she would have been bad in a few different ways (but really far fewer than most would think) but no not worse.
She might have you paying 90% more tax to pay for "carbon emissions" and the "if you want to identify as a turnip" scheme, "then we - the government - will pay for psychological counselling on how good it is to be a turnip" and pay for "compulsory gender reassignments for two year olds" (this will keep the population down in the next generation) and "compulsory training in LGTB sensitivity and why LGTBness is the new 'natural'" and she would be scheming to take all your guns from you. And then of course she might introduce a new "pay to play tax", a percentage goes to the Clinton foundation, and if any overseas leaders want to see the American president for any reason whatsoever, then they have to pay between 25 and $50,000 to the Clinton foundation. All this among other things as well.
AND we'd have the TPP.
The republican congress-critters would have prevented any of that from happening
Please explain your opposition to TPP
But now you get a far more regulated economy, over 10,000 new febbie LEO's a wall, fed-gov crackdowns, an AG who believes police can do no wrong, check points to produce your papers (already a
domestic flight was held and the passengers required to show ID before deplaning) stop and frisk, to name just a few, not to mention I hope you like your obamacare, because its here to stay.
Oh and YOU get to pay for all of the above
At some point people need to wake learn that until we can completely get rid of government, what exist should be gridlocked.
Choosing between cheeto-jesus and hitlerly is like choosing between lung cancer and stomach cancer