Print

Please login or register.
1 Hour 1 Day 1 Week 1 Month Forever
Login with username, password and session length

[Elias Alias]

Instead of returning to our original "conspiracy theory" thread, which stands now at about twenty-five pages, it seems perhaps better to start a second thread in which we may continue the massive body of work we were building originally. For readers who have way too much time on their hands, and for readers who wish to know what ground has already been covered, and for anyone who is truly interested in finding out just what is behind the price of a loaf of bread and a carton of eggs, but mostly for all readers who genuinely dread the encroaching military-industrial police state and would like to learn who and what the "enemy" is, our Part One conspiracy theory thread is here:

http://thementalmilitia.com/forums/index.php?topic=2347.0

To begin Part Two, I would like to introduce a relatively unheard-of word: "Amero". Ever hear of that? What is an "Amero"? Since it is a part of the plan to destroy America, let's look into it.

~

Most people who see the word “Amero” will not have previously seen that word, nor heard of it. It is a word which is not discussed in America as yet. But, very possibly, and I would even say “most likely”, it shall most certainly become a household word in the near future. Let's be among the first to look into it.

To look into the Amero, we must go back a distance in history. To be fully informative for readers I should actually draw our attention backward in time to the American Revolution, but covering that much historic time, two and a third centuries, strikes many folks as being tedious and laborious, so let us just go back to the most recent century, beginning with the Administration of President Woodrow Wilson. The activity which had long been simmering in a slowly-heating pan on America's stove became much more visible by the earliest 1900s. For example, the years 1907, 1910, 1913, and 1917 were each fortuitous years, and each of those years featured realities which now may be seen to have been “ingredients” of a recipe for a dish that most Americans never knew (and still do not know) was being cooked-up for their, well, let us facetiously just say the dish was being cooked-up for their dining pleasure, as claimed by those who had written the recipe and hired the cooks.

Of course, what was being cooked-up was in truth a dish which the chefs and cooks, and indeed their employers themselves, from the start,  knew would have to ultimately be stuffed down the American people's collective throat, force-fed to them with a spoon symbolizing the full force and power of the Federal government of the United States of America. This force-feeding was foreseen to be “necessary”, and those who concocted and prepared the unsavory main course of the intended meal were well aware that the preparation would have to enlist the force of government in a very tasteless manner.

So they grouped together a number of like-minded men and tasked them to draw up the recipe in full, and that group of men came into the light of public knowledge at the end of World War I. By 1921 their recipe was largely contained within published papers, written articles, a few books, many public speeches, government proclamations, and in the charter of the Council on Foreign Relations. Yet in the furor of  the aftermath of WWI, the American people, having suffered the enormous number of losses of their sons in the European war-trenches of madness and horror, found themselves completely disinterested in a government speech, or in some paper written by a New York banker, or in the procedures of a corporate board meeting. Americans were by and large celebrating victory and licking their wounds and mourning their dead.

The men who employed the chefs and cooks to prepare back then a dish which today we are being force-fed knew that the American people were not focused on Wall Street to any degree at all, and were focused upon the doings in Washington DC only slightly if at all. While I have access to the history which shall verify the social and political climate of the 1910s and 1920s and 1930s, I'll spare the readers here that pooled knowledge, unless called for later. Instead, let us look at what happened very quietly on January 20, 1930. Ever hear of the BIS?

The BIS is the acronym for the Bank of International Settlements. The Bank of International Settlements is one of the most interesting banks ever created, for reasons I'd like to share with you below.

The BIS is the bank which owns the world. The BIS is the power which intends to destroy America as we've known it and convert America into a slave-state. It owns every American and employs each working American as its very own slave. Yes, if you work today, you are demonstrably a slave for the BIS, and most Americans do not even know this. In fact, most Americans have never even heard of the BIS. And in fact, most Americans have never heard of the “Amero”. Yet each time an American worker earns a dollar, the BIS is involved in many subtle, hidden, invisible ways. Please humor me by asking me to prove these statements.

To get at the truth of the BIS I must, regrettably, ask readers to not only inquire into the BIS and the Amero, but also to look into the CFR and the Trilateral Commission and a few other private-sector groups who work behind the scenes for the elite who dominate and employ the Bank of International Settlements. I'll keep that aspect of this portrayal down to a minimum, because I know well that most readers are reluctant to delve into such seemingly-unrelated subjects.  But there is really no way for we slaves to awaken to our chains and shackles unless we become willing to acknowledge that as a nation of people we have fallen into slavery in service to a massive but hidden agenda for world ownership – and the way we first may know that we need to awaken to that sad fact is in admitting that we are asked today to accept in our lives the existence of terrorism.

Terrorism relates to government which relates to finance which relates to “gross product” which relates to production which relates to you and me directly.

The primary purpose of an organization founded by David Rockefeller and Zbigniew Brzezinski, the Trilateral Commission, was to see the world as a grouping of three major regions: Europe, the Americas, and Asia – generally speaking. Part of the vision of Brzezinski includes seeing these three regions of the earth in terms of their regional economies. Seeing things in economic terms introduces the association of the political forces which affect any region's economic activity. And seeing things as tied together  or unified in a marriage of economic and political terms leads one directly to the motive to understand the influence and operation of those legal fictions which we call “governments”.  It is through the activities of governments that we may expect to wake up one day soon and find the Amero in our pockets instead of Dollars.

That is where the Bank of International Settlements comes in. It is the bank which sits atop the pyramid. On the next level below the pyramid's top rest the three geo-political regions desired by the Trilateral Commission. “Tri” equals “Three”. Below that level, third from the pyramid's top, exist the more than 180 various nation-states' governments – including the government of the United States of America. The chain of command spreads outwardly and downwardly from there. In the case of the USA, which is merely one of nearly two hundred nation-states in the pyramid of the BIS power-structure, the government organizes its agencies to reach into every activity in which we Americans participate each day of our lives – consuming, producing, re-creating, living. Every American who is “plugged into the system”, who is “on the grid”, who uses a social security number, uses banks, uses credit, owns property, works, attends schools, takes “vacations”, seeks entertainment, has inter-personal relationships, has a hobby, collects anything, pursues any interest whatsoever (other than freedom outlawry and resistance), is in the service of the BIS – and the BIS has legal claim of ownership over his life.

This all sounds pretty radical, does it not? No way could this be true, most readers will quickly assert. However, the case can be made, and I would like to try to make that case here.

Continued next post.

[Bill St. Clair]

Well, Elias, you've certainly whetted my apetite...

[Junker]

... Please humor me by asking me to prove these statements.

. . .

... Continued next post.
- - -

Yes, please do.

[Elias Alias]

To begin making that unsavory case, I will ask each reader to admit that he has heard of, or is aware of, a phenomenon called “the Euro”. I think it is safe to believe that every thinking American with any degree of cognizance at all has heard of the Euro. The more politically-aware American also knows that much concern is held in Washington DC and on Wall Street regarding the role being currently played in world affairs by the Euro. For example, US policy watches every minute of every day every activity relative to the function of the Euro, and the US government (USG) has already demonstrated that it will take instant – and militant – action if the Euro chances to be used in any way which could lever the US Dollar. Saddam Hussein, for example, was a deeply-involved trading partner with the US for about two decades, spending billions of dollars buying from us the products of our war-industry and selling billions of dollars worth of oil to us by the way. Suddenly Saddam became a bad person in the eyes of official US policy, and Bush 41 struck Saddam in Desert Storm. Know why? Because Saddam had dared to entertain the notion of pegging Iraqi oil to the Euro instead of to the US Dollar. No matter what else we've heard that attempts to rationalize and justify and explain our invasion of Iraq in Desert Storm, the central reason underlying our invasion of Iraq reveals a USG concern that Saddam was looking at the Euro as the prime motivator of the invasion.

[And to the observant and interested, we may also note today that Iran and Argentina also have shifted their monetary pegs from the Dollar to the Euro, or are in the process of doing so. Keep that in mind as we watch what unfolds in our headlines during the coming year.]

The purpose of the Trilateral Commission is to consolidate the global economy into three primary regions, as we've noted already. To do so, however, each of the three regions'  monetary systems and political/governmental systems must be integrated. Trilateralists call that process “convergence”.

Here is something interesting -

~ Quoting
For those American readers who do not grasp the significance of the adoption of the euro by European Union countries, consider how one American globalist describes it.
C. Fred Bergsten is a prominent and core Trilateral Commission member and head of the Institute for International Economics. On January 3, 1999, Bergsten wrote in the Washington Post
"The adoption of a common currency is by far the boldest chapter of European integration. Money traditionally has been an integral element of national sovereignty ...and the decision by Germany and France to give up their mark and franc ...represents the most dramatic voluntary surrender of sovereignty in recorded history. The European Central Bank that will manage the euro is a truly supranational institution".
~end quote.

(I will furnish the source for that quote soon enough.)

