices) that send us letters.
Internal means private, like the back room of Albertson’s. Revenue means revenue,
which means to re-venue from the private jurisdiction to the public jurisdiction or
from one-person like a check, payable to another-person, or vise versa. Employees
conduct Services. Now that we have broken down “The Internal Revenue Service,” now
you can see why everything is a tax matter. One more tidbit is the Individual Master
File. If you read yours, it says crazy things like you are a drug runner from the Mariana
Islands or a Whisky Stiller from Puerto Rico, well that is because some corporation is
using your name to spend against. Some corporation is using your tax exemption to
build their business and they put the tax liability back on you by stealing your exemption
when they make you pay for a thing that is already paid for (See Pre-Paid and
Registration & Taxes). Corporations are the reason why your tax liability on April 15 is a
billion more than it ever should be, ever noticed a larger than normal tax bill? Well,
what is happening is a corporation has your name and social security number (TIN) on
their books and the corporation uses those two things to claim an expense of up to one
million dollars by writing you a check back to them self as your fiduciary because as the
operator of your name and social security number (TIN) on their books, they are your
fiduciary. By holding onto the check they wrote to you, with your social security number
(TIN) to claim the expense, they claim you had the income. This income gets reported
to the Internal Revenue Service to report your massive tax liability that you are paying
every April 15. With the tax liability, your self being exempt shows that some
corporation is using your name to write them self a check to avoid their own tax
liabilities both by claiming the expense and the capital to invest back into the economy
into a futures contract.
Page 47 of 95 October 17, 2000
When we talk about adjusting the account, we are directing the correspondents
to the bookkeeper in the back of the corporation, not to a district IRS office because
collectively, all of these corporations are using this soft money to collectively fund
themselves. Our paperwork never makes it to a district office (unless you are accepting
to the IRS) but it stays right in the corporation at the bookkeepers level.
Tax liens go against the taxpayers’ creditors; the lien is in favor of the taxpayer.
What the lien is showing is that some corporation is using my name and TIN and is not
paying their taxes (stealing my exemption) and because I am not paying the taxes
(applying my exemption to the account), we have two people claiming an exemption
(See 1040ES about claiming your exemption, and See Exemption & Deduction).
Because we are the owners of the exemption, not the corporation, the corporation that
is fraudulently using my exemption to avoid paying taxes when they are supposed to be
on the deduction schedule of paying taxes refuses to pay, the lien goes against the
corporations using the money.
The IRS is IRS/CID; all Criminal Charges come from the Treasury (which is the
cash register) (See Criminal Charges Are Delinquent Taxes). The IRS is the criminal
investigators that are responsible for charging people with offenses through the
Treasury. When you are charged with a crime the IRS charges the account with sin,
coming after you with the shadow (See Court Language- Forensic Accounting). The
reason they charge you, is because some corporation, whether municipal or not is using
your name and is going bad on their loans and because of that, they have to charge the
account to make up for the loss i.e. The more the government spends, the more they
have to pay back, but they charge you to get the necessary capital to pledge against,
and then create more prisons to try to correct the debt (Public Corrections). Take a
pondering thought about the bail schedule that they have for every crime. Consider that
your payment for their municipal bonds that they secure with your name and TIN. What
happens is the municipal corporation sells your name to Merrill Lynch or whomever on
some collateralized municipal bonds (you body being the collateral through execution of
law) and the economy gets funded because the mutual fund has more securities to be
invested in creating a bigger economy, which creates more products.
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #26 on: July 08, 2004, 06:08:55 pm »

Page 48 of 95 October 17, 2000
To get a remedy, it must go into the fiscal and back or into the calendar and
back. It must cross the account.
Everything in the circle is domestic to itself; everything outside the circle is
domestic to itself. Both inside the circle and outside the circle are foreign to the other.
To get the redemption, you need a foreign exchange.
Re-venuing the charge to the venue it oriented from grounds/charge-backs the
charge and dissipates the charge, i.e. from fiscal back to fiscal and likewise for the
reverse and pays the tax. The dissipation of the charge is the payment of the tax.
Page 49 of 95 October 17, 2000
Taxes,
Interest & Principal
My acceptances are a tax matter. Every payment is a payment of tax. Your
grocery bill is a tax bill, same when you rent a video. Did you return the video? Well
that was a tax return. Every offer being accepted and returned is a tax return. I look at
taxes this way: The Sovereign Taxing Authority Of The Nation= Police Powers=
Executive Branch= Executors of Law= Executing the Redeemer= Holding Him
Accountable= The Accountant= An Account. See how the liability of every account is a
tax liability. We hold the “Sovereign Taxing Authority” not by the police powers under
the executive branch but under operation of law do we get our just return (tax return).
The legislature fools the people into thinking that taxes are either 7%, 14%, or 28%, well
taxes are everything, like grocery bills, credit card bills, gas bills, bills in Congress and
the Senate, Offers, Acceptances, renderings, returning, they are all taxes. Another
thing the legislature did was with the word interest, interest is coined to be only the
interest that a bank account accrues, well that is one type of interest, the kind I am
writing about is the kind that is used in the phrase “That is interesting,” and “I have an
interest in that.” It is also a “security interest,” because I am an accommodation party
endorser.
Now remember interest accrues from the principal. The principal is the originator
of the interest because the interest was apart from the principal being “in trust” to the
fiduciary holder. Interest is that which is separated from the principal, which allows it to
be spent because when the interest is in the principal, it is all principal and cannot be
spent. Most banks advertise, “Come refinance a home loan from us because the
interest is tax deductible.” What is happening is the interest, which is accruing from the
principal, is returning to it for a public deduction. One principle that must be observed
here is taxes can be paid to the IRS on April 15, and you will receive a deduction of tax
liability for that year depending on the amount of the check you sent in or you can make
a payment of interest at your local home lender and obtain the same result= a tax
deduction. The principles of taxation are= what accrues from the Principal must return
to it for a deduction on the account. That is the same thing as “The Income tax is just
the Interest payments on the National Debt.” This is a correct principle. On April 15,
everybody in the public (where the national debt resides) makes a tax payment and in
turn, deducts the liability based on the payment to wherever the funds were used. Now
I understand the Grace Commission said that not one dime goes to the national debt
and that is correct in that the operating expenses of the government were more then the
payments were and could not reach the national debt so no payment could be applied
to the debt because it couldn’t cover the principal of the operating expenses. Lets take
it one step further, Now on a home loan, the money comes from your signature on the
promissory note, the credit is then issued to the construction company to pay off the
house and now you make payments to the bank. The interest is tax deductible. My first
question is where did the bank get the money to pay the construction company? Well,
here is a phonetic play on words. A bond is a debt instrument, and biblically, debt is sin.
In physics, “E” is short for “energy” and doesn’t the banker say “SinE on the dotted line”
or “Sign on the dotted line,” phonetically you are putting energy to the debt (sin) and it
Page 50 of 95 October 17, 2000
turns into “SinE” or “Sign.” Now back to the explanation. The banker gets the money to
pay the construction company from your promise to repay that debt. That will bring us
into the 1099OID and 1099INT latter but for now let me answer the original question
with “The banker gets the money from your signature.” A signature for the
accommodation of a strawman makes money. Now my next question in this
progression is “Who owns your signature?” If you own your signature because you
made it, then you are the principal of the signature and the signature is the interest that
accrued from you. Don’t you have an interest in your signature? Therefore, regarding
the bond, you were the principal and the bond for the house is the interest because it
contains your signature by accommodating your strawman. The bond accrued from
you, causing the account to be in escrow for as long as the interest that has accrued
from you has not been returned (tax returned) to you.
Here is another example, you are the principal of you kids; the kids are the
interest because they accrued from you. Now here comes a kidnapper. The kidnapper
takes your kids and it terrifies you because the account is now open (escrowed) and the
kids (interest) must return (tax return) to you for the account to close (kidnapper must
give the kids back for your fears to go away). This works the same way for everything
you can say is interesting. The industrial society pays the interest to you when they
release the order of the court. Bottom line, interest accrues from the principal and for
the account to close, the interest must return to the principal. All taxes are interest
payments back to the original owner (principal). Look at it in the same light as Jubilee,
and maybe it will help.
Examine, Understanding The Energy, to see that a tax must be rendered to
whom ever it belongs i.e. Return the interest to the Principal and also See, Pass Thru &
The Internal Revenue Service To Ground The Charge, it will help you identify that fiscal
energy must be returned to the fiscal year and calendar energy must be returned to the
calendar year to ground/charge-back the account to zero by rendering/ a tax return to
pay the tax to create zero liability (Heir to The Note) and redeem the account.
Also for everybody in the calendar year, like myself, it is a foreign tax being paid
into the calendar year when I get the release. And when I pay taxes (accepting offers),
they are foreign to me when I return them because I return them to a foreign jurisdiction
being the fiscal year. What we are doing is a foreign exchange. We are exchanging
fiscal debt for calendar credit in which the ledger zero’s out and grounds the charge in
the adjustment.
Page 51 of 95 October 17, 2000
Interest & In Trust
& The Trust Account
Interest Apart From Principal
Principal + Interest Together
I Am Both
The Owner of Both Sides of The Account
Being both the Settler and The Beneficiary, there is a very limited trust making
the trustee a fiduciary with strict obligations and that is why when I request the release
of the interest, they have to release it to me immediately.
Settler/
Principal/
Owner/
Sponsor
For Credit
Trustee/
Agent/
Fiduciary/
Holding
Interest-
In Trust
Beneficiary/
Principal/
Owner/
Recipient Of
Exchange
Interest is
Apart from
The
Principal-
Income to
Fiduciary
Interest
Must
Return To
Close The
Trust-
Expense To
Fiduciary
Registered
Agent of the
Industrial
Society
Page 52 of 95 October 17, 2000
Bond
A bond is an evidence of indebtedness and it indemnifies future liability of the
owner of the funds. All the public needs is a debt (bond) to make any check (bill) good.
See they strive off of the “Bond.” They need the bond for the currency structure. They
need someone to incur a liability before they can have an asset to pay anybody with. At
the atomic level it is a nuclear bond that is a capacitor of stored energy.
Your UCC-1 is a bond that gets registered in the commercial registry. It is an
indemnity bond to indemnify your future commercial liability. Your strawman is the
debtor and you are the secured party. If you commit a chargeable offence, you are held
indemnified because they charge your strawman in the all capital letters name. The
registration of your Bond is what creates your exemption because bonds must be
registered to be tax exempt. The reason they charge your strawman with a criminal
charge is because if they charge you, you fry on a wooden chair. In insurance, they
have what are called “contract bonds,” and these bonds serve as insurance policies for
commerce operations, look at it in light of the insurance policy that we live in is the
Public Policy. Public Policy is our supersedeas bond because it bonds our future
liability by making our payment for us since we can’t pay. It is our insurance policy. Our
exemption comes from registration of the bond. A contract is a bond and when you
register the bond for the tax liabilities the contract becomes exempt. The public values
debt (sin) more than it values being free from the bonds of debt (Keynesian Economics).
The public claims you as a debtor by merely having your name on an account
that is in deficit, and because they are registered with the Secretary of State to do
business in the State, they acquire your exemption just waiting for you to redeem it, that
is why you don’t need to even do a UCC-1, you just have to recognize that it is eligible
for filing. The same goes for doing a UCC information statement on a delinquent offeror
to provide information to the Revenue Department of the state. The Public can claim an
interest in you up to one million dollars because at the national level, publicly bided
bonds are issued at one million dollars. They do this just by having your name and TIN
on an account that is in deficit (See Internal Revenue Service/ IRS, and See Exemption
& Deduction, and See 1040ES). This is why they need you to make their check good.
With your straw man’s name on their books, they can write a million dollar bond secured
by you and sell it onto the market. What the system is doing is priming the economy by
claiming your exemption. Read the part about the 1040ES, here is a quote from that
section, “In the 1040ES booklet, at “part 4” under “Estimated Tax Worksheet,” the form
gets into “exemptions,” this is an important part. It writes, “If you can be claimed as a
dependent on another person’s 2000 return, your personal exemption is not allowed.”
