So, have fun. Do what you think is right. Or not.
That's exactly what I'm trying to do... and it isn't easy.
You have no obligation to defend Stewart, I think, with or without personal attacks. Could you perhaps mention the facts you dispute and, maybe, cite where better information can be found? The argument is probably at least part of what brings this person back, but I'm not aware of a problem with him. If you find someone who is doing troll stuff, please use the report feature and let me know. I don't normally monitor this section much at all, and would appreciate the help.
The facts in dispute are the manner and motive of Stewart walking away from practicing law. He explained the whole thing on Oath Keepers' private forum, which our friend can access for the low, low price of just $40.
He didn't get fired, he quit. That's the long and short of it.
Now this guy wants to get all frothy about abandoning clients and breaking his oath to be a good minion of the state's enforcement apparatus.
When repeatedly asked if he was a lawyer or LEO, he obfuscated every time.
Conclusion: he's a good little minion of the state's enforcement apparatus who is hell-bent on besmirching a man who defied and left it because it's evil. The metaphor of the house negro is perfect.
As for being obligated to defend Stewart... I'm not obligated to do diddly, include play nice to make Elias happy. Skip the part about it being his house. Yeah, I'm also not obligated to hang out here either.
So, if Elias doesn't want me to hang out here anymore, that's OK. I won't stop speaking truth or water it down for anyone. This is me. I'm not changing who I am because Elias wants his forum to more wussy-friendly.
.