Now I would like to ask readers here to play a little association game for a moment. We all know that there exists a three-pronged effort by the Rockefeller-led private-sector powers of international finance to disintegrate the United States of America. The three prongs are named:
NAFTA  ~ (already passed by Congress and signed into law by White House)
CAFTA  ~ (just passed Congress months ago and signed into law by White House)
FTAA    ~ (failed to pass Congress in January 2005, sent back to drawing board and will soon reappear again)

Those three “trade agreements” are actually the mechanism which is being used to take down America's borders, integrate our legal system, merge our economic policy and unify the Western Hemisphere thereby. The Trilateral plan sees Europe, the Americas, and Asia as the three regions of the world which must be fully organized and controlled – as regions – before they shall ultimately be absorbed into a one-world government.

Once anyone understands this, it is no longer puzzling to see Bush 43 Administration leaving our borders wide open and offering amnesty to all illegal aliens. And -
 
Once anyone knows that basic fact about the three trade agreements being jammed down America's throat, one can begin to understand what is behind the Amero.

It is the same thing that stands behind the Euro. It is a part of a grand plan which has literally been formulated and executed to such a degree that the globalists may no longer rely upon secrecy to hide the plan.

The men who seek to control the world knew long ago that they faced many obstacles in accomplishing their goal of world ownership. What began as a secret conspiracy to do just that soon morphed, along about the 1960s,  into an openly-proclaimed plan. They came out of the closet, so to speak. It was during the 1960s that the powers came to know that they had reached a threshold, that they had accumulated enough regional controls over finance and governmental policy among the many nation-states on the membership rosters of the United Nations, and that their conspiracy no longer required hiding. They permitted, for example, Carroll Quigley to publish Tragedy And Hope.
 
Tragedy And Hope is an insider's view of the history of the conspiracy, and it tells their story, their history, in undebatable and undeniable clarity. In the book is the following statement:

"[....] The powers of financial capitalism had another far reaching plan, nothing less than to create a world system of financial control in private hands able to dominate the political system of each country and the economy of the world as a whole. This system was to be controlled in a feudalistic fashion by the central banks of the world acting in concert, by secret agreements arrived at in frequent meetings and conferences. The apex of the system was to be the Bank for International Settlements in Basle, Switzerland, a private bank owned and controlled by the world's central banks, which were themselves private corporations. Each central bank, in the hands of men like Montagu Norman of the Bank of England, Benjamin Strong of the New York Federal Reserve Bank, Charles Rist of the Bank of France, and Hjalmar Schacht of the Reichsbank, sought to dominate its government by its ability to control treasury loans, to manipulate foreign exchanges, to influence the level of economic activity in the country, and to influence co-operative politicians by subsequent rewards in the business world."

I would say that Quigley spoke the truth, and I think I can show any reader here just how that has been done to us. I apologize for alluding to distant historic fact, but we're going to have to acknowledge that our day today was preceded by something we call "yesterday" or "the past", and what happened yesterday sat the stage for what is happening today - so I see no way around our need to know the past if we intend to understand the present.

I'll be back next post with more on Mr. Carroll Quigley and his relationship with the money-masters who seek to destroy America.
Meanwhile, here is the scoop on his amazing book.

Tragedy And Hope: A History Of The World In Our Time
by Carroll Quigley; copyright 1966 by Carroll Quigley; first published by Macmillan, New York; current publisher: GSG and Associates, Post Office Box 590, San Pedro, California, 90733; phone – 310-548-3455; Library of Congress catalog card member: 65-13589.

Salute!
Elias

[Elias Alias]

Former U.S. President Bill Clinton was a Rhodes Scholar when he attended Georgetown University. One of his mentors there was Professor Carroll Quigley, who himself was a Rhodes Scholar. Bill Clinton appreciated Professor Quigley's tutorage, as we learned in 1991 when Bill Clinton rendered his acceptance speech to the DNC.

In his acceptance speech Clinton praised his Georgetown mentor, Professor Carroll Quigley:

“I heard that call clarified by a professor I had named Carroll Quigley...” -  President Bill Clinton

I mention this Quigley-Clinton connection for several reasons. One reason is that both Clinton and Quigley were Rhodes Scholars, a fact which leads to further connections, in that Quigley, like Clinton, had a Rhodes Scholar relationship with his own mentor, the administrator of the Rhodes Scholarship Fund and the Rhodes Trust, Lord Milner.  Lord Milner had been appointed by Cecil Rhodes himself to further Rhodes' work by administering those two funding institutions. So Bill Clinton was connected to Quigley, who was connected to Lord Milner, who was connected to Cecil Rhodes himself.

But the connections do not stop there. Just one step back in the lineage of connections between these monoply-capitalistic socialists of the British Empire stood Cecil Rhodes' own 'mentor', Lord Rothschild of the House of Rothschild, for whom Rhodes consolidated the gold mines of South Africa and created the international De Beers diamond syndicate – done with of course the financial backing of the House of Rothschild.

So we have a direct descent from the House of Rothschild to Cecil Rhodes to Lord Milner to Carroll Quigley to Bill Clinton. That is one reason I noted the piece of trivia above regarding Clinton's having mentioned Carroll Quigley in his 1991 acceptance speech before the DNC.


We have seen previously how the CIA uses banks, especially proprietary banks,  as an integral part of its infrastructure. [Recall: Castle Bank and Trust of Nassau; Nugan-Hand Bank; and BCCI] We have seen previously how governments use banks, especially central banks which relate to respective governments. Particularly, we have noted that it was the Houses of Rothschild, Warburg, Rockefeller, and Morgan which gave us the Federal Reserve System, Inc., which is America's central bank. Perhaps now it's time to look into the ways by which the invisible world leaders do business through the banking game.
~
If we consider our view of governments in general, we may say that each government exists as it inter-relates within a world of governments. Each government exercises the dispersion of authority through its respective infrastructures of hierarchy. Thusly we may say that throughout that dispersion of authority each incremental movement downward and outward from the top of the authority pyramid is accompanied by a financial translation into the Policy within each participant government. And as we have also already noted, that is where the political Players arrive on the scene.

Recalling earlier passages from the history of the CFR by Peter Grose, we remember that Colonel Edward Mandel House, Woodrow Wilson's closest adviser and aide, had helped engineer The Inquiry, the Paris Peace Conference of 1919, the League of Nations, and finally the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921. We know that Colonel House wrote openly and published in his book, Philip Drew: Administrator (2), his affection for what could be called “socialism in the tradition of Karl Marx”.
 
Thusly by deed and by the written word, Colonel Edward Mandel House, aide and personal adviser to the very President who gave us the Federal Reserve System, Inc., the Federal Income Tax, a questionably-ratified 16th Amendment, and our entry-by-deception into World War One, was truly devoted to the socialist/globalist Anglo-American bid for world domination. The man did so, and the man said so in his published book, and that stands as uncontested  history. As LaRouche would dub it, House's view affords a glimpse into the “Anglo-American special relationship”.

I mention that because it is relative to what happened after World War I, when the Dawes Plan and the Young Plan came into play. Once again withholding my source on this until later, let us look at the following passages from an excellent observer:

~ Quoting
As we will see, the BIS was founded in 1930 during a very troubled time in history. Some knowledge of that history is critical to understanding why the BIS was created, and for whose benefit.

There are three figures that play prominently in the founding of the BIS: Charles G. Dawes, Owen D. Young and Hjalmar Schacht of Germany.

Charles G. Dawes was director of the U.S. Bureau of the Budget in 1921, and served on the Allied Reparations Commission starting in 1923. His latter work on "stabilizing Germany's economy" earned him the Nobel Peace Prize in 1925. After being elected Vice President under President Calvin Coolidge from 1925-1929, and appointed Ambassador to England in 1931, he resumed his personal banking career in 1932 as chairman of the board of the City National Bank and Trust in Chicago, where he remained until his death in 1951.

Owen D Young was an American industrialist. He founded RCA (Radio Corporation of America) in1919 and was its chairman until 1933. He also served as the chairman of General Electric from 1922 until 1939. In 1932, Young sought the democratic presidential nomination, but lost to Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

More on Hjalmar Schacht later.

In the aftermath of World War I and the impending collapse of the German economy and political structure, a plan was needed to rescue and restore Germany, which would also insulate other economies in Europe from being affected adversely.
The Versailles Treaty of 1919 (which officially ended WWI) had imposed a very heavy reparations burden on Germany, which required a repayment schedule of 132 billion gold marks per year. Most historians agree that the economic upheaval caused in Germany by the Versailles Treaty eventually led to Adolph Hitler's rise to power.

In 1924 the Allies appointed a committee of international bankers, led by Charles G. Dawes (and accompanied by J.P. Morgan agent, Owen Young), to develop a plan to get reparations payments back on track. Historian Carroll Quigley noted that the Dawes Plan was "largely a J.P. Morgan production". The plan called for $800 million in foreign loans to be arranged for Germany in order to rebuild its economy.