What happens is the corporation claims your exemption by showing you on an account
in deficit when they send you a bill, which in turn makes their checks good to pay for the
product that you are indebted for. By the corporation sending you the bill, it makes their
check good to be able to provide the services on the bill. They need a debtor to provide
the payment. It is just one more asset to pledge in the credit-debit system.
Page 53 of 95 October 17, 2000
The public has to have a debt to be able to make a commercial exchange and
remember the public operates by execution of law and in auditory, “debt” sounds just
like “dead,” that’s why the public can’t discharge debt until there is an execution.
Through private operation, we can allow the debt to pass over ourselves for our benefit
to stave off our execution because the corporation has already become indebted itself
thus already executing itself making it not necessary to incur a second debt for the
same product.
The public obtains up to one million dollars of pledging ability with your name on
their books as a debtor priming the economy for your acceptance to be able to take
back your exemption. This is as simple as I can put it. The car dealer is hoping you
buy the car because he purchased it on soft money (over drafted his account) in
speculation that that particular color would sell fast. In doing so, when you go up to buy
the car, it is you that is actually making the payment for the creation of the car, good.
You in turn, turn their soft money into secured money when you write a check to them or
take out a note to pay for it, which in turn makes the note written on soft money (an
overdraft of yourself) because you didn’t even have the money to secure the note
before you took it out. The entire system works off of soft money, or a deficit to float the
credit.
Being fictional entities, corporations enter debt for our benefit. Having the
corporation enter into the debt on the owner’s behalf, we avoid our own debt/death.
The corporations are our insulators. With them entering death onto their ledger by
borrowing money from the Federal Reserve System, they need a redemption from their
bondage. Corporation operate in execution of law because they enter debt onto their
ledger. Corporations need to borrow money because they cannot create it on their own.
Corporations exist to borrow money and enter into debt to make products. That is why
it is not necessary to redo what has already been done, realizing that the debt the
corporation incurred was good enough and that is all it takes to create a product, not a
continual debt one after another in a revolving futures contract in which we all partake
in, by making re-payments on the debt. Redeem the first debt made by the corporation
and it will stave off another execution that might occur on a living person.
Page 54 of 95 October 17, 2000
Registration & Taxes
Registration is a system of records kept by an entity. In this process it is the
Secretary of State that records the UCC’s as well as the corporations and serves as the
second witness, which is eligible to identify the person entitled to possession of the
property whether it is tangible goods or intangible services. In a military government,
the goods and services have to be registered to identify if they are friend or foe and who
is the one entitled to rightful possession. Here is a play on words. You have bearer
instruments and registered instruments. Your contract between you and your strawman
in the commercial registry is a registered contract in whom your witness (the Secretary
of State) bears witness of. The witness is kind of like a converter from registered to
bearer instruments. This is one of the only purposes a witness serves; it is to tell the
world that you are entitled to possession of the property for a distance of time apart from
mother earth. Assumed principals attempt to use their secondary registration (the
delinquent fiduciary’s business license) to supersede the authority of the principal
registration (a good fiduciary who is working for you i.e. Secretary of State with the
UCC-1, or a Holder-in-due-course). By the assumed principal’s attempt to supersede
the principal registration through the assumed ownership of your trade name, they
assume a large amount of liabilities. You decide when you pick your fiduciaries to
whom gets your principal registration and to whom gets your secondary registration; it is
just by its operation do you pick one (whomever is good gets principal registration).
Registration and Taxes are the same thing. In the scriptures it says “The whole
world should be registered” and it also says, “The whole world should be taxed”
depending on what version you read, and that is wholesale. The registration identifies
to whom the taxes are to be paid. Taxes get paid to the registered owner. Interest can
either be paid and a deduction can be given or the interest can be registered and the
exemption can be taken. Registration perfects the priority-principal-exemption-private
side of things. Bonds must be registered to be tax exempt. Now you see the public is
already registered for us thus making our UCC-1 not necessary although it does help
you understand the principals of registration and the mental effects of being in charge.
The system has been doing everything right all along, we just needed to learn how to
operate it. Take a corporation for instance. They are registered in the corporate
registry through the Secretary of State, and although they are held in bar (thus faking
the incorporation because the only real incorporation is the incorporation into the body
of Christ and that is into the UCC because the UCC is where live people register making
us living gods, and since the attorney is an agent for the Corporation, the corporation is
a dead entity, making it a dead god. Dead gods can only have false profits of a “debt
debt system;” living gods operate on the law of the profits, a “credit credit system).” And
on top of that, they get exemption certificates for everything. The registration creates
the exemption. Principals use registration to create their exemption because they have
recorded the interest that is entitled to be returned to them and the State is the eligible
witness to say the principal is allowed to be in possession of the interest.
Many people are having difficulties getting names of registered agents for the
offers being made like tickets and the like, where a name is refused to be given. In that
Page 55 of 95 October 17, 2000
instance, use the Secretary of State as the registered agent for the person who made
you the offer. Go ahead and write the Secretary of State with your acceptance and let
him handle it, it will let him know that the business organization is so delinquent in
providing an eligible name for the registration of the account that the Secretary of State
is now going to have to get involved and be the registered agent for that business
organization that has refused to give a name.
Page 56 of 95 October 17, 2000
Exemption & Deduction
There are two occurrences for the payment of taxes. Deductions are public and
exemptions are private. Exemption is created from the pre-payment of the tax.
Deductions can only be given after a tax is paid. Your exemption is what you pay with
because it is your pre-payment of your efforts in society that as a creator, you get
exempt use from. The exemption is based on a prior event (pre-payment of tax) that is
evidenced with the registration of the account because registration is a date and time
event. In redemption, the prior event that we spiritually rely on is Christ’s redemption of
our debt through the garden of Gethsemane and his crucifixion. Christ creates our
exemption both spiritually and temporally on a condition that we accept him and operate
as he would. Because registration is based on a prior event, how is Christ’s life
measured? Well, it is our calendar and currently it has been 2000 years since his birth.
Our operation on the calendar year and not the fiscal is the registration of his existence.
That is another reason why we use the calendar year and not the fiscal, because the
fiscal is not centered on Christ. The prior event of registration creates the exemption.
Bonds must be registered to be tax exempt and the registration of your UCC-1, or if you
don’t have one, the ownership of that you possess as the Principal owner of every
corporation and business out there through their registration creates you exemption
(either you are registered or your fiduciary is registered). You have to look at the end
result of the exemption to see what it does. Because you can’t see an exemption since
it is a private item, it is not an object that can be directly examined because it is private,
you have to look into the public to see how the exemption works and that is, it creates in
the industrial society a deduction of tax liability. Exemption is the non-requirement to
pay future taxes, being Grace. Another reason for the exemption is because as the
creators of the industrial products, as the employers (the wages we pay are our works)
of all that exists, we get to reap what we sow being free from obligation as the creators
of such. The reason our exemption covers everything is because as an Employer like
yourself, I can’t do all that is necessary to sustain my life individually and for that reason
mutual employers like myself (all Preferred Stock Holders of The United States
Corporation) assist each other in making tax exempt property to facilitate our existence
(Just picture yourself working to help your brothers and sisters for the mutual love and
affection you show and not for the bills you have to pay. One is by operation and the
other is by execution.) A deduction occurs after a payment of taxes has been made.
Deduction is equated with the payment of taxes and is the same thing as paying for sin
and is displayed as an execution of Old Testament. Everybody who accepts for value is
applying their exemption to make the payment, because they cannot pay just as much
as you or I can, but what happens is, is the unjust stewards/renters won’t settle with you
when you accept their order for money and return their money order for settlement for
them to get off the property and the consequences of their actions are: If that guy won’t
turn the other cheek and forgive you of your debt at the day of redemption, then his
debts won’t be forgiven and he losses his exemption until he settles with you. By
forcing you to be the bond, he unwittingly coined himself to be the bond. The squatter
on the property must turn their cheek and forgive you of your debts if he himself wants
to be in Grace. He cannot be a hypocrite. This is called STEALING YOUR
EXEMPTION. When a public entity that is supposed to use the deduction/Mosaic side
Page 57 of 95 October 17, 2000
of the account assumes the use of the exemption, he is stealing your exemption, like
forcing payment for a product, when there is no money to pay with. Compare it to the
worshiping of a false profit, because that is what he is after. What this process does is it
removes the requirement to have money to get what you need to survive; you just have
to remember the golden rule and to operate in internal moderation without gluttony.
Now remember payments of taxes is the same thing as an interest payment back to the
principal and after the payment is made, a deduction is given to offset the expense of
the tax payment. Public Policy comes into play here, many would say, if we don’t pay
for the debt, who would? Remember in 1933 there was a promise made through Public
Policy to discharge all debts “dollar for dollar” and the payment comes thought the
adjustment in the Internal Revenue Service for the discharge or deduction to offset the
tax liability (their expense is my interest). All payments are made through the Internal
Revenue Service of the Industrial Society. A deduction comes from the adjustment
when the Industrial society cannot claim the false profits of the debt, debt system. What
happens is the debt is written off (adjusted for the tax liabilities) when the Exemption is
used to pay for the product because interest payments on indebtedness are tax
deductible. You know how banks advertise, “Come and get a loan because the interest
is tax deductible,” well, that is it. Interest accrues from the principal and when the
interest is returned to the principal, the account closes. Remember the 1040ES, if you
don’t claim your exemption, someone else can. Well, you are claiming your exemption
from paying interest payments because you are the principal from which the interest
accrued, making who ever is holding your interest (in trust) the tax fugitive by “Stealing
Your Exemption” if they refuse to adjust the account and release the order of the court
to you and return the interest because you are the principal account from which the
interest has accrued. The industrial society gets paid through the adjustment by the
deduction because it was all pre-paid, and when they attempt to “Steal Your
Exemption,” they are assuming the role as the originator or principal, thus saying that
you have to pay the interest to them. Your exemption comes with being the principal
and the industrial societies’ deduction comes with making interest payments to you.
Also remember that corporations through their Internal Revenue Service write checks
payable to you to themselves as your fiduciary to claim your exemption and make you
pay the tax (making you take the deduction side of the account), which makes the
checks that they wrote payable to you but held, good. That is why when a Tax Lien
gets placed on the taxpayer, it is actually for the taxpayers’ benefit, and against the
taxpayers creditors who are refusing to return the checks to the taxpayer and hold on to
the check for them self to both invest in the stock market with the added capital and
claim it as an expense by using my name and TIN to say the income went to me, when
in fact, it stayed with my fiduciary.
When the exemption is claimed, the taxes have to be pre-paid. Having accepted
and returned the taxable claim to them and fulfilling your side of the tax obligations, now
it changes from a “taxable charge/taxable claim” to a real claim for you personal
exemption while the offeror loses their personal exemption until they settle with you and
honor the acceptance.
Page 58 of 95 October 17, 2000
1099OID
The 1099 OID is “Original Issue Discount,” and you are the original issue.
Original Issue Discount is the difference between the offered price and the stated
redemption price at maturity. I look at it this way. A man is priceless. When I sign a
note, or a check, my signature has now been discounted to the value of the check,
whereas shortly before, I was priceless. How it works in the system is a municipality
funds a mutual fund, which buys a Treasury bill, which is invested in by corporations.
The Treasury bill being an industrial revenue bond, which is the funding for the object
that the corporation creates and is an original issue from the treasury. The corporation
uses your name as a constituent to purchase the Treasury bill. Here is an example of
“The Principal Account:” When you normally buy a car, the value of the treasury bill is in
the value of the car and when you say you want to buy that car, that becomes the
principal account which can be traced from the dealer to the financing corporation to the
mutual fund to the Treasury and to the municipality which is collaterally endorsed by
your physical presence. The reason the corporation makes you pay for the car in a
normal sale is because they bought the Treasury bill on soft money (an overdraft) and
they need you pay for the car to cover their tax liabilities on that Treasury bill. When
you request the 1099OID, you want the Offeror to identify you as the sponsor for the
credit that funded the Treasury bill in the first place. This form identifies the principal
from which the interest was taken and returned. If you are having a tough time getting
the account adjusted and you want to find out who is giving the orders to leave the
account in escrow and unadjusted, this form identifies who is the one that is sponsoring
the credit and the instrument that was used.
