Forgive me for not reading the 9 pages in their entirety...why on earth would you have done that to the attorney? Is that someone who represented you before? Fee dispute? Represented an opponent? Are you against people having the right to counsel or his selection of clients?
Assuming you were wronged, why take that approach? Signboards 3 days a week? Sorry, I may be new here but this just seems a little nutty.
If you don't read the 9 pages in their entirety then you know not of what you speak.
SJF is defending himself from unscrupulous elected officials in his home county.
Do your homework .... THEN ask questions IF you still have them. TANSTAAFL
Ok, then...done the reading. So, he thinks that a law cannot be passed banning concealed weapons in courthouses? Why not? If there ever were a place to ban concealed weapons that would be it. The public safety and system integrity issues are obvious. Why do people here believe that is somehow not a valid law? And, don't lob a softball back. I practice law for a living. So, give me some real analysis, not just "uh, well there is a right to carry arms in teh second amendment."
Look, I am sure he is a great guy, but this still sounds nutty. Don't get me wrong, I am all for liberty, think concealed carry should generally be legal everywhere, but certain limitations on that are appropriate and places like courtrooms and courthouses top the list....but I would probably be ordering a psych exam if i were a judge and some dude walked around wearing a signboard 3 days a week over this issue.
"A well regulated militia being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms
shall not be infringed."
What part of that wording did you not understand ?
Where is the exception for courthouses ?
So the personal exercise of the First Amendment
protected Right to free speech and to peaceably assemble and Petition for Redress of Grievances is considered abnormal behavior and warrants an intrusive psych exam. Hmmm
[ "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press, or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."]
Where was SJF's infraction ? Other than the local judge and prosecutors tender feelings .... ?
Now I realize that SJF was publicly wearing a loaded signboard but I still think that he should be allowed to do that as long as he wears pants with it Right ?
I had No Idea that the First Amendment only works for Two days of the week not three or seven.
I also Completely Forgot that the local Judge is the Arbiter of its interpretation and implementation.
Silly Me. Here I was thinking I had all of these Unalienable ["God-Given" or Goddess Granted whatever ....] Rights too numerous to even enumerate simply by being born human.
[Do they even mention the Ninth Amendment in Law School anymore ?]
Thank the Flying Spaghetti Monster Goddess that you have Finally arrived to set us all straight on our
state allowed privileges er rights.
I await with bated breath your response. Softball is one of my favorites .... bring your own bat ....
So, weasel, you not only want to deprive an individual of the right to self-denfese, but also subject a harmless, peaceful individual to a forced psychiatric examination - captivity and invasive actions - just because you can, under color of law?
How did you end up here???
Wrong turn from the martini bar???
ff
FF Really .... Martini's are soooo 90's
Although a dirty Martini can be pretty tasty once in a great while.
Not having been a large metro indoctrination center in over 25 years I would be guessing at best ....
Author
Topic: Grand Jury Indicts Winston Ward Johnson (Read 127134 times)