In 1924, Dawes was chairman of the Allied Committee of Experts, hence, the "Dawes Plan." He was replaced as chairman by Owen Young in 1929, with direct support by J.P. Morgan. The "Young Plan" of 1928 put more teeth into the Dawes Plan, which many viewed as a strategy to subvert virtually all German assets to back a huge mortgage held by the United States bankers.
Neither Dawes nor Young represented anything more than banking interests. After all, WWI was fought by governments using borrowed money made possible by the international banking community. The banks had a vested interest in having those loans repaid!

In 1924, the president of Reichsbank (Germany's central bank at that time) was Hjalmar Schacht. He had already had a prominent role in creating the Dawes Plan, along with German industrialist Fritz Thyssen and other prominent German bankers and industrialists.
The Young Plan was so odious to the Germans that many credit it as a precondition to Hitler's rise to power. Fritz Thyssen, a leading Nazi Industrialist, stated

"I turned to the National socialist party only after I became convinced that the fight against the Young Plan was unavoidable if complete collapse of Germany was to be prevented." 

Some historians too quickly credit Owen Young as the idea-man for the Bank for International Settlements. It was actually Hjalmar Schacht who first proposed the idea, which was then carried forward by the same group of international bankers who brought us the Dawes and Young Plans.
~ end Quote

In thinking about what we've just read, we recall from our original old conspiracy theory thread that Fritz Thyssen was in business with Prescott Bush, George Herbert Walker, E. Roland Harriman, and Averell Harriman at Harriman Brothers and Union Banking Corporation on Wall Street. And we recall that our current President's grandfather's Union Banking Corporation was seized under the Trading With The Enemy Act in October, 1942, months after the US had declared war on Germany. So when we today compare George Walker Bush and his war-mongering neo-con Cabinet with Hitler and the Third Reich, there is after all a basis in truth for the comparison. More on that later.

Harriman Brothers and Union Banking were two of the major Wall Street companies doing business with Germany during Germany's reconstruction following WWI. When Hitler came to power in 1933 these companies and others made use of the Dawes and Young plans. When the BIS was established in 1930, its secrecy facilitated such antics as Harriman Brothers and Union Banking Corporation's funding of Hitler's Brown Shirts through misuse of the Hamburg-Amerika Steamship Lines.

In other words, if the banksters on Wall street wished to get some money to Hitler for funding his dictatorial policies in Germany, (which they most certainly did, as we shall see), but they did not wish for that money transfer to be discovered or traced publicly, all they had to do was make a deposit into the Bank of International Settlements, from which Hitler would later receive payment. Pretty neat little system, eh?

Also we notice that U.S. major corporations were placing private-sector giants (founder and head of RCA, for example – although there were scores of others doing similar tricks) in the arena of governmental policy, its making and execution. I know that some readers here are already keenly aware of this liaison between government and private-sector interests, but I shall continue to draw this fact into light on this thread because it is one direct piece of evidence which supports our “conspiracy theory”.
But in my next post I would like to get back to the Bank of International Settlements and show this thread just how insidious and monstrous that quiet entity of evil actually is.

Thank you, Bill St.Clair and Junker, for the interest and the encouragement. And also, I thank you both for the work you've already done on our old original conspiracy theory thread, which of course predisposed me to begin anew here. I would like for this thread to be our gift to TCF, as it shall be comprised of dated entries which shall become a benchmark of hope for all us little people of the world. I mean, if little people like us can discover what Basil Fishbone dubs “the inconvenient history”, there exists evermore thereafter a true hope that anyone can discover the truth.

Salute!
Elias

[Bill St. Clair]

I have one question about this huge conspiracy. No need to answer it right away if the narrative as a whole will do so.

I don't understand the desire for power. Personally, I find it difficult enough being responsible for my own life. Being responsible for my children is already a nearly impossible burden. I can't imagine wanting to be in control of, hence responsible for, a large number of other people. I suppose if I could decouple control from responsibility, completely shirking the responsibility that to my thinking comes as part and parcel of control, I might want power. But I can't. I can imagine it, though.

What I can't imagine, is working towards global control over a period of many generations. I can see wanting power now, for yourself, but wanting power 100 years from now? For your ancestors? I don't get it.

[ladylearning]

What I can't imagine, is working towards global control over a period of many generations. I can see wanting power now, for yourself, but wanting power 100 years from now? For your ancestors? I don't get it.

It is, indeed, quite intriqing. As there is negative and positive in all energy, within the human psyche there is light and dark, good and bad, the ying and yang. There lies within us the seed of evil or greatness. This singularity of purpose you speak of above can also be sighted in the instances of 300 year old masterpieces of Chinese dynasty art which had been worked by the hands of several generations of the same family. It would seem near impossible to do that given the immediacy of our 21st century thinking and lifestytle but many disciplines still practice it today.  The scientific world for instance.  Scientists are much like those ancient artists. They focus of one sqaure inch of their particular universe in hopes it will yield a far greater impact for those that follow and will, somehow, give us the key to the entire universe of knowledge.
Conspiricies of World dominance can generally be traced back to cults or secret societies. Within these societies are disciplines which are never questioned. It is the darker side of this discipline. It is not so much for each particular "player" to have the control of the world as it is to do their part in laying the ground work for those that follow.
There is a huge framework that must be in place before the final hand can be played. Those initiated into these societies are disciplined to complete that task of laying the groundwork.
I do, however, sense a growing acceleration of the "plan" as evidenced by the continued curtailment of freedoms we enjoy, the bombardment of carefully orchestrated programming via CFR contolled media and the entertainment moguls, and the uneasiness of folks like myself that sense the calm before the storm.

LL

[Elias Alias]

Note: As I came online to post this, I discovered that ladylearning had already given a reply to Bill's questions. While hers makes better sense than my explanation, I'll add my thoughts here anyway. (Nice to see you working the boards once again, ladylearning!)

I have one question about this huge conspiracy. No need to answer it right away if the narrative as a whole will do so.

I don't understand the desire for power. Personally, I find it difficult enough being responsible for my own life. Being responsible for my children is already a nearly impossible burden. I can't imagine wanting to be in control of, hence responsible for, a large number of other people. I suppose if I could decouple control from responsibility, completely shirking the responsibility that to my thinking comes as part and parcel of control, I might want power. But I can't. I can imagine it, though.

What I can't imagine, is working towards global control over a period of many generations. I can see wanting power now, for yourself, but wanting power 100 years from now? For your ancestors? I don't get it.

Bill, that is an excellent question. And your intuition regarding my intent to reveal your answer as this thread unfolds is spot-on and correct. Soon enough we shall see more deeply into the motivation behind this insane desire to rule the world. As I tried to remind Boston over at his message boards, "motive" is a valid aspect of any criminal investigation, for good reason.

As you know, I am not a member in any religion, so what I'm about to say, although treated extensively by most all religions, is coming from me as purely psychological input. I do not claim to be able to "prove" what I'm about to say, and I have no wish to defend what follows as being true for anyone outside myself. I will however share it with you here because it is the only way I know to offer you any sort of answer to your question. Please overlook this if it seems to be too weird.

There are two primary sources for all human thought. I call those two sources "Love" and "Fear". It is like they both reside inside each human psyche as vortexes through which all mentality passes into consciousness. As I see it, every thought available to a human mind comes through one or the other of those two vortexes - love, or fear; good, or evil. Since the mind may be defined as the sum of its content, how anyone chooses that content is the statement of one's condition of being-ness. In other words, if I entertain a fear thought, give it "air time" in my consciousness, that thought is a part of my mentality. If I choose to not entertain that thought, but to instead replace it with a thought which I would value more, then the latter thought is that which is a part of my mentality - hence, there is a simple purpose in "minding what one thinks".

The result of my choices regarding which thoughts to keep, and which thoughts to discard, is the characterizing statement of my will. It is also a testament of my values. And it also is one of the determinants of my own health as a person, and of my happiness as a person.

The task of awakening any individual to his right, capability, and self-duty to monitor the content of his mind is the objective of all known religions and most philosophies. I take that to mean that we as humans are born with the conflict between good and evil already inherent within each new-born baby's mind. It is a subject central to all great literature and art. It is one's daily task and responsibility, for it accrues with each passing day to build the foundations of one's perception and ultimately one's vision of life.

Therefore: when a fear thought would enter my mind, I notice it and then promptly kick it out of my head. Sometimes, I do a better job of monitoring myself than

I do at other times; but the point here is that I am aware that I must be ever vigilant about which thoughts I allow to remain in my mind and which thoughts I do not want cluttering up my mentality. I try to pick only the thoughts of love's thought system, which are manifested by such things as patience, forgiveness, joy, happiness, pleasure, confidence, playfulness, everything that relates to such things. I try to dismiss quickly any thought coming from fear's thought system, which would include misery, a sense of lack, insecurity, acute need, jealousy, enviousness, greed, and, to get to your answer finally, the fear of death.