1099INT
Interest Income. These two things are the same thing, in that my interest in the
fiduciaries possession is Income to him. Every bit of income is someone’s interest.
That is why the fiduciaries income is taxable back to zero (the charge must be
grounded/charge-back) by adjusting the account as an expense and paying the tax.
This form reports to where the interest accrued from the Original Issued debt instrument
was paid to. This form is used concurrently with the 1099 OID. If interest is withheld
from the principal, being myself and paid to assumed principals, it is income to them
because the value didn’t accrue from them but from me. Lets take for example that I
am on an account as a debtor, which makes their check good, and they bill me for the
debt to cover the check. Any value the fiduciary gets out of the Original Issued debt
instrument while holding my name as a debtor, is income to him and is my interest.
Because the Original Issued debt instrument accrues value by being in their
possession, the fiduciary is holding my interest and any profits they make (a false
prophet) is taxable back to me and reportable on a 1099INT and/or 1099OID to account
for all the value dispersed (accrued) from my name.
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #27 on: July 08, 2004, 06:10:33 pm »

Page 59 of 95 October 17, 2000
Page 60 of 95 October 17, 2000
1040ES
Estimated Tax for Individuals. The 1040ES is an Internal Revenue Tax Form,
which is used only once. This tax form is attached with the Bill of Exchange that is sent
with the birth certificate and is a payment voucher for interest payments. Remember all
taxes are interest payments, which accrue form the principal and must return for the
close of escrow. The particular form is entitled “Payment Voucher” and when attached
with the BOE for the Birth Certificate, this form creates a paper trail with the treasury
showing that you have not willfully failed to file. This form with the Bill of Exchange gets
rid of the bogus claim that the public may have. An important portion of the 1040ES is
based on a calendar year. The Calendar Year is a 365-day year. Men and Women live
on a calendar year. Now that you have shown the Treasury you operate on a Calendar
Year, they can no longer presume you execute on a fiscal year with all of the other
members of the industrial society. In the 1040ES booklet, at “part 4” under “Estimated
Tax Worksheet,” the form gets into “exemptions,” this is an important part. It writes, “If
you can be claimed as a dependent on another person’s 2000 return, your personal
exemption is not allowed.” This is a very important sentence; your exemption is what
you pay with in Redemption. The quote from the 1040ES booklet is the recourse for the
accommodation party. Am I the dependant of the industrial society, thus they are
accommodating me? Or am I claiming the industrial society as my dependant because I
am accommodating them? Personally, I find that without us, nobody would be in the
industrial society making anything so they are dependant upon me, making me the
accommodation party entitled to the Exemption. An accommodation party uses his
name as a sponsor for credit for the accommodated party. I am the accommodation
party for my strawman and I am the sponsor for the credit on every instrument I endorse
for my strawman. I am the source of the energy. I am the sponsor for the credit when
the offeror passes over the promise to deliver and draws on me as though I am a bond
in which the offeror overdrafts and I in turn loan him the value of the instrument of his
offer in which he is now in bondage for in accordance with Public Policy. I am the
principal that the interest accrues from.
The Industrial society claims your exemption if you don’t, and that is why you pay
for groceries, gas, house payments, you name it…(Remember the part about
corporations writing checks to them self, payable to you). This form makes everybody
in the industrial society who uses your principal account (name and/or TIN) a tax fugitive
if they refuse to return the interest to you, the principal. On the funny side of it, you are
filing an “Estimated” tax form, and lets face it, an estimation is about as close as you
can ever get to fulfilling the Income Tax Laws of this country. To complete this form,
print your name, address, social security number, and leave the “$ ” blank.
The dollar sign is blank because your employee’s will fill it in. The dollar sign “$” is what
sets the standard for taxation which is called “functional currency,” because money is a
value (being the shadow cast by the object), the “$” is the object casting the shadow of
numbers. The most that money “$” can be is an artificial object which makes it the form.
The exchange of energy is the fact.
Page 61 of 95 October 17, 2000
W-9
Request for Taxpayer Identification Number and Certification. This form is used
to identify if a claim exists. A Taxpayer Identification number (TIN) must be given if an
exemption is claimed and because that is what we pay with, the Employer ID# must
always be given when an acceptance is being made, (the claim of the exemption of the
requirement to pay interest taxes as you are the principal source they accrued from).
Put your Employer ID# on everything being what is your social security number without
the dashes. When the Offeror or Industrial Society refuses to adjust (refusing to return
interest to you), they are making a claim to your exemption in an attempt to “Steal Your
Exemption.” If they continue to demand payment after an acceptance has been made
and they act as if their business will be hurt if you personally don’t pay, what they are
saying is that they are holding your exemption to avoid their tax liabilities (See
Exemption & Deduction). What the form is used for is when an acceptance is made and
the Industrial society refuses to adjust the account and return the interest to the
principal, they need to provide you with the account (W-9/TIN) that is doing that. That is
why you request their Employee ID# (W-9) for the individual that you are accepting
against, you don’t want the business organizations’ TIN, you want that persons TIN, and
enclose one for them to fill out. If the W-9 is not completed and returned, what they are
saying is that they are making a taxable claim (a taxable charge, and they are holding
my interest making me the principal, and that they are going to take the expense to their
income) and the tax must be paid to you by the adjustment and release of the
property/Order of the court.
Page 62 of 95 October 17, 2000
Calendar Year & Fiscal Year
The calendar year is a 365-day year. The time it takes for the earth to circle the
sun one full rotation is 365 days. Men and women operate their existence on a 365-day
year, and to be completely precise, it is actually 365 and ¼ days for one full rotation
around the sun. The mirror image operates on a 360-day fiscal year, one is real, and
the other is fiction. What has happened is the fiction/fiscal claims to completely rotate
around the earth in their fiscal year but their year has only 360-days. Because the time
for a day being 24 hours is identical for both the calendar year and the fiscal year, why
does it only take 360-days to get around the earth on a fiscal year and 365-days to
rotate once around the sun on a calendar year? The answer is= The Fiscal Year skips
days to compensate for the deficiency of the 5 days. The deficiency of 5 days is the
reason for the adjustment to occur. When an adjustment is made on a set of books, the
fiscal books cannot claim my calendar object (When I accept, they have no right to
claim it on their fiscal books because I took it onto the calendar year book= adjustment).
Because Men and Women operate on a calendar year (as earlier shown on the
1040ES,) the mirror image of the calendar year is the fiscal year. The Corporations
operate on a deficiency of days and what must happen for goods and services to be
released, an adjustment of the two systems must occur. The Corporate society
executes on the fiscal year and this is where the public debt resides. In the fiscal year,
all transactions that occur are debt based. A false profit is what is created when bonds
are traded for a debt making double the debt for the transaction. The original debt still
exists because what has occurred was a debt instrument was used to pay a debt. Debt
and debt equals double the debt. What is needed is the credit must be in fluxed to
adjust the ledger. The calendar year is where all the credit resides because all the debt
exists in the fiscal year, as the thief side of the account on Calvary Hill. In a public
transaction, a bond is traded for a debt based product and no reduction of the debt has
occurred. In an Acceptance for Value, the debt based instrument i.e. credit card bill, is
taken from the fiscal/public side where debt exists and put into the calendar/private year
now making it a credit. When the bill is now returned (return is equivalent with a tax
return), a “+” positive is now inflexed with a “-“ negative thus discharging the liability
because the industrial society now has your “return” which is eligible to be adjusted off
the fiscal books for the tax liability because what has happened was, the interest (being
the product) which accrues from the principal (being yourself) has returned to the
principal (yourself) for a public deduction (tax credit) for adjustment of the tax liabilities
on the public/fiscal society. If you are fiscal/public, then the “Federal Reserve Note” is
directly your liability “-“, and you can be considered a cosigner to the note through your
public officials that are performing their public service. If you are calendar/private, then
the “Federal Reserve Note” is your asset “+” and you are not a cosigner to the note but
the lender of the credit to the public officials. Having both the fiscal year and the
calendar year infused together creates the “whole year,” or being made “whole.”
Calendar year files are domestic to each other and are foreign to fiscal year
filers, the likewise for the reverse. Because everything in the fiscal is foreign to us, and
calendar is foreign to the fiscal, every time a contract crosses the account (re-venues
itself) for the adjustment or release of the order, it is the payment of a foreign tax.
Page 63 of 95 October 17, 2000
Remember it is the foreigners that are taxed which make the children free (Mathew
17:24-27). Every tax is a foreign tax because of the Re-venuing (revenue) that has
occurred. Taxing the foreign revenue (fiscal filers) makes the domestic children
(calendar filers) free. Through the registration of the account, it is identified to whom the
taxes are owed. Having paid (fiscal filers) the expense (my interest) of the re-venue, it
is a foreign tax that is being paid to me. When I return/render back to a fiscal filer, I am
paying a foreign tax. Domestic taxes do not exist and that is why the account will not
work when both people are in the same year, it needs to go foreign (See, Pass Through
& The Internal Revenue Service To Ground The Charge). Registration turns the
account from foreign to domestic for the owner making the taxes payable to the
registered owner.
When the charge returns to the same jurisdiction from which it started, it grounds
itself and the tax is paid. The charge grounds itself (charges itself back) when it is
returned to the fiscal after having been in the calendar. When it was reported as being
worthless, it then became off book income by the new holder. They said it had value,
so I gave it back and now it is worthless because it won’t pay for itself, well it sounds as
if they took the value out of the instrument and are trying to avoid reporting the income
by claiming it had no value. The witness that it has no value after you accepted it for
value identifies that the value was taken from it and is now unreported income. That is
why it is a tax matter.
Page 64 of 95 October 17, 2000
Understanding The Energy
Fiscal Calendar
The Corporation Of The United States You
(4) (3)
(2) (5)
(6) (1)
The charge of Sin (the debt/dead) (an empty charge) (Execution of Law)
The charge of the Property (in-charge “in fact” of the property) (Operation of Law)
Everybody standing in the calendar year is domestic to each other and the same
goes for the fiscal filers. Calendar filers are foreign to the Fiscal filers and the same
goes for the opposite. For it to be an exchange (foreign exchange) one must be
calendar and the other must be fiscal, otherwise it is a transfer.
(1) As mutual Preferred Stock holders of the United States Corporation, we as the
sponsor for the credit being “able bodied” (there is the Bill) being our ability to bring
atoms together into a resourceful product and create, thus as the creators, we are
exempt, invest our time in being productive, and good people through our daily business
operations.
(2) The energy we put into the corporations (industrial society) is amassed and from it
comes a product that individually we could not have accomplished (look at how long it
takes to create a car all by yourself, it is thousands of hours and hundreds of thousands
of dollars to create a car that now costs fifteen thousand and hundreds can be made in
a day. The industrial society is the conveyer belt that speeds up production to sustain
life for 6.4 billion people). Having invested energy into the account, this is the first
evidence of debt that the corporation of the United States is liable for. The corporation
Page 65 of 95 October 17, 2000
is now in debt/dead to the creator because it is holding the energy apart from the
sponsor and now it is necessary for the corporation to offer it’s product (the Note) back
to the sponsor to close the account and ground the charge.
(3) From the energy we put into our daily efforts comes this product that is resourceful
and beneficial to the owner that gets unobstructed use. As you can see your energy
went from the calendar year to a fiscal year and returned to the calendar (It went from
intangible effort into a tangible product). In this, it is called an exchange. When the
property is given to the person standing in the calendar year, he is charged-in-fact, thus
discharging the industrial societies duty. The corporation can no longer claim it on their
fiscal books, as it has now entered into a calendar year when a calendar filer held the
item (physical possession). The creator is exempt and receives unobstructed use of the
property, as it was he that was the sponsor for the credit being his pre-payment of
energy. This is the fulfillment of operation of law because the creator redeeming his
interest from the corporation of the United States redeems the energy that is being held
by the corporation in the form of a product. The corporation is now resurrected.
