The Mental Militia Forums

Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Author Topic: Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com  (Read 3687 times)

mouse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7566
Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com
« on: December 11, 2011, 05:27:50 am »

http://lewrockwell.com/orig11/cinque8.1.1.html

It’s always heartening to me to hear from people in response to my articles about the murder of John Kennedy because it tells me that interest in this crime of the century, this coup d’etat against America, is still strong and healthy.

And yesterday’s article was no exception: I have heard from a lot of people, and most of them, the vast majority, have been very supportive. But, one person pointed out something that I missed, and it is absolutely blowing my mind.

First take a look at the picture of Oswald.

snip
Logged

Klapton Isgod

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4193
  • Long-Haired, Over-Fed, Leaping Gnome
Re: Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com
« Reply #1 on: December 11, 2011, 04:21:48 pm »

I'm really confused.  I have no idea what his point is.
Logged
"I got things under control, that's why people call me an extremist.  I'm autonomous.  I understand that I declare my independence every day."  Ted Nugent

"It is the conservative laissez- fairist, the man who puts all the guns and all the decision-making power into the hands of the central government and then says, 'Limit yourself'; it is he who is truly the impractical utopian."  Murray Rothbard

Adventurer, Explorer, Inquiring Mind.

  • Given up.
  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3222
Re: Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com
« Reply #2 on: December 11, 2011, 05:51:31 pm »

Look, we know that in any assassination scenario, whoever made it possible is also guilty.  So the American Reichfuhrer's SS failed to keep him alive.  Given the level of obsession and leader worship the majority have, and the level of defense around these otherwise worthless men sitting in a fancy office, one has to wonder HOW is it that such things came to pass, without someone calling it off, or someone slipping.  Given the fanaticism I've met in the few American SS men I've known personally, I strongly doubt they "slipped" accidentally.  So whoever headed that SS group that failed is guilty, likely most of its members are guilty, and whoever benefited is most assuredly guilty.  The system, is, for sure, guilty, since it supremely benefitted by destroying one of its own agents.

However, one has to admit that the quality of the hit is marvelous, by any historic standard, PERFECTLY adhering to the Sun Tzu's "sacrifice of the unknowing agent to win the war."

The communists and fascists in power sacrificed JFK, Mr. Commie, to their cause, even after his "mr. stalin and I would be friends if it weren't for where we were born" lines, and by killing one of their own, they forever managed to throw a monkey wrench into everyone else's plans.

JFK was the unknowing agent, and his partners and masters were the winning side in the war against the people.  And all they had to do was betray one of their own and arrange to get him killed.

If anyone still thinks it happened any other way, they'll spend the next thousand years chasing dangling threads, without realizing that the garment's already burned, so trimming the threads won't fix it anymore.  We need to put on a new shirt.  The old one's too far gone to be worth wearing.

That's just my take and why I seriously don't much care for the JFK thing.
Logged
Understeer is when you hit the wall with the front of the car and oversteer is when you hit the wall with the rear of the car.
Horsepower is how fast you hit the wall, torque is how far you take the wall with you.

LaughingBear

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 484
Re: Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com
« Reply #3 on: December 11, 2011, 07:03:49 pm »

I'm really confused.  I have no idea what his point is.

Heh, neither does he ^_^
Logged
"The most dangerous man to any government is the man who is able to think things out for himself, without regard to the prevailing superstitions and taboos. Almost inevitably he comes to the conclusion that the government he lives under is dishonest, insane and intolerable, and so, if he is romantic, he tries to change it. And even if he is not romantic personally he is very apt to spread discontent among those who are."

H. L. Menken

mouse

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7566
Re: Visible proof that Oswald was innocent; LewRockwell.com
« Reply #4 on: April 07, 2012, 06:30:21 am »

I care very much for the JFK thing.  Mainly because it was so OBVIOUSLY a conspiracy by the CIA and OBVIOUSLY has nothing to do with Lee Harvey Oswald, and the fact that it was blamed on him assumed the people and anyone who had anything to do with arresting LHO or Jack and setting up Jack Ruby, were absolute morons for believing the crazy story that was told.

There are so many holes in the "official story" big enough to drive a bus through, and they must have been obvious to anyone who thought about it at the time too.

It has become a bit of a joke now.  Big joke:  "The CIA killed JFK and got away with it because people are stupid".  I don't like anything that makes fools out of the public, because generally they are not fools but can be easily manipulated to get hysterical about something and demand that "something be done".
Logged
Pages: [1]   Go Up