I personally think, or "feel", that those sick-minded people who deliberately seek to gain ownership over the world and execute that ownership through the vehicle of a one-world government are basically driven by ideation which derives from fear's thought system. I think they fear extinction, fear death, fear the loss of life, fear the loss of control over their fate, fear that they must finally leave this world. I think that they are materialists at heart and that they attach their "identities" to their bodies, and thereby to their bloodlines - which could explain how it is that they can and do plan for their heirs to own a world in which they themselves could never realize such ownership. I think they harbor thoughts of lack, of insecurity, of immeasurable need, and of general unhappiness. And I think that they are afraid to face themselves, afraid to face what lies hidden in the center of their fearful minds, afraid to face the truth regarding their responsibilities as souls.  I think they are pathological, un-enlightened, and therefore very dangerous because while denying their own pathology in order to prolong it and pass it through their genetic hierarchies, they feel that their view of life is the superior view.

Keep all this in mind as this thread unfolds, Bill. Shortly I will be looking into the last will and testament of Cecil Rhodes, who bothered to write down an amazing statement of a perverted and vile form of British supremacy [and white supremacy] to leave behind him. It is fascinating to read.  In my next post I'll get back to the BIS and its dirty business. But along the way, I'll be glad to continue to discuss this aspect of things with you as well. Sick mentality goes hand in hand with anyone's insane desire to own the world. As we look more deeply into the workings of those men of power who have done this to America, we shall note in amazement just how evil their pathology has grown to be. It is true - they not only want to own and control the planet's human population; they also want to reduce that population by several billion souls. In other words, they want to get rid of between three and four billion of us - now. Unfortunately, they have now the means, which is another aspect of the conspiracy. I intend to cover all these points and aspects, the many facets of the conspiracy.

What you and I and our good neighbors may benefit from remembering always is that not everyone sees the same world which we see, and not everyone means well. Some people have deliberately destroyed their consciences, as we shall see soon enough.

Salute!
Elias

[henshawe]

Elais,

Re: your last post in answer to Bill St Clair as to why these SOB's continue to persue this insane idea of world domination generation after generation, this is possibly the best explication I have ever read, anywhere!! and I have read extensively in this topic for many years and have even obtained a M.Div. in an attempt to help me understand what's going on in these sociopaths heads.

Your explanation is spot on the money, bro. Well done.

As to the thread its self, I have an  idea where your going with it, so I will sit back, have dos equis xx or six  and a bit of the sacred weed and enjoy the lecture presentation.

Regards,

Americus

[Elias Alias]

I am going to paste in here now two back-to-back posts which I have copied from a website which I am presently studying intensely. I will place the link for all this at the end of the next post after this one. This is but an excerpt from that link:
~

The Hague Agreement of 1930


The formation of the BIS was agreed upon by its constituent central banks in the so-called Hague Agreement on January 20, 1930, and was in operation shortly thereafter. According to the Agreement,
 
"The duly authorised representatives of the Governments of Germany, of Belgium, of France, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, of Italy and of Japan of the one part; And the duly authorised representatives of the Government of the Swiss Confederation of the other part Assembled at the Hague Conference in the month of January, 1930, have agreed on the following:
 
"Article 1. Switzerland undertakes to grant to the Bank for International Settlements, without delay, the following Constituent Charter having force of law: not to abrogate this Charter, not to amend or add to it, and not to sanction amendments to the Statutes of the Bank referred to in Paragraph 4 of the Charter otherwise than in agreement with the other signatory Governments."
 
As we will see, German reparation payments (or lack thereof) had little to do with the founding of the BIS, although this is the weak explanation given since its founding. Of course, Germany would make a single payment to the BIS, which in turn would deposit the funds into the respective central bank accounts of the nations to whom payments were due. (It would be the subject of another paper to show the shallowness of this operation: Money and gold were shuffled around, but the net amount that Germany actually paid was very small.)

The original founding documents of the BIS have little to say about Germany, however, and we can look directly to the BIS itself to see its original purpose:

“The objects of the Bank are: to promote the co-operation of central banks and to provide additional facilities for international operations; and to act as trustees or agent in regard to international financial settlements entrusted to it under agreements with the parties concerned.”

Virtually every in-print reference to the BIS, including their own documents, consistently refer to it as "the central banker's central bank."

So, the BIS was established by an international charter and was headquartered in Basle, Switzerland.

BIS Ownership

According to James C. Baker, pro-BIS author of The Bank for International Settlements: Evolution and Evaluation, "The BIS was formed with funding by the central banks of six nations, Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, and the United Kingdom. In addition, three private international banks from the United States also assisted in financing the establishment of the BIS."7
Each nation's central bank subscribed to 16,000 shares. The U.S. central bank, the Federal Reserve, did not join the BIS, but the three U.S. banks that participated got 16,000 shares each. Thus, U.S. representation at the BIS was three times that of any other nation. Who were these private banks? Not surprisingly, they were J.P. Morgan & Company, First National Bank of New York and First National Bank of Chicago.

On January 8, 2001, an Extraordinary General Meeting of the BIS approved a proposal that restricted ownership of BIS shares to central banks. Some 13.7% of all shares were in private hands at that time, and the repurchase was accomplished with a cash outlay of $724,956,050. The price of $10,000 per share was over twice the book value of $4,850.

It is not certain what the repurchase accomplished. The BIS claimed that it was to correct a conflict of interest between private shareholders and BIS goals, but it offered no specifics. It was not a voting issue, however, because private owners were not allowed to vote their shares.

Sovereignty and Secrecy

It is not surprising that the BIS, its offices, employees, directors and members share an incredible immunity from virtually all regulation, scrutiny and accountability.
 
In 1931, central bankers and their constituents were fed up with government meddling in world financial affairs. Politicians were viewed mostly with contempt, unless it was one of their own who was the politician. Thus, the BIS offered them a once-and-for-all opportunity to set up the "apex" the way they really wanted it -- private. They demanded these conditions and got what they demanded.

A quick summary of their immunity, explained further below, includes:

diplomatic immunity for persons and what they carry with them (i.e., diplomatic pouches)
no taxation on any transactions, including salaries paid to employees
embassy-type immunity for all buildings and/or offices operated by the BIS
no oversight or knowledge of operations by any government authority
freedom from immigration restrictions
freedom to encrypt any and all communications of any sort
freedom from any legal jurisdiction
 
Further, members of the BIS board of directors (for instance, Alan Greenspan) are individually granted special benefits:

“immunity from arrest or imprisonment and immunity from seizure of their personal baggage, save in flagrant cases of criminal offence;”
“inviolability of all papers and documents;”
“immunity from jurisdiction, even after their mission has been accomplished, for acts carried out in the discharge of their duties, including words spoken and writings;”
“exemption for themselves, their spouses and children from any immigration restrictions, from any formalities concerning the registration of aliens and from any obligations relating to national service in Switzerland ;”
“the right to use codes in official communications or to receive or send documents or correspondence by means of couriers or diplomatic bags.”
 
Lastly, all remaining officials and employees of the BIS have the following immunities:

“immunity from jurisdiction for acts accomplished in the discharge of their duties, including words spoken and writings, even after such persons have ceased to be Officials of the Bank;”[bold emphasis added]
“exemption from all Federal, cantonal and communal taxes on salaries, fees and allowances paid to them by the Bank…”
exempt from Swiss national obligations, freedom for spouses and family members from immigration restrictions, transfer assets and properties – including internationally – with the same degree of benefit as Officials of other international organizations.11
Of course, a corporate charter can say anything it wants to say and still be subject to outside authorities. Nevertheless, these were the immunities practiced and enjoyed from 1930 onward. On February 10, 1987, a more formal acknowledgment called the "Headquarters Agreement" was executed between the BIS and the Swiss Federal Council and basically clarified and reiterated what we already knew:

Article 2
Inviolability
The buildings or parts of buildings and surrounding land which, whoever may be the owner thereof, are used for the purposes of the Bank shall be inviolable. No agent of the Swiss public authorities may enter therein without the express consent of the Bank. Only the President, the General Manager of the Bank, or their duly authorised representative shall be competent to waive such inviolability.

The archives of the Bank and, in general, all documents and any data media belonging to the Bank or in its possession, shall be inviolable at all times and in all places.

The Bank shall exercise supervision of and police power over its premises.

Article 4
Immunity from jurisdiction and execution

The Bank shall enjoy immunity from criminal and administrative jurisdiction, save to the extent that such immunity is formally waived in individual cases by the President, the General Manager of the Bank, or their duly authorised representative.

The assets of the Bank may be subject to measures of compulsory execution for enforcing monetary claims. On the other hand, all deposits entrusted to the Bank, all claims against the Bank and the shares issued by the Bank shall, without the prior agreement of the Bank, be immune from seizure or other measures of compulsory execution and sequestration, particularly of attachment within the meaning of Swiss law.