(4) This is where execution of law is first evidenced. In an attempt to steal the creator’s
exemption, a debt is sent from the fiscal year for the value of the creation (either you
can create the sustenance or a mutual Preferred Stock Holder in the United States
Corporation can create the sustenance). The Industrial society is trying to regain the
charge after they gave you the charge of the property. This is where they are trying to
hold onto the debt that must be redeemed. Coming from the fiscal year, it is a debt
instrument (being a sin, represented by debt/dead) representing that you are indebted
for the creation of the property (under execution of law you went into debt/dead by
investing your energy). But being in operation of law, a just return (tax return) to you for
the energy you have given them leaves no one in debt/dead but their attempt to steal
the exemption has caused the corporation to sin in which they need you to sinE or Sign.
(5) As the sponsor for the credit, when it is put into your hands (you are standing in the
calendar year) and returned, it is now represented by your pre-payment of the energy
as the sponsor for the credit and it turns from sin to (sinE or Sign).
(6) As the sponsor for the credit, the debt/dead offered instrument is now a credit and
the energy is zeroed out and the charge of sin is now grounded/charged-back and the
tax is paid. When energy crosses from the fiscal to the calendar or the calendar to the
fiscal, the energy zero’s out and is called an exchange, otherwise it is fiscal-to-fiscal or
calendar-to-calendar and is a taxable transfer.
This portion is summed up in Mark 12:13-17 and take it in the light that to whom
things are owed (tax liabilities), they are rendered and you will see the energy flow. I
put the energy into the account in the form of my works and good deeds and they turn
into a tangible property. Having put my energy into the creation of the property, I need
the return (tax return) of the property. And the mirror image applies to the paper offer
(the return to the fiscal). Everything is given back to whom it is belonged and that is
Page 66 of 95 October 17, 2000
what creates the redemption of the account. The dissipation of the charge is the
payment of the tax of the interest back to the principal and it zero’s the liability.
The owner receiving joy from the release of the Note by operating in accordance
with Public Policy.
Using the Note (the product/ the present liability) to pay for itself, nobody is going
into debt, in that the bonds maid is never called upon for payment. Because no debt is
created, it is a “credit credit system” because an hour ago someone needed a car and
now there is a car and that person is happy and no debt exists, the car paid for itself
and makes life easier so it creates credit upon credit upon credit as more and more
useful products get built. It creates a surplus with no debt attached and that is the
blessing that we will not have enough to receive.
Picture yourself standing around a big table, everybody in the United States has
one hand on the table. If one person knocks on the table with their knuckles, everybody
feels the wave of energy that flows through the table. This is how the United States
Corporation works. We are all knocking on the table adding energy into the table in
which someone else will then reap the benefits of. Look at this example: I can’t make
all that is necessary for sustenance so everybody is working together to help each other
out, either for the money in it or to love thy neighbors survival as thy self’s survival. In
Michigan, the guy making all of the cars can never use them all, so they get dispersed
throughout the United States Corporation for others to reap the benefit of. It is a simple
team effort.
Page 67 of 95 October 17, 2000
Employer & Employee
I am a mutual Owner and Employer of the United States Corporation and I hold
preferred stock in this corporation as a creator.
We are the government’s employer. A good example of this is the relationship of
a “fidelity bond.” A fidelity bond is a bond between the conduct of the employee and
the liability of the employer. An employer can be associated with the words owner,
wage payer, principal, private, exemption, registration, offender, flesh and blood,
redeemer and the like. When we use our employer ID#, we are making whom ever we
give the number to our employee because the Internal Revenue Service only
recognizes two people, those that are employers and those that are employees. We
are now recognized as the employer on that account.
Since we are the employer as the one that sponsors the credit with our
productivity (the one in charge of paying the wages), now it is time to fit into the roll of
our responsibilities. One problem that I always come to see is that people think they
need someone’s permission to do something, like those dang proof of services. Lets
say you are the owner of a business, do you need the vice president (the President of
Vice) to say you mailed a letter, no you do it and that’s that and if you don’t like it, your
fired. Take the approach that as the employer, you own and do what ever you want, if
you feel like you want to do something, just do it, you are in grace. Give the employees
the instructions as to what they are to do to fit your needs. You give the money orders
here. Just remember to make a request as a gentile man (gentleman). My
acceptances are a 33-cent envelope and I don’t care if I ever hear from them again.
Make your request as a gentile man and then do it. Set your purpose as to what your
position is and then proceed to head there till you get your remedy. You don’t need
permission because if you need permission, you are an infidel and the supervisors will
run you over. As the employer, take it in the idea that you are placing a purchase order
for some (you fill in the blank for whatever remedy you are
ordering up) from their store.
Remember that as the Employer you can create your exemption by your direct
UCC registration or your fiduciary can be registered.
Employee can be associated with fiduciary, holder-in-due-course, license holder,
supervisors, government, public, defendant, strawman, accuser, witness, vendors,
deduction takers, a steward/renters and the like. The employees are here to serve us,
the Internal Revenue Service. They are what are described in the bible as the angels of
heaven or the agents. We would always be mad at them and call whatever they are
doing as their agenda, well that is correct because they are the agents. When we
accept, they are the unjust stewards/renters that won’t get off the owners land when it is
being redeemed. See Leviticus 25.
Page 68 of 95 October 17, 2000
Adjustment
Adjustment is a crucial word. Adjustment of the account is to clean up the
account (heal the leaper of the divided interest in the body) and bring the assets and
liabilities to zero (grounding the charge pays the tax) by writing off/charging off the debt
and release the property if the property is still sitting on the account to the owner, and if
it isn’t, then release the order saying the account is at zero liability. Adjustment is for
when the liabilities and the assets do not match the liabilities. Remember how Public
Policy reverses the liabilities. Well adjustment reverses the entries.
On the adjustment, the account is credited off (which I am the sponsor for) and a
deduction in tax liabilities is given to the holder of the account (fiduciary) because of the
payment of the taxes to the principal owner. Think in a practical way of when you were
angry and you hated your sibling (your emotional account was skewed). What did your
parents probably say, “You need an attitude adjustment,” well with an adjustment, the
account is brought to zero (no liabilities, and in good standing), and that is how it is with
an attitude adjustment. Here is another example. Because you can’t pay, because
there is no money, the public side writes it off as bad debt (the mirror image is good
credit, from which you are the sponsor), now that the bad debt has been written off and
they can use your exemption to get their deduction by using your Employer ID#, the
debt gets effectively redeemed because they forgive it. It is how the scriptures say
‘”turn the other cheek,” well if they don’t forgive your debt (when it is impossible to pay),
they lose their exemption (due to their dishonor/ the re-fuse boxing) until they settle with
you. If you are looking for justice in your problems I think you should “add justice,” or
“adjust.” The account gets adjusted as an expense because my interest is their
expense.
By having the two systems of years, both calendar and fiscal, adjustment is the
relation between a 365-day year and a 360-day year. When a fiscal offer is made and a
calendar acceptance is made, the offer is taken from fiscal books onto calendar books.
The public has no right to claim the offer on their fiscal books because I have “Taken
For Value” the offer onto my calendar books with my acceptance. The spread between
the two systems is 5 days and to make up for the deficiency, the two systems have to
be adjusted to match. The matching effect is: the books are closed. The adjustment of
the books is because the product has left from one system of year and went to another.
The product must then be adjusted from one set of books to another and returned back
to the original owner, thus closing the books and adjusting them to create no liability.
To understand that debt is a charge, examine the word that is associated with a
“write off,” it is also called a “charge-off.” See the only way to get them to discharge
their duty is to take the charge-off of their books. The charge-off is then in accordance
with their fiduciary duty/tax under the Constitution to “discharge their duty.” So when
you re-pay the charge, it then gets invested into a futures contract in which their duty
will never be discharged as now you have just replaced their charge-off with a new
charge. Think about when they say “I am charging you…” and they keep the debt over
my head, well they charged me and kept the charge (debt), this is an example of “empty
Page 69 of 95 October 17, 2000
charges” or “charges without charges.” See when this happens, the acceptance for
value/taken for value of the charge must occur to completely take it away from the
fiduciary for the “charge-off” to occur or their books will never be cleaned up. (The leper
has divided interests in his account that need to be cleansed/ a cleaning up of the
account, Mathew 10:8.)
Page 70 of 95 October 17, 2000
Criminal Charges Are Delinquent Taxes
Everybody has been shocked by a wire before, if not, go ask someone what it
was like. The first thing that I think of is a stunned look of amazement and a sore pain.
What just happened was your body was charged and to remove the charge, the
electricity had to return to where it came from and that was earth. The charge started in
the soil, and must be returned there to discharge that charge. In our society, we talk
about criminal charges and accounting charges and yet, with all of this, nobody gets
shocked. How weird? For your benefit, what has happened is the Public Jurisdiction
has created an intangible strawman (a man of no substance) that only exists on paper,
to assist you in avoiding the charges and redirecting them through this dead entity to
avoid the direct charge of yourself, which if referred to economically would be a called a
“capital” crime of the death penalty.
Every charge starts out as a “taxable charge,” because what is happening is the
offeree is being taxed for the offense. Once the offeree accepts the offer and becomes
the acceptor and returns/renders the instrument, the taxes are paid, having made a tax
return of the contract for settlement. Once the offeror becomes delinquent to deliver the
offer, they lose their personal exemption until they settle with me. When they refuse to
adjust, it now becomes a “taxable charge” on them as they are holding delinquent
income taxes apart from the principal from which it has accrued. See it is taxable back
to the principal because the fiduciary has become a delinquent holder and is now a tax
fugitive in possession of the delinquent delivery of the offer. It becomes a “taxable
charge” on their part due to them holding the delinquent taxes that I returned (a tax
return) to them. See they are holding my interest (the adjustment) and are not releasing
the promised offer (the Note). After having returned the instrument, that fulfills my tax
obligations and it changes from a taxable charge to a claim. See Firm Offer &
Possession & Payment, and See Replevin Bond.
Charges come from the Treasury. When you are “charged” with a crime, you
have to look at it economically, or commercially and it makes all the sense in the world.
You are charged with a crime and they take you to court, and because of you past
feudal efforts to find a public remedy, rather then realize that your solutions starts with
you, a private jurisdiction, you re-COG-nize your accuser and the (mill stone) wheels of
justice seem to grind you through the thresher and take all of your time and money.
Well, what has happened was you were charged and to discharge that liability, you
discharged that liability by giving them the credit from your pocket or the sweat from
your brow. Ultimately what happens is when you have served time and exit the
Receiving & Discharge door of the prison warehouse, they give you a “Discharge
Order,” go figure, and it’s basic accounting.
What is happening is a sin (See Taxes Interest & Principal, and See Very Basic
Accounting). They don’t really charge you. They fake the charge with “charges without
charges” or “empty charges”. If you read through the New Testament, you will hear the
Apostles reference charging and what is happening is the Apostles were giving
intangible services of the word of the Lord to the people. The Apostles were giving
Page 71 of 95 October 17, 2000
substance and were charging with the same. These are true charges. When you go to
the grocery store, they have to charge you with the food by putting it into the bag; the
bill comes second.
Rule 1: Do not hold the charge or you will fry on the chair.
Rule 2: Pass the charge to a fiduciary entity to remove yourself from that liability
by grounding the account and charging them with the charge, to
discharge yourself.
It is that easy. The game is hot potato but only it is not a potato, it is a grenade!
Here is the game… Your sitting in a circle with all of your friends (fiduciaries) and here
comes this grenade, the pin is pulled and the clasp is open (that is the charge, waiting
to be discharged), you only have two options when a grenade is tossed into your lap
while you sit Indian style. 1) Accepting the grenade for what it is, reaching down and
grabbing it putting your hand on the clasp for the time being to stave off the foreseeable
problem, and returning (tax return) it back to where it came from, the guy holding the
pin, or 2) Protest the item and you get returned (tax returned) to where you came from,
mother earth. What actually happened was the grenade was offered to you, and now
you were in-charge of accepting the grenade for what it is and returning it to where it
came from thus discharging your liability by returning it to the Offeror.
