I fear you are watching too much TV again, mouse.
Personally, I really don't care where Atta is, or isn't. sigh
I don't watch TV. Haven't watched TV since 2002.
When I read this I thought of reading a BBC article years ago (even though the BBC is famous for telling a load of utter garbage, but sometimes something they write does "ring true") about seven of the 19 ALLEGED hijackers being found "alive and well" and living in various countries.
If you remember we were bombarded, by the MSM, by constant pictures of the "19 hijackers" with their biographies, within 24 hours of the incidents on 9.11. What sowed the first "seeds of doubt" in my mind about the "official story" still being parroted by the MSM, was someone showing me a video image of a "controlled demolition" of a building similar in size to one of the twin towers alongside an image of "the 9.11 thing". This was within hours of "9.11" occurring (well, taking the time zone difference into account of course).
I'll never forget his words: We were looking at a television screen image of the explosions and I remarked "it looks like a controlled demolition, doesn't it?" He said to me "that's because it IS a controlled demolition". Then he brought out his video tapes, then the next day when the publicity started about "Mohommed Atta's amazing fireproof passport fluttering down from the sky at the most opportune moment", I got very cynical.
So much has changed since then WORLDWIDE, and just about everything can be put down to "... since 9.11 ... the rules have changed" (how many times have you heard that one?) Earlier tonight I was reading an article about "the Watergate scandal" and how "it proved that the American justice system actually worked and nobody was above the law". I thought, "that's probably right - in 1974 at least - but I think if something like that was to happen today there would be either a successful cover-up or a blatant "I am the POTUS, I can shut down the investigation, and I will because I have done nothing wrong so don't you little people go thinking you can have any power over anything that one of your 'betters' does". Then the MSM would step in and start spouting "for security reasons we are unable to probe this any further", then people would insist "the president obviously knows far more about the security of this country than we do, so he must have good intentions". Then a couple of years later Mark Dice would interview people on a beach about "the incident" and 95% of them wouldn't know what he was talking about and 4% would say something like "yeah, someone tried to tell me about this before but I'm like 'I don't care', it's a beautiful day on the beach and I still don't care".
That's why it is important where Atta is. It is important that he is actually not dead.