As you can see, the BIS, its directors and employees (past and present) can do virtually anything and everything they want, with complete secrecy, immunity and with no one looking over their shoulders. It was truly a banker's dream come true, and it paved the international freeway for the rampant financial globalism that we see manifest today.
 
Day-to-Day Operations

Acting as a central bank, the BIS has sweeping powers to do anything for its own account or for the account of its member central banks. It is like a two-way power-of-attorney – any party can act as agent for any other party.

Article 21 of the original BIS statutes define day-to-day operations:

1.buying and selling of gold coin or bullion for its own account or for the account of central banks;
2.holding gold for its own account under reserve in central banks;
3.accepting the supervision of gold for the account of central banks;
4.making advances to or borrowing from central banks against gold, bills of exchange, and other short-term obligations of prime liquidity or other approved securities;
5.discounting, rediscounting, purchasing, or selling with or without its endorsement bills of exchange, checks, and other short-term obligations of prime liquidity;
6.buying and selling foreign exchange for its own account or for the account of central banks;
7.buying and selling negotiable securities other than shares for its own account or for the account of central banks;
8.discounting for central banks bills taken from their portfolio and rediscounting with central banks bills taken from its own portfolio;
9.opening and maintaining current or deposit accounts with central banks;
10.accepting deposits from central banks on current or deposit account;
11.accepting deposits in connection with trustee agreements that may be made between the BIS and governments in connection with international settlements.;
12.accepting such other deposits that, as in the opinion of the Board of the BIS, come within the scope of the BIS’ functions.
 
The BIS also may
1.act as agent or correspondent for any central bank
2.arrange with any central bank for the latter to act as its agent or correspondent;
3.enter into agreements to act as trustee or agent in connection with international settlements, provided that such agreements will not encroach on the obligations of the BIS toward any third parties.14
Why is "agency" an important issue? Because any member of the network can obscure transactions from onlookers. For instance, if Brown Brothers, Harriman wanted to transfer money to a company in Nazi Germany during WWII (which was not "politically correct" at that time), they would first transfer the funds to the BIS thus putting the transaction under the cloak of secrecy and immunity that is enjoyed by the BIS but not by Brown Brothers, Harriman. (Such laundering of Wall Street money was painstakingly noted in Wall Street and the Rise of Hitler, by Antony C. Sutton.)

There are a few things that the BIS cannot do. For instance, it does not accept deposits from, or provide financial services to, private individuals or corporate entities. It is also not permitted to make advances to governments or open current accounts in their name.15 These restrictions are easily understood when one considers that each central bank has an exclusive franchise to loan money to their respective government. For instance, the U.S. Federal Reserve does not loan money to the government of Canada. In like manner, central banks do not loan money directly to the private or corporate clients of their member banks.
 
How Decisions are Made

The board of directors consist of the heads of certain member central banks. Currently, these are:

Nout H E M Wellink, Amsterdam (Chairman of the Board of Directors)
Hans Tietmeyer, Frankfurt am Main (Vice-Chairman)
Axel Weber, Frankfurt am Main
Vincenzo Desario, Rome
Antonio Fazio, Rome
David Dodge, Ottawa
Toshihiko Fukui, Tokyo
Timothy F Geithner, New York
Alan Greenspan, Washington
Lord George, London
Hervé Hannoun, Paris
Christian Noyer, Paris
Lars Heikensten, Stockholm
Mervyn  King, London
Guy Quaden, Brussels
Jean-Pierre Roth, Zürich
Alfons Vicomte Verplaetse, Brussels16

Of these, five members ( Canada, Japan, the Netherlands, Sweden and Switzerland) are currently elected by the shareholders. The majority of directors are "ex officio," meaning they are permanent and are automatically a part of any sub-committee.
The combined board meets at least six times per year, in secret, and is briefed by BIS management on financial operations of the bank. Global monetary policy is discussed and set at these meetings.

It was reported in 1983 that there is an inner club of the half dozen central bankers who are more or less in the same monetary boat: Germany, U.S., Switzerland, Italy, Japan and England.17 The existence of an inner club is neither surprising nor substantive: the whole BIS operation is 100% secret anyway. It is not likely that members of the inner club have significantly different beliefs or agendas apart from the BIS as a whole.
~

end excerpt. new excerpt follows immediately, with link to this source.

[Elias Alias]

Another longish excerpt regarding the Bank of International Settlements. The source  shall be linked at the end of this post. I urge anyone curious about why there is a police state, government intrusion, economic havoc, an assault on the US Constitution, wars upon wars, weapons of mass destruction, oppressive taxation, and terrorism world-wide, to read that link and think on what this thread has already revealed.

Then gear up, because we're going to take 'er to the next level soon enough.

~

How the BIS works with the IMF and the World Bank

The interoperation between the three entities is understandably confusing to most people, so a little clarification will help.
 
The International Monetary Fund (IMF) interacts with governments whereas the BIS interacts only with other central banks. The IMF loans money to national governments, and often these countries are in some kind of fiscal or monetary crisis. Furthermore, the IMF raises money by receiving "quota" contributions from its 184 member countries. Even though the member countries may borrow money to make their quota contributions, it is, in reality, all tax-payer money.
 
The World Bank also lends money and has 184 member countries. Within the World Bank are two separate entities, the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD) and the International Development Association (IDA). The IBRD focuses on middle income and credit-worthy poor countries, while the IDA focuses on the poorest of nations. In funding itself, the World Bank borrows money by direct lending from banks and by floating bond issues, and then loans this money through IBRD and IDA to troubled countries.
 
The BIS, as central bank to the other central banks, facilitates the movement of money. They are well-known for issuing "bridge loans" to central banks in countries where IMF or World Bank money is pledged but has not yet been delivered. These bridge loans are then repaid by the respective governments when they receive the funds that had been promised by the IMF or World Bank.
 
The IMF is the BIS' "ace in the hole" when monetary crisis hits. The 1998 Brazil currency crisis was caused by that country's inability to pay inordinate accumulated interest on loans made over a protracted period of time. These loans were extended by banks like Citigroup, J.P. Morgan Chase and FleetBoston, and they stood to lose a huge amount of money.
 
The IMF, along with the World Bank and the U.S., bailed out Brazil with a $41.5 billion package that saved Brazil, its currency and, not incidentally, certain private banks.

Congressman Bernard Sanders (I-VT), ranking member of the International Monetary Policy and Trade Subcommittee, blew the whistle on this money laundry operation. Sander's entire congressional press release is worth reading:

IMF Bailout for Brazil is Windfall to Banks, Disaster for US Taxpayers Says Sanders

BURLINGTON, VERMONT - August 15 - Congressman Bernard Sanders (I-VT), the Ranking Member of the International Monetary Policy and Trade Subcommittee, today called for an immediate Congressional investigation of the recent $30 billion International Monetary Fund (IMF) bailout of Brazil.
 
Sanders, who is strongly opposed to the bailout and considers it corporate welfare, wants Congress to find out why U.S. taxpayers are being asked to provide billions of dollars to Brazil and how much of this money will be funneled to U.S. banks such as Citigroup, FleetBoston and J.P. Morgan Chase. These banks have about $25.6 billion in outstanding loans to Brazilian borrowers. U.S. taxpayers currently fund the IMF through a $37 billion line of credit.

Sanders said, "At a time when we have a $6 trillion national debt, a growing federal deficit, and an increasing number of unmet social needs for our veterans, seniors, and children, it is unacceptable that billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are being sent to the IMF to bailout Brazil."
 
"This money is not going to significantly help the poor people of that country. The real winners in this situation are the large, profitable U.S. banks such as Citigroup that have made billions of dollars in risky investments in Brazil and now want to make sure their investments are repaid. This bailout represents an egregious form of corporate welfare that must be put to an end. Interestingly, these banks have made substantial campaign contributions to both political parties," the Congressman added.
 
Sanders noted that the neo-liberal policies of the IMF developed in the 1980's pushing countries towards unfettered free trade, privatization, and slashing social safety nets has been a disaster for Latin America and has contributed to increased global poverty throughout the world. At the same time that Latin America countries such as Brazil and Argentina followed these neo-liberal dictates imposed by the IMF, from 1980-2000, per capita income in Latin America grew at only one-tenth the rate of the previous two decades.

Sanders continued, "The policies of the IMF over the past 20 years advocating unfettered free trade, privatizing industry, deregulation and slashing government investments in health, education, and pensions has been a complete failure for low income and middle class families in the developing world and in the United States . Clearly, these policies have only helped corporations in their constant search for the cheapest labor and weakest environmental regulations. Congress must work on a new global policy that protects workers, increases living standards and improves the environment."

One can surmise that a financial circle exists where the World Bank helps nations get into debt, then when these countries can't pay their massive loans, the IMF bails them out with taxpayer money -- and in the middle stands the BIS, collecting fees as the money travels back and forth like the ocean tide, while assuring everyone that all is well.
 
BIS dumps gold-backed Swiss Francs for SDRs

On March 10, 2003, the BIS abandoned the Swiss gold franc as the bank's unit of account since 1930, and replaced it with the SDR.