Criminal charges are the exact same. Now I am willing to guesstimate that 99
percent of the people in this country that have a drivers license have been charged with
an infraction. Now don’t get yourself festering on what the law is or whether they can
legally do this or not, just realize that they are fiction and they do whatever they can just
short of putting their insurance policy in harms way! You get charged with a crime, you
are now operating like a debtor because they are holding your name on an account that
is in deficit and that is the charge of a crime. What the system wants is your ability to
give credit, being the productivity of operating your life. The fictional society we live in is
the mirror image of reality. Everything is under the laws of the United States
Corporation. Everybody say out loud… “A corporation is a fiction and I am not a fiction,
I am a reality.” The most fundamental structure of a corporation is that of a “charter,”
now get real, a charter is a fancy name for a BOOK, no more, no less. Simple, fiction is
really all the public jurisdiction is. I am not here to be subject to the Books but own the
Bookcase.
So if you ever get charged, make sure you get rid of it as fast as possible, let
your fiduciary hold the charges not you, because if you hold the charge, they will fry you
on the chair. Plus, the ticket is the instrument they use to make the claim against you, if
you give them back the original and now it is in their possession, how can they possible
make a claim against you when they are in possession of their own bill.
Page 72 of 95 October 17, 2000
Priority Exchange & Transfer
In the sense of the word, “Exchange” is an equal word meaning that something is
given for something else of same value creating no taxable gain. But because “equal”
is a “common” word, we use “Priority Exchange,” being a prior event (The hostage
exchange of our Savior). Equal is common stock with the supervisors and that is why
we don’t use that phrase, and remembering that we are in the international “credit credit
jurisdiction,” nothing is equal, it is all “preferred” and “priority.” The only “sense of equal”
that can be equated with “exchange” is that it creates no taxable gain, and even then, I
may have not worded this sentence correctly so you will need to find your own meaning,
that you can understand. Money is a form and creates a transfer; an exchange is the
fact of energy. Exchanges are not taxable and because of that no return needs to be
made to an unknown principal, only to myself. That is why we use “Bills of Exchange,”
because we are exchanging our exemption to be placed with one fiduciary instead of
the other fiduciary that we are drawing against, because of being in derelict of the tax
return. Exchange is a circle, one thing goes one way and another thing goes the other
way. “Transfer” is a taxable word because it is a one-way line in a similar operation like
a semi-circle; an exchange is the complete circle. A transfer is a taxable event because
there is nothing returning to the account from which the transfer left.
Page 73 of 95 October 17, 2000
A Graphic Of A
Transfer & Exchange
Transfer & Trade Exchange
Expense
A: Principal
B: Fiduciary
A B A B
Income Income
Interest Apart From Principal Interest Returned To Principal
Taxable Tax Exempt
Levy able Exempt From Levy
Requires Adjustment Adjusted
Escrow Open Escrow Closed
All Fiscal Fiscal and Calendar
Page 74 of 95 October 17, 2000
Strawman
The Strawman relates to the paper creation in Washington, D.C. When the
industrial society (any one that operates on a fiscal, corporate, fictional, governmental,
mosaic, commercial, public, everything on paper, etc.) does business with you in any
form of contracting, they usually write you like this JOHN DOE, or Doe, John and how
the scriptures say Jesus Christ and Christ Jesus and the like. A strawman is a man of
no substance. Purely form. This can be taken from the Bible when it says that Life was
breathed into Man. When reality deals in paper, a strawman is created. Because the
strawman doesn’t have a brain, I sign for accommodation and sponsor the credit of my
name every time I make an endorsement. Signing for accommodation, I am also
entitled to recourse. How it operates is this, when the parties in a controversy bring it
into the equation, it now exists as a fact. Don’t ever expect them to say it is your
strawman that they are doing business with, just look at how it operates to identify if you
as a tangible flesh and blood man/woman can operate that way. The strawman is your
trade name and operates as a transmitting utility with your fiduciary title. With your
fiduciary, it is a conduit. Everybody works thru his or her own strawman. Here is a
really good few examples of a man of no substance (a strawman). When you get a
ticket, what is the wattage the police officer charges you with? Do you fit in the
envelope that the IRS sends you telling you that you owe them money? Do you ride on
an electric current as your credit card gets swiped at a vendor? Do you fit on a court
docket? If you go to jail and get “booked,” do you physically sit down on books? Do
you fit on your high school diploma? What does fit in or on these things? Your name
fits. When any thing uses your name, they take your straw man’s name. It is just on
whether the parties in the controversy argue it, does it exist. Now we don’t argue it per
se but we do have to have our conscience and our subconscious in alignment for one to
avoid second-guessing ourselves and for you to know where we stand. We need to
have the attitude “I did it and it’s done, now where is my remedy and who is the person
responsible for refusing to return my remedy.” Let me ask another thing. Have you
ever been charged with a crime? If you have, did they strap you down on a wooden
chair, put a bag over your head, with a wet sponge a metal cap on your head, an
electrode on your leg and fry you? If they didn’t, whom did they charge? It couldn’t
have been you because you are still here reading this, so what was it? Your strawman
was who was charged because if they charge you, you fry. They are holding you
harmless by charging your strawman. Think about this example. When they fry people
on the chair aren’t they called “Capital Crimes,” well think of that in an economic or
business math sense. It is a capital crime because of your criminal charges; they have
so much money (capital invested into the economy) that they don’t need your body as
collateral so they expend (an expense of interest returned to the principal) you back to
mother earth.
Owner & License Holder
Every thing is for the benefit of the owner. If it isn’t for the benefit of the owner,
then it has to change, plain and simple. Take that approach that it is all for your benefit
and you will never have a gloomy day in your life. I am the source of the energy they
are after. I am the sponsor for the credit they are after. I am the principal that the
interest accrues from that they are after. The system exchanges intangible substance
for tangible goods, all based on your being in the society that needs to be provided for.
You are a liability to the municipality that has to provide for you and when you go to
work, Human Resources say that the employees are the corporation’s strongest assets.
There is the account we are talking about. If they are not doing this for the benefit of the
owner, then they need to change. Say this sentence “It is all for my benefit,” and now
what you have to do is find out how to make it so. To be a true redeemer, you have to
be the original owner. Read Leviticus 25. We are the owners; the accuser is the renter
that is the unjust Stewart/renters that will not get off of our property. As the owner, you
own everything, not in unrighteous dominion but under self-restraint that can exemplify
the golden rule of “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” It is not in
your liberty to take the liberties of others. We as mutual employers own the government
as the holders of preferred, and you own the property that the stewards/renters are
sitting on when you accept their offer in your attempt to redeem it. You must be a just
master for you have a master as well. As the owner, you are not the holder-in-duecourse
for the tax adjustment; the holder-in-due-course is the holder of a business
license by being registered to operate in the industrial society, which is your fiduciary
like the bank or a vendor. Don’t worry; there is nothing better than being a brigadier
general than owning a brigadier general. There is nothing better than being the holderin-
due-course than owning the holder-in-due-course. Look at it in the light of the Queen
of England. I bet she doesn’t even tie her shoes. As the owner/employer, we give the
money ORDERS to conduct a commercial operation like the creation of a vehicle or the
like. Your fiduciary serves as a transmitting utility for your exchange. The holder-indue-
course can “ONLY” hold the account for the owner if they are holding it for the
benefit of the owner and the moment the fiduciary act in derelict of his obligation, he can
no longer hold the property nor the money for the owner, so take it away if they are in
derelict. They “ONLY” hold with our order to hold it. This means that if a vendor is
refusing to adjust the account after you have accepted the account and returned it to
them to be the holder-in-due-course for the tax adjustment and they refuse, they neither
get to use your exemption to get their payment, nor do they get to hold the property
before they get the payment so they lose the ability to hold either the object or the
shadow. When they act outside the employers order, they assume all liability. The
fiduciary is likening unto a guy in the crow’s nest of the ship as the escrow agent. If the
guy up top sees anything peculiar like rocks, pirates, your paperwork, or anything of a
possible threat to delivering the cargo, the fiduciary will steer off the course of the ship.
Upon steering the ship off course, the fiduciary either assumes all liability if it was
unwarranted or is allowed Grace if the holder-in-due-course act in accord with the
employers request to port the vessel and unload the goods safely.
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #28 on: July 08, 2004, 06:11:55 pm »

Page 75 of 95 October 17, 2000
Page 76 of 95 October 17, 2000
We must have more than one fiduciary, one must be a creditor and one must be
a debtor. That means that one must be holding my credit and one must be holding the
debit. Look at your checkbook (a bill of exchange book, solely for the purposes of
drawing on banks); it is a three party instrument. You have two fiduciaries on that one
as well. You are in the middle as the Pass Thru, and you have a drawee/payor and a
payee. One is holding the funds and the other person is entitled to receive the funds.
The funds can only Pass Thru with your endorsement on the check that creates the
order to pay. When a fiduciary acts in derelict of your order, you need to let that entity
know that they are no longer your fiduciary; to do so, you have to bring into the contract
another fiduciary. Go ahead and call the new fiduciary “(my fiduciary, holder-in-duecourse)”
because now it will let the derelict entity know that they are not your fiduciary
so who the heck are they? They can only be your fiduciary if your want them to be so.
The reason we operate in our own name is because it is in our name that carries
our remedy of an aligned conscience as the owner. Your name is not what anybody
says you are, it is what you are most comfortable reading, saying, spelling, and the like.
It has to appease your consciences and feel right to you. When a Title of Nobility
comes onto the scene, he is trying to re-present you through his fiduciary title. Doing
this will make you an agent to the corporation, just as he is an agent of the court. When
a Title Holder attempts to re-present you, as a public defender, he is actually defending
the public from you and because of that they will treat you as an enemy. We are
supposed to present ourselves, not be re-presented in what we do. We are not to
protest the fiduciary title but accept them for value and bring them in for direct
examination as the Title Holder of delinquent taxes. (See Court Language-Forensic
Accounting). See Luke 11:46,52 and Romans 12:1-2.
A fiduciary is the one that must testify for us that we are eligible to be in
possession of the property, that is the purpose of registration. The state as our fiduciary
registers the property and acts on our behalf since if we speak, the Miranda Warning
kicks in. That is why we need a fiduciary (since witness is an extremely touchy word,
when I write “witness,” I mean it in the limited capacity to express my ownership
reflected on their books for their internal operations to tell everyone I am entitled to
possession apart from mother earth. And even then, that might not be completely
correct, I just know that if you expect them to testify on your behalf like in a court
scenario or even a testimony scenario, you are in the wrong frame of mind and your
finished. Be very careful with that word, because a witness for you can turn against
you.)
When operating your process, don’t use their fiduciary title as an extension of
their name when writing them, use their real name care of their DBA or whatever. The
reason this is done is because a fiction has no accountability but a real person does.
So bind the real person to the account.
We should not put the value of our acceptances on the offer. That needs to be
done by either the person making the offer, or if there is no value expressly written in
dollars and cents, we need to obtain the value of that “good and valuable consideration”
Page 77 of 95 October 17, 2000
that we are returning to them by obtaining an eligible witness for the value of that offer
by getting a car estimate, or an estimate of a replacement, or the estimated cost of a
Certificate of Deposit from a bank. Think about it if you were getting an insurance
settlement (Public Policy). If your car got destroyed, the insurance company gets the
Kelly Blue Book value, or maybe a value from a dealer. See even insurance companies
can’t put the value when it directly involves them; they need a witness just like we need
a witness. So ask yourself the question. Who will testify for the value of this
dishonor/refusal I am accepting? Well here is the answer, and you will get a kick.
Because of the advances in our mathematics with the intellect of calculus and the like,
take it in the light of algebra. Algebra works this way: 7 x “Y” = 28, what does “Y”
equal? Well, “Y” equals “4.” Now replace the “7” with a car estimate of “$ 12,000.00,”
“Y” is your commercial dishonor, and “28” is the physical car itself. See the commercial
dishonor is the variable. Lets look at the math now. “Car estimate of $12,000.00” x
“commercial dishonor” = “physical possession of a car.” Isn’t it funny, I finally
understand algebra.
