I recently came across someone who clamed the OPPOSITE—that SS gives a very low return on the amount invested…
So which is Correct?
If we had been able to actually invest the amount that was stolen by government, we'd most likely be much better off. The money government steals is not EVER "invested," but thrown down rat holes and shoved into pockets as fast as they get their grubby hands on it.
No comparison.
It takes about 7 to 10 years for the average retired person to "break even," but only if you count the amounts stolen from the employer as well. Remember they "contribute" half... And then there is the stolen money for "medicare" that goes down a rathole and into pockets even faster than SS. I don't know the exact numbers, but a good half of those receiving medicare "benefits" now never paid in a dime. And then there's medicaid, Obummercare, and a lot more. All so-called entitlements, with nothing but inflation and lies to back them.
The big problem with Social Security and Medicare is that they are unfunded mandates. No matter how much is collected from workers and employers, the promises made to previous generations cannot be kept as the economy tanks and the ponzi scheme is revealed. Future generations may decide to honor that mandate. I suspect they will not, or will not be able to do so no matter what they want.
But these things are but a tip of the iceberg. Just try to contemplate the actual cost to taxpayers for all of the government institutions, employees, programs and "property." The pensions and health care for the glorious leaders and their minions is costing far, far more than most people believe. Just try to calculate that for your own town. It is staggering. Consider that very small towns now have million+ "budgets" and are ever scratching for more and more of everything the people there have and produce.