SDR stands for Special Drawing Rights and is a unit of currency originally created by the IMF. According to Baker,
"The SDR is an international reserve asset, created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement the existing official reserves of member countries. SDR's are allocated to member countries in proportion to their IMF quotas. The SDR also serves as the unit of account of the IMF and some other international organizations. Its value is based on a basket of key international currencies."
 
This "basket" currently consists of the euro, Japanese yen, pound sterling and the U.S. dollar. [EA note: soon to be the Amero]

The BIS abandonment of the 1930 gold Swiss franc removed all restraint from the creation of paper money in the world. In other words, gold backs no national currency, leaving the central banks a wide-open field to create money as they alone see fit.

 Remember, that almost all the central banks in the world are privately-held entities, with an exclusive franchise to arrange loans for their respective host countries.
 
Regional and Global Currencies: SDR's, Euros and Ameros

There is no doubt that the BIS is moving the world toward regional currencies and ultimately, a global currency. The global currency could well be an evolution of the SDR, and may explain why the BIS recently adopted the SDR as its primary reserve currency.
 
The Brandt Equation, 21st Century Blueprint for the New Global Economy notes, for instance, that
 
Since the SDR is the world's only means of meeting international payments that has been authorized through international contract, "The SDR therefore represents a clear first step towards a stable and permanent international currency"

As to regional currencies, the BIS has already been hugely successful in launching the euro in Europe. Armed with new technical and social know-how, the BIS' next logical step is to focus on America and Asia.

For instance, according to BIS Papers No. 17, Regional currency areas and the use of foreign currencies,
"Canada, Mexico and the United States are members of the trade group NAFTA. Given the high proportion of Canada and Mexico’s trade with the United States, a NAFTA dollar or “Amero” has been proposed by some Canadian academics such as Grubel (1999). See also Beine and Coulombe (2002) and Robson and Laidler (2002)."

Assuming that NAFTA permanently identifies Canada, the U.S. and Mexico as one trading block, then North America will look like the European Union and the Amero will function like the Euro. All of the work put into the SDR would be perfectly preserved by simply substituting the Amero for the U.S. dollar when they choose to bring the Amero to ascendancy over the dollar. [EA note: at the time this article was published, the U.S. Congress had not yet passed into law the CAFTA, which is now passed and signed.]

(snip)

Conclusions
Our credo is "Follow the money, follow the power." This report has endeavored to follow the money. We find that:
The BIS is central bank to all major central banks in the world
It is privately owned by central banks themselves, most of whom are also private [EA note:  Federal Reserve is secret and private]
It was founded under questionable circumstances by questionable people
It is accountable to no one, especially government bodies
It operates in complete secrecy and is inviolable
Movement of money is obscured and hidden when routed through the BIS
The BIS is targeting regional currency blocks and ultimately, a global currency
It has been hugely successful at building the New International Economic Order, along with its attendant initiatives on global governance.

As to "follow the power," another paper will more fully explore the influence of power that the BIS exerts over other banks, nations and governments. For your own consideration in the meantime, Proverbs 22:7 provides a useful compass: "The rich rule over the poor, and the borrower is servant to the lender".

NOTE: Carl Teichrib, World Research Library Senior Fellow, contributed to this report.
~
end excerpt from this source:
http://www.augustreview.com/index.php?module=pagesetter&func=viewpub&tid=4&pid=8
 
their home page is here:
http://www.augustreview.com

It's the weekend. I hope interested readers find time to go to that site and take a long, deep read. It is one of the finest sources I've encountered to date.

There are several reasons why I did not link this source earlier in the thread, as I'm sure now some of you understand.

Salute!
Elias

[Elias Alias]

... Please humor me by asking me to prove these statements.

(snip)

Yes, please do.

Junker, you responded to this paragraph:

The BIS is the bank which owns the world. The BIS is the power which intends to destroy America as we've known it and convert America into a slave-state. It owns every American and employs each working American as its very own slave. Yes, if you work today, you are demonstrably a slave for the BIS, and most Americans do not even know this. In fact, most Americans have never even heard of the BIS. And in fact, most Americans have never heard of the “Amero”. Yet each time an American worker earns a dollar, the BIS is involved in many subtle, hidden, invisible ways. Please humor me by asking me to prove these statements.

Okay, let's take it from the average working-class Joe on the streets of America. First, I said that the BIS owns the world - meaning to imply that those few people who control the BIS own the world. By now, having read the preceding entries here by me, you probably already know clearly that the BIS operates, contols, regulates, and supervises the World Bank and the IMF, as well as each nation-state's Central Bank, which for our Joe on the job here in America  is the Federal Reserve System, Incorporated - a privately-held "for-profit" corporation whose owners are not known. We do know who created the Federal Reserve, however, so we have a clue or four about which European powers and American powers are in control of the Fed.

Each subsidiary of the BIS regulates the fluctuations of the respective economies of the various (184) nation-states who subscribe to the global empire. In so doing, they use financial pressures and leverages to control the forging and application of each respective national policy for each nation-state. In other words, at the finger-tips of the controllers are the powers which can send the Mossad, the CIA, the ISI, MI6, and any other Intelligence organization into any program anywhere on earth. They create the propaganda of the mass media and the indigenous press for each nation-state by holding ownership powers which they obtain through debt - which they themselves have generated in response to human failure. They regulate the content of text books in every industrialized nation-state and others as well. They create the perception of history which best suits their retention of power and control.

To imagine how they do such things one merely need recall what the distinguished Larry Bates publicly said: "The Federal Reserve is more powerful than the Federal Government." [Mr. Larry Bates is: former bank CEO, former Chair of the Tennessee House Banking Committee, author of The New Economic Disorder, Chief Economist FAMC].  Given by Bill Still Productions the opportunity to explain that statement, Mr. Bates noted that the Fed sets the interest rates on American monetary practices. The Fed determines what your house-note shall be, what your car payments shall be, and whether or not you have a job. [my paraphrase from a faulty memory; the actual statements are preserved on the film by Bill Still entitled "Capital Crimes" - and anyone here who has not yet got that film is urged to get it immediately and view it a number of times, preferably with notebook in hand. Allow me to update myself please - my copy of that film is on video cassette, but I see now that there is a newer version on DVD which has changed its name to "The Money Masters: How International Bankers Gained Control Over Amerca". It is an extravantly-done walk through American history and the history of banking and monetary traditions all compacted into one three-hour presentation. Mr. Still took his cameras to various American and European locations to film footages exactly where key events happened, events such as Waterloo, the Constitutinal Convention at Philadelphia, the Fed's headquarters, the Bank of England, and etc. Available here:
http://www.themoneymasters.com/index.html ]
To get a taste of the quality of the information on that film, go here and read comments by Nobel economics  laureate Milton Friedman, Arun Gandhi,the grandson of Mahatma Gandhi, and G. Edward Griffin, author of The Creature From Jekyll Island: A Second Look At The Federal Reserve, among others:

http://www.themoneymasters.com/viewcim.html

Something that Joe Job-holder has never been allowed to know is that the owners of the Federal Reserve System, inc. used the Fed's discount window to cause the crash of Wall Street in the fall of 1929, and continued to contract this nation's money supply through the early years of the ensuing Great Depression of the 1930s while building up the Third Reich under Hitler to prepare this nation for a war into which Franklin Delano Roosevelt involved this country with lies.

Joe-sixpack also does not know that the "boom-bust" "business cycle" is a complete fraud played out on Wall Street with deliberate cunning and craftiness by the owners of the Federal Reserve.

Joe doesn't know that all inflation is created and regulated by the Federal Reserve. When Joe awakens to this sickening reality ( an awakening to with which you and I are tasked with the grass-roots facilitation thereof), Americans have one last chance to stop this tyranny and get rid of Federal taxes and the fraudulent banking system which has enslaved us. The national debt will simply evaporate when we transfer the issuing power back to the U.S. Treasury Department where it belongs constitutionally and the men who would enslave us will be forced into hiding for a long long time. And yes, that includes David Rockefeller and his Bohemian Grove dote, Alan Greenspan. (I should add here that there is, thanks to our good friend and neighbor "planetaryjim", an even better alternative to allowing the Treasury Department to issue our money, but we'll possibly get into that newest idea later. Just did not want to overlook it while on this topic, this aspect of the conspiracy. Thanks, planetaryjim. Btw, planetaryjim has a membership here, and I'm guessing that one can get hold of him either in our membership files or over at Boston T. Party's Free State Wyoming boards, where my lazy and over-worked ass owes him a nice reply, lol.)