Page 78 of 95 October 17, 2000
Preferred Stock & Common Stock
The value of Preferred over Common is significant. The United States
government is a Corporation. Being a corporation it has shares. Its share can be
defined in to the two classes of holders. Common stock holders are the employees,
supervisors, public, fiscal, agencies, agents, defendants, straw men, accusers,
witnesses and the like. As fictions, they have no rights, only privileges. And being
common they hold only one side of the account, the public side. From common stock
comes common law. In that I mean law that is common for all of these common
collective fictions using this collective debt that can be represented by the Mosaic Law
and base their existence on execution of law, and by that, to get a remedy, an execution
is required. In common law, the contract has to die before someone gets paid.
Common Stock is what the Supervisors hold and when you are in controversy with
them, they assume (as a corporate officer assumes the position of CEO) that you are an
infidel and that you need to go to jail. Supervisors try to force the issue that you are
holding common with them, and by that, I mean that they hold 50% and you hold 50%
and because you are equal with them, you are an infidel. Through common law or the
law of the commoners, all of the agencies hold common with each other. In the
common law there is no ultimate remedy because sooner or later, everybody will be
executed. Grace does not exist under the law, Grace can only exist under the
discernment of your conscience and that is why government cannot operate in Grace,
only we can. Government doesn’t have a conscience to make discernment with. I am
not at common with a government agency; I have the priority and am preferred over
them, by being their employer with the ability to use my conscience. I am not a coemployee.
I own them, I accommodate them therefore I am entitled to recourse to
them. I am claiming them as a dependant upon me. I am exempt as the creator. I do
not operate my existence under common law because under common law, there is no
remedy. A more perfect contract (Public Policy/Grace) is now in effect and that is why
in the United States Corporation, I hold Preferred Stock. You can equate your Preferred
Stock with you unalienable rights. Preferred Stock means that you hold both sides of
the account and by that, I mean 100% of the world, both public and private, as the
owner of the world you give the orders (money orders). You are not the creditor or the
debtor on the account, you own the debtor and you own the creditor. The government
cannot take this right away, only by your offer to operate in Mosaic Law will they
assume jurisdiction over you. We own both sides and that is why we want the identity
of the fiduciary creditor and the fiduciary debtor. In Acts 10:14 (KJV), Peter tells us
what type of stock he holds, when it was written “for I have never eaten anything that is
common or unclean.” See we hold Preferred Stock, not Common Stock. Preferred
Stock holders have priority over the commoners. The law cannot provide Grace
because the people don’t have the ability to use their consciences appropriately. Read
First Timothy Chapter 1 to identify to whom the common law applies. Stay away from
common law; it is the law of the executors. Use preferred Grace to operate on a higher
plane (Preferred Stock).
Page 79 of 95 October 17, 2000
Supervisor
The supervisor is superman. The supervisor is in charge of regulating the
superfund. The supervisor holds common stock and you hold preferred stock. The
supervisor assumes the position just like the CEO assumes the position of a corporate
officer and when you admit they exist as a more superior person than yourself by
arguing with them, they will kill you as an executor of law because they will assume you
are incompetent, don’t argue with the supervisors. When you argue with the supervisor,
you are saying that they hold common with you and by that I mean they hold 50% and
you hold 50% common stock, and because they are a SUPERvisor, they will assume
that you are an infidel. Don’t challenge their common stock, remember that you hold
preferred stock and don’t need to argue with them. Realize that the strongest argument
doesn’t need to be argued, because the arguing of your point proves its weakness. The
moment there is any sarcasm in the conversation, just leave. They become the Mill
Stone (See REV 18: 21-22). Once you argue the facts, you lose. Tell them what you
want by giving them their instructions, and don’t compromise (a renegotiation/counter
offer) because as an owner of both sides of the account, it is your way or the highway.
When you get into a stumbling block, and you have to deal with an accountant that can’t
satisfy your requests like making the adjustments to the accounts, you need to request
to speak to their supervisor. Their supervisor is like superman, if superman cant do it,
who the heck can? What happens is when you ask your way up the chain of command,
you get all of the people to testify as to who is more important and has more authority.
With the added authority to do your requests of adjustments, comes the liability if they
don’t. You are working your way up the top of the chain of command and this will allow
all of those people to confess against their superior, which says that they can make the
adjustments.
Page 80 of 95 October 17, 2000
Claim & Dispute Of Title
A Claim is a right to title. By showing our claim, we are in a dispute of title. The
dispute of title we talk about is the “Title of Nobility.” This is a dispute of Title of Nobility,
is what you are really saying. You could say to yourself, “Who owns the attorney that is
holding the corporation in Bar?” What is happening is an assumed principal (the one
who hired him to be the attorney in the case) is trying to direct the Title of Nobility to act
in derelict of your principal wishes. The problem with the assumed principal is: He
doesn’t know how to accept a claim like we do and because of that he can’t say he is
the original source of the funds, therefore he can’t direct the title of nobility. The
assumption occurs when there is only one witness, with our acceptance it now becomes
two witnesses and exists a fact. Because he doesn’t know how to accept a claim and
use his exemption, he will then be forced to take the deduction side of the account and
that can only happen after he returns my interest to me. That is the dispute of title that
we are talking about. When an attorney assumes a contract by making demands
against us, he is saying he is holding the checkbook of the corporation to provide the
remedy. Our acceptance makes his check good because he can use our exemption to
claim it as an expense and adjust the account and receive the foreign tax credit. Picture
yourself as the King of England sitting there on your throne and you have one Noble
walk in and start to wine about the other Noble getting more land then He. There are
three parties to this equation, one King (you) and two Nobles (attorney’s). This is the
dispute of title and that is why we want the identity of the fiduciary creditor and the
fiduciary debtor because they try to play both sides of the account until we can pin them
down with that question. The simple internal question I ask myself is “Who owns the
Nobles?” I do. Look at it in the sense of a Prosecuting attorney and the Defense
attorney, trying to get you involved in their controversy over whether you are
commercial guilty or not. Bottom line, I am the Settler and the beneficiary on the
account so the trust that exists is a very limited one and the fiduciary trustees better
behave or they will be removed from the trust (interest or in trust) and will not be able to
have my exemption nor the property on their books. We own the attorney, and the
attorney works for the state that we own, and the state is registered and gets to hold the
title to the property like the Manufactures Statements of Origins (MSO) but we get
possession of the property. See the State get the title to the property when the title gets
registered but the property has no maturity date so we get the property indefinitely until
termination of the property.
With title to that property comes risk for the liability of the product. That is why
the state takes all of the Manufactures Statements of Origins (MSO) when a car is sold.
It is because if you hold the title to that property, you will assume the risk if you hit and
kill someone. That is why they take the titles, it is because they have so many
(titles/blessings of the house of Israel) on their books that if you happen to injure
someone, the injured party can go after the title holder, being the State. The State, or
the registered agent for the Department of Motor Vehicles you could say. The owner of
the title of the car assumes the risk of the car but we get possession. The State has
removed us from liability if we injure someone. And all that matters is that we have
products to live off of because we can’t live off of paper, only sustenance. You have
Page 81 of 95 October 17, 2000
heard the phrase “All property ownership rests in the hands of the state.” That is
correct. They hold all of the titles of property for the goods but we get possession as
the owner of the state.
The first way to show value for a claim is to provide a check with the order so that
the property can be released to the buyer. This is what you could call a real claim to the
item being both equitable and legal by giving a check. It satisfies the Replevin bond.
The opposite of the real claim is the taxable claim. This “taxable claim” is the second
type of claim and is where your acceptance for value comes into play. A request is
made against you without providing a check, thus it was an (order for money/ money
order), that is why you RETURN (tax return) the offer after acceptance to the Offeror
because the Offeror is holding your check as your fiduciary and they need to Pass Thru
your account to make their check good which in turn reflects itself as a deduction to the
entities tax liability making the credit memo to the account for the tax adjustment good
allowing the release of the goods to the acceptor and now there is no debt claimed on
the account.
Page 82 of 95 October 17, 2000
You & Dispute Of Title
Title of
Nobility
Fiduciary
Creditor
YOU
&
Dispute Of
Title
Title of
Nobility
Fiduciary
Debtor
Business
Organization
Business
Organization
Assumed
Principal
Assumed
Principal
Page 83 of 95 October 17, 2000
Firm Offers & Possession & Payment
An offer is a promise to perform (There’s the “Note”). It is also the first one to
come to the table with a promise to deliver prior to the offeree’s acceptance. Having
received a “bill” as though I am the “bond” and passing over the “note,” it is the note
(delivery of the paper adjustment) that must be delivered by the offeror first, to the
acceptor, before the acceptor has any obligations in the contract. See how the offeror
has to perform first. This is very important. The offeror must perform their side of the
contract first or deliver the registered required reserves to indemnify his actions of refusing
to deliver the offer (See Replevin Bond, a.k.a. their check).
Firm Offers guarantee that an item is for sale and will be held available for not
more than 3 months and that creates a warranty that title is clear. Remember title
means Title of Nobility. A firm offer has a signature. Sometimes you will get a
computer printed signature, which is ok. And sometimes you won’t get a signature. If
you don’t get a signature, call up and get an eligible name at the business organization
like the Chief of Police or the City Manager for the registration of the contract. Maybe it
will be the Secretary of State. With a firm offer, title of nobility is guaranteed to be clear
and that means that no other principal owner like myself owns the attorney so when the
property is registered with the state, I have clear Title of Nobility of the State.
Remember firm offer is the law firm and in the scriptures it is the firmament. I still get
possession of the property but the State gets the paper title, which is how the scriptures
say that The House of Israel will get blessings, well Israel is a military organization
being divided up into 10’s 100’s and 1000’s. The government gets all the blessings of
holding the titles on file, which they put on microfiche. Title passes at the meeting of the
minds and not some latter dated instrument. After the Firm offer is received, payment of
your exemption cannot be demanded of you until the close of the escrow on the
account. Since even with one day of time left, a principal can come into the contract
and redeem his interest in it, you still have nothing to pay for. You don’t own the Title of
Nobility of The State completely until escrow closes at midnight of the third day after the
day of trade. They can’t make a compelling reason for you to pay until you get
possession of the item for three days after trade and then again not until escrow closes,
but since you were the original owner and it was pre-paid you are not obligated to pay
because they were the ones that paid you back by giving you back your property, thus
applying your exemption to the account. Remember that the Offeror is an escrow agent
and is in the crow’s nest of the ship as an escrow agent. This person is looking into the
distance to see if he will find a reason like rocks, pirates, and rough waters to not port
the ship and unload the cargo. Because the Offeror is in the crows nest, if he sees any
funny business, he will steer the ship off course either 1) taking the glory for saving the
ship if it were a real problem or 2) assume all of the liability if he act in derelict of the
owner of the ships requests. When dealing with escrow agents, the moment they see
land (your paperwork), they will steer off course and in that act will assume all of the
liability by acting outside your needs to port the ship and unload your cargo. The rule of
thumb is to unload the cargo and obtain possession before any of your paperwork gets
shown to them.
Page 84 of 95 October 17, 2000
Replevin Bond
A Replevin bond indemnifies your claim to title. It must be displayed as the
registered required reserves to indemnify a party’s actions in case of an injury to the
other party due to not having delivery of the item. A Replevin bond is used when a
party will not release the property to indemnify the inaction. When the credits and the
debits are balanced the property can be released as there is no liability to be fulfilled to
hold the property. A true claim must have a bond to indemnify the parties incase of any
injury, and when you return the offer, accepted, you have now returned the value (the
Replevin bond) in the same fashion as to what you are referring to when you write that
you didn’t find their check enclosed. See the absent check was the pass over of the
Note and because of that it pre-paid the check upon redemption of the account. When
the bond is posted by execution of law (actual enclosing of the check) or operation
(mentioning the check was not enclosed), the treble damages can now be released
(order of the court). The Bond is usually one to three times the value of the claim being
made. The bond balances the credits and the debits on the account and once the
debits and the credits are balanced, the property can be released. An offer is made
against you to pay, which debits your value and to balance that value, you need a
credit. Your acceptance of their offer returned to them satisfies the Replevin Bond by
operation. That is why you accept and return (tax return) the original, yourself being the
sponsor for the credit to the account through your exemption. The reason you return
the original is because what the person is doing is taxing you. When you return it, it is a
tax return that is eligible for adjustment with the Internal Revenue Service. Remember
that once you accept and return, the other person loses their exemption (due to their
dishonor/ the re-fuse boxing of their strawman) until they settle with you (they have to
honor your acceptance because it is their own offer that they are dishonoring when they
blow the circuit and re-fuse, that is why you accept the refusal, because when the fuse
blows, you have to re-fuse it). Once these two things are satisfied (offer and
acceptance= Replevin bond) and balanced, we can now go to a third dimension for the
release of the order of the court being the treble damages by the adjustment (treble
being the third item), a release of the property, order, or an acceptance of a commercial
dishonor.
