While in most cases no matter how belligerent someone is, I don't want a person to be banned, however in this instance, when Oathkeepers are trying to stick to the straight and narrow as far as why they were formed and what the purpose of their being is, then people with their own agendas that can make the Oathkeepers get a "bad rap" (for want of a better word) and that is harmful to OK as a whole, and because of that, as Johnny Cash would say, people need to "walk the line". There is a great deal of interest, investigation, and more than a little media coverage and we need to maintain and stick by the rules we have set for ourselved, and those that can't do so need to be made unable to continue to speak AS an Oathkeeper in any capacity at all, and that includes online. I am pretty new to this myself, but I have really grasped a hold of how damn NECESSARY the Oathkeepers are, and for that very reason we need to make sure that all members understand our purpose and standards.