Now Junker, allow me to present a common-sense metaphor from actual history. Remember when the Egyptians owned the Hebrews' asses as slaves? What did the Phaeroh have to do when he owned all those Hebrew slaves? Heck, Mon, he had to house them, clothe them, feed them, treat their healh concerns - all before he could work their asses off, right? Well, things have changed in the old slavery game since then. Today's slave-owners have tricked the slaves themselves into worrying about their own housing, clothing, food, and health-care, among other things. In the trade-off the slaves are allowed an unprecedented splurge into the realms of creature comforts and conveniences, enhanced mobility and communications and entertainment, and etc. So the slaves are happy. When accosted about their servitude they invariably say with a defensive conviction - "Yeah, but America is still the best country on earth, and if you don't like it then leave it." Ever hear that before, lol? All the while, the slaves work their lives away, feed the criminal justice system, fatten the coffers of the IRS with late fee and penalty payments, give it up to Fedgov in a zillion ways, and defend their right to suffer that sort of abuse. Meanwhile, the international banksters are sitting atop their pyramid trying to decide how to divide the wealth of the world amongst the deserving, in preparing to eliminate billions of us off their planet plantation.

I know that sounds harsh, but the ugly truth is now known, and I'm going to attempt to logically and coherently provide that proof here on this thread. But I digress.

With the passage of NAFTA we saw the real beginnings of outsourcing of American industry, a move which was designed to assault the middle-class of America. With CAFTA newly minted by Congress, we'll see much more of the same, but with relaxed restrictions when compared with those of NAFTA. But when they get the FTAA (Free Trade Area of the Americas) pushed through Congress, the legal framework for the dismantling of the US Constitution will be in place. Then is when they'll pop the Amero on us and every western hemisphere nation-state, about 34 of them. That is when one or both of two possibilities would come into play. They will either crash the American economy, using the Fed to do it, or they will pitch another little government-sponsored "terrorist event".

Don't think that they won't do this, for they have already planned to do either option. They think ahead, and have been doing so for more than a hundred years. Their choice of tactic shall depend on matters which only they know presently. But they will do it. These are the forces which planned the entire War on Terror and used domestic terrorism events to launch their final grab for global ownership. They have for decades now been putting the legal infrastructure into place to do just that, and to take martial-law control over every aspect of our lives, including curfews, rations of everything from gasoline to sugar to batteries to literally everything. We'll be seeing internal passports (they just passed the REAL ID Act, yes?), bank foreclosures on properties, relocation of entire communities into FEMA and FHA-created "zones", loss of all property rights and water rights, control over all education and health-care systems, control over all transportation systems including truck traffic and boats and airplane traffic, and on and on - they even have an executive order which will allow them to take your goddam car or pickup truck at their discretion. Another EO gives them the full legal right under "national emergency" (such as a market crash, for instance) to confiscate private businesses and farms. It's pretty well planned out just how they'll instantly mobilize total military - police control over every aspect of our lives.  Think the outsourced prison industry is bulging at the seems presently? Wait until they drop that iron net of totalitarian martial law and see how FEMA comes to life. DOJ will outsource millions of prison beds nationwide in the ensuing purge of any and all forms of dissent, for after all, in times of national emergency we're all supposed to support our troops, who will be doing what DARPA named "OOTW" (Operations Other Than War; 1993 DARPA annual report, State Department website) right here on American soil.

Today it just seems to be near - tomorrow it may actually be here.

How they set it up has to do with our tolerance for secret societies on our University campuses and in private-sector think tanks like CFR and PNAC and etc. And don't forget the tax-exempt foundations like Ford, Carnegie, Rockefeller, Morgan et al. They've used the NEA, the DOE, the State Department, the mass media and national press, and they've used our beloved Federal Reserve System, Inc. Through their banking system they have literally taken possession of our country, its government, and our lives. If that is not so, to what else should we attribute all the symptoms of encroaching tyranny and the now-undeniable loss of our liberties?

And if any slave wakes up to his chains and bitches, or withdraws from the system which is slowly murdering himself and his heirs, if he rebels or resists or opposes in any way, well then, the bankers have the full force and power of massive government with which to restrain him. People like me who refuse to use the national ID card, the social security number, the credit system, the licensing system, are - what? Shit out of luck, to put it mildly. If we ever think that we are not under some very rigid controls, all we have to do is try to live one month without working a tax-withholding job, pay for our home without going through a mortgage company which is plugged right into the Federal Reserve, and etc and etc. It doesn't take anyone long outside the system to discover just how barren and futile one's opportunity in this land of opportunity really is unless one is plugged in properly.  And if one chooses to become a whistle-blower on all this shit, one meets the face of justice pronto; just ask Joseph Bannister or Sibel Edmonds or hundreds of other brave souls who are trying their best to sound the alarm for America right now. Our slavery is real, and our attempts to escape it are slim to none, sans what I call the "2nd American Revelation", lol.  (If the Revelation doesn't work, we'll be left only with the 2nd American Revolution, which ain't gonna be very pretty, if it even happens, even gets off the ground, I promise.)

Hence the urgency for getting this out to the public. Yet in the eye of this coming storm, all good Freedom Outlaws must remain calm and mentally in control of themselves. Like the Gadsen Flag's rattlesnake, we are to be coiled, but still waiting for the right moment of vulnerability before striking. Each person shall know when that moment of truth is before him, and I do not want that speculation to creep into this thread, eh?

More very soon. Perhaps I should next consider digging up some stuff from Cecil Rhodes for Bill St.Clair's earlier question. I'll see what I pop up with next.

Salute!
Elias

[Elias Alias]

Elais,

Re: your last post in answer to Bill St Clair as to why these SOB's continue to persue this insane idea of world domination generation after generation, this is possibly the best explication I have ever read, anywhere!! and I have read extensively in this topic for many years and have even obtained a M.Div. in an attempt to help me understand what's going on in these sociopaths heads.

Your explanation is spot on the money, bro. Well done.

As to the thread its self, I have an  idea where your going with it, so I will sit back, have dos equis xx or six  and a bit of the sacred weed and enjoy the lecture presentation.

Regards,

Americus

Americus, thank you for showing me I'm not alone, and for reminding me to take a toke at times, lol. I just did, and I'm back here to demonstrate the misbehaviors associated with marijuana smoking. Before getting into matters with you, allow me to share a joy I take often. A friend here made something for me, as a gift. It is a most-wonderful antler pipe. It is a large section of antler, with an inserted antler pipe-stem, said juncture with main body to pipe antler of which is wrapped in sheet silver, very seamlessly done. On the bottom of the pipe proper where the antler was sawed is an oval sterling silver concho. The natural features and textures of the whole thing take one's heart right back into the bossom of Nature, especially a standout burst of sub-antler formations on a just-started branch near the top of the pipe. Additionally, my friend constructed a table-top stand for sitting the pipe down between tokes. Another friend here gave me a couple of buds, which fit nicely into the generous bowl of the pipe. For me, toking that antler herb-burner is a blessed sacrament which opens the visionary part of my mentality. But let's get to it here.

I think I will open another can of worms while replying to your comforting post above. Now we know that the Bank of International Settlements is real, and we also note that the danged bank doesn't advertise for or solicit your and my checking account business, lol. They ain't giving away any cell phones or rap CDs or floral arrangements for new business, and in fact they would prefer that you and I don't even know they're doing their evil business. But now, thanks to fine researchers and investigators, we know they're there. And we know that they are the ones behind Claire's "Bastards", as featured in, "Don't Shoot The Bastards, Yet".  I'm gonna be dropping some interesting names on this thread, names like Jamie Gorelick and Paul Wolfowitz and General Richard Myers.

But before we get to the heavier of the heavies who work for and support the bankers' pyramid of power, let's look at some of the more lowly-stationed centurians in their employ. Let's wonder about the FBI for a little while. (Toke, Toke!)

But since I took those last two tokes, I got lost and found something else before I could get to my files on the FBI, so let's just toss this little tidbit in here for smiles while I go back and hunt up some FBInfo.

“This gives us a large portion of the existing civilized world in which men's minds may be readjusted to the idea that their existing governments are in the position of trustees for the greater government of the coming age. Throughout these communities it is conceivable that the structural lines of the world community may be materialized and established with only minor struggles, local boycotts, vigorous public controversies, normal legislative obstruction, social pressure, and overt political activities.”
 
- From The Open Conspiracy by H.G. Wells, page 89; Published in 1928 and re-published in 1933

Maybe someone will want to hit on that infamous little quote, eh? Jeez, how did Wells even know to write about such stuff way back then?  And isn't it refreshing that he cautioned the world controllers about the unavoidable "minor struggles", the "local boycotts", the "public controversies" (that's were me'n you come in, right?), even the "normal legislative obstruction" - yeah, it took 'em a heap of time and trouble to get that damned Patriot Act jammed through and the DHS and all.... obstruction indeed, lol.

But here's some stuff relating to the FBI.

“The mission of the FBI is to uphold the law through the investigation of violations of federal criminal law; to protect the United States from foreign intelligence and terrorists activities; to provide leadership and law enforcement assistance to federal, state, local, and international agencies; and to perform these responsibilities in a manner that is responsive to the needs of the public and is faithful to the Constitution of the United States.”  FBI mission statement, 1998.