Page 85 of 95 October 17, 2000
The Acceptance Stamp
Accepted For Value.
This Property is Exempt from Levy.
Please Adjust this Account for the Proceeds;
Products; Accounts; and Fixtures; and Release
The Order(s) of the Court to Me Immediately.
Signed
Date__________________
Employer ID # ________________
Mathew 5:25-26(KJV). 25. Agree with thine adversary quickly, whiles thou art in
the way with him; lest at any time the adversary deliver thee to the judge, and the judge
deliver thee to the officer, and thou be cast into prison. 26. Verily I say unto thee, Thou
shalt by no means come out thence, till thou hast paid the uttermost farthing.
We must truly agree with the adversary. They want to identify if you are going to
spur a controversy with them (what they train for) and by any means they will test you.
They want to identify if you will agree with them, so accept what they say. The moment
you defend your actions, you became the defendant and only defendants go to jail. I
look at it this way: You are in an predicament with a guy who starts to bicker about you,
once you agree with him, well now there are two people on your side (you and the
accuser) and both of you are rebuking thin air because your on the same side as him.
Your only saving grace is through acceptance of the Charge (Christ off of the
account) to be an heir to the Promise entitled to the Note and not of the Bonds maid as
an offeror under Mosaic Law. By accepting the claim made against you, you are
allowing it to Pass Thru your account (the use of your name, TIN, and the registration of
their books), and now that the commercial energy is on board that contract the energy
can make an exchange for services occur (receive the Note). When they charge you
and you accept and return it, they have to charge it back or charge-back for the
adjustment. Public Policy requires the reversing of entries by being precluded from
paying in debt. Here is a funny tidbit that I don’t want you to forget, it is very important.
When the public tells you your paperwork (acceptance for value) had no value and
won’t pay for the charge, who’s offer are they really talking about? When they don’t
adjust, they are saying their paper had no value to begin with and because of that, they
are not entitled to have possession of the property because the property wasn’t the
collateral for the contract but the paper itself, and when the paper had no value, they
Page 86 of 95 October 17, 2000
have no business holding the property, so they need to release it to me. (See Calendar
Year & Fiscal Year). For one, they are not entitled to possession because the off book
income paid for the Note when the paper comes back worthless. Remember the most
we can do is to the point of having accepted it; we can’t pay it, which is where our
exemption kicks in (that is Grace) and makes the payment. Remember that when you
accept, you are agreeing with your adversary quickly (the obligee being the person
demanding payment) but because you cannot pay, being precluded from payment by
under Grace, the actual payment that we are relying on temporally may be HJR-192 but
in all fact what you are doing is tendering the contract back in reference to the Original
Promise through the Garden of Gethsemane and His death on the cross as our surety
by our Acceptance of Him as our Savior. That is the payment that we are all relying on
to pay both our temporal and spiritual debts in this redemption process. See the paper
contract is the actual collateral, not the house, nor the car but the actual contract.
Stating, “This property is exempt from levy,” is incredible. It identifies that the
property is exempt, preferred, private, registered, and it may not be levied against as
you are the principal and the interest must return to you not the other way around.
Remember, the exemption comes from the registration of the account by the principal
registration. It is a profound statement because you are pretty much saying, “Nobody
can use this property but myself and if you intend to move against me, make your check
payable to my bank.” See a security interest (garnishment) is the same thing as a
return of the interest to the principal, only security interest is a legal phrase that applies
to the Mosaic Law while interest returned to the principal is an Internal Revenue phrase
and the Internal Revenue Service is where your exemption comes from. If you study
more into claims to property, you will see that this statement identifies an exemption;
exempt property is not levy able.
The adjustment to the account is a key phrase as well (See Adjustment).
Adjustment means tax adjustment and what happens when they take the tax adjustment
and they write it off as an expense, (their expense is my interest) and now that it is an
expense to the company, they get a tax deduction on that portion of interest paid to the
principal and that is my exemption. Acknowledgment/acceptance of the deficiency
allows for the adjustment. The release of the order of the court is a check or money
order. The reason tickets and bail notices say pay by check or money order is because
if you didn’t find their check enclosed, you return their money order. Release is an
insurance word because the insurance policy we are dealing with is Public Policy. And
you know that insurance is a group effort to stave off liability (like the one world money
order where everybody is in it together.) The release of the order can either be a
negotiable instrument if it is a check and it is a non-negotiable instrument if it is a
dishonor letter. Expect quite a few dishonor letters. See, they pay us in non-negotiable
instruments. All these dishonor letters are money orders (order(s) of the court) in nonnegotiable
form to place with you the charge/delinquent tax back into your possession.
Because when you stamped the original offer, didn’t you say to release the order, well
they did, but in a non-negotiable way being the dishonor. The commercial dishonor
establishes the value because it is the order of the court that they released to you in
non-negotiable form. Just tack it to an eligible witness for the value of their dishonor (an
Page 87 of 95 October 17, 2000
estimate) and exchange their dishonor for the product that you need to get your remedy
(remember algebra).
Just like the Birth Certificate, start at the principal source of every offer. Don’t let
anything slip by because they will assume that to be the contract. Look at it this way:
Your desk has a lot of crud on it (offers), ever time you accept, one article is taken off
and they can’t use it against you. There goes an eraser, then a pencil, then a paper,
and so on until sooner or later everything has been accepted and the desk is completely
cleared off. But what happens when you forget to accept something, lets say it is as
small as a paperclip, they will assume the paperclip to be the contract that you are liable
for and they will attack you with the paperclip because they assume that to be the
contract you have with them. Make sure you go all the way back to the beginning and
get everything to the smallest offer. Once you accept it, you own it all. That is why we
accept the birth certificate and put “All proceeds, products, accounts, and fixtures are
covered.” It gets everything.
The stamp gets placed on the Original of the Offer, not the photocopy. The logic
behind that is: The original is what you cash at the bank. Stamp the stamp at a 45-
degree angle right on the face of the document. Make sure to overlap your stamp right
on top of the Offer of their words to give an unequivocal expression that you have
accepted exactly what they wrote. Put your legend directly over their legend and now
some attorney can’t explain away the evidence. It is the same thing as a certified
check. All we can do is certify the check, we can’t pay it.
Page 88 of 95 October 17, 2000
Offender & Defendant
Yes you can argue the law, but you have to realize to whom the law applies to.
See First Timothy Chapter 1. It applies to them who operate in execution of law. The
law doesn’t apply to you directly but your employees. The law is not to subject us but to
subject our employees since they can’t use their conscience. You have to do what is
best for you. If you argue the law, there is a controversy that their courts can decide on.
If you argue the facts and begin to defend your actions, you become the defendant and
defendants are the only ones that get arraigned and thrown in jail, be the offender and
stay the offender by accepting that title for value. The reason I am the principal is
because they charged me with the offense. The offense is the premier action in a suit,
thus saying that I am the reason this account at the courthouse exists (it is because of
my actions that they are charging me), making me the principal for this action. If you
don’t accept your offence, they will label you the defendant and remember Romans
4:25, “Who was delivered for our offences, and was raised again for our justification.”
Christ took our offenses, not our defenses. Be the offender not the defender.
Defendants are felons, or fallen men and only felons go to jail. Even if you have been
convicted of a crime before, a defendant is only one who recognizes himself as that.
The municipalities bookkeeping secrets are what matter most to them, and the more
you learn about that the more simple life will be. You will actually want to be charged.
What you see is real to you, although you may not want to experience the pains that
come with it. If the judge calls you the defendant, don’t recognize him. Be very careful
for what you do, if you defend yourself while you are being booked, there is a possibility,
that you may be the defendant. See the system tries to assume preferred stock in this
situation again by charging you with an offense and then you go to court and you are a
defendant. They need to make up their mind. Well the reason is, if you have debt on
you, then you are a fallen man holding sin. That is why you have to accept the offer and
mail back the original as fast as possible because then you have effectively redeemed
the debt and now the burden is on them to release the order of the court to you. It puts
the ball in their court of conscience to perform up to your courts desires.
Page 89 of 95 October 17, 2000
International Jurisdiction
The jurisdiction we are exercising is the International Jurisdiction. By that it is
“Internal” or private. It is inside the body. The International jurisdiction only used to be
recognized publicly with the International Monetary Fund (being a private internal
organization) that is publicly represented by The Bureau of The Public Debt. The
Bureau of The Public Debt collateralizes the United States for our economic paper
system. The IMF used to be the insiders but because they are making offers through
the Bureau of The Public Debt. When we accept for value we become the sponsor for
the credit, not the municipality, nor the municipal bond insurance underwriter, nor the
investment banker, nor the mutual fund, nor the Treasury, we underwrite the
underwriter. When we accept, the bag gets flipped inside out and now we are the
insiders and they are the outsiders since we now get charged in fact (charged with
tangible objects, not the shadows). In the international jurisdiction as holders of
preferred stock, there is no crediting or debiting the account because as the owner of
both sides, we are always at zero. The International Jurisdiction is for our benefit. In
this system it is all surplus as we remain in the center T-chart and always remain at zero
liability. The payment of this system is “it just takes time, you have to spend and invest
you time.” It is a put and take. You have to offer your time and study the principals of
what you are doing and from that devoted time, you will grow. By being in the
international jurisdiction, the ecclesiastical court of conscience is in effect because
“Internal,” and “court of consciences” are private operations, exercised in a private and
sanitary jurisdiction.
Page 90 of 95 October 17, 2000
Ecclesiastical Court Of Conscience
The court of conscience is what you are prosecuting in when you do your
acceptance and especially in the oral proceedings. By exercising the court of
conscience, you are making moral decisions as to how you are going to lead your life.
Do not seek to others to walk you through the operation of your court i.e. your friends,
the judge and the like, because the moment you recognize their court, you are no longer
in your court. Your court orders are the acceptances because it turns those offers into
money orders to use your exemption. When you accept and return an offer and they
refuse to adjust, they are the ones who are in contempt of court, not you. See the
contempt comes from the senate being in contempt of congress. The constitution says
that the house shall be in charge of all revenue laws and all of our criminal laws are
currently coming from the Senate. But you see The House of Congress is not the
“House” wee are talking about because the public cannot provide a remedy because the
public only has a window, the Federal Reserve Acceptance Window and the scriptures
talk about a door that you can walk in and out of, well that is the door to the warehouse,
it is the “Receiving & Discharge” door and it is “Your House,” because you are the one
that is revenuing the currency from a public jurisdiction of debt back to your private
jurisdiction of credit and effectively redeeming the debt. This is why we want the order
of the court released to us; it is because it is our court we are exercising. When
exercising your conscience, don’t ask anyone for permission; just do what your
conscience dictates because as the operator of your court as the employer/owner. Do
what it takes as the employer of the United States Corporation to get your remedy. Just
make your request and take it from there. That is why it is so important for you to
identify your position in the account before you start.
“Court” also means, “Bank.” See, we are banks of a different nature, not that of
“$” but of potential electric energy.
To operate the court of conscience, we need our conscience and sub conscience
in alignment. In that, I mean that we can’t be second-guessing ourselves like if we had
a devil and angel on each of our shoulders. The public tries to get you thinking you
can’t do anything right, well they are wrong because in Grace, how can you go wrong.