~

“... we may have on our hands a man who will pull down the temple with him, including me.”

 - Former President Richard Nixon, Oval Office, with AG John Mitchell and key White House aides while discussing how J. Edgar Hoover should be asked to resign as head of the FBI., October 1971.

~

Structure and Infrastructure

As we have already observed, there exists a hierarchy in the dispersion of authority within governmental infra-structure. At the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) there is a central office, then regional offices, then localized specific field offices, then operatives, officers, and related miscellaneous affiliates such as paid and unpaid informants, underworld contacts, some law enforcement community contacts, and etc. Atop all that sits the U.S. Department of Justice with its commander, the U.S. Attorney General.

The Attorney General, and the Department of Justice under his leadership, are expected to follow closely the Policy of the White House, in harmony with dictates and requirements in consideration of the Congress and the Supreme Court and the U.S. Constitution.

Issuing downwardly and outwardly from the office of the U.S. Attorney General are the many Policies which denote and define the duties of the FBI. The FBI's own internal hierarchy forwards down its chain of command those policies which are formalized in DOJ and which originated from the Policy as understood through the Common Law, from the White House or/and U.S. Department of State Policy. When a sitting U.S. President appoints an Attorney General, that appointee is expected to reflect through his administration of DOJ's duties and activities the Policy of the appointing President.

The agency's basic structure includes: Criminal Justice Information Services Division; Training Division; Personnel Division; Information Resources Division; National Security Division; Criminal Investigative Division; Laboratory Division; Finance Division. The Director of FBI has for his subordinate and  immediate assistance the Office of The General Counsel; the Office of the Deputy Director; the Office of the Chief of Staff; and the Inspection Division.

To look at the FBI from the bottom up, we must begin with the individual officer attached to a field office. An individual officer is assigned a work-load and a “field” or area or group in which to operate as an agent for his office. He becomes the man on the street, so to say, the man who contacts and observes various “real” people. When he is tasked with the gathering of information he is expected to cultivate new sources and maintain previous sources as needed. He must do a lot of paperwork. He is expected to be on the ball, to show initiative in his work, to perform by furnishing his office results which add to the effectiveness of the office and support the entire hierarchy from the ground up.

Often times, he is expected to operate clandestinely, to infiltrate a group or organization or network of targeted individuals deemed worthy of FBI surveillance. His purpose and goal include an obligation to reflect the Policy of the Administration and the DOJ. His work is reviewed and selections from his work are sent up the chain of command to appropriate levels of authority – sometimes, but not in all cases, as we shall see.

The FBI has an interesting perspective from which to view the world of crime, and that perspective has lately morphed into the world of “terrorism”. As we might expect, the FBI routinely seeks to infiltrate and to spy upon criminal groups, “terrorist” groups, “cells”, and networks. Toward that purpose the FBI uses the talents of its operatives and their “informants”, as well as agents-provocateur, and as well as input from other agencies both domestic and foreign.

And yes, agents-provocateur exist. They're real, and they're really out here among we the people, hiding from us from within us. I'll give you an example of one of their more radical applications of the principle of "provocateur".  Remember the Battle at Seattle, where lots of people showed up to protest the globalists and a large and militarized police response was brought out amid blazing national tv coverage? Remember that smaller group of "protestors" in an adjacent section of town peripheral to the main protests, the ones in black masks with red "A"s on them, the ones who were torching cars and smashing store-front windows and generally wrecking everything in sight all for the cameras which had instinctively or intuitively been attracted to that smaller zone of the protests? Remember those bad guys in black masks? Yes, most Americans today would remember those vivid scenes of street violence. And most Americans still to this day haven't figured out that those professional hoodlums behind black hoods were actually law-enforcement (Justice Department) agents-provocateur. That could well be a better understanding of that media publicity stunt, a "psy-op" by perps in the provocateur industry, some of which, thanks to our well-defined Intelligence community's carte blanche license, are "outsourced". That is just how dirty this government now operates toward fulfillment of any agenda it seeks next. 

Of course, a better example is the Northwoods Document, which shows the Joint Chiefs of Staff (couldn't they have used a different word, one other than our favorite, "Joint"?) In that Pentagon document we see that they literally offered the Secretary of Defense a plan to blow up buildings in Miami and Washington DC, to mortar their own military base at Guantanamo, to blow up an American ship and fake an American flight shoot-down over Cuba, all just to get the American people behind a hot little war against Cuba. That is also real, and it's really true, and was signed by the Joint Chiefs and their head, Admiral L. L. Lemnitzer himself. To do those things as the Pentagon study group suggested in writing on government paper, they would have used something called "agents-provocateur" and special forces military personnel like Green Berets or Marine Corps Force Recon units and Delta Force units and CIA para-military operatives. More on that elsewhere on this thread.

But back to the FBI and some name-dropping. Here are some good FBI people who have come forward to the public the best way each of them could do.  We will compare them to other FBI shitbirds in high places who have persecuted these good FBI agents for trying to tell America the truth about government-sponsored terrorism.

The Good Guys from FBI:
Sibel Edmonds, former FBI translator who found financing for 911 traced right into the White House and who now is under two Justice Department gag orders and, amazingly, is still alive. (Pray for this woman, or whatever you do in place of praying.)

Robert Wright, former FBI field agent who tried his damndest to make Ashcroft's Justice Department aware of the impending attacks; wrote a book the name of which I'll have to recall later, in which he noted that [The FBI] "was merely gathering intelligence so they would know who to arrest after a terrorist attack."  Mr. Wright was punished for going over his commander's head to alert the USG about the impending attacks.

Coleen Rowley, former FBI agent who wrote the famous memo which wondered aloud whether al Qaeda had infiltrated the highest levels of FBI offices.

In memory of: John O'Neil, former chief of counter-terrorism division of FBI who investigated al Qaeda for years before resigning in disgust because of Bush 43's blocking of his access to the Saudi money trail, the Royal family and the Saudi bin Laden family. He went public before he died in the WTC attacks of 911, and his quite-damning statements are in an amazing book entitled:

Forbidden Truth: U.S.-Taliban Secret Oil Diplomacy And The Failed Hunt For Bin Laden
by Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie; translated by Lisa Rounds; introductions by Joseph Trento and Wayne Madsen; Thunder's Mouth Press / Nation Books; New York; ISBN- 1-56025-414-9; authors' copyright 2002.

Those are some of the good guys at the FBI. There is a much longer list of CIA agents and officers who've gone public but this is focusing on the FBI, so we'll get to other Intel community patriots further along in the thread.

But here are three sons of bitches at the FBI who not only made decisions which facilitated the attacks of 911 but who also each got promotions and praise in the wake of 911. (This is being looked into, closely now.)

Three who need to answer questions before Congress: 1) Michael Maltbie; 2) Marion Bowman; 3) David Frasca.

Those three traitors had all the FBI field-office reports, including the ones from Rowley and Wright, not to mention a host of other information which was crucial to the execution  of the attacks on 911. All three of those high-ranking co-conspirators worked together prior to 911 to stop their own field agents' progress in their ongoing terrorist investigations. They were the three who are behind the FBI's refusal to permit a hard-drive search of Moussoui's computer prior to 911, that hard-drive which would have put the nation on alert before the impending attacks. Had that info come to light prior to 911, it would have caused Dick Cheney's wargame drills of the morning of 911 to be called off, and as we now know, but for those wargame drills under Cheney's command the attacks of 911 could not have succeeded in hitting their targets.  Yet these three treasonous bastards never got one sign of reprimand for "incompetence" or for failing to execute standard procedures in FBI intel gathering operations. Instead, each of them got a pay-hike and a promotion and a slap on the back in encouragement from Ashcroft's Justice Department. Where did they work prior to 911? Among other offices, each of them was in the FBI's "Radical Fundamentalism Unit", the group which received the FBI field agents' several advance warnings about 911 and shut down those investigations and hid the reports from the rest of the USG. They did that, and we now know it.  Remember those three names. They may not have gotten away with their treason as well as they think, lol.

But I wax long here, so I'll quit for the moment. But before signing off, let me ask you - does M.Div mean "Masters in Divinity"? That is all I can gather for a meaning. Can you affirm or explain for me?  I'm honored and flattered that you liked my spontaneous take on the globalists' mentality. And I'm glad to know you've been researching into the madness. I'm pretty new to it, but have had about six years to warm up to it now, and I find that the more one looks into the matter, the deeper the rabbit hole goes, y'kno?

Salute!
Elias

[Bill St. Clair]

Elias,

I'm finding this new thread more interesting than the old Conspiracy Theory thread. There was too much there for me to wade through. For some reason, this one is holding my interest better. I've actuallly read every word.

Thank you, sir.

[Junker]

Thanks, Gen'l.

"... the deeper the rabbit hole goes, y'kno?"

I'd made a list of all the central banks in order to.... But, BIS...amazing. Again, thanks.