Just realize that you have to get your thinking straight so that you can operate in good
faith because if the industrial society can get you to think otherwise, then they still serve
a purpose in dictating your life around in Mosaic Law. Operate in Grace and come to a
comfortable position of good faith and you will be able to now operate on faith and be
guided by your conscience as to the appropriate moves you should take.
We need to be carrying on our commercial life in order, 1Corinthians 14:40 and
15:23. Most people have a difficulty getting control of what they are doing with their life
and it is because it is not until “After the order of Melchizedek” do you get control, you
need the order first then second you will find control.
Page 91 of 95 October 17, 2000
Court Language-Forensic Accounting
The reason people go to jail is because of the absence of the check. They
charge you but they lie. (See Charges Of Sin=Coming At You With The Shadow & The
Strawman; and See Charges Of Sign=Coming At You With The Object & You The
Owner). The system charges you with the shadow of service (which is sin) and they
need you to recognize them as the object to appease their conscience to be able to put
you in jail. If you don’t recognize them as the object, which is casting the shadow, but
the check that is casting the shadow, they have to release to you the check (order(s) of
the court). Remember Revelations 18:21-22, that is the reason you avoid the oral
controversy until you are prepared for it. After you obtain enough personal confidence
in your operations, feel free according to the dictates of your conscience to go to the
oral proceedings and ask the questions, it will bring the account to closure because you
can bind the real people in the showdown, but till that time, avoid it until you are
personally prepared for the challenge. When operating your process, bind the real
people, not their titles. Don’t call them by their title but their name. If you are in the oral
proceedings, then use the four questions and the statement.
Your recognition of them is what causes you to go to jail because when they
come at you with the shadow of a service, they want you to recognize them as the
object in the controversy that casts the shadow, and when you recognize them, they
keep your check and put you in jail as collateral for the check. When you request the
Order of the Court released to you, they have to give you the check or they are now in
contempt of your court. In that, I mean that the corporation is using your exemption to
write checks to them self by bonding against you to claim you as a dependant and an
infidel that has to get locked up. If you stick strictly with the “where is my check?”
attitude, they have to clean their books to meet their record keeping obligations.
Remember Revelations 18:21-22
Many people have a fear of court; in faith, your fear should fall away. If you are
not prepared for the oral proceedings, prepare for it, because if you want to push paper,
they will push paper and they are much better paper pushers than myself. Only utilizing
one side of the account (the paper pushing), the steamroller will get revved up.
Operating in both sides of the account we have the paper and the oral proceedings.
Learn to utilize both sides as the owner of the account. The oral proceedings are a
necessary part because it is very difficult to displace the presumption that you are only a
strawman when you are not there in person. Being there in the flesh proves you are not
the strawman.
The Mill Stone is the Mill Levy and is the basis of taxation for the township just
like the county being at a grand like the grand jury at $1000.00. When the Great Angel
picked up the stone and cast it into the sea, it took the city, county, state, federal
government with it, all flying into the sea with each other never to be heard from again.
(The Fiction and Maritime Jurisdiction)
Page 92 of 95 October 17, 2000
Plain and simple: The government is fictions represented by fancy books
called “corporate charters” and can’t talk to have a “hearing” nor get hurt to even
hold a claim, a book can’t talk so don’t worry what they say. REMEMBER
REVELATIONS 18:21-22.
Follow the money trail of the financial asset known to the municipality as a
“speeding ticket” and you will know what your acceptance accounts for. Hold those
accountants accountable that are running amuck of your principal account. If you want
to learn how the (angels of heaven/agents) operate their jobs as the record keepers for
the (kingdom of heaven/government), learn their field. Angels don’t build a universe,
which is the Lords job; angels keep the (records of heaven/bookkeeping) and that’s that.
Remember Revelations 18:21-22
The main goal of the accuser is to make the offender appear to be the defendant
strawman by getting you to argue with them and create a jointer between you and your
strawman. Remember that the Miranda Warning applies to you as well as them so
don’t argue the facts or the law and don’t show fear or act confused if you get an
awkward response. Remember Revelations 18:21-22
You are entitled to the direct examination of the witness, not the crossexamination
because the accuser is your witness (you own him). If any witness has
been examined by the prosecutor prior to you, they are conducting the cross
examination first in hopes that you will allow that testimony to get into the account of the
dispute and be unexamined and remain to be testimony against you. This prior
testimony needs to be directly examined. When you are given a chance to question the
witness as though it is the cross examination, just call the accuser as a witness to be
directly examined and it removes everything they did before your examination.
The reason you call a direct examination is because the witness is yours (you
own him). That makes you the Bank Examiner and the Forensic Examiner and now it is
your opportunity to examine the witness that is laying the claim against you.
Remember, that as the examiner (direct examiner), you go into the emergency (State of
Emergency) room, which is a sanitary (private ecclesiastical court of conscience)
environment to operate on the executed body to redeem him and give his life back.
In the Examination, you get to see if you injured a strawman that is laying a claim
against you. That can’t happen. With the direct examination comes the first
questioning. Look at it as the hand in the cookie jar scenario. If you come up to a little
kid with chocolate all over his face and you know he was eating the chocolate cake,
what is the first thing you ask him even though you know the answer? Did you eat the
cake? Now, you knew the answer before you asked him; you just wanted to hear what
the kid would say, right? It is the same thing, you are catching the corporation spending
against you and they are trying to make you pay for what they did, when it is against
Public Policy to make you pay in the first place.
Page 93 of 95 October 17, 2000
Don’t let any testifier go unquestioned. One thing to be on the lookout for is
testimony coming in from the sides of the court (like a bailiff or the like). Not all of the
testimony will come from the witness chair. Anybody and everybody is going to attempt
to create the jointer of you and your strawman by saying stuff like, “Yep, that’s him,
that’s the defendant,” and any other particular thing that comes from anybody
attempting to make you the strawman, needs to be questioned with the request for the
release the order. It doesn’t necessarily have to come from the witness chair. It might
come from the jail cell, or whatever. Just be on the lookout for accusations or testimony
against you in every location you find yourself in.
If you go down to the court, what they usually do is wait to hear your case the
last. What this does is it is the operation of going into judges chambers in the negative
because they don’t say it, and you will find yourself as the last person there. The
reason for this is in the public forum there is no binding of the parties. In chambers,
being private, the parties can be bound to the contract.
If you are given a public defender, remember that he is defending the public not
you. He is the traitor/spy/tar baby. Make sure you question him because he is a bailee
that they are trying to assume you with, as to having a contract with the court. It is very
important to question him as much as the accuser. He is an accuser from the inside.
Here is the court language. These are used for the oral proceedings. Say
nothing more than these once you start the first question. Once you start there is no
going back, and don’t start the questions and finish them short. Once you start, you
have to get through the end of the request for the release of the order. If you are
curious what the answers are, read Revelations 18:21-22 and then internally reference
yourself to what ever they say to the Miranda Warning. Remember that you don’t care
what the answers are because for them to make a claim against you, they have to give
you a check (the one you write about having not found in their offer) to post for their
Replevin bond and when they don’t do that, they have no claim in fact because they
didn’t post the reserves to indemnify their actions because you would endorse it back to
them paid in full. If they do say they have a claim, it is really against the strawman not
yourself, and on top of that, if they say they have a claim, then they are admitting to be
my fiduciary, either holding the claim as a credit or a debit then the order must be
released to you as the owner of the fiduciary. Especially when you accepted for value
the offer and returned it, they can Pass Thru your account and use your exemption to
remedy themselves for what ever was needed. When they fail to release the order of
the court during your written correspondents with them after you have accepted, they
are then in dishonor and lose their exemption and can have no claim. You are playing
prosecutor and they are the witness that is lying. When they talk, just chuckle up your
sleeve. Once you are done with the questions, just leave. These questions are to be
directed to the witness that is testifying against. That is the employee that is your
accuser. Don’t let any testimony from an accuser get unchallenged without your
DIRECT EXAMINATON by saying the questions and the statement. Feel free to
question everybody who is your accuser; don’t let any testimony go unchallenged.
Page 94 of 95 October 17, 2000
REMEMBER, YOU DON’T CARE WHAT THE ANSWERS ARE; THE MIRANDA
WARNING APPLIES TO THEM TOO!
You have to wait to be orally charged in the light of an accusation of calling you
the strawman or some sort of defendant before it is appropriate to use the questions,
see they have to charge you to be able to discharge their duty. Wait for the
charge/accusation, then enter into the direct examination.
May I Have your name Please?
Do you have a claim against me?
Do you know anyone else that has a claim against me?
I request the Order of the Court released to me immediately.
If they are being huge jerks and yelling and playing their old games, say this in
the most inopportune time. The attorneys try to play both sides in an attempt to have
preferred stock. What needs to happen is they need to be identified as a creditor or a
debtor so we know who is in possession of the delinquent tax that needs to be returned
to me.
These proceedings are a dispute over title.
Who is the Person that is the Fiduciary Creditor and who is the person that is the
Fiduciary Debtor?
If you are not being allowed to call a witness and they are steam rolling right over
you, you need to call a witness, so call the accuser who is steam rolling right over you
for a direct examination.
I would like to call a witness for direct examination.
May I Have your name Please?
Do you have a claim against me?
Do you know anyone else that has a claim against me?
I request the Order of the Court released to me immediately.
Page 95 of 95 October 17, 2000
Closing
Well I hope this helps. These are my thoughts as of October 17,
2000 and they will be different tomorrow as I learn more. Just remember
that the principles are the real truth, and the how-to always change as the
process gets more and more streamline. Live off of principles. Remember
to use your court of conscience to be a just master and live the Golden
Rule Galatians 5:13-14, and start reading your scriptures.
Thank heavens The Lord provided a way that the money should be
removed from the United States in 1933 because with money comes the
liability to make the payments.
LEAST PREFERRED DENOMINATOR: There is NO money (in that
substance cannot be used as an obligation of payment). There is no way
to credit or debit an account unless you have money to do so with. It is all
soft money= overdraft/bounced check in operation, and when they refuse
to adjust, delinquent books, all in hopes that we will make the soft money
(bribe money) hard by the mental pictures we put in our head (thus creating
our reality of substance) that we have to re-pay a debt (the vice added
labor that we commonly do) that has been pre-paid by the Redeemer, both
The Lord Jesus Christ and by our emulation of Him (If we accept the
Redeemer as making the payment for all debt, both temporal and spiritual,
why redo what has already been done, emulate Him and you will receive
His promise). Just remember the scriptures taught us to labor with our
hands daily and not to be busybodies. Be productive by you internal
operation and not by someone’s execution against you. The Industrial
Society feeds off of our potential electrical energy because we are the
accommodators of the credit. Work to live, don’t live to work.
I now understand that the value of the currency is not in paper that I
accept or a gold coin (substance) or a product of an exchange, but the
most important thing I see with this process is that on a completely private
level, internally deep within myself, I realize that the value of the world is
the internal energy I use to control the cells and organs in my body to
operate on my own accord.

Page 95 of 95 October 17, 2000
Logged

unstructuredreality

  • Guest
A New Beginning
« Reply #29 on: July 08, 2004, 06:20:11 pm »

Well, if you're with it so far there is light at the end of the tunnel.  Only one more chapter remains.  Til tomorrow, Unstructuredreality.  What a wild ride it has been and I'm still trying to figure out what it's all saying.  I guess the best thing to do is read it, take the pieces that make sense, study the rest and do what you will with it.  I posted it as a tribute to SuijurisFreeman, who talks in these terms and I have been quite fascinated with these concepts ever since.  Some of this could come in useful, some is so esoteric, I challenge anyone to use all of it.  To those that do, I salute you.  There are other resources out there that are similar, but much shorter and better explained.  Hope you have found some insight.  sorry for the spelling I'm doing 3 things at once.  You may want to download the links given above and read at your leisure rather than sitting here, I might add.  More of this type of thing can be found at http://www.suijuris.net/main/suijuris/user...rs.php?mode=new

Good Day